Test: MSI Prestige 14 Evo - Intel närmar sig (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.5 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
85.3 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 11/2020 | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
86.5 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.2 kg | 16.55 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 293 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1628:1 (Svärta: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.099
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 AUO B140HAN06.2 (AUO623D), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ AU Optronics B140HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 2% | -1% | -45% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.8 | 68.6 0% | 71.7 4% | 68.2 -1% | 37.2 -46% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 98.3 -1% | 99.3 0% | 98.5 -1% | 55.9 -44% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.9 | 69.8 -2% | 72.9 3% | 69.8 -2% | 38.43 -46% |
Response Times | 19% | 17% | -15% | 28% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 59.6 ? | 49.6 ? 17% | 45.6 ? 23% | 65.2 ? -9% | 41 ? 31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32.8 ? | 26.4 ? 20% | 29.6 ? 10% | 39.6 ? -21% | 25 ? 24% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -2% | -17% | 1% | -80% | |
Brightness middle | 293 | 375.1 28% | 399.6 36% | 432.5 48% | 269 -8% |
Brightness | 277 | 371 34% | 385 39% | 405 46% | 244 -12% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 91 2% | 89 0% | 86 -3% | 83 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.34 -89% | 0.37 -106% | 0.3 -67% | 0.23 -28% |
Contrast | 1628 | 1103 -32% | 1080 -34% | 1442 -11% | 1170 -28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.95 | 1.79 39% | 3.2 -8% | 2.34 21% | 4.94 -67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.03 | 3.05 49% | 6.44 -7% | 3.59 40% | 20.37 -238% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 1.79 -99% | 1.73 -92% | 1.83 -103% | 5.03 -459% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 2.3 45% | 4.7 -12% | 2.5 40% | 1.71 59% |
Gamma | 2.099 105% | 2.29 96% | 2.21 100% | 2.1 105% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 6622 98% | 6405 101% | 7184 90% | 6582 99% | 6535 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 71 | 63.9 -10% | 66.3 -7% | 63.8 -10% | 35 -51% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93 | 98.8 6% | 99.5 7% | 99.4 7% | 56 -40% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
0% | 1% /
-9% | -5% /
-2% | -32% /
-60% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.4 ms rise | |
↘ 33.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 4894 poäng | |
Hjälp |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 |
* ... smaller is better
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ Samsung PM991 MZVLQ1T0HALB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -37% | -10% | -19% | -41% | |
Write 4K | 248.4 | 132.3 -47% | 146.1 -41% | 111.4 -55% | 98.8 -60% |
Read 4K | 56.4 | 51.7 -8% | 47.18 -16% | 58.2 3% | 32.44 -42% |
Write Seq | 2513 | 1264 -50% | 2896 15% | 2195 -13% | 1582 -37% |
Read Seq | 2250 | 1484 -34% | 2754 22% | 2516 12% | 1471 -35% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 589 | 478.4 -19% | 425.8 -28% | 472.1 -20% | 375.4 -36% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 696 | 366.9 -47% | 514 -26% | 380.5 -45% | 491.9 -29% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2515 | 1750 -30% | 2989 19% | 2339 -7% | 1574 -37% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 4915 | 1970 -60% | 3568 -27% | 3565 -27% | 2329 -53% |
AS SSD | -87% | -39% | -63% | -64% | |
Seq Read | 3760 | 1219 -68% | 1658 -56% | 1976 -47% | 1960 -48% |
Seq Write | 2335 | 947 -59% | 2464 6% | 1389 -41% | 1547 -34% |
4K Read | 66.8 | 50.9 -24% | 59.5 -11% | 50.7 -24% | 31.56 -53% |
4K Write | 184.3 | 150.9 -18% | 128.6 -30% | 105.5 -43% | 116.6 -37% |
4K-64 Read | 1801 | 587 -67% | 1576 -12% | 853 -53% | 454.7 -75% |
4K-64 Write | 1754 | 862 -51% | 1986 13% | 1970 12% | 262.1 -85% |
Access Time Read * | 0.135 | 0.083 39% | 0.049 64% | 0.058 57% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.018 | 0.114 -533% | 0.087 -383% | 0.104 -478% | 0.034 -89% |
Score Read | 2244 | 760 -66% | 1802 -20% | 1101 -51% | 682 -70% |
Score Write | 2172 | 1108 -49% | 2361 9% | 2214 2% | 533 -75% |
Score Total | 5500 | 2260 -59% | 5133 -7% | 3862 -30% | 1552 -72% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -62% /
-66% | -25% /
-27% | -41% /
-45% | -53% /
-54% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 7522 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 101457 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20821 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5332 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1859 poäng | |
Hjälp |
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
Average of class Office (7.6 - 59.1, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE | |
Average of class Office (3.8 - 34, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 96.4 | 87.8 | 31.9 | 12.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 96.4 | 64.7 | 33.4 | 16 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 83.2 | 76.4 | 54.3 | 51.6 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 50.5 | 37 | 32.4 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 63 | 24 | 22 | 0 |
Battlefield V (2018) | 83.9 | 42.5 | 36.8 | 29.9 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 50.3 | 26.4 | 15.9 | 12.1 |
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 46 severe graphical problems | 36 severe graphical problems | 32 severe graphical problems | 23 severe graphical problems |
Valorant (2020) | 171 | 124 | 112 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
Crysis Remastered (2020) | 58.3 | 19.5 | 11.7 | 8.99 |
FIFA 21 (2020) | 190 | 90.3 | 84.3 | 60.9 |
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 46 severe graphical problems | 27 severe graphical problems | 0 severe graphical problems | 0 severe graphical problems |
Dirt 5 (2020) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 43.4 | 24.4 | 23.3 | 20.2 |
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) | 39 | 26 | 23 | 21 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
Hitman 3 (2021) | 85 | 39 | ||
Outriders (2021) | 49.9 | 29.9 | 26.2 | 26.2 |
Resident Evil Village (2021) | 53.4 | 24.9 | 23.2 | 21.4 |
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 63.8 | 0 () | ||
Days Gone (2021) | 31.9 | 23.4 | 21 | 16.5 |
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) | 79.6 | 56.6 | 50.1 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
Deathloop (2021) | 0 game wont start | |||
New World (2021) | 35.2 | 23.6 | 20.9 | 17.1 |
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) | 53.1 | 42.2 | ||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) |
Back 4 Blood (2021) | 49.1 | 39.1 | 35 | 33.7 |
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start | 0 game wont start |
Riders Republic (2021) | 33 | 22 | 18 | 16 |
Call of Duty Vanguard (2021) | 0 severe graphical problems | |||
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 49 | 0 () | ||
Battlefield 2042 (2021) | 0 game wont start (crash) | |||
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 103 | 0 () | 0 () | 0 () |
Halo Infinite (2021) | 0 game wont start (no GPU support) |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 25 / 27 / 39 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 43 / 43 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | 10% | -1% | -0% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 29.8 -24% | 26.3 -10% | 30 -25% | 31.2 -30% | 24.3 ? -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 29.9 -20% | 26.5 -6% | 30.6 -22% | 31.2 -25% | 24.6 ? 2% |
Idle Average * | 27 | 31 -15% | 26.5 2% | 30.6 -13% | 31.2 -16% | 24.9 ? 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 39 | 31 21% | 26.5 32% | 30.6 22% | 31.2 20% | 26 ? 33% |
Load Average * | 43 | 35.6 17% | 31.8 26% | 33.6 22% | 33.8 21% | 35 ? 19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39 | 37.4 4% | 35.9 8% | 36.3 7% | ||
Load Maximum * | 43 | 40.8 5% | 35.9 17% | 39.2 9% | 33.5 22% | 40.2 ? 7% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 61 °C / 142 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-13.3 °C / -23.9 F).
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 11% | 14% | 13% | 16% | 12% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 41 18% | 43.8 12% | 43.6 13% | 39.5 21% | 41.1 ? 18% |
Maximum Bottom * | 61 | 44.4 27% | 43 30% | 52.6 14% | 43.6 29% | 44.1 ? 28% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 28 -0% | 24.8 11% | 22.4 20% | 25.9 7% | 27.4 ? 2% |
Idle Bottom * | 29 | 29.8 -3% | 28.6 1% | 27.2 6% | 26.6 8% | 28.8 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.6 / 1.1 Watt |
Låg belastning | 5 / 7 / 11 Watt |
Hög belastning |
54 / 65 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8 | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 21% | 9% | 30% | 28% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 4.8 4% | 4 20% | 2.6 48% | 2.8 44% | 4.54 ? 9% |
Idle Average * | 7 | 6.5 7% | 6.3 10% | 5 29% | 4.8 31% | 7.49 ? -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 11 | 7.7 30% | 7.7 30% | 5.6 49% | 6.7 39% | 9.14 ? 17% |
Load Average * | 54 | 29.6 45% | 48.3 11% | 39.8 26% | 28 48% | 42.8 ? 21% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39 | 28.6 27% | 49 -26% | 37.1 5% | 57 -46% | |
Load Maximum * | 65 | 57.8 11% | 57.6 11% | 49.9 23% | 31 52% | 61.3 ? 6% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52.4 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX425EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 67 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7-14ARE R7 4800U, Vega 8, 61 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 53 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R4XJ R7 4700U, Vega 7, 48.85 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 116% | 50% | 76% | 65% | 55% | |
Reader / Idle | 825 | 1554 88% | 1623 97% | 1392 69% | 1300 ? 58% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 451 | 786 74% | 619 37% | 795 76% | 715 59% | 600 ? 33% |
Load | 68 | 194 185% | 79 16% | 114 68% | 118.1 ? 74% | |
H.264 | 968 | 704 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med Tiger Lake-generationen försöker Intel minska avståndet från AMD, vilket verkligen är på tiden.
Men planen har bara lyckats till viss del. Även om grafikprestandan har tagit ett stort steg framåt på Core i7-1185G7 (Iris Xe Graphics G7) så är relationen mellan processorprestanda och pris fortfarande bättre hos AMD. I motsvarande prisskikt erbjuder Intels konkurrent redan åttakärniga processorer med 16 trådar istället för fyrkärniga med åtta trådar, vilket belöner vissa program med betydligt högre prestanda. Dessutom är AMD-modellerna mer energieffektiva (mindre värmeutveckling, längre batteritid).
MSI har lyckats skapat en framgångsrik allt-i-allo för användning i farten.
I övrigt har MSI fokuserat mer på den mobila aspekten än den professionella aspekten. Portutbudet och service/uppgraderingsmöjligheterna (fastlött RAM) blir offer för ett kompakt och lätt hölje. Vi får också ge kritik för kvaliteten på webbkameran och högtalarna. Prestige 14 Evo får däremot bland annat poäng för sin tjusiga design och sin stora styrplatta.
Pris och tillgänglighet
MSI Prestige 14 Evo går för tillfället att få tag på för 13.000 kronor i konfigurationen A11M-005 (i7-1185G7, Iris Xe, 16 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD) hos bland annat Notebooksbilliger.de och Amazon.de.
MSI Prestige 14 Evo A11M-005
- 12/09/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser