Test: MSI WP65 9TH - För proffs som behöver tänka på budgeten (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
76 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620 | 1.9 kg | 21.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
87.8 % v7 (old) | 08/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop) | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2018 | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200 | 2.6 kg | 29.95 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
83.2 % v6 (old) | 08/2018 | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE i5-8550U, Quadro P500 | 2.2 kg | 20.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 267.4 cd/m²
Kontrast: 723:1 (Svärta: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.46% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
MSI WP65 AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE N156HCE-GN1, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Precision 7530 Sharp LQ156D1, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE NV156FHM-N47, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US SAMSUNG LƒFL156FL02-101 , IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 70% | 57% | 105% | 6% | 20% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.46 | 69.2 75% | 62.4 58% | 82.5 109% | 41.83 6% | 47.43 20% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.8 | 97.1 65% | 91.5 56% | 99.4 69% | 62.1 6% | 71.4 21% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.69 | 69.7 71% | 63.4 56% | 96.2 136% | 43.22 6% | 49 20% |
Response Times | -45% | 29% | 5% | -33% | -1% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 68.8 ? -83% | 34.4 ? 9% | 35.2 ? 6% | 47.2 ? -26% | 36.8 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 29.6 -7% | 14 ? 49% | 26.4 ? 4% | 38.4 ? -39% | 28.4 ? -3% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 198.4 ? | 21550 ? | 1351 ? | ||
Screen | 42% | 39% | 24% | 20% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 267.4 | 451 69% | 542 103% | 292.8 9% | 291 9% | 259.4 -3% |
Brightness | 259 | 434 68% | 528 104% | 295 14% | 284 10% | 247 -5% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 84 -2% | 85 -1% | 91 6% | 85 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.25 32% | 0.41 -11% | 0.36 3% | 0.11 70% | 0.43 -16% |
Contrast | 723 | 1804 150% | 1322 83% | 813 12% | 2645 266% | 603 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.21 | 4.4 -5% | 3.5 17% | 3.48 17% | 6.7 -59% | 5.5 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.1 | 6.7 68% | 7.8 63% | 6.81 68% | 20.2 4% | 12.7 40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.27 | 1.8 58% | 1.3 70% | 3.13 27% | 4.5 -5% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 5 -117% | 4.8 -109% | 4.1 -78% | 4.5 -96% | 3.6 -57% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.31 95% | 2.33 94% | 2.2 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 6578 99% | 7717 84% | 7690 85% | 6740 96% | 7503 87% | 7163 91% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.2 | 63 69% | 58.8 58% | 84.4 127% | 39.6 6% | 45 21% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.5 | 97 66% | 91.1 56% | 99.6 70% | 61.7 5% | 71 21% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 22% /
36% | 42% /
41% | 45% /
37% | -2% /
11% | 5% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.2 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4165 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5213 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5025 poäng | |
Hjälp |
MSI WP65 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Dell Precision 7530 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 15% | 20% | 3% | -8% | -26% | |
Seq Read | 1097 | 2083 90% | 2980 172% | 1807 65% | 1463 33% | 2133 94% |
Seq Write | 1838 | 1715 -7% | 2094 14% | 1540 -16% | 1164 -37% | 1287 -30% |
4K Read | 52.9 | 55.3 5% | 45.05 -15% | 34.27 -35% | 44.98 -15% | 40.2 -24% |
4K Write | 108.4 | 137.6 27% | 155.4 43% | 103 -5% | 140 29% | 114.6 6% |
4K-64 Read | 1509 | 1211 -20% | 1291 -14% | 1304 -14% | 1312 -13% | 710 -53% |
4K-64 Write | 1695 | 1446 -15% | 1506 -11% | 1221 -28% | 612 -64% | 314 -81% |
Access Time Read * | 0.067 | 0.039 42% | 0.064 4% | 0.055 18% | 0.065 3% | 0.128 -91% |
Access Time Write * | 0.103 | 0.026 75% | 0.024 77% | 0.037 64% | 0.026 75% | 0.033 68% |
Score Read | 1671 | 1474 -12% | 1634 -2% | 1519 -9% | 1504 -10% | 962 -42% |
Score Write | 1988 | 1755 -12% | 1871 -6% | 1478 -26% | 868 -56% | 557 -72% |
Score Total | 4558 | 3976 -13% | 4300 -6% | 3761 -17% | 3131 -31% | 1979 -57% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1800 | 2015 12% | 3015 68% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 569 | 597 5% | 519 -9% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 1409 | 1449 3% | 1172 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
MSI WT75 8SM | |
HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
Dell Precision 7530 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
MSI WP65 | |
HP ZBook 15v G5 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
MSI WT75 8SM | |
MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Dell Precision 7530 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
MSI WP65 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
HP ZBook 15v G5 | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
MSI WT75 8SM | |
HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
Dell Precision 7530 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
MSI WP65 | |
HP ZBook 15v G5 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE |
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
MSI WT75 8SM | |
MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
Dell Precision 7530 | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
MSI WP65 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
HP ZBook 15v G5 | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
MSI P65 Creator 9SF-657 | |
MSI WT75 8SM | |
MSI WS75 9TL-636 | |
Dell Precision 7530 | |
HP ZBook 17 G4-Y3J82AV | |
MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE | |
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM | |
HP ZBook Studio G5-4QH10EA | |
MSI WP65 | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
HP ZBook 15v G5 | |
Asus Zenbook UX510UW-CN044T | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P43s-20RH001FGE |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34862 poäng | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 25105 poäng | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6492 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 100811 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22501 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4493 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1572 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Guild Wars 2 (2012) | 149.9 | 73.1 | 28.4 | |
StarCraft II: Heart of the Swarm (2013) | 542 | 258.9 | 156.8 | 82.4 |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 301.7 | 160.9 | 140 | 52.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 101 | 57.7 | 33 | 18.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 101.9 | 62.9 | 33.7 | 26.4 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 50.6 | 29.2 | 25.4 | |
Doom (2016) | 96.7 | 76.3 | 44.1 | |
Overwatch (2016) | 261.8 | 169 | 77 | |
Prey (2017) | 144.7 | 74.8 | 56.7 | |
Rocket League (2017) | 248.9 | 153.5 | 96.5 | |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 96 | 37 | 27 | 20 |
Destiny 2 (2017) | 100.5 | 48.6 | 37.6 | 30.1 |
Fortnite (2018) | 183.6 | 113.2 | 41.9 | 29.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 51.9 | 25.6 | 18.3 | |
F1 2018 (2018) | 106 | 55 | 42 | 25 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 70 | 16 | 14 | 12 |
Apex Legends (2019) | 88.4 | 35.2 | 29.1 | 26 |
Metro Exodus (2019) | 46.6 | 21.4 | 15.5 | 12.9 |
F1 2019 (2019) | 102 | 46 | 39 | 26 |
Borderlands 3 (2019) | 75.8 | 29.7 | 19.3 | 14.5 |
FIFA 20 (2019) | 166 | 117.8 | 112 | 92.4 |
MSI WP65 Quadro P620, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA Radeon Pro WX 3200, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE Quadro T1000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G | Dell Precision 7530 Quadro P3200, i9-8950HK, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE Quadro P500, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US Quadro P4000 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 13% | 14% | 5% | 14% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 28.7 | 29.7 -3% | 28.8 -0% | 28.3 1% | 29 -1% | 28 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 33.4 | 29.7 11% | 28.8 14% | 28.3 15% | 29 13% | 33.2 1% |
Idle Average * | 33.5 | 29.7 11% | 28.8 14% | 28.3 16% | 29 13% | 33.2 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 33.5 | 30.3 10% | 28.8 14% | 30.5 9% | 31.2 7% | 33.2 1% |
Load Average * | 37 | 32.6 12% | 36.1 2% | 34.5 7% | 32.5 12% | 41.4 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.7 | 34.2 12% | 49.5 -28% | 32.5 16% | 38.4 1% | |
Load Maximum * | 59.5 | 36.1 39% | 36.7 38% | 49.5 17% | 37.5 37% | 43.5 27% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 33.4 / 33.5 / 33.5 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 37 / 59.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.7 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.4 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 41.3 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.4 °C / 81.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
MSI WP65 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.29 / 0.78 Watt |
Låg belastning | 5.6 / 8.6 / 30.7 Watt |
Hög belastning |
78 / 170.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE i5-8550U, Quadro P500, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P52 20MAS03N00 i7-8750H, Quadro P1000, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 25% | -77% | 39% | -38% | -38% | 17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.6 | 5.5 2% | 15.7 -180% | 4.1 27% | 13.3 -138% | 13.7 -145% | 4.02 28% |
Idle Average * | 8.6 | 9.8 -14% | 20.3 -136% | 7.7 10% | 17.2 -100% | 17.5 -103% | 7.2 16% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.7 | 12 61% | 25.7 16% | 10.7 65% | 17.9 42% | 20.9 32% | 11.46 63% |
Load Average * | 78 | 59 24% | 118.9 -52% | 52 33% | 83.7 -7% | 77.2 1% | 76.3 2% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 63.5 | 51 20% | 131.2 -107% | 38.8 39% | 101.9 -60% | 74 -17% | |
Load Maximum * | 170.2 | 70 59% | 174 -2% | 65 62% | 114.3 33% | 123.7 27% | 154 10% |
* ... smaller is better
MSI WP65 i7-9750H, Quadro P620, 51 Wh | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P1 2019-20QT000RGE i7-9850H, Quadro T1000 (Laptop), 80 Wh | Dell Precision 7530 i9-8950HK, Quadro P3200, 97 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P52s-20LB000HGE i5-8550U, Quadro P500, 104 Wh | MSI WS63VR 7RL-023US i7-7700HQ, Quadro P4000 Max-Q, 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 105% | 81% | 32% | 319% | -22% | |
Reader / Idle | 605 | 745 23% | 382 -37% | 2360 290% | 235 -61% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 362 | 415 15% | 532 47% | 278 -23% | 974 169% | 175 -52% |
Load | 37 | 140 278% | 79 114% | 95 157% | 221 497% | 54 46% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
MSI är i huvudsak kända för sina spellaptops så det är kanske inte så förvånande att arbetsstationen WP65 känns som och ser ut som en laptop från G-serien. Den har till och med flera ljudanslutningar i guld för mikrofon och hörlurar, vilket är ovanligt för en arbetsstation. Från ett professionellt perspektiv är detta ett tveeggat svärd; WP65 är definitivt mer tilltalande och visuellt sett livlig än en typisk tråkig instegsmodell som Dell Precision 3000 eller HP ZBook 15v, men de ytliga fördelarna kommer på bekostnad av hårdvaran.
Gräv djupare och en lång lista över brister uppenbarar sig. Funktioner som är vanliga på arbetsstationer såsom Xeon-processorer, ECC-minne, full sRGB-täckning, SD-kortläsare, inbyggt numeriskt tangentbord, Smart Card-läsare eller inloggning genom fingeravtryck saknas på WP65. Dessutom böjer sig chassit och gångjärnen mer än på de allra billigaste arbetsstationerna ThinkPad P eller Precision 3541, vilket ger ett dåligt första intryck. Klickplattan och fabriksförseglingen som avråder från användarservice känns som kvarlevor från en konsumentlaptop snarare än något tänkt att tilltala proffs. Du får byta upp dig till MSI:s lyxigare WS-serie eller den riktigt kraftfulla WT-serien om du vill ha dessa vanliga arbetsstationsalternativ.
Vanliga billiga arbetsstationer prioriterar alternativ och funktioner framför utseende. MSI WP65 lutar lite för mycket åt det sistnämnda och inte tillräckligt mycket mot det första vilket resulterar i en avskalad upplevelse. Fler varianter och funktioner dedikerade åt proffs hade hjälpt den att stå ut mer vid jämförelse med giganter som HP, Lenovo och Dell.
MSI WP65
- 10/15/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo