Test: Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (sammanfattning)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL (Lumia Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A57/-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 430
Minne
3 GB
Skärm
5.70 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar, kapacitiv pekskärm, AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB
, 25.2 GB ledigt
Vikt
165 g, Strömförsörjning: 70 g
Pris
699 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 296.7 cd/m² Minimum: 7.19 cd/m²Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 297 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.81 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.79% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.31% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
72.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | LG G4 Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 16% | -13% | 13% | 29% | 23% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 297 | 343 15% | 566 91% | 583 96% | 538 81% | 363 22% | 352 19% |
| Brightness | 297 | 338 14% | 536 80% | 560 89% | 528 78% | 365 23% | 350 18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 94 1% | 90 -3% | 91 -2% | 92 -1% | 90 -3% | 87 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.47 | 0.46 | 0.66 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.67 | 2.2 18% | 6.17 -131% | 3.55 -33% | 2.63 1% | 2.34 12% | 4.95 -85% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.98 | ||||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.81 | 2.37 16% | 6.26 -123% | 3.88 -38% | 3.24 -15% | 1.03 63% | 6.54 -133% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2.41 91% | 2.48 89% | 2.2 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6379 102% | 6425 101% | 8171 80% | 7280 89% | 6906 94% | 6429 101% | 6943 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.31 | 87.77 32% | 65.48 -1% | 59.05 -11% | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.79 | 98.63 -1% | 92.8 -7% | ||||
| Contrast | 1204 | 1267 | 815 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.42 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.52 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.72 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.68 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | BaseMark OS II | Linpack Android / IOS | Basemark X 1.1 | JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Nokia Lumia 930 | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL | |
| Google Nexus 6P | |
| Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ | |
| Motorola Moto X Style | |
| HTC One M9 | |
| Sony Xperia Z5 | |
| Huawei Mate S | |
| Apple iPhone 6S Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.14 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  2.85 / 2.95 / 3.26 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
8.92 / 9.39 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Sony Xperia Z5 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 49% | 43% | 43% | 41% | 53% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.85 | 0.5 82% | 0.83 71% | 0.7 75% | 0.7 75% | 0.6 79% |
| Idle Average * | 2.95 | 1.9 36% | 1.09 63% | 2.2 25% | 1.7 42% | 1.2 59% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.26 | 2.2 33% | 1.17 64% | 2.3 29% | 1.8 45% | 1.6 51% |
| Load Average * | 8.92 | 3.2 64% | 7.49 16% | 3.9 56% | 5.6 37% | 4.1 54% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.39 | 6.4 32% | 9.51 -1% | 6.8 28% | 8.7 7% | 7.4 21% |
* ... smaller is better
| Microsoft Lumia 950 XL Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Motorola Moto X Style Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 6P Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei Mate S Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Apple iPhone 6S Plus A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 32% | -0% | 20% | 28% | 30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1078 | 1459 35% | 1141 6% | 1447 34% | 1124 4% | 1655 54% |
| H.264 | 611 | 383 -37% | 533 -13% | 569 -7% | 714 17% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 369 | 501 36% | 400 8% | 375 2% | 575 56% | 513 39% |
| Load | 179 | 223 25% | 219 22% | 280 56% | 282 58% | 197 10% |
För
+ Snabb systemkrets
+ Utökningsbar lagring
+ Bra Wi-Fi-räckvidd
+ Continuum
+ Windows Hello
+ Bra GPS
+ Utmärkta kameror
+ Bra anslutningsmöjligheter
+ Utmärkt skärm med exakta färger och korta svarstider ...
Emot
- ... och PWM
- Inte klockren röstkvalitet
- Verkar lite väl enkel
- Batteritiden kunde varit bättre
- Saknar appar i butiken
- Små problem med Windows 10 Mobile
Den långa väntan på en ny flaggskepps-smartphone från Microsoft har varit värd besväret. Lumia 950 XL är en utmärkt produkt som inte gör några misstag vad gäller tekniken. Förutom en snabb systemkrets får du tillräckligt med lagringsutrymme, som kan utökas. Kameran tar utmärkta bilder och videoklipp. Microsoft implementerar en ny USB typ C-port som även stöder USB 3.1-standarden, något som för närvarande är unikt i segmentet.
Just denna port är nyckeln till Continuum, som kan vara en verklig fördel och skapa nya möjligheter. Microsoft inkluderar också ett års prenumeration på Office 365 samt en Display Dock om du slår till nu. Windows Hello är en enkel och pålitlig autentiseringsmetod som är väl integrerad i systemet.
Det största frågetecknet med mobilen från mjukvarujätten är faktiskt just mjukvaran. Både idén och användargränssnittet i Windows 10 Mobile är bra, men operativsystemet verkar tyvärr inte vara helt klart än. Butiken saknar också en hel del program, vilket är ett välbekant problem för de mobila versionerna av Windows. Röstkvaliteten kunde också varit bättre i den här prisklassen.
Om du letar efter en stor smartphone med Windows 10 är Lumia 950 XL definitivt ett bra val – och det finns egentligen inga alternativ. Den första riktiga utmanaren blir Acer Liquid Jade Primo, som bör bli tillgänglig i februari.
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
- 04/13/2016 v5 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Smartphone - Vägt medel
Price comparison
