Test: Motorola Moto G5s Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Motorola Moto G5s
Brand: Motorola

Kamera-evolution. Specialutgåvan av Moto G5 är tänkt att läggas till Motorolas utbud av mittenskikts-smartphones och ett antal förändringar har skett för att få det att hända. Mest märkbart är att kameran har förbättrats avsevärt. Vi kommer i vår recension slå fast huruvida detta visar sig vara en tydlig förbättring för vardaglig användning.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 12/13/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of Lenovo Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Moto G5s (Moto G5s Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) 8 x 1.4 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 505

Minne

3 GB

Skärm

5.20 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 424 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB

, 21.7 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5mm headset-port, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerationssensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, USB-OTG

Nätverk

802.11a/b/g/n (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B19/B20/B28/B38/B40); Max. bandbredd (nerladdning/uppladdning): 150Mbps/50Mbps, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.5 x 150 x 73.5

Batteri

11.4 Wh, 3000 mAh Litiumjon, QuickCharge

Operativsystem

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, fasdetektering-af, LED-blixt, video @1080p/30fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.0, LED-blixt

Övrigt

Högtalare: mono-högtalare i botten, Tangentbord: virtuellt tangentbord, Snabbladdare, USB-kabel, SIM-kortsverktyg, Moto, 24 Månader Garanti, Huvud-SAR: 0.472W/kg, Kropp-SAR: 1.050W/kg, fanless

Vikt

157 g, Strömförsörjning: 81 g

Pris

249 Kr

Länkar

Motorola hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	281 MBit/s +153%
BQ Aquaris X Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash	270 MBit/s +143%
Nokia 5 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s +1%
Motorola Moto G5s Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	111 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto G5 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	110 MBit/s -1%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 MBit/s -3%
iperf3 receive AX12
BQ Aquaris X Adreno 506, 626, 32 GB eMMC Flash	333 MBit/s +175%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	278 MBit/s +130%
Nokia 5 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	122 MBit/s +1%
Lenovo Moto G5 Adreno 505, 430, 16 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Adreno 505, 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s
Motorola Moto G5s Plus Adreno 506, 625, 32 GB eMMC Flash	121 MBit/s 0%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Motorola Moto G5s

OnePlus 5

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G5s

OnePlus 5

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Motorola Moto G5s

OnePlus 5

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

Canon EOS 70D

ColorChecker: target colour is displayed in the lower half of each colour square


501 cd/m²	521 cd/m²	524 cd/m²
481 cd/m²	490 cd/m²	510 cd/m²
490 cd/m²	483 cd/m²	520 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 524 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 502.2 cd/m² Minimum: 6.63 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 490 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1140:1 (Svärta: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.4

	Motorola Moto G5s IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	BQ Aquaris X LTPS IPS , 1920x1080, 5.2"	Nokia 5 IPS, 1280x720, 5.2"	Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Super AMOLED, 1280x720, 5.2"	Lenovo Moto G5 IPS, 1920x1080, 5"	Motorola Moto G5s Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		1%	-4%	12%	26%	11%
Brightness middle	490	675 38%	630 29%	448 -9%	660 35%	512 4%
Brightness	502	702 40%	635 26%	451 -10%	625 25%	500 0%
Brightness Distribution	92	91 -1%	90 -2%	91 -1%	92 0%	90 -2%
Black Level *	0.43	0.59 -37%	0.57 -33%		0.29 33%	0.35 19%
Contrast	1140	1144 0%	1105 -3%		2276 100%	1463 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.7	4.5 21%	5 12%	2.7 53%	4.9 14%	4.6 19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.8	9.1 -17%	8.7 -12%	9.8 -26%	7.6 3%	7.6 3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.7	6.4 -36%	6.9 -47%	1.6 66%	4.8 -2%	3.8 19%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.37 ^93%	2.06 ^107%	2.18 ^101%	2.11 ^104%
CCT	7526 ^86%	7478 ^87%	8736 ^74%	6557 ^99%	7357 ^88%	6952 ^93%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

2358 Hz

≤ 6 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 6 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 22 ms rise
48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	46370 Points
BQ Aquaris X	63428 Points +37%
Nokia 5	45274 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	45613 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto G5	44653 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	63746 Points +37%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	4669 Points
BQ Aquaris X	5792 Points +24%
Nokia 5	5060 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	5006 Points +7%
Lenovo Moto G5	4730 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	5656 Points +21%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	3604 Points
BQ Aquaris X	4891 Points +36%
Nokia 5	3807 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	3889 Points +8%
Lenovo Moto G5	3583 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	5035 Points +40%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	848 Points
BQ Aquaris X	1333 Points +57%
Nokia 5	958 Points +13%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1022 Points +21%
Lenovo Moto G5	815 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	1033 Points +22%
System (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	1553 Points
BQ Aquaris X	3551 Points +129%
Nokia 5	2154 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	2218 Points +43%
Lenovo Moto G5	1656 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	2914 Points +88%
Memory (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	656 Points
BQ Aquaris X	1039 Points +58%
Nokia 5	788 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1249 Points +90%
Lenovo Moto G5	538 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	584 Points -11%
Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	723 Points
BQ Aquaris X	1014 Points +40%
Nokia 5	740 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	534 Points -26%
Lenovo Moto G5	722 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	986 Points +36%
Web (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	703 Points
BQ Aquaris X	843 Points +20%
Nokia 5	671 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	737 Points +5%
Lenovo Moto G5	686 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	679 Points -3%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	630 Points
BQ Aquaris X	929 Points +47%
Nokia 5	671 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	732 Points +16%
Lenovo Moto G5	619 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	841 Points +33%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	2270 Points
BQ Aquaris X	4522 Points +99%
Nokia 5	2849 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	3704 Points +63%
Lenovo Moto G5	2563 Points +13%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	4308 Points +90%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	1871 Points
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	2332 Points +25%
Lenovo Moto G5	1731 Points -7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	2628 Points +40%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	9491 Points
BQ Aquaris X	14034 Points +48%
Nokia 5	9529 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	8227 Points -13%
Lenovo Moto G5	9494 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	13732 Points +45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	9626 Points
BQ Aquaris X	13330 Points +38%
Nokia 5	9684 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	7484 Points -22%
Lenovo Moto G5	9617 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	13225 Points +37%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	9045 Points
BQ Aquaris X	17124 Points +89%
Nokia 5	9023 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	12605 Points +39%
Lenovo Moto G5	9089 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	15860 Points +75%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	555 Points
BQ Aquaris X	849 Points +53%
Nokia 5	581 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	340 Points -39%
Lenovo Moto G5	572 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	843 Points +52%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	483 Points
BQ Aquaris X	724 Points +50%
Nokia 5	503 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	277 Points -43%
Lenovo Moto G5	496 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	723 Points +50%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	1158 Points
BQ Aquaris X	2139 Points +85%
Nokia 5	1268 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1685 Points +46%
Lenovo Moto G5	1243 Points +7%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	2016 Points +74%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	295 Points
BQ Aquaris X	465 Points +58%
Nokia 5	298 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	231 Points -22%
Lenovo Moto G5	296 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	463 Points +57%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	243 Points
BQ Aquaris X	380 Points +56%
Nokia 5	245 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	185 Points -24%
Lenovo Moto G5	243 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	379 Points +56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	1199 Points
BQ Aquaris X	2179 Points +82%
Nokia 5	1227 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1727 Points +44%
Lenovo Moto G5	1245 Points +4%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	2021 Points +69%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	16 fps
BQ Aquaris X	22 fps +38%
Nokia 5	27 fps +69%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	20 fps +25%
Lenovo Moto G5	14 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	19 fps +19%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	16 fps
BQ Aquaris X	23 fps +44%
Nokia 5	17 fps +6%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	12 fps -25%
Lenovo Moto G5	16 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	23 fps +44%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	7.4 fps
BQ Aquaris X	9.7 fps +31%
Nokia 5	14 fps +89%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	10 fps +35%
Lenovo Moto G5	7.4 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	10 fps +35%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	7.1 fps
BQ Aquaris X	9.8 fps +38%
Nokia 5	7.2 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	5.1 fps -28%
Lenovo Moto G5	7.1 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	9.8 fps +38%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	5 fps
BQ Aquaris X	6.3 fps +26%
Nokia 5	10 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	7.4 fps +48%
Lenovo Moto G5	5 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	6.9 fps +38%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	4.6 fps
BQ Aquaris X	6.4 fps +39%
Nokia 5	4.6 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	3.2 fps -30%
Lenovo Moto G5	4.6 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	6.4 fps +39%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	2.7 fps
BQ Aquaris X	3.5 fps +30%
Nokia 5	5.2 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	3.7 fps +37%
Lenovo Moto G5	2.7 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	3.8 fps +41%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Motorola Moto G5s	2.5 fps
BQ Aquaris X	3.5 fps +40%
Nokia 5	2.5 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	1.9 fps -24%
Lenovo Moto G5	2.5 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus	3.5 fps +40%

Legend

Motorola Moto G5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 32 GB eMMC Flash

BQ Aquaris X Qualcomm Snapdragon 626, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto G5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto G5s Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 625, Qualcomm Adreno 506, 32 GB eMMC Flash

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)	27.1 Points +45%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)	26.41 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)	26.37 Points +41%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)	21.48 Points +15%
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)	20.36 Points +9%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	18.66 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)	4968 Points +64%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)	4786 Points +58%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)	4456 Points +47%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)	3138 Points +3%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	3035 Points
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)	2604 Points -14%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	13057 ms *
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)	11358 ms * +13%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)	10396 ms * +20%
Motorola Moto G5s Plus (Chroem Version 62)	9361 ms * +28%
BQ Aquaris X (Chrome Version 60)	8825 ms * +32%
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)	6784 ms * +48%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos (Samsung Browser 5.4)	80 Points +31%
Motorola Moto G5s (Chrome 62)	61 Points
Lenovo Moto G5 (Chrome 57)	57 Points -7%
Nokia 5 (Chrome 56.0.2924.87)	57 Points -7%

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Moto G5s	BQ Aquaris X	Nokia 5	Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos	Lenovo Moto G5	Motorola Moto G5s Plus
AndroBench 3-5		-14%	-14%	-36%	-15%	-5%
Sequential Read 256KB	259	266.4 3%	255.6 -1%	204.4 -21%	230.6 -11%	237.4 -8%
Sequential Write 256KB	77.5	75.3 -3%	74.9 -3%	52 -33%	45.6 -41%	75.7 -2%
Random Read 4KB	40.6	37.47 -8%	40.54 0%	24.07 -41%	37.6 -7%	37.94 -7%
Random Write 4KB	46.2	11.85 -74%	8.39 -82%	9.9 -79%	37.9 -18%	44.89 -3%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	84.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	83.9 0%	72.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -14%	78.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7%	79.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -5%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	62.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	62.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	62 0%	44.21 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -29%	58 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -7%	58.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) -6%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


36 °C	33.4 °C	32.6 °C
34.3 °C	33.7 °C	31.6 °C
34.9 °C	32.5 °C	31.4 °C

Max: 36 °C
Medel: 33.4 °C


32.4 °C	33 °C	33.1 °C
32.1 °C	32.3 °C	31.9 °C
30.1 °C	32.1 °C	32.2 °C

Max: 33.1 °C
Medel: 32.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 22.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 20.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Motorola Moto G5s audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Moto G5 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.23 Watt
Låg belastning	0.67 / 1.4 / 1.52 Watt
Hög belastning	4.56 / 7.05 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh	BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh	Nokia 5 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh	Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh	Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh
Power Consumption		-20%	5%	36%	0%	-4%
Idle Minimum *	0.67	1.12 -67%	0.52 22%	0.52 22%	0.73 -9%	0.83 -24%
Idle Average *	1.4	2.16 -54%	1.78 -27%	1.17 16%	1.64 -17%	1.67 -19%
Idle Maximum *	1.52	2.18 -43%	1.96 -29%	1.24 18%	1.68 -11%	1.85 -22%
Load Average *	4.56	2.94 36%	3.23 29%	1.66 64%	3.46 24%	3.47 24%
Load Maximum *	7.05	5.1 28%	4.88 31%	2.94 58%	6.13 13%	5.41 23%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		20tim 33min
WiFi Websurfing		8tim 38min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10tim 45min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 45min

	Motorola Moto G5s 3000 mAh	BQ Aquaris X 3100 mAh	Nokia 5 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) Duos 3000 mAh	Lenovo Moto G5 2800 mAh	Motorola Moto G5s Plus 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		14%	37%	53%	-1%	65%
Reader / Idle	1233		1772 44%	1564 27%	1243 1%	1496 21%
H.264	645		790 22%	917 42%	616 -4%
WiFi v1.3	518	592 14%	713 38%	738 42%	561 8%	974 88%
Load	225		323 44%	449 100%	207 -8%	419 86%

För

+ robust, attraktivt hölje

+ nästan ingen bloatware

+ exakt GPS

+ Ljudstark högtalare med hyfsade ljudegenskaper

+ bra kamera

+ exakt hantering

+ prestandan överförs bra till vardagliga uppgifter

+ blir inte särskilt varm

Emot

- batteriet kunde hållit längre

- skärmen har jämförelsevis låga kontrastnivåer

- hög energiförbrukning vid belastning

- omärkvärdig mikrofon

Review: Motorola Moto G5s. Test unit supplied by Motorola Germany.

Moto G5s är en lyckad utveckling av sin föregångare och ändrar mindre än vad det först verkar som: större minne, förbättrad kamera, större skärm och en ny högtalare. De nya kamerasensorerna presterar dessutom väldigt passande: foton tagna av huvudkameran är en aning kalla men sensorn korrigerar också för dåliga ljusförhållanden. Den framåtriktade kameran bekräftar dessa upptäckter.

Denna smartphone har inga allvarliga brister: dess skärm är mörkare än föregångarens och dess energiåtgång är aningen för hög. Dessutom behöver den respektabla högtalaren finjusteras med en equaliser för att rätta till dom överbetonade höga frekvenserna. Dessutom är mikrofonen ganska medioker. I gengäld körs mjukvaran smidigt och kommer utan bloatware. Enheten förblir dessutom sval.

Även med det större batteriet har batteritiden inte förbättrats alls och med allt inräknat är en uppgradering från Moto G5 inte värt det. Om du däremot väljer mellan att skaffa G5 eller G5s så beror det på hur viktigt det löstagbara batteriet i G5 är för dig. Annars är det säkerligen ett bra val att skaffa G5s, då den kommer med mer minne och en förbättrad kamera. G5s Plus kommer med en dual-kamera som inte utgör ett drastiskt övertag, men den betydligt snabbare CPU:n och GPU:n kan rättfärdiga prisskillnaden.

Motorola Moto G5s är en lyckad mellanliggande produkt som inte erbjuder någon revolutionerande innovation. Snarare så kommer den med förbättringar på en del detaljer, men också en eller annan förändring åt det sämre: dess skärm, till exempel, är mörkare än föregångarens. Allt som allt så verkar Moto G5s vara ett välbalanserat erbjudande som hittar sin plats i det lägre mittenskiktet.

När allt är sagt så har Moto G5s förtjänat sin plats i Moto G-seriens familj och kan stå sig mot likvärdigt prissatta smartphones från andra tillverkare.

Motorola Moto G5s - 12/07/2017 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Design

87%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

93%

Anslutningar

42 / 60 → 71%

Vikt

92%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

86%

Spelprestanda

19 / 63 → 30%

Programprestanda

40 / 70 → 57%

Temperatur

92%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

60 / 91 → 66%

Camera

72%

Medel

72%

83%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Motorola Moto G5s Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer, 2017-12-13 (Update: 2017-12-13)

Size comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Motorola Moto G5s audio analysis

Lenovo Moto G5 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison