Test: Motorola Moto G8 – Smartphone för 2.000 kronor med mångsidig kamera (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
76.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Motorola Moto G8 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1560x720 | |
84.7 % v6 (old) | v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Motorola Moto G7 SD 632, Adreno 506 | 172 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 2270x1080 | |
76.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi 8 SD 439, Adreno 505 | 188 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.22" | 1520x720 | |
79.2 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A30s Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2 | 166 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1560x720 | |
75.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Honor 9X Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.59" | 2340x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Honor 9X | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Honor 9X | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Motorola Moto G8 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 83 %
Mitt på batteriet: 504 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1800:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.235
Motorola Moto G8 IPS, 1560x720, 6.4" | Motorola Moto G7 IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2" | Xiaomi Redmi 8 IPS LCD, 1520x720, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy A30s Super AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.4" | Honor 9X LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -35% | 15% | 24% | -50% | |
Brightness middle | 504 | 471 -7% | 554 10% | 488 -3% | 494 -2% |
Brightness | 452 | 453 0% | 516 14% | 489 8% | 483 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 94 13% | 85 2% | 93 12% | 94 13% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.5 -79% | 0.24 14% | 0.51 -82% | |
Contrast | 1800 | 942 -48% | 2308 28% | 969 -46% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.84 | 5.5 -43% | 2.6 32% | 1.7 56% | 5.74 -49% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.1 | 7.95 -30% | 4.9 20% | 3.3 46% | 10.26 -68% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 5 -85% | 2.7 -0% | 2 26% | 7.3 -170% |
Gamma | 2.235 98% | 2.326 95% | 2.17 101% | 2.1 105% | 2.086 105% |
CCT | 7125 91% | 7654 85% | 6814 95% | 6506 100% | 8572 76% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 625 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 625 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 625 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Geekbench 4.4 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (1495 - 1536, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years) | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (5134 - 5663, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years) |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Honor 9X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Honor 9X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Honor 9X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (10 - 27, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Motorola Moto G7 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Honor 9X | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (13 - 13, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G8 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (167305 - 181432, n=9) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (22.9 - 31.2, n=6) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (33.4 - 51, n=8) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (25.4 - 30.8, n=6) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chome 81) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (38 - 58, n=9) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6133 - 9671, n=9) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Xiaomi Redmi 8 (Chrome 79) | |
Motorola Moto G8 (Chrome 81) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Motorola Moto G7 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (4434 - 6719, n=9) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G8 | Motorola Moto G7 | Xiaomi Redmi 8 | Samsung Galaxy A30s | Honor 9X | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | -3% | -7% | 65% | -12% | 383% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 301 | 297 -1% | 285.7 -5% | 291.8 -3% | 860 186% | 274 ? -9% | 1839 ? 511% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 239 | 216 -10% | 202.6 -15% | 101.7 -57% | 196.1 -18% | 176.2 ? -26% | 1425 ? 496% |
Random Read 4KB | 57.3 | 69.3 21% | 79 38% | 93.2 63% | 142.3 148% | 59.4 ? 4% | 277 ? 383% |
Random Write 4KB | 128.1 | 75.6 -41% | 7.33 -94% | 13.95 -89% | 159.3 24% | 32 ? -75% | 309 ? 141% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 68.7 ? | 86.9 ? 26% | 86.9 ? 26% | 80 ? 16% | 76.2 ? 11% | 77.4 ? 13% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 48.7 ? | 66.8 ? 37% | 63.6 ? 31% | 64 ? 31% | 67.1 ? 38% | 58.3 ? 20% |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (122.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
Låg belastning | 1.3 / 2 / 2.8 Watt |
Hög belastning |
3.9 / 7.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 8 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A30s 4000 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 6% | 36% | 31% | -49% | 11% | -0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.3 | 1.1 15% | 0.57 56% | 0.79 39% | 2.3 -77% | 1.017 ? 22% | 0.894 ? 31% |
Idle Average * | 2 | 1.8 10% | 1.8 10% | 1.98 1% | 3 -50% | 1.893 ? 5% | 1.456 ? 27% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.8 | 2.6 7% | 1.82 35% | 2.03 27% | 4.2 -50% | 2.36 ? 16% | 1.616 ? 42% |
Load Average * | 3.9 | 4.2 -8% | 2.57 34% | 2.37 39% | 5.3 -36% | 3.77 ? 3% | 6.45 ? -65% |
Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 6.8 6% | 4.12 43% | 3.68 49% | 9.4 -31% | 6.66 ? 7% | 9.8 ? -36% |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G8 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 8 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A30s 4000 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -21% | 9% | -9% | -16% | |
Reader / Idle | 1953 | 1548 -21% | 2521 29% | ||
H.264 | 1048 | 819 -22% | 798 -24% | 982 -6% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 988 | 798 -19% | 1157 17% | 634 -36% | 832 -16% |
Load | 276 | 219 -21% | 308 12% | 317 15% |
För
Emot
Omdöme – Kamera med riktiga fördelar
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Motorola Moto G8 är en skaplig mittenskiktstelefon till ett lågt pris. Den har en lite mer konventionell och därmed mer användbar kamerauppsättning än Moto G8 Plus. Kamerorna presterade riktigt bra för sin klass och har till och med stöd för zoom. Däremot hade bilderna ibland för låg kontrast.
Vi uppskattade också batteritiden, prestandan som låg över genomsnittet och det robusta höljet. Den dedikerade fingeravtrycksläsaren är ett nöje att använda, enheten håller sig jämförelsevis sval och högtalaren är okej.
Motorola Moto G8 är hyfsat billig och har flera kameror, vilket är en stor fördel gentemot dess konkurrenter.
Faktum att den har ett lägre pris än sin göregångare tar sitt uttryck i en skärm med lägre upplösning. Skärmen är som tur är fortfarande bra nog och har skaplig bildkvalitet. G8:s största fördel jämfört med dess konkurrenter är utan tvekan de mångsidiga kamerorna. Men en anledning till detta kan vara att de flesta mittenskiktsenheter från 2020 ännu inte ens har släppts. Vid den nuvarande prisnivån är dock Moto G8 ett totalt sett skapligt paket utan några större brister.
Motorola Moto G8
- 05/12/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt