Test: Motorola Moto G9 Play - Billig prestanda (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
77.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Motorola Moto G9 Play SD 662, Adreno 610 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
79.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 199 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 | |
76.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A21s Exynos 850, Mali-G52 MP1 | 192 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
75.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Sony Xperia L4 Helio P22 MT6762, PowerVR GE8320 | 178 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 1680x720 | |
74.9 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 200 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy A21s | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Sony Xperia L4 | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy A21s | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Sony Xperia L4 | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptobjektiv BlumeHauptobjektiv UmgebungHauptobjektiv Low Light
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 450 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1957:1 (Svärta: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.495
Motorola Moto G9 Play IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 IPS LCD, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A21s PLS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Sony Xperia L4 IPS, 1680x720, 6.2" | Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | 25% | 22% | -6% | -15% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 38.8 ? 25% | 44 ? 15% | 58 ? -12% | 70.4 ? -35% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 25.6 ? 25% | 24 ? 29% | 34 ? -0% | 32.4 ? 5% |
PWM Frequency | 500 ? | 100 ? | |||
Screen | 43% | -7% | -5% | -19% | |
Brightness middle | 450 | 553 23% | 540 20% | 429 -5% | 493 10% |
Brightness | 428 | 527 23% | 509 19% | 404 -6% | 462 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 89 1% | 91 3% | 92 5% | 91 3% |
Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.12 48% | 0.36 -57% | 0.26 -13% | 0.47 -104% |
Contrast | 1957 | 4608 135% | 1500 -23% | 1650 -16% | 1049 -46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.49 | 3.8 31% | 6.58 -20% | 6.14 -12% | 5.7 -4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.19 | 8.7 15% | 11.55 -13% | 10.51 -3% | 12.8 -26% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.5 | 2.2 71% | 6.4 15% | 6.6 12% | 6.8 9% |
Gamma | 2.495 88% | 2.3 96% | 2.206 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.31 95% |
CCT | 8711 75% | 6727 97% | 8482 77% | 8346 78% | 7596 86% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 34% /
40% | 8% /
-1% | -6% /
-5% | -17% /
-18% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27 ms rise | |
↘ 25 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy A21s | |
Sony Xperia L4 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7247 - 8714, n=8) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy A21s | |
Sony Xperia L4 | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (5866 - 7184, n=9) |
Motorola Moto G9 Play | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 | Samsung Galaxy A21s | Sony Xperia L4 | Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 8% | -13% | -23% | -18% | -24% | 389% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 315.2 | 306.6 -3% | 307 -3% | 293.4 -7% | 284 -10% | 274 ? -13% | 1847 ? 486% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 187.2 | 248.1 33% | 104.3 -44% | 165 -12% | 226.5 21% | 176.2 ? -6% | 1436 ? 667% |
Random Read 4KB | 98.4 | 65.1 -34% | 77.2 -22% | 61.2 -38% | 59.9 -39% | 59.4 ? -40% | 277 ? 182% |
Random Write 4KB | 96.1 | 146.9 53% | 89.5 -7% | 22.5 -77% | 24.17 -75% | 32 ? -67% | 308 ? 220% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.4 ? | 84.4 ? -1% | 80 ? -6% | 83.5 ? -2% | 83.4 ? -2% | 77.4 ? -9% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.3 ? | 63.5 ? -3% | 66.4 ? 2% | 62.5 ? -4% | 63.8 ? -2% | 58.3 ? -11% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G9 Play audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.5% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (130.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A21s audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (128.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G9 Play 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 5020 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A21s 5000 mAh | Sony Xperia L4 3580 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power Lite 5000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | ||||||
WiFi Websurfing | 962 | 867 -10% | 943 -2% | 783 -19% | 833 -13% | 985 ? 2% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Hög prestanda och lång batteritid
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med sin Moto G9 Play levererar Motorola en billig smartphone med lång batteritid. Jämfört med Moto G8 Power Lite rör det sig om en betydande uppdatering, både i fråga om kommunikationsmoduler och prestanda. Det är därför värt att betala lite mer för den nya enheten.
På de flesta områdena är Moto G9 Play ganska konkurrenskraftig jämfört med andra enheter för samma pris: Oavsett om det rör sig om processorns och grafikkortets prestanda, hantverkets kvalitet eller den bra högtalaren. Men kamerasystemet är inte lika flexibelt som på andra enheter och tar ibland suddiga foton. Skärmen kunde varit ännu mer ljusstark och dessutom visat färgerna lite mer exakt. Telefonen blir däremot inte särskilt varm vid belastning och skärmen klarar sig utan PWM för att minska ljusstyrkan.
Motorola Moto G9 Play är en framgångsrik och billig smartphone som har hög prestanda och god uthållighet, men däremot inte en särskilt bra kamera.
Du får inte lägga för stor vikt vid kameran om du väljer Moto G9 Play, men i övrigt kan vi rekommendera denna billiga mittenskiktstelefon.
Motorola Moto G9 Play
- 10/09/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt