Test: Motorola Moto G9 Power - Motorola-telefon med uthålligt batteri (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
77.4 % v7 (old) | 03/2021 | Motorola Moto G9 Power SD 662, Adreno 610 | 221 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.80" | 1640x720 | |
78.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Motorola Moto G8 Power SD 665, Adreno 610 | 197 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2300x1080 | |
77.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | Realme 7i Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 208 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
79.7 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Samsung Galaxy M21 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 188 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
78 % v7 (old) | 01/2021 | Xiaomi Poco M3 SD 662, Adreno 610 | 198 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.53" | 2340x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Realme 7i | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
Realme 7i | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main lens - FlowerMain lens - SurroundingsMain lens - Low light
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 414 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1294:1 (Svärta: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.377
Motorola Moto G9 Power IPS, 1640x720, 6.8" | Motorola Moto G8 Power IPS, 2300x1080, 6.4" | Realme 7i IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy M21 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi Poco M3 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -63% | -68% | 26% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 414 | 462 12% | 597 44% | 617 49% | 465 12% |
Brightness | 373 | 483 29% | 569 53% | 614 65% | 428 15% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 93 9% | 91 7% | 95 12% | 89 5% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.65 -103% | 0.74 -131% | 0.21 34% | |
Contrast | 1294 | 711 -45% | 807 -38% | 2214 71% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.41 | 5.7 -137% | 5.47 -127% | 2.11 12% | 1.7 29% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.35 | 8.9 -105% | 12.11 -178% | 3.41 22% | 3.5 20% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 6.5 -160% | 6.9 -176% | 2.6 -4% | 2.4 4% |
Gamma | 2.377 93% | 2.303 96% | 2.363 93% | 2.073 106% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 6280 104% | 8073 81% | 8091 80% | 6921 94% | 6664 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise | |
↘ 13 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Realme 7i | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (7247 - 8714, n=8) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Realme 7i | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (5866 - 7184, n=9) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 - 26, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (13 - 14, n=10) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (167471 - 185542, n=9) |
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (4660 - 15832, n=7) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (30.4 - 32.4, n=10) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88) | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (47.8 - 53.7, n=9) | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88) | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (26.5 - 29.3, n=9) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chome 88) | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chome 85) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (51 - 59, n=11) | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (8893 - 10247, n=14) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88) | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Motorola Moto G8 Power (Chrome 80) | |
Samsung Galaxy M21 (Chrome 85) | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power (Chrome 88) | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 (Chrome 87.0.4280.101) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (3779 - 4650, n=11) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G9 Power | Motorola Moto G8 Power | Realme 7i | Samsung Galaxy M21 | Xiaomi Poco M3 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 13% | 8% | 35% | 58% | -8% | 436% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 299.8 | 300.9 0% | 316.4 6% | 487.8 63% | 509 70% | 283 ? -6% | 1839 ? 513% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 227.2 | 181.9 -20% | 187.2 -18% | 192.7 -15% | 269.2 18% | 194.6 ? -14% | 1425 ? 527% |
Random Read 4KB | 131.9 | 57.7 -56% | 77.4 -41% | 126 -4% | 147 11% | 82.7 ? -37% | 277 ? 110% |
Random Write 4KB | 44.6 | 132.6 197% | 89.5 101% | 124.2 178% | 154.1 246% | 55.1 ? 24% | 309 ? 593% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 85.9 ? | 69.4 ? -19% | 83.9 ? -2% | 77.9 ? -9% | 85.9 ? 0% | 78.1 ? -9% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.3 ? | 49.7 ? -23% | 63.5 ? -1% | 62.2 ? -3% | 64.2 ? 0% | 61.8 ? -4% |
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Moto G9 Power | |
Xiaomi Poco M3 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Motorola Moto G9 Power audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (115.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G8 Power audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (125.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0 / 0.1 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.8 / 1.9 / 2.6 Watt |
Hög belastning |
5.3 / 7.6 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Motorola Moto G9 Power 6000 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 21% | -9% | 23% | -6% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.8 | 0.9 -13% | 1.2 -50% | 0.5 37% | 0.846 ? -6% | 0.895 ? -12% |
Idle Average * | 1.9 | 1.3 32% | 1.8 5% | 1.84 3% | 2.51 ? -32% | 1.453 ? 24% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.6 | 1.6 38% | 2.1 19% | 1.87 28% | 2.72 ? -5% | 1.613 ? 38% |
Load Average * | 5.3 | 3.2 40% | 6.2 -17% | 3.99 25% | 4.99 ? 6% | 6.5 ? -23% |
Load Maximum * | 7.6 | 7.1 7% | 7.9 -4% | 6.01 21% | 7.16 ? 6% | 9.86 ? -30% |
* ... smaller is better
Motorola Moto G9 Power 6000 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Power 5000 mAh | Realme 7i 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M21 6000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco M3 6000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -14% | 12% | 1% | 9% | |
Reader / Idle | 2540 | 2297 -10% | 2756 9% | ||
H.264 | 1245 | 1352 9% | 1164 -7% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 1165 | 1002 -14% | 1307 12% | 1298 11% | 1249 7% |
Load | 315 | 289 -8% | 404 28% |
För
Emot
Omdöme – En gedigen mittenskiktstelefon
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Moto G9 Power är en framgångsrik uppdatering av den tidigare modellen och har snabbare WiFi, mer lagring och framför allt, bättre batteritid. Det är irriterande att prestandan har minskat en aning, men det går att acceptera med tanke på priset.
Positioneringssystemet gör sitt jobb väl och kameran tar fina foton av objekt men saknar skärpa på landskapsbilder. Skärmen kunde varit mer ljusstark och haft högre upplösning, men den återger åtminstone färger ganska bra.
Motorola Moto G9 Power har lång batteritid och är utan större svagheter, men den lyckas heller inte riktigt stå ut från mängden.
Moto G9 Power har starka konkurrenter och det finns många andra telefoner i det här prisskiktet som kommer med batterier på 6.000 mAh. Moto G9 Power lyckas inte riktigt stå ut från mängden och det finns dessutom en del smartphones som har ännu längre batteritid.
Men Moto G9 Power är ett gediget val för den som letar efter en stor telefon utan större svagheter som dessutom kommer med en ganska ren version av Android.
Motorola Moto G9 Power
- 03/04/2021 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt