Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Mycket bättre än tidigare: Razer Blade Pro 17

Den gyllene standarden för ultratunna bärbara speldatorer på 17 tum.

Det må ha tagit Razer ett par försök, men nu har de tillslut konstruerat en närmast perfekt Blade-laptop som är en av de bästa bärbara speldatorerna i sin storlekskategori. Den senaste iterationen av Blade Pro tar bort onödiga funktioner som fanns på de tidigare versionerna till förmån för en lättare, mindre, effektivare och mer strömlinjeformad spelupplevelse som alla — inta bara Razer-fans — kan uppskatta.
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q (Blade Pro 17 Serie)
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1090 MHz, Minne: 1600 MHz, GDDR6, 430.86, Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, DDR4-2666, 19-19-19-43, Dubbla kanaler
Skärm
17.30 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, AUO409D, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB 
Ljudkort
NVIDIA TU104 - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
5 USB 3.0, 5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 5 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Kombinerad 3.5 mm, Kortläsare: SD-kortläsare (UHS-III)
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 19.9 x 395 x 260
Batteri
70 Wh Litiumpolymer
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Razer Synapse, 12 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.75 kg, Strömförsörjning: 790 g
Pris
3200 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

424 mm 281 mm 22.5 mm 3.6 kg412.6 mm 304.9 mm 23 mm 2.8 kg410 mm 292.5 mm 23 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 273 mm 26.4 mm 2.9 kg396 mm 259 mm 19 mm 2.3 kg395 mm 260 mm 19.9 mm 2.8 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Framsidan: Inga portar
Framsidan: Inga portar
Höger: SD-kortläsare UHS-III, USB Typ C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.0b, Kensington-lås
Höger: SD-kortläsare UHS-III, USB Typ C + Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.2 Gen. 2, HDMI 2.0b, Kensington-lås
Baksidan: Inga portar
Baksidan: Inga portar
Vänster: AC-adapter, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning
Vänster: AC-adapter, 2.5 Gbit RJ-45, 2x USB 3.2 Gen. 2, USB-C 3.2 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
176.6 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
174.4 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80 MB/s -54%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
50 MB/s -71%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207.8 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203.4 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s -58%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
52 MB/s -74%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
697 MBit/s
Alienware m17 P37E
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
659 MBit/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
605 MBit/s -13%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
528 MBit/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
356 MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
686 MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
671 MBit/s -2%
Alienware m17 P37E
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
670 MBit/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
599 MBit/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
598 MBit/s -13%
305.8
cd/m²
290.9
cd/m²
291.9
cd/m²
289.1
cd/m²
299.3
cd/m²
288.7
cd/m²
292.4
cd/m²
289.9
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 305.8 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 293.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14.99 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 299.3 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1032:1 (Svärta: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.7% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
89% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX
B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Alienware m17 P37E
AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160
Display
2%
4%
40%
6%
38%
Display P3 Coverage
60.6
62.9
4%
64
6%
88.9
47%
63.6
5%
86.4
43%
sRGB Coverage
89
87.8
-1%
90.4
2%
100
12%
95.4
7%
99.9
12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
62.1
63.9
3%
64.8
4%
99.7
61%
65.5
5%
99.1
60%
Response Times
-3%
-81%
-547%
-6%
-308%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
6.8 ?(3.4, 3.4)
7.2 ?(3.6, 3.6)
-6%
15.6 ?(8, 7.6)
-129%
60.8 ?(28.8, 32)
-794%
7.6 ?(3.8, 3.8)
-12%
35.6 ?(19.6, 16)
-424%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)
-0%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-33%
38.4 ?(22, 16.4)
-300%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-0%
28 ?(16, 12)
-192%
PWM Frequency
204.9 ?(20)
25510 ?(17)
Screen
13%
-30%
-22%
24%
-29%
Brightness middle
299.3
288
-4%
299.1
0%
230
-23%
355
19%
357.9
20%
Brightness
294
287
-2%
273
-7%
207
-30%
327
11%
347
18%
Brightness Distribution
94
91
-3%
81
-14%
83
-12%
85
-10%
94
0%
Black Level *
0.29
0.2
31%
0.27
7%
0.2
31%
0.26
10%
0.33
-14%
Contrast
1032
1440
40%
1108
7%
1150
11%
1365
32%
1085
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.55
2.33
9%
5.07
-99%
5.62
-120%
1.54
40%
6.57
-158%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.73
5.34
-13%
10.55
-123%
10.24
-116%
3
37%
9.86
-108%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.9
2.47
15%
3.31
-14%
0.77
73%
6.74
-132%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.5
1.19
66%
6.8
-94%
4.54
-30%
2.19
37%
4.3
-23%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.41 91%
2.46 89%
2.36 93%
2.42 91%
2.6 85%
CCT
7101 92%
6710 97%
7805 83%
6625 98%
6893 94%
6403 102%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
57
57
0%
58.5
3%
88
54%
61
7%
88.4
55%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
88.7
88
-1%
89.9
1%
100
13%
95
7%
100
13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 9%
-36% / -30%
-176% / -80%
8% / 17%
-100% / -52%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3.4 ms rise
↘ 3.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

065130195260325390455520585650715780845910975104011051170Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1076 (1067.18-1187.86)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0); CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1017 (1007.38-1101.08)
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1187 (1126.76-1226.54)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
212 Points +18%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
191 Points +6%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
189 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (170 - 194, n=82)
183.7 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
180 Points
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
176 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
166 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
158 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
144 Points -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K
2022 Points +71%
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
1721 Points +46%
Alienware m17 P37E
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1238 Points +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H
1227 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (952 - 1306, n=85)
1182 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1180 Points
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H
821 Points -30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
805 Points -32%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
771 Points -35%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H
757 Points -36%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
2.11 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (1.96 - 2.19, n=10)
2.1 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
1.81 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
1.64 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
18.94 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (11.3 - 14.1, n=10)
13 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
9.21 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK
8.39 Points
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
42456 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (28251 - 36304, n=13)
33539 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
20687 Points
Rendering Single 32Bit
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
6967 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  (6659 - 7214, n=13)
6923 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
4770 Points
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
197.1 s *
Average Intel Core i7-9750H
  ()
154.4 s *
MSI GE75 9SG
Intel Core i9-9880H
118.7 s *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
180 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1180 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
119.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
PCMark 10
Score
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6306 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (5374 - 6202, n=9)
5842 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5734 Points
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
5632 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5555 Points -3%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3991 Points -30%
Essentials
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9608 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
9473 Points
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (8791 - 9927, n=9)
9356 Points -1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
8780 Points -7%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
8711 Points -8%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
8255 Points -13%
Productivity
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8416 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (7180 - 8200, n=9)
7640 Points +2%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
7599 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7482 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7331 Points -2%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
5259 Points -30%
Digital Content Creation
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8419 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (6675 - 8862, n=9)
7594 Points +5%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
7325 Points +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
7227 Points 0%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
7219 Points
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
3975 Points -45%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
4861 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (4207 - 5539, n=9)
4603 Points +4%
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4550 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
4531 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4412 Points
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
3812 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GE75 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6004 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (4755 - 6593, n=9)
5755 Points +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5672 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5663 Points 0%
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
4765 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
2486 Points -56%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4412 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5672 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
5734 poäng
Hjälp
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Alienware m17 P37E
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Razer Blade Pro 2017
2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
AS SSD
-40%
-26%
-10%
-19%
7%
Seq Read
1831
1315
-28%
1835
0%
1153
-37%
2599
42%
3005
64%
Seq Write
1744
927
-47%
1121
-36%
1328
-24%
588
-66%
2668
53%
4K Read
45.16
52.4
16%
23.98
-47%
35.05
-22%
37.57
-17%
40.89
-9%
4K Write
107.1
122.8
15%
100
-7%
96
-10%
104.4
-3%
94.4
-12%
4K-64 Read
1240
326.5
-74%
687
-45%
727
-41%
1116
-10%
1366
10%
4K-64 Write
1695
727
-57%
776
-54%
1212
-28%
513
-70%
1197
-29%
Access Time Read *
0.064
0.11
-72%
0.047
27%
0.063
2%
0.051
20%
0.055
14%
Access Time Write *
0.037
0.045
-22%
0.053
-43%
0.04
-8%
0.036
3%
0.039
-5%
Score Read
1468
510
-65%
895
-39%
878
-40%
1414
-4%
1708
16%
Score Write
1977
942
-52%
988
-50%
1441
-27%
676
-66%
1558
-21%
Score Total
4197
1715
-59%
2306
-45%
2784
-34%
2715
-35%
4123
-2%
Copy ISO MB/s
2086
773
-63%
1487
-29%
Copy Program MB/s
425.5
493
16%
608
43%
Copy Game MB/s
555
647
17%
1162
109%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3179 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1859 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 429.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 384.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1115 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1146 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 41.03 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 100.7 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
27228 Points +18%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
25126 Points +9%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
23032 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (18048 - 23032, n=19)
20658 Points -10%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
20323 Points -12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
19236 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
18879 Points -18%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7820HK
18505 Points -20%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
15088 Points -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
13355 Points -42%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
11332 Points -51%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9292 Points -60%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
8004 Points -65%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7374 Points -68%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
11099 Points +25%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
10243 Points +16%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
8844 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (6464 - 8844, n=19)
7903 Points -11%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
7446 Points -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
7431 Points -16%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
6380 Points -28%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7820HK
6101 Points -31%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
5657 Points -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
4867 Points -45%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
3626 Points -59%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9900K
5660 Points +10%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
5148 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (3698 - 5295, n=19)
4531 Points -12%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
4100 Points -20%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
39651 Points +28%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
30910 Points
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
28083 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (23386 - 30910, n=20)
27852 Points -10%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
24868 Points -20%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7820HK
24425 Points -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
24172 Points -22%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
20181 Points -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
17170 Points -44%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
13125 Points -58%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
12620 Points -59%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
9805 Points -68%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
9032 Points -71%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop), R7 2700X
13883 Points +14%
Alienware m17 P37E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK
12538 Points +3%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
12441 Points +2%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12170 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (9212 - 14894, n=20)
11726 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H
11597 Points -5%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK
10129 Points -17%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q, i7-7820HK
9607 Points -21%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i5-9300H
9159 Points -25%
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, i9-8950HK
8450 Points -31%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H
7932 Points -35%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H
6839 Points -44%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 3750H
6644 Points -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
22693 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
38597 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18887 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
8460 poäng
Hjälp
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 OC
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (Desktop)
103.4 (81min - 119max) fps +18%
MSI GT76 Titan DT 9SG
Intel Core i9-9900K, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
100 fps +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
87.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (65.7 - 92.7, n=22)
79.2 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
73.1 fps -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
71.8 fps -18%
Razer Blade Pro 2017
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
64.9 fps -26%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
64.4 fps -26%
Alienware 15 R3 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-7820HK, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
64.2 fps -27%
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
57.6 (46min) fps -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA502DU
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
48.8 fps -44%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GM
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
40 fps -54%
Acer Aspire Nitro 5 AN515-54-53Z2
Intel Core i5-9300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
35.4 (28min) fps -59%
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H
Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
27.9 fps -68%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U
Intel Core i7-8565U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150
12.6 fps -86%
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø83.5 (31-90)
lågmed.högultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 307.6 282.2 252.3 177.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 287.9 237.3 152.2 87.4
Rocket League (2017) 249 247.7 248.4
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Alienware m17 P37E
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i9-8950HK, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Razer Blade Pro 2017
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0)
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0)
Noise
-8%
-3%
4%
-7%
-8%
off / environment *
28.2
29
-3%
28.2
-0%
28.3
-0%
30
-6%
30
-6%
Idle Minimum *
28.2
29
-3%
28.2
-0%
31.5
-12%
30
-6%
31
-10%
Idle Average *
28.2
32
-13%
28.2
-0%
31.6
-12%
31
-10%
32
-13%
Idle Maximum *
30.8
40
-30%
31
-1%
31.6
-3%
33
-7%
41
-33%
Load Average *
42
46
-10%
50.8
-21%
32.3
23%
43
-2%
47
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
51
51
-0%
50.8
-0%
43
16%
55
-8%
47
8%
Load Maximum *
53
52
2%
50.8
4%
45.5
14%
58
-9%
48
9%

* ... smaller is better

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
28.2 / 28.2 / 30.8 dB(A)
Hög belastning
42 / 53 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 28.2 dB(A)
 38.2 °C43 °C37.2 °C 
 33.6 °C38 °C31.8 °C 
 31 °C26.8 °C31 °C 
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 30.6 °C
39 °C47.2 °C40.6 °C
33.8 °C42.4 °C36 °C
31 °C35.2 °C32.2 °C
Max: 47.2 °C
Medel: 37.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  59 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.9 °C / -7 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.6442538.140.73137.939.34038.939.55037.336.36336.836.48035.337.210034.242.912533.148.416033.558.320032.962.325031.467.831531.171.44003170.150030.271.663029.472.680029.175.7100028.773.8125028.175.3160027.974.6200027.671.1250027.667.7315027.463.1400027.466.3500027.170.9630027.271.1800027.164.3100002759.21250026.956.71600026.954.6SPL40.283.6N3.960.4median 28.1median 67.8Delta1.95.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-QApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.65 / 1.3 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 16.2 / 20.4 / 26.1 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 96.5 / 214.3 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3"
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 2x Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD
i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption
-9%
-47%
13%
-8%
17%
Idle Minimum *
16.2
19
-17%
31
-91%
13
20%
13.9
14%
10
38%
Idle Average *
20.4
22
-8%
36
-76%
17
17%
18.8
8%
15
26%
Idle Maximum *
26.1
29
-11%
44
-69%
23
12%
23.1
11%
22
16%
Load Average *
96.5
102
-6%
107
-11%
90
7%
112.3
-16%
92
5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
182.9
190
-4%
212
-16%
147
20%
231
-26%
153
16%
Load Maximum *
214.3
231
-8%
258
-20%
215
-0%
291.5
-36%
216
-1%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
4tim 55min
WiFi Websurfing
4tim 40min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 26min
Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh
Alienware m17 P37E
i9-8950HK, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 90 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh
Razer Blade Pro 2017
i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80.25 Wh
MSI GE75 9SG
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-4%
16%
-32%
-17%
11%
5%
Reader / Idle
295
372
26%
543
84%
253
-14%
464
57%
WiFi v1.3
280
235
-16%
296
6%
190
-32%
197
-30%
316
13%
294
5%
Load
86
67
-22%
49
-43%
81
-6%
54
-37%
Witcher 3 ultra
52

För

+ Thunderbolt 3, 2.5 Gbit Ethernet och UHS-III SD-kortläsare
+ lättservad; 2x SODIMM + 2x M.2 2280
+ RTX 2080 Max-Q som presterar över genomsnittet
+ liten och lätt AC-adapter
+ tjusig och klassisk Razer-design
+ inbyggt stöd för Windows Hello
+ WiFi 6 är standard
+ tyst vid låg belastning
+ tangentspecifik RGB-belysning
+ stabilt lock och basenhet

Emot

- Core i7-9750H är inte snabbare än en Core i7-8750H
- svagare webbkamera än Blade Pro 2017 (1 MP vs. 2 MP)
- kunde varit tystare när man spelar i "High Performance"-läget
- mjuk återkoppling från tangentbordet och styrplattan
- lägre batterikapacitet än Blade Pro 2017
- AC-adaptern har en tjock och otymplig kabel
- än så länge inget stöd för 4K UHD, 240 Hz eller OLED
- ingen subwoofer eller fingeravtrycksläsare
- utökad garanti är dyrt
- ingen 2.5-tums SATA III-plats
- har ej stöd för G-Sync
Recension av Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-0287. Recensionsex från Razer
Recension av Razer Blade Pro 17 RZ09-0287. Recensionsex från Razer

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Historiskt sett har Razers Blade Pro-modeller alltid haft nymodiga funktioner som fått dem att stå ut gentemot sina konkurrenter. Blade Pro 2015 hade till exempel en unik screenpad medans Blade Pro 2017 hade mekaniska knappar, styrplattebelysning, THX-certifiering och ett hjul för att justera volymen. 2019 års modell av Blade Pro 17 gör sig av med alla dessa flashiga funktioner och fokuserar istället på grunderna. Resultatet är den bästa Blade-modellen Razer någonsin släppt ifrån sig. Förbättringarna gentemot förra generationen är verkligen påtagliga och inte bara marginella eller ytliga; den är 22 procent lättare, 24 procent mindre, har 30% mer ljusstyrka och är 14 procent mer energieffektiv när man spelar samtidigt som den har upp till 39 procent snabbare grafikprestanda jämfört med Blade Pro 2017 GTX 1080. Lägg till RAM och lagring som är lätta att uppgradera och du får en spellaptop som tycks bocka av alla de viktiga rutorna.

Det finns ett antal aspekter som vi tror hade gjort Blade Pro 17 ännu bättre. Fastare och djupare tangentbordsknappar i stil med MSI:s SteelSeries-knappar hade förbättrat den taktila känslan och den svampiga klickplattan kunde definitivt ha lärt sig en del av MacBook Pro. Fläktarna låter mindre i "High Performance"-läget än på Blade Pro 2017, men de är fortfarande högljudda med en ljudnivå på över 50 dB(A). Macro-knappar för att byta mellan "Balanced"- och "High Performance"-lägena hade gjort det snabbare och smidigare än att varje gång behöva öppna och klicka sig fram genom Synapse. Att bygga in en dedikerad subwoofer hade förbättrat ljudets kvalitet utan att någon THX-certifiering hade behövts. Vidare var AC-adapterns kabel för styv och hade kunnat vara tunnare och mer flexibel, vilket hade gjort den lättare att bära. Bristerna är dock inte allvarliga nog för att sänka vad som i övrigt är en utmärkt spellaptop för sin skärmstorlek och ultratunna kategori.

Priset kommer troligen vara något som hindrar en del gamers från att ge den ett försök. För 25.000 kronor går det att köpa en Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH som har samma Core i7-9750H CPU och RTX 2080 Max-Q GPU som vår Blade Pro 17-konfiguration som kostade 32.000 kronor. Huruvida det högre priset är värt ett objektivt sett starkare och en diskuterbart lyxigare chassidesign är en fråga bara du själv kan besvara. För våra pengar är det dock mer värt än någonsin att överväga den med tanke på de betydande förbättringarna jämfört med Blade Pro 2017.

Razer har strömlinjeformat sin Blade Pro-serie för ett ge en totalt sett starkare spelupplevelse. Om du letar efter en tunn spellaptop på 17 tum, hoppa över den uppblåsta Blade Pro 2017 och överväg istället den smidigare Blade Pro 17 2019. Den kostar mer än en del konkurrenter, men i gengäld både känns den lite bättre och hanterar spel lite bättre.

Razer Blade Pro 17 RTX 2080 Max-Q - 09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo

Design
94 / 98 → 96%
Tangentbord
81%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
69 / 80 → 87%
Vikt
58 / 10-66 → 86%
Batteri
62 / 95 → 65%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
95%
Programprestanda
90%
Temperatur
87 / 95 → 92%
Ljudnivå
80 / 90 → 89%
Audio
80%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Medel
78%
88%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Mycket bättre än tidigare: Razer Blade Pro 17
Allen Ngo, 2019-06-25 (Update: 2024-11- 4)