Test: Nokia 1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Nokia 1
Brand: Nokia

Lilla nummer 1. Nokia 1 är instegsmodellen till smartphone-världen: under 1 000 kronor, ett litet format och till och med ett utbytbart batteri. I den här recensionen får du reda på om Nokia 1 är tillräckligt bra för vardaglig användning.

Florian Wimmer, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Sven Kloevekorn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 05/29/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nokia 1 (1 Serie)

Processor

Mediatek MT6737 4 x 1.3 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Minne

1024 MB

Skärm

4.50 tum 16:9, 854 x 480 pixlar 218 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

8 GB eMMC Flash, 8 GB

, 5.2 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Närhetssensor, FM-Radio

Nätverk

802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.2, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.5 x 133.6 x 67.8

Batteri

8.2 Wh, 2150 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 9 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 360 tim

Operativsystem

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 5 MPix Kontrast-autofokus (AF), LED-blixt, Video i upp till 720p/30 FPS
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens baksida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, Hörlurar, 24 Månader Garanti, Bandbredd Nerladdning/Uppladdning: 150 Mbps / 50 Mbps LTE; IP52-certifierad, SAR-värde: 0.66 W/kg (Huvud), 1.2 W/kg (Kropp), fanless

Vikt

131 g, Strömförsörjning: 40 g

Pris

100 Kr

Länkar

Nokia hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 2 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash	54.2 MBit/s +6%
Nokia 1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash	51.2 MBit/s
Gigaset GS170 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.9 MBit/s -3%
Lenovo B Mali-T720, MT6735M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	47.7 MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Moto C Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	47.2 MBit/s -8%
iperf3 receive AX12
Nokia 2 Adreno 304, 212 APQ8009, 8 GB eMMC Flash	55.4 MBit/s +13%
Gigaset GS170 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	49.4 MBit/s +1%
Nokia 1 Mali-T720 MP2, MT6737, 8 GB eMMC Flash	49.1 MBit/s
Lenovo Moto C Mali-T720, MT6737, 16 GB eMMC Flash	43.7 MBit/s -11%
Lenovo B Mali-T720, MT6735M, 8 GB eMMC Flash	39.5 MBit/s -20%

GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Route through a wooded area

GPS test – Garmin Edge 520: Route across a bridge

GPS test – Nokia 1: Route through a wooded area

GPS test – Nokia 1: Route across a bridge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


247 cd/m²	234 cd/m²	253 cd/m²
252 cd/m²	256 cd/m²	255 cd/m²
262 cd/m²	249 cd/m²	255 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 262 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 251.4 cd/m² Minimum: 13.3 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 257 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2133:1 (Svärta: 0.12 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.3

	Nokia 1 IPS, 854x480, 4.5"	Nokia 2 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Gigaset GS170 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Lenovo Moto C TFT, 854x480, 5"	Lenovo B TN LED, 854x480, 4.5"
Screen		-40%	-60%	-54%	-74%
Brightness middle	256	527 106%	418 63%	364 42%	309 21%
Brightness	251	503 100%	418 67%	355 41%	302 20%
Brightness Distribution	89	91 2%	92 3%	92 3%	96 8%
Black Level *	0.12	0.68 -467%	0.45 -275%	0.31 -158%	0.46 -283%
Contrast	2133	775 -64%	929 -56%	1174 -45%	672 -68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.82	5.3 -10%	9.7 -101%	10.4 -116%	9.8 -103%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	11.75	9.2 22%	18.9 -61%	18 -53%	19.7 -68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5.2	5.8 -12%	11.3 -117%	12.7 -144%	11.5 -121%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.12 ^104%	2.27 ^97%	2.04 ^108%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	7107 ^91%	7894 ^82%	10414 ^62%	12904 ^50%	12460 ^52%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ ms rise
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	3054 Points
Nokia 2	3109 Points +2%
Gigaset GS170	3344 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto C	2877 Points -6%
Lenovo B	2125 Points -30%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2415 - 3624, n=18)	3155 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	2335 Points
Nokia 2	2304 Points -1%
Gigaset GS170	2600 Points +11%
Lenovo Moto C	2313 Points -1%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2313 - 2768, n=13)	2543 Points +9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 1	457 Points
Nokia 2	149 Points -67%
Gigaset GS170	538 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto C	432 Points -5%
Lenovo B	136 Points -70%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (176 - 588, n=17)	391 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6326 Points +1284%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 1	859 Points
Nokia 2	901 Points +5%
Gigaset GS170	1170 Points +36%
Lenovo Moto C	883 Points +3%
Lenovo B	799 Points -7%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (859 - 1394, n=17)	1073 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10181 Points +1085%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 1	505 Points
Nokia 2	233 Points -54%
Gigaset GS170	610 Points +21%
Lenovo Moto C	419 Points -17%
Lenovo B	311 Points -38%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (419 - 942, n=17)	622 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6785 Points +1244%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	176 Points
Nokia 2	251 Points +43%
Gigaset GS170	210 Points +19%
Lenovo Moto C	177 Points +1%
Lenovo B	145 Points -18%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (176 - 384, n=17)	216 Points +23%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	17165 Points +9653%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 1	571 Points
Nokia 2	9 Points -98%
Gigaset GS170	558 Points -2%
Lenovo Moto C	534 Points -6%
Lenovo B	9 Points -98%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (9 - 703, n=17)	353 Points -38%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1566 Points +174%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	492 Points
Nokia 2	423 Points -14%
Gigaset GS170	581 Points +18%
Lenovo Moto C	450 Points -9%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (450 - 581, n=11)	533 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +1015%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	1252 Points
Nokia 2	1118 Points -11%
Gigaset GS170	1595 Points +27%
Lenovo Moto C	1254 Points 0%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1252 - 1595, n=11)	1465 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +1103%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 1	943 Points
Average Mediatek MT6737 (938 - 1065, n=7)	988 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +1172%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2	4577 Points
Gigaset GS170	3666 Points
Lenovo Moto C	3142 Points
Lenovo B	2640 Points
Average Mediatek MT6737 (3142 - 6843, n=17)	3861 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 2	4150 Points
Gigaset GS170	3167 Points
Lenovo Moto C	2706 Points
Lenovo B	2239 Points
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2706 - 6147, n=17)	3356 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 2	7150 Points
Gigaset GS170	8178 Points
Lenovo Moto C	7209 Points
Lenovo B	7072 Points
Average Mediatek MT6737 (5462 - 11340, n=17)	8181 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 1	76 Points
Nokia 2	120 Points +58%
Gigaset GS170	152 Points +100%
Lenovo B	Points -100%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (68 - 164, n=14)	140 Points +84%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +5432%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	61 Points
Nokia 2	120 Points +97%
Gigaset GS170	227 Points +272%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (54 - 227, n=14)	121.2 Points +99%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +7670%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	663 Points
Nokia 2	539 Points -19%
Gigaset GS170	781 Points +18%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (663 - 781, n=14)	738 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +398%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 1	75 Points
Gigaset GS170	93 Points +24%
Lenovo B	Points -100%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (75 - 265, n=15)	108.3 Points +44%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +4012%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	60 Points
Gigaset GS170	74 Points +23%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (60 - 220, n=15)	87.3 Points +46%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +5338%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 1	666 Points
Gigaset GS170	772 Points +16%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (666 - 946, n=15)	749 Points +12%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +393%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	14 fps
Nokia 2	9.6 fps -31%
Gigaset GS170	11 fps -21%
Lenovo Moto C	13 fps -7%
Lenovo B	11 fps -21%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (6 - 14, n=17)	10.4 fps -26%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	86.1 fps +515%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	5.1 fps
Nokia 2	5.4 fps +6%
Gigaset GS170	6 fps +18%
Lenovo Moto C	5.1 fps 0%
Lenovo B	4.1 fps -20%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (5.1 - 10, n=17)	6.11 fps +20%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	283 fps +5449%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 1	8 fps
Nokia 2	4.4 fps -45%
Gigaset GS170	4.8 fps -40%
Lenovo Moto C	7.8 fps -2%
Lenovo B	5.5 fps -31%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (2.1 - 8, n=17)	4.7 fps -41%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +844%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	1.9 fps
Nokia 2	1.6 fps -16%
Gigaset GS170	2.2 fps +16%
Lenovo Moto C	1.6 fps -16%
Lenovo B	1.5 fps -21%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.6 - 4.5, n=17)	2.42 fps +27%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	167.1 fps +8695%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	6 fps
Gigaset GS170	3.4 fps -43%
Lenovo Moto C	1.2 fps -80%
Lenovo B	4.2 fps -30%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.2 - 14, n=17)	3.92 fps -35%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.6 fps +993%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 1	1.2 fps
Gigaset GS170	1.4 fps +17%
Lenovo Moto C	5.5 fps +358%
Lenovo B	1 fps -17%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1.2 - 5.5, n=17)	1.629 fps +36%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	118.5 fps +9775%

Legend

Nokia 1 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009, Qualcomm Adreno 304, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Gigaset GS170 Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto C Mediatek MT6737, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo B Mediatek MT6735M, ARM Mali-T720, 8 GB eMMC Flash

Average Mediatek MT6737

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average Mediatek MT6737 (11.6 - 21.9, n=17)	15.2 Points +32%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)	14.34 Points +24%
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)	12.64 Points +9%
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)	11.68 Points +1%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	11.61 Points +1%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	11.55 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	37278 Points +1855%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (1730 - 3383, n=17)	2386 Points +25%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)	2284 Points +20%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	1948 Points +2%
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)	1929 Points +1%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	1907 Points
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)	1730 Points -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Lenovo Moto C (Chrome Version 60)	19879 ms * -5%
Nokia 2 (Chrome 65)	19275 ms * -2%
Nokia 1 (Chrome 66)	18927 ms *
Lenovo B (Chrome 56)	18130 ms * +4%
Average Mediatek MT6737 (10615 - 30114, n=17)	17043 ms * +10%
Gigaset GS170 (Chrome Version 59)	16723 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1563 ms * +92%

* ... smaller is better

	Nokia 1	Nokia 2	Gigaset GS170	Lenovo Moto C	Lenovo B	Average 8 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-21%	-8%	-9%	-59%	-42%	1931%
Sequential Read 256KB	208.3	131.1 -37%	197.9 -5%	179.3 -14%	115.6 -45%	128.8 ?(38.1 - 289, n=51) -38%	1847 ?(226 - 4512, n=193, last 2 years) 787%
Sequential Write 256KB	51.8	50.8 -2%	44.79 -14%	44.55 -14%	8.1 -84%	22.1 ?(6.22 - 54.8, n=51) -57%	1436 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=193, last 2 years) 2672%
Random Read 4KB	25.7	17.44 -32%	18.34 -29%	18.37 -29%	12.4 -52%	18.1 ?(8 - 50.5, n=51) -30%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=193, last 2 years) 978%
Random Write 4KB	9.1	8.1 -11%	10.45 15%	10.9 20%	4.2 -54%	5.35 ?(1.08 - 14, n=51) -41%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=193, last 2 years) 3285%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		81.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	37.41 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	13.5	24.16 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	43.1 ?(16.3 - 84.2, n=21)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	21.34 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	10.7	16.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	29.1 ?(11.2 - 63.4, n=21)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


33.3 °C	28.9 °C	27.5 °C
34.3 °C	28.8 °C	27.6 °C
32.7 °C	28.5 °C	27.6 °C

Max: 34.3 °C
Medel: 29.9 °C


28 °C	28.9 °C	36 °C
28.3 °C	29.2 °C	35.6 °C
27.7 °C	29.3 °C	33.7 °C

Max: 36 °C
Medel: 30.7 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 44 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nokia 1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 61.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (127.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 97% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Nokia 2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.2 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastning	0.9 / 1.5 / 2 Watt
Hög belastning	3.5 / 4.3 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nokia 1 2150 mAh	Nokia 2 4100 mAh	Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh	Lenovo B 2000 mAh	Average Mediatek MT6737	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		13%	12%	12%	-14%	-38%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.55 39%	0.54 40%	0.64 29%	0.869 ?(0.54 - 2.2, n=16) 3%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.02 32%	1.56 -4%	0.96 36%	1.987 ?(1.35 - 3.4, n=16) -32%	1.453 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Maximum *	2	1.09 45%	1.6 20%	1.33 33%	2.11 ?(1.39 - 3.5, n=16) -6%	1.613 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 19%
Load Average *	3.5	4.48 -28%	3.18 9%	4.59 -31%	4.14 ?(2.18 - 6.51, n=16) -18%	6.5 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -86%
Load Maximum *	4.3	5.32 -24%	4.42 -3%	4.63 -8%	4.94 ?(3.61 - 6.96, n=16) -15%	9.86 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -129%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid


WiFi Websurfing		9tim 12min

	Nokia 1 2150 mAh	Nokia 2 4100 mAh	Gigaset GS170 2500 mAh	Lenovo Moto C 2350 mAh	Lenovo B 2000 mAh
Battery Runtime		52%	-20%	-6%	-20%
WiFi v1.3	552	840 52%	442 -20%	517 -6%	442 -20%
Reader / Idle				1159
H.264				529
Load				278

För

+ löstagbart batteri

+ lång batteritid

+ bakstycket går att byta ut

+ lågt pris

+ slimmat OS

+ många LTE-band

+ hyfsad GPS

+ hög kontrast och skärm med exakta färger

+ Dual-SIM

+ dedikerad microSD-kortplats

Emot

- problem med dataöverföring till PC

- inte alla microSD-kort är kompatibla

- frekvent märkbar ryckighet

- en viss fördröjd reaktion på inmatning

Nokia 1 recenseras. Testenhet från notebooksbilliger.de

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Vad kan man förvänta sig från en smartphone som kostar under 1 000 kronor? Nokia 1 erbjuder inte prestanda i världsklass, men Nokia har byggt en telefon som klarar sig bra för sitt pris. Nokia 1 är för den som har låga krav på sin smartphone. I gengäld får man en smartphone med många positiva aspekter. Nokia 1 har en skaplig skärm med ett imponerande kontrastförhållande och bra färgnoggrannhet. Dess GPS är exakt, högtalarna låter bra och kamerorna är dugliga, även om dom presterar dålig vid låg belysning.

Sporadiskt lagg och ryckighet är irriterande och kommer ta ett tag att vänja sig vid. Men den nivån av prestanda kan man förvänta sig av en smartphone för under 1 000 kronor. Bra batteritid och ett utbytbart batteri kompenserar till viss del för den låga prestandan.

Nokia 1 är en skaplig budget-smartphone som får ut mesta möjliga av sina begränsade resurser. Dess löstagbara batteri, bra skärm och utbytbara skal imponerade på oss.

Den begränsade mängden intern lagring och RAM uppvägs av Android Oreo (Go Edition) som ger användaren mer lagringsutrymme och minne än traditionella Android. Det kan finnas problem med att utbyta information med en dator som du borde känna till. På den här prisnivån kommer det alltid att finnas kompromisser, men detta är ändå frustrerande. Nokia 1 är bara ca 200 kronor billigare men erbjuder mycket av vad Nokia 2 gör, om än med en mindre skärm och lägre upplöst optik.

Nokia 1 - 05/18/2018 v6 ^(old)
Florian Wimmer

Design

68%

Tangentbord

63 / 75 → 84%

Mus

74%

Anslutningar

33 / 60 → 55%

Vikt

94%

Batteri

92%

Skärm

81%

Spelprestanda

5 / 63 → 7%

Programprestanda

27 / 70 → 39%

Temperatur

93%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

53 / 91 → 58%

Camera

46%

Medel

64%

75%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11244 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Nokia 1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Wimmer, 2018-05-29 (Update: 2018-05-29)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Nokia 1 audio analysis

Nokia 2 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison