Test: Nokia 5.3 - Tunn Android One-mobil (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Bewertung | Rating Version | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Nokia 5.3 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.55" | 1600x720 | |
| 80.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 76.7 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Huawei P smart Pro Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 206 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.59" | 2340x1080 | |
| 78.4 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Motorola Moto G8 Plus SD 665, Adreno 610 | 188 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2280x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Nokia 5.3 | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Nokia 5.3 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 523 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1137:1 (Svärta: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.226
| Nokia 5.3 IPS, 1600x720, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Huawei P smart Pro TFT-LCD (LTPS), 2340x1080, 6.6" | Motorola Moto G8 Plus IPS, 2280x1080, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 21% | 8% | 28% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56 ? | 44 ? 21% | 51.2 ? 9% | 36 ? 36% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 24 ? 20% | 28 ? 7% | 24 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 463 ? | |||
| Screen | 18% | -3% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 523 | 622 19% | 480 -8% | 597 14% |
| Brightness | 482 | 612 27% | 459 -5% | 596 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 94 9% | 87 1% | 93 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.56 -22% | 0.47 -2% | 0.52 -13% |
| Contrast | 1137 | 1111 -2% | 1021 -10% | 1148 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.22 | 3.98 36% | 5.7 8% | 5.93 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.56 | 7.33 31% | 11.3 -7% | 9.42 11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8 | 4.5 44% | 7.8 2% | 5.3 34% |
| Gamma | 2.226 99% | 2.206 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.232 99% |
| CCT | 8856 73% | 7361 88% | 8813 74% | 7632 85% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 114.9 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 20% /
18% | 3% /
-1% | 20% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5.3 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7437 - 9051, n=10) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5.3 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6189 - 11432, n=12) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5.3 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (6.2 - 15, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5.3 | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (7.8 - 8.4, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5.3 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (3.9 - 9.1, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 5.3 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | |
| Huawei P smart Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G8 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (2.7 - 2.8, n=12) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 5.3 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S | Huawei P smart Pro | Motorola Moto G8 Plus | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 40% | 76% | 17% | -19% | 445% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 299.5 | 496.6 66% | 822 174% | 302.5 1% | 274 ? -9% | 1887 ? 530% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 243.2 | 214.8 -12% | 195.4 -20% | 217.4 -11% | 176.6 ? -27% | 1471 ? 505% |
| Random Read 4KB | 109.1 | 137 26% | 154.3 41% | 59.9 -45% | 59.4 ? -46% | 278 ? 155% |
| Random Write 4KB | 45.2 | 123.6 173% | 156.3 246% | 124.9 176% | 32.2 ? -29% | 311 ? 588% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 77.3 ? | 74.5 ? -4% | 76.5 ? -1% | 72.6 ? -6% | 77.4 ? 0% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.7 ? | 54.9 ? -10% | 69 ? 14% | 52.2 ? -14% | 58.3 ? -4% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.7 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Nokia 5.3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (30.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.7% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Nokia 5.3 4000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S 5020 mAh | Huawei P smart Pro 4000 mAh | Motorola Moto G8 Plus 4000 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 876 | 1187 36% | 757 -14% | 980 12% | 991 ? 13% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - För lite att erbjuda
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Nokia 5.3 känns lite som att den ligger ett år efter. Förra året kunde den fått poäng för ett relativt stort batteri, ett flexibelt kamerasystem och skaplig prestanda för sin klass. Under 2020, och för 2.000 kronor, har den däremot för lite jämfört med konkurrenterna och lider av en del brister som vi inte kan förlåta, inte ens för en enhet för 2.000 kronor:
Den blir alldeles för varm vid belastning, till och med vid rumstemperatur. WLAN-datafrekvenserna varierar och den har långsamt LTE. Skärmen har dessutom en kraftigt blå ton, vilket verkligen inte behöver vara fallet 2020.
Nokia 5.3 har en del svagheter och hamnar därför långt efter konkurrenter med samma pris.
Nokia 5.3 är förvisso lätt och tunn, har skaplig batteritid och prestandan är tillräcklig för enkelt vardagsbruk. Mjukvaran är uppdaterad och tack vare Android One är du säker de kommande två åren i fråga om uppdateringar. Men kameran kan knappt övertyga den heller och det finns helt enkelt så många bättre alternativ från andra tillverkare, så vi finner det svårt att rekommendera Nokias telefon.
I bästa fall, om priset snabbt går ner ordentligt, kan telefonen passa bra för användare med låga krav.
Nokia 5.3
- 07/02/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
