Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Nokia 6 (2018) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

En cool Finne. Nokia har uppdaterat sin mittenskiktstelefon Nokia 6. Även om namnet är samma så har konfigurationen och kvaliteten förhoppningsvis förbättrats. Låt oss ta reda på huruvida så är fallet i vår recension.
Nokia 6.1 (6 Serie)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 8 x 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
Qualcomm Adreno 508
Minne
3 GB 
Skärm
5.50 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 401 PPI, kapacitiv, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm kombinerad ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD, upp till 256 GB (SIM 2-plats), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, gyro, närhet, kompass, fingeravtryck, USB C
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM: 850, 900, 1800, 1900, UMTS: 850, 900, 1900, 2100 LTE: 700, 800, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.2 x 148.8 x 75.8
Batteri
3000 mAh Litiumjon, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 16 tim, Standby 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 500 tim
Operativsystem
Android 8.1 Oreo
Camera
Primary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, 1.0 µm
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 1.12 µm
Övrigt
Högtalare: 1, Tangentbord: virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, nätadapter, headset, ingen, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värde huvud (EU): 0.49 W/Kg; SAR-värde kropp (EU): 0.71 W/Kg, fanless
Vikt
175 g, Strömförsörjning: 76 g
Pris
299 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

power supply

Size Comparison

148.4 mm 73.4 mm 9.5 mm 163 g149.1 mm 72.9 mm 8.1 mm 142 g148.8 mm 75.8 mm 8.2 mm 175 g142 mm 70 mm 9.7 mm 171 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
345 MBit/s
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
336 MBit/s -3%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s -16%
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
274 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto X4
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
337 MBit/s +17%
Sony Xperia XA2
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
309 MBit/s +7%
Nokia 6 2018
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
289 MBit/s
HTC U11 Life
Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash
224 MBit/s -22%
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Nokia 6
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
Color Checker
Color Checker
test chart
test chart
test chart details
test chart details
439
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
446
cd/m²
417
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
438
cd/m²
427
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 446 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 421.1 cd/m² Minimum: 1.98 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 417 cd/m²
Kontrast: 684:1 (Svärta: 0.61 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16
Nokia 6 2018
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Sony Xperia XA2
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Motorola Moto X4
LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"
HTC U11 Life
SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2"
Screen
21%
21%
31%
Brightness middle
417
513
23%
469
12%
545
31%
Brightness
421
506
20%
479
14%
526
25%
Brightness Distribution
88
93
6%
86
-2%
87
-1%
Black Level *
0.61
0.42
31%
0.37
39%
0.42
31%
Contrast
684
1221
79%
1268
85%
1298
90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.1
5
18%
5.5
10%
4.9
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.2
11.4
-2%
10.7
4%
8.5
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
7.1
7.8
-10%
6.7
6%
5.4
24%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.2 100%
2.1 105%
2.31 95%
CCT
8362 78%
7964 82%
8064 81%
7610 85%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 2381 Hz ≤ 17 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 2381 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 17 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 2381 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.8 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
59.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 29.2 ms rise
↘ 30.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
72580 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
71552 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4
70445 Points -3%
HTC U11 Life
73617 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (44128 - 73617, n=12)
68642 Points -5%
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
90435 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
89228 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (87300 - 90674, n=11)
89396 Points -1%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
5484 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
5844 Points +7%
Motorola Moto X4
5919 Points +8%
HTC U11 Life
5818 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4948 - 6264, n=13)
5632 Points +3%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
4719 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
5006 Points +6%
Motorola Moto X4
4887 Points +4%
HTC U11 Life
4835 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4636 - 5987, n=12)
4968 Points +5%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1504 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1563 Points +4%
Motorola Moto X4
1536 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life
1368 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1152 - 1570, n=13)
1479 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)
6297 Points +319%
System (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
3237 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
3256 Points +1%
Motorola Moto X4
3279 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life
3215 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1763 - 3319, n=13)
3147 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)
10163 Points +214%
Memory (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1161 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1328 Points +14%
Motorola Moto X4
1405 Points +21%
HTC U11 Life
838 Points -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (838 - 1405, n=13)
1199 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)
6767 Points +483%
Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1520 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1500 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4
1519 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life
1515 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1409 - 1523, n=13)
1494 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)
16908 Points +1012%
Web (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
895 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
921 Points +3%
Motorola Moto X4
795 Points -11%
HTC U11 Life
858 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (666 - 936, n=13)
859 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)
1564 Points +75%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
883 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
865 Points -2%
Motorola Moto X4
870 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life
877 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (710 - 885, n=13)
853 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)
5486 Points +521%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
4210 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
4170 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4
4115 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life
4193 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2246 - 4234, n=13)
4009 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)
15064 Points +258%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
3690 Points
Motorola Moto X4
3894 Points +6%
HTC U11 Life
3956 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (2910 - 3956, n=12)
3718 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)
11998 Points +225%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
17030 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
16974 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
16767 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life
16859 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (15466 - 17032, n=13)
16750 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
18572 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
18534 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
18355 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life
18469 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (16508 - 18635, n=13)
18279 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
13196 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
13112 Points -1%
Motorola Moto X4
12870 Points -2%
HTC U11 Life
12919 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (12437 - 13217, n=13)
12963 Points -2%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1332 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1334 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
1351 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life
1336 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1315 - 1374, n=13)
1341 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)
4204 Points +216%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1249 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1251 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
1259 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life
1257 Points +1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1234 - 1289, n=13)
1258 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)
4740 Points +280%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1733 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1737 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
1816 Points +5%
HTC U11 Life
1711 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1687 - 1816, n=13)
1746 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)
3303 Points +91%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
814 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
811 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
835 Points +3%
HTC U11 Life
839 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (809 - 839, n=13)
825 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +279%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
707 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
709 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4
724 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life
729 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (704 - 729, n=13)
718 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +362%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
1738 Points
Sony Xperia XA2
1631 Points -6%
Motorola Moto X4
1811 Points +4%
HTC U11 Life
1779 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (1631 - 1822, n=13)
1734 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +89%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
31 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
31 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
31 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
29 fps -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (25 - 31, n=13)
29.2 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
86.3 fps +178%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
30 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
30 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
30 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
30 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (29 - 30, n=13)
29.7 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)
280 fps +833%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
15 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
15 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
15 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (11 - 15, n=13)
13.8 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)
75.5 fps +403%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
14 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
14 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
14 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life
14 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (13 - 14, n=13)
13.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)
165.3 fps +1081%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
10 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
10 fps 0%
Motorola Moto X4
11 fps +10%
HTC U11 Life
9.8 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 11, n=13)
9.36 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)
65.7 fps +557%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
9.8 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
9.7 fps -1%
Motorola Moto X4
9.6 fps -2%
HTC U11 Life
9.7 fps -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.2 - 10, n=13)
9.38 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +1096%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
5.9 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
6 fps +2%
Motorola Moto X4
5.7 fps -3%
HTC U11 Life
5.4 fps -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4.3 - 6, n=13)
5.48 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)
47.8 fps +710%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Nokia 6 2018
5.6 fps
Sony Xperia XA2
5.5 fps -2%
Motorola Moto X4
5.3 fps -5%
HTC U11 Life
5.5 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (5.3 - 5.6, n=13)
5.48 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)
70.6 fps +1161%

Legend

 
Nokia 6 2018 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia XA2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
30.81 Points +9%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
28.99 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (27.4 - 30.8, n=12)
28.3 Points 0%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
28.17 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
27.37 Points -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points +644%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
5050 Points +1%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
4993 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (4398 - 5202, n=13)
4963 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
4893 Points -2%
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
4771 Points -4%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
10236 ms * -3%
Nokia 6 2018 (Browser: Chrome 65)
9923 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (8396 - 10257, n=13)
9702 ms * +2%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
9493 ms * +4%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
8396 ms * +15%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * +84%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Nokia 6 2018
117 Points
Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109)
106 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 (86 - 117, n=10)
105.9 Points -9%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)
100 Points -15%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)
86 Points -26%

* ... smaller is better

Nokia 6 2018Sony Xperia XA2Motorola Moto X4HTC U11 LifeAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
47%
38%
1%
1054%
Sequential Read 256KB
272.6
271.5
0%
281.6
3%
268
-2%
Sequential Write 256KB
118.3
127.4
8%
120.5
2%
120
1%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-15%
Random Read 4KB
38.78
43.07
11%
45.4
17%
39.3
1%
Random Write 4KB
15.3
13.82
-10%
55.3
261%
50.2
228%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
83.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
3%
83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
1%
82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-1%
71.8 ?(8.2 - 96.5, n=178)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
61.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
60 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-2%
52.9 ?(3.4 - 87.1, n=178)
-14%
Shadow Fight 3
 InställningarVärde
 high59 fps
 minimal29 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Arena of Valor
 InställningarVärde
 min30 fps
 high HD30 fps
  Your browser does not support the canvas element!
Hög belastning
 33.3 °C33.5 °C32.9 °C 
 32.9 °C33.4 °C35.4 °C 
 31.9 °C32.9 °C34 °C 
Max: 35.4 °C
Medel: 33.4 °C
31.2 °C31 °C32 °C
31.2 °C31.6 °C31.9 °C
31.4 °C31.7 °C31.9 °C
Max: 32 °C
Medel: 31.5 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  28.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.4 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.245.82532.946.53137.232.24031.738.45039.639.76328.332.28027.330.910026.929.712526.732.51602433.620020.939.125020.947.331519.551.140018.559.250017.568.563017.566.780015.768.5100015.872.9125016.673.6160015.875200015.476.8250015.578.531501676.7400015.876.450001676.1630016.375.5800016.375.51000016.268.61250016.463.61600016.452.1SPL28.687.2N1.167.9median 16.4median 68.5Delta2.211.928.627.224.929.624.624.826.428.830.828.623.62020.222.219.920.717.625.119.142.319.142.917.449.716.95316.857.215.159.216.560.615.664.41567.615.568.715.373.215.775.715.575.315.575.515.47715.875.61674.415.873.516.17116.16717.357.427.985.6159.9median 16median 670.711.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia 6 2018Sony Xperia XA2
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia 6 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Sony Xperia XA2 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.13 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.67 / 1.76 / 1.78 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.82 / 4.56 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 630
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
8%
-6%
-12%
-18%
-50%
Idle Minimum *
0.67
0.39
42%
0.65
3%
0.63
6%
0.732 ?(0.35 - 1.4, n=13)
-9%
Idle Average *
1.76
1.61
9%
1.51
14%
2.1
-19%
1.835 ?(1 - 2.31, n=13)
-4%
Idle Maximum *
1.78
1.62
9%
1.57
12%
2.15
-21%
2.16 ?(1.4 - 3.8, n=13)
-21%
Load Average *
2.82
3.12
-11%
3.88
-38%
3.34
-18%
3.81 ?(2.82 - 6.2, n=13)
-35%
Load Maximum *
4.56
4.92
-8%
5.47
-20%
4.83
-6%
5.62 ?(4.56 - 8, n=13)
-23%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
30tim 33min
WiFi Websurfing
15tim 42min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11tim 15min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 02min
Nokia 6 2018
3000 mAh
Sony Xperia XA2
3300 mAh
Motorola Moto X4
3000 mAh
HTC U11 Life
2600 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
-15%
-6%
Reader / Idle
1833
2503
37%
1652
-10%
1820
-1%
H.264
675
766
13%
688
2%
798
18%
WiFi v1.3
942
886
-6%
659
-30%
725
-23%
Load
362
298
-18%
289
-20%
303
-16%

För

+ grundläggande Android
+ snabba säkerhetsuppdateringar
+ bra batteritid
+ genomsnittlig energiförbrukning
+ väldigt låga temperaturer
+ certifierad för aptX
+ NFC och Bluetooth 5.0
+ många LTE-band
+ ingen bloatware
+ antireflex-skärm
+ bra bildkvalitet på huvudkameran
+ stabilt hölje
+ trevlig design
+ skaplig batteritid
+ spel visas i upp till 60 fps
+ snabb tryckkänslig skärm

Emot

- det headset som ingår kunde varit bättre
- skärmen har en tydlig blå ton
- oanvänd svart kant nedanför skärmen
Review: Nokia 6 (2018). Test unit provided by HMD Global DE.
Review: Nokia 6 (2018). Test unit provided by HMD Global DE.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Den senaste ättlingen till Nokia 6-serien erbjuder en intressant helhet, men den starka konkurrensen i det här prisskiktet gör det svårt för den. Denna modell på 5.5 tum med en 16:9-panel har inte riktigt något unikt säljargument. Minst en av dom jämförda enheterna har också en hybrid SIM-plats, 3 GB RAM och 32 GB lagring. Nokia har också valt att gå mot trenden med dual-kameror, vilket kan vara en nackdel för köpare som tycker tekniska specifikationer är viktigt, även om en närmare titt på bilder som tagits med kameran visar att kamerans kvalitet är precis lika bra som hos dual-kameror. Purister kan tänkas uppskatta det helt orörda Android-operativsystemet och det faktum att det inte finns någon onödig mjukvara installerad på telefonen. Säkerhetsuppdateringarna installeras direkt från Google tack vare Android One och vi kan förvänta oss fler systemuppdateringar.

Elegans, hög prestanda, totalt sett en framgång ... med andra ord: En riktig Nokia.

Nokia 6 är en utmärkt helhet: Den har en snabb SoC som kan hålla jämna steg med alla aktuella smartphone-krav, en snygg utsida, låga temperaturer och en bra konfiguration för ett attraktivt pris. Vi upplevde inga svagheter under vårt test och kan definitivt rekommendera den med tanke på dess pris på 2 500 kronor.

Nokia 6 2018 - 05/15/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Schaar

Design
90%
Tangentbord
65 / 75 → 87%
Mus
93%
Anslutningar
46 / 60 → 76%
Vikt
90%
Batteri
96%
Skärm
83%
Spelprestanda
41 / 63 → 66%
Programprestanda
52 / 70 → 74%
Temperatur
94%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
73%
Medel
76%
86%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Nokia 6 (2018) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Florian Schaar, 2018-05-17 (Update: 2018-05-17)