Test: OnePlus 5T Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| LG V30 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 92 %
Mitt på batteriet: 425 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.32
| OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Sony Xperia XZ1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | OnePlus 5 AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -23% | -47% | -16% | -61% | 20% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 425 | 620 46% | 656 54% | 415 -2% | 432 2% | 560 32% | 426 0% |
| Brightness | 423 | 610 44% | 634 50% | 420 -1% | 428 1% | 562 33% | 431 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 93 1% | 93 1% | 87 -5% | 87 -5% | 93 1% | 93 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.79 | 0.4 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 4.2 -100% | 5.3 -152% | 2.7 -29% | 4.18 -99% | 1.7 19% | 1.6 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 5.8 -71% | 7.8 -129% | 4.3 -26% | 8.53 -151% | 3.4 -0% | 4.1 -21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 3.9 -56% | 5.2 -108% | 3.3 -32% | 5.3 -112% | 1.6 36% | 1.7 32% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.02 109% | 2.22 99% | 2.36 93% | 2.33 94% | 2.13 103% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6455 101% | 7086 92% | 7905 82% | 6787 96% | 7487 87% | 6435 101% | 6329 103% |
| Contrast | 785 | 1640 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | ||||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 242.7 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 242.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 242.7 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
| T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 5T | Sony Xperia XZ1 | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL | Google Pixel 2 XL | LG V30 | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | OnePlus 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | -43% | 5% | -25% | -6% | 1% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 699 | 679 -3% | 287.4 -59% | 760 9% | 669 -4% | 788 13% | 748 7% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 203.4 | 204.4 0% | 205.3 1% | 195.3 -4% | 193.2 -5% | 194.2 -5% | 201.5 -1% |
| Random Read 4KB | 138.1 | 156.6 13% | 68.6 -50% | 170.6 24% | 78.2 -43% | 127.2 -8% | 141 2% |
| Random Write 4KB | 20 | 14.93 -25% | 7.59 -62% | 17.84 -11% | 10.21 -49% | 15.27 -24% | 19.3 -3% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 65.5 ? | 86.9 ? | 62.8 | 71.1 ? | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 47.71 ? | 66.5 ? | 47.2 | 57.2 ? |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 5T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.02 / 0.2 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.58 / 1.44 / 1.53 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
3.17 / 8.54 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -46% | -36% | -38% | -2% | 4% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.58 | 0.51 12% | 0.84 -45% | 1.28 -121% | 0.72 -24% | 0.68 -17% | 0.73 -26% |
| Idle Average * | 1.44 | 2.16 -50% | 2.31 -60% | 1.87 -30% | 1.37 5% | 1.13 22% | 1.44 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.53 | 2.23 -46% | 2.33 -52% | 1.89 -24% | 1.41 8% | 1.16 24% | 1.5 2% |
| Load Average * | 3.17 | 7.45 -135% | 4.76 -50% | 3.73 -18% | 3.46 -9% | 4.69 -48% | 6.91 -118% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.54 | 9.28 -9% | 6.39 25% | 8.08 5% | 7.83 8% | 5.24 39% | 8.51 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Asus ZenFone 4 ZE554KL 3300 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | LG V30 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | -7% | -5% | 6% | -2% | -17% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1754 | 1612 -8% | 1665 -5% | 1706 -3% | 1914 9% | 1565 -11% | 1534 -13% |
| H.264 | 799 | 580 -27% | 698 -13% | 672 -16% | 822 3% | 742 -7% | 623 -22% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 718 | 601 -16% | 562 -22% | 581 -19% | 774 8% | 736 3% | 518 -28% |
| Load | 257 | 172 -33% | 286 11% | 302 18% | 267 4% | 275 7% | 247 -4% |
För
Emot
OnePlus 5T är en utmärkt smartphone för den som vill satsa smart: Ett bra pris, låg energiförbrukning och ett utmärkt förhållande mellan pris och prestanda. OnePlus 5T är för tillfället en av dom snabbaste smartphones som finns att tillgå och den erbjuder också ett väldigt uthålligt batteri, bra högtalare och utmärkta kameror. Flaggskeppstelefonerna från större tillverkare erbjuder fortfarande ännu bättre kameror, till exempel så saknade vår testenhet en optiskt bildstabilisator. LTE-hastigheten hos OnePlus 5T är heller inte riktigt så snabb som hos andra smartphones, men det kommer du troligen aldrig märka. Mjukvaran tar inte upp särskilt mycket plats och tillverkaren tar bra hand om den. Telefonen borde ha bra mottagning överallt i världen och WiFi-hastigheterna är väldigt bra. Dess GPS är exakt, fingeravtrycksläsaren också och ansiktsigenkänning är en trevlig och användbar gimmick.
Enheten har en snabb lagringsenhet som erbjuder generösa 128 GB - detta kan dock inte utökas med ett microSD-kort. Bekväm att använda, en skarp skärm med rika färger och acceptabla temperaturer fulländar OnePlus 5T. Även dom som älskar föregångaren kan tänkas vilja överväga en uppdatering: Det ger dig en aningen bättre högtalare, bättre kameror och ett batteri som håller bra mycket längre. Och förstås, en modern design med tunn infattning.
Tillverkaren har lyckats skapa en utmärkt toppskikts-smartphone med knappt några tillkortakommanden och rättar till föregångarens få defekter. Lång batteritid, hög systemprestanda, bra kameror och starkt ljud hjälper alla till att göra den här telefonen till ett bra köp.
Även om OnePlus 5T inte är riktigt så infattningsfri eller tunn som Galaxy S8+ så är OnePlus 5T en utmärkt utveckling från sin föregångare som fram tills nu har lyckats hålla sig fri från missöden (till skillnad från OnePlus 5 när den släpptes). Så vi kan utan tvekan säga: Flaggskeppsdödaren är tillbaka!
OnePlus 5T
- 01/03/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
