Test: OnePlus 6 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| LG V30 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| LG V30 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 430 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
| OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3" | Sony Xperia XZ2 IPS, 2160x1080, 5.7" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | LG V30 OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | OnePlus 5T AMOLED, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 26% | 15% | -48% | 34% | 6% | |
| Brightness middle | 430 | 630 47% | 565 31% | 432 0% | 600 40% | 425 -1% |
| Brightness | 437 | 632 45% | 571 31% | 428 -2% | 606 39% | 423 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 96 10% | 96 10% | 87 0% | 94 8% | 92 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.5 35% | 2.3 -0% | 4.18 -82% | 1.2 48% | 2.1 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.6 | 4.3 7% | 4.8 -4% | 8.53 -85% | 3 35% | 3.4 26% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.1 12% | 1.9 21% | 5.3 -121% | 1.6 33% | 2.5 -4% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.17 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.33 94% | 2.23 99% | 2.32 95% |
| CCT | 6160 106% | 6513 100% | 6332 103% | 7487 87% | 6707 97% | 6455 101% |
| Contrast | 1432 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 236 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 236 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 236 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ ms rise |  |
| ↘ ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (162183 - 242953, n=23) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (246366 - 299878, n=27) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7998 - 13211, n=26) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (7360 - 9868, n=27) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (21 - 59, n=27) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| LG V30 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 5T | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (32 - 61, n=28) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 (Chrome 65) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
| OnePlus 5T (Chrome 63) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 6 | Sony Xperia XZ2 | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | LG V30 | OnePlus 5T | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -5% | 4% | -27% | -3% | 142% | 555% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 726 | 679 -6% | 819 13% | 669 -8% | 699 -4% | 760 ? 5% | 1887 ? 160% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 201.4 | 198.7 -1% | 204.9 2% | 193.2 -4% | 203.4 1% | 297 ? 47% | 1471 ? 630% |
| Random Read 4KB | 137 | 149.4 9% | 129.7 -5% | 78.2 -43% | 138.1 1% | 152.9 ? 12% | 278 ? 103% |
| Random Write 4KB | 21.8 | 17 -22% | 22.74 4% | 10.21 -53% | 20 -8% | 131.6 ? 504% | 311 ? 1327% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.25 ? | 79.2 ? | 62.8 | 76 ? | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.12 ? | 67.2 ? | 47.2 | 59.6 ? |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| min | 60 fps | ||
| high HD | 60 fps | ||
| Shadow Fight 3 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 60 fps | ||
| minimal | 60 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| Smooth | 60 fps | ||
| Balanced | 40 fps | ||
| HD | 30 fps | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
OnePlus 6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 62.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (108.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 5T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.6 / 1 / 1.6 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.3 / 8.6 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -43% | -39% | 11% | -44% | -2% | -33% | -32% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.6 | 0.75 -25% | 0.72 -20% | 0.68 -13% | 1.03 -72% | 0.58 3% | 0.862 ? -44% | 0.88 ? -47% |
| Idle Average * | 1 | 2.25 -125% | 2.21 -121% | 0.95 5% | 2.4 -140% | 1.44 -44% | 1.728 ? -73% | 1.444 ? -44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.6 | 2.26 -41% | 2.22 -39% | 1.09 32% | 2.6 -63% | 1.53 4% | 2.07 ? -29% | 1.6 ? -0% |
| Load Average * | 4.3 | 4.89 -14% | 4.6 -7% | 4.58 -7% | 2.96 31% | 3.17 26% | 4.87 ? -13% | 6.57 ? -53% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.6 | 9.6 -12% | 9.34 -9% | 5.16 40% | 6.6 23% | 8.54 1% | 9.27 ? -8% | 9.91 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
| OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S 3400 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 3180 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | OnePlus 5T 3300 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -6% | -19% | -19% | -1% | -25% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1806 | 1678 -7% | 1402 -22% | 1343 -26% | 1754 -3% | 1292 -28% |
| H.264 | 791 | 718 -9% | 722 -9% | 674 -15% | 799 1% | 634 -20% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 762 | 716 -6% | 679 -11% | 521 -32% | 718 -6% | 564 -26% |
| Load | 246 | 239 -3% | 159 -35% | 237 -4% | 257 4% | 180 -27% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
OnePlus 6 är en smartphone av väldigt hög kvalitet som erbjuder toppskikts-funktioner med ett utmärkt förhållande mellan pris och prestanda. OnePlus struntar helt i VR, vilket även märks på skärmteknologin, där en FHD+-upplösning får räcka. Generellt verkar det inte finnas några framsteg när det gäller panelen. Jacket är helt och hållet en fråga om smak. Vi hade önskat något i stil med Apples True Tone-skärm eller en 120 Hz-panel. Avvikandet från en helkropp i aluminium följer också en trend, men den ger inte denna OnePlus-telefon trådlös laddning. Dessutom, i stället för en snabbare överföringsstandard som hade kunnat erbjuda fler funktioner såsom videoutmatning eller ett desktop-läge så förlitar man sig på USB 2.0.
OnePlus fokuserar istället på telefonens kärnfunktioner och utrustar sin senaste smartphone med högre hastighet, lagring som både är större och snabbare, uppdaterad mjukvara och en bra kamera. Men framstegen jämfört med föregångaren är marginella. Batteritiden är ungefär samma som föregångarens, vilket, även om det inte är en överraskning, fortfarande är trevligt då OnePlus 5T klarade sig riktigt länge. Dessutom kommer den med samma blixtsnabba snabbladdnings-teknik som vi känner igen från OnePlus 5T, även om den inte längre bär namnet Dash Charge (namnet behövde bytas på grund av licenskonflikter).
OnePlus har återigen producerat en utmärkt smartphone. Den föregår en del toppskickts-gimmicks, men OnePlus 6 lyckas utmärkt med att kombinera hög prestanda med ett lågt pris.
För att summera så levererar OnePlus återigen en riktigt bra smartphone. Men konkurrensen i det här området ökar. I synnerhet Honor 10 med sin aggressiva prissättning (utgångspris från 4.000 kronor) är inte att skratta åt och den snart tillgängliga Asus ZenFone 5z samt Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s spelar i samma liga både i fråga om teknologi och pris.
OnePlus 6
- 05/29/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt & Florian Wimmer
Price comparison
