Test: OnePlus 7T - En stor mängd förbättringar (Sammanfattning)

Name: OnePlus 7T
Brand: OnePlus

Pro blir standard.

OnePlus 7T är en kraftfull uppdatering från sin föregångare och kommer med många funktioner som tidigare varit reserverade för "Pro"-modellen. Detta låter bra för alla intresserade köpare och i den här recensionen får du reda på om denna billiga toppskiktstelefon verkligen är värd pengarna.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 10/18/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM Android Touchscreen Smartphone OnePlus

Test device courtesy of OnePlus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

OnePlus 7T (7 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus 8 x - 3 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 485)

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 640

Minne

8 GB

Skärm

6.55 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 402 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, Vattendropps-jack, 90 Hz, glansig: ja, HDR

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash, 128 GB

, 101 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: Ljudutgång genom USB-C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.13 x 160.94 x 74.44

Batteri

3800 mAh Litiumpolymer, WarpCharge 30T Snabbladdning (30 watt)

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 48 MPix f/1.6, kontast-AF, fasdetekterande-AF, OIS, dubbel LED-blixt, video @2160p/60fps (kamera 1); 16.0MP, f/2.2, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2); 12.0MP, f/2.2, teleobjektiv (kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0, video @1080p/30fps

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Snabbladdare, USB C-kabel, Silikonfodral, SIM-verktyg, OnePlus Community, OnePlus Switch, Game Space, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE Cat 18/13 (1200Mbps/150Mbps); A-GPS (L1/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo (E1/E5a); SAR: 1.06 W/kg (Huvud), 0.93 W/kg (Kropp), fanless

Vikt

190 g, Strömförsörjning: 128 g

Länkar

OnePlus hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Jämförelseenheter

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	10/2019	OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640	190 g	8.13 mm	6.55"	2400x1080
85.1 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05/2019	OnePlus 7 SD 855, Adreno 640	182 g	8.2 mm	6.41"	2340x1080
85.7 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	05/2019	OnePlus 7 Pro SD 855, Adreno 640	206 g	8.8 mm	6.67"	3120x1440
88.6 % v6 ^(old)	v6 ^(old)	08/2019	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro SD 855, Adreno 640	191 g	8.8 mm	6.39"	2340x1080
86.5 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	194 g	8.3 mm	6.10"	1792x828
85.1 % v7 ^(old)	v7 ^(old)	04/2019	Samsung Galaxy S10e Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12	150 g	7.9 mm	5.80"	2280x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	529 (204^min - 603^max) MBit/s +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (438^min - 506^max) MBit/s +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	468 (351^min - 489^max) MBit/s +11%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	422 (238^min - 447^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	389 (366^min - 444^max) MBit/s -8%
OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	330 (232^min - 365^max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	563 (490^min - 597^max) MBit/s +31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	520 (445^min - 571^max) MBit/s +21%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	467 (375^min - 519^max) MBit/s +9%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	430 (374^min - 485^max) MBit/s
OnePlus 7 Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	388 (361^min - 421^max) MBit/s -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	383 (242^min - 434^max) MBit/s -11%

OnePlus 7T; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø430 (374-485)

OnePlus 7T; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø422 (238-447)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

ColorChecker OnePlus 7T: 10.22 ∆E min: 3.21 - max: 19.38 ∆E


723 cd/m²	698 cd/m²	701 cd/m²
704 cd/m²	693 cd/m²	703 cd/m²
699 cd/m²	696 cd/m²	711 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 723 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 703.1 cd/m² Minimum: 2.26 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 693 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.42 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.265

	OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	OnePlus 7 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy S10e AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8"
Screen		-7%	23%	12%	33%	8%
Brightness middle	693	603 -13%	586 -15%	594 -14%	679 -2%	426 -39%
Brightness	703	605 -14%	584 -17%	607 -14%	671 -5%	427 -39%
Brightness Distribution	96	94 -2%	97 1%	91 -5%	93 -3%	96 0%
Black Level *					0.68
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.42	3.5 -2%	1.39 59%	1.51 56%	0.8 77%	2.14 37%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.12	7.7 -26%	2.7 56%	4.27 30%	2.4 61%	3.29 46%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.3	2.7 18%	1.6 52%	2.6 21%	1.1 67%	1.8 45%
Gamma	2.265 ^97%	2.266 ^97%	2.243 ^98%	2.219 ^99%	2.24 ^98%	2.111 ^104%
CCT	6799 ^96%	6775 ^96%	6672 ^97%	6390 ^102%	6610 ^98%	6329 ^103%
Contrast					999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

357 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 357 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 357 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	783 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1343 Points +72%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (761 - 792, n=4)	782 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +19%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2753 Points
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3463 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2519 - 2940, n=4)	2788 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +9%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2707 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2652 - 2727, n=4)	2701 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +54%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3705 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3510 Points -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3472 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3429 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4506 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3603 - 3705, n=2)	3654 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +48%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11388 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	11388 Points 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10812 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10976 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10553 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (9705 - 11388, n=2)	10547 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +32%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8317 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7372 Points -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7470 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10170 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (7196 - 8317, n=2)	7757 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +44%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10286 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	12095 Points +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	11766 Points +14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	11167 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	10008 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (10286 - 15510, n=6)	13201 Points +28%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8702 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9205 Points +6%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9974 Points +15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9296 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	7966 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (8702 - 11690, n=6)	10315 Points +19%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	75613 Points
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	64389 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	63969 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	97276 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	56465 Points -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (69829 - 81679, n=6)	75314 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	117304 Points
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	106829 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	103955 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	209204 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	72022 Points -39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (108418 - 118129, n=6)	114593 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	33697 Points
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	26936 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	27278 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33864 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	32155 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (30069 - 42240, n=6)	34737 Points +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8136 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7556 Points -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7501 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5478 Points -33%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4015 Points -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (6452 - 8338, n=6)	7770 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10781 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10008 Points -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9845 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6325 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4507 Points -58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (9328 - 11259, n=6)	10354 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -56%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4377 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4068 Points -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4091 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3726 Points -15%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	2906 Points -34%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3103 - 4503, n=6)	4165 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -25%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8531 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7940 Points -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7955 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5460 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	9199 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4321 Points -49%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (6601 - 8651, n=6)	7952 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +30%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11433 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	10302 Points -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10420 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6730 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	17853 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4886 Points -57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (7751 - 11448, n=6)	10562 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +72%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4517 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4405 Points -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4352 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3288 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3411 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3077 Points -32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3143 - 4725, n=6)	4323 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6319 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5648 Points -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5581 Points -12%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5475 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4400 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4477 Points -29%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (5174 - 6319, n=6)	5993 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7150 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6336 Points -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6248 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6325 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5726 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	5206 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (6314 - 7150, n=6)	6826 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4492 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4093 Points -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4063 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3724 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2429 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3005 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3166 - 4519, n=6)	4223 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points -27%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6875 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6249 Points -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6270 Points -9%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5440 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6067 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4620 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (5141 - 6916, n=6)	6358 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +13%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7977 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7089 Points -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7115 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	6739 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	8119 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	5368 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (5424 - 8006, n=6)	7358 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +45%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4635 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4416 Points -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4429 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3280 Points -29%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3219 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	3106 Points -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3137 - 4737, n=6)	4371 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5530 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5012 Points -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4548 Points -18%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (3981 - 5530, n=5)	5023 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6640 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5862 Points -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5794 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5702 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (4250 - 6640, n=5)	5966 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points -53%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3489 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3324 Points -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3317 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	2657 Points -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2587 - 3565, n=5)	3293 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -22%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	60 fps +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	69 fps +17%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	60 fps +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (59 - 61, n=4)	60 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +46%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	167 fps -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	166 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	167 fps -10%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	322 fps +74%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	141 fps -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (166 - 185, n=4)	175.5 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +51%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	60 fps +2%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	55 fps -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	59 fps 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (56 - 61, n=4)	58.3 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +28%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	112 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	100 fps -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	101 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	90 fps -20%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	175 fps +56%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	85 fps -24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (73 - 112, n=4)	99 fps -12%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +48%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	58 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	57 fps -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36 fps -38%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	51 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	53 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (40 - 58, n=4)	49.3 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +13%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	67 fps -15%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	71 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	62 fps -22%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	117 fps +48%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	53 fps -33%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (51 - 79, n=4)	70 fps -11%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +48%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	37 fps -10%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	21 fps -49%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	40 fps -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (24 - 41, n=4)	32 fps -22%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +17%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	42 fps -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	36 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	73 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	43 fps -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (31 - 48, n=4)	42.3 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +50%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	38 fps -7%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	23 fps -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	36 fps -12%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +46%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	16 fps -61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23 - 41, n=5)	31.2 fps -24%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +21%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	43 fps -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	42 fps -11%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	87 fps +85%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	41 fps -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (16 - 47, n=5)	40.8 fps -13%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +70%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	27 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	26 fps -4%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	15 fps -44%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps -37%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	28 fps +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (17 - 34, n=5)	24.4 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +39%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	18 fps
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	17 fps -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	16 fps -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	24 fps +33%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33 fps +83%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	16 fps -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (18 - 39, n=5)	22.6 fps +26%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +78%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	395265 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	370908 Points -6%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	369294 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	372734 Points -6%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	456891 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	329444 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus ()	395265 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5124 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5089 Points -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4982 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	4045 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4548 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (4992 - 5335, n=5)	5151 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +23%
System (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8988 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8986 Points 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9143 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	7423 Points -17%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	7831 Points -13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (8507 - 9294, n=5)	8896 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +13%
Memory (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4869 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	5610 Points +15%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5243 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	3922 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	4474 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (4869 - 6077, n=5)	5378 Points +10%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +39%
Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10611 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	9477 Points -11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9421 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	8700 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	8484 Points -20%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (9334 - 10618, n=5)	10312 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +59%
Web (sort by value)
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1485 Points
OnePlus 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1407 Points -5%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1364 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 8192	1076 Points -28%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S10e Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 6144	1439 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (1236 - 1546, n=5)	1436 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +5%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	132.9 Points +104%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (62.4 - 70.9, n=5)	65.8 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	65.3 Points
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	63.1 Points -3%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	62.5 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	58.7 Points -10%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	293.4 Points +143%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	120.8 Points
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	117.8 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (113.9 - 120.8, n=5)	117.4 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro	96.1 Points -20%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	157 runs/min +127%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +97%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)	69.1 runs/min
OnePlus 7 (Chome 74)	67.9 runs/min -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)	61.5 runs/min -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (39.1 - 69.1, n=4)	59.3 runs/min -14%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	42.5 runs/min -38%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	184 Points +84%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +49%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	111 Points +11%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	110 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	107 Points +7%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	100 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (89 - 111, n=5)	98.2 Points -2%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	48819 Points +93%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +47%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	25353 Points
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	25051 Points -1%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	24730 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (23781 - 25353, n=5)	24606 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	20598 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	18697 Points -26%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro (Chrome 75)	2334 ms * -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73)	2240 ms * -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus (2007 - 2134, n=5)	2054 ms * -2%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	2021 ms *
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	1965 ms * +3%
OnePlus 7 (Chrome 74)	1958 ms * +3%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +22%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	573 ms * +72%

* ... smaller is better

	OnePlus 7T	OnePlus 7	OnePlus 7 Pro	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro	Samsung Galaxy S10e	Average 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		21%	17%	82%	-24%	182%	395%
Sequential Read 256KB	1406	1463 4%	1468 4%	809 -42%	792 -44%	1520 ?(1406 - 1692, n=13) 8%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 31%
Sequential Write 256KB	218.4	392 79%	387 77%	196.9 -10%	194.1 -11%	546 ?(213 - 740, n=13) 150%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 552%
Random Read 4KB	170.1	175.3 3%	174.1 2%	142.5 -16%	136.9 -20%	206 ?(170.1 - 253, n=13) 21%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 63%
Random Write 4KB	29.9	28.7 -4%	24.8 -17%	148.5 397%	24.1 -19%	193.9 ?(29.9 - 271, n=13) 548%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 933%

OnePlus 7T; Arena of Valor; min; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.6 (59-60)

OnePlus 7T; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.31.1.5: Ø59.6 (48-60)

OnePlus 7T; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.7.3a: Ø30 (29-31)

OnePlus 7T; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.7.3a: Ø29.7 (27-31)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


48.2 °C	45.7 °C	41.1 °C
46.9 °C	45.3 °C	41.7 °C
46.7 °C	45.2 °C	41.1 °C

Max: 48.2 °C
Medel: 44.7 °C


37.4 °C	41.7 °C	44.2 °C
38.4 °C	42.2 °C	44.1 °C
38.8 °C	42.6 °C	44.2 °C

Max: 44.2 °C
Medel: 41.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 41.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.2 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

OnePlus 7T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 72.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 72.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 72.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0 / 0.4 Watt
Låg belastning	0.9 / 1.4 / 2.9 Watt
Hög belastning	4.7 / 8.3 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	OnePlus 7 3700 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		21%	-9%	15%	-7%	12%	-11%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.6 33%	0.9 -0%	0.7 22%	0.56 38%	0.6 33%	1.183 ?(0.59 - 2.1, n=6) -31%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average *	1.4	1.1 21%	1.8 -29%	1 29%	2.99 -114%	1.2 14%	1.883 ?(0.88 - 3, n=6) -35%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) -4%
Idle Maximum *	2.9	2 31%	2.9 -0%	1.3 55%	3.02 -4%	1.5 48%	2.32 ?(0.95 - 3.5, n=6) 20%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 44%
Load Average *	4.7	4 15%	5.5 -17%	5.2 -11%	4.17 11%	5.2 -11%	4.91 ?(4.14 - 5.3, n=6) -4%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -37%
Load Maximum *	8.3	8 4%	8.2 1%	10 -20%	5.44 34%	10.2 -23%	8.59 ?(8.3 - 9.2, n=6) -3%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -18%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		33tim 23min
WiFi Websurfing		14tim 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		16tim 07min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 43min

	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	OnePlus 7 3700 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-15%	-9%	12%	-39%
Reader / Idle	2003	1989 -1%	1745 -13%	1768 -12%	2765 38%	1185 -41%
H.264	967	933 -4%	802 -17%	987 2%	1147 19%	795 -18%
WiFi v1.3	896	901 1%	768 -14%	762 -15%	866 -3%	416 -54%
Load	283	278 -2%	236 -17%	249 -12%	267 -6%	164 -42%

För

+ 90 Hz-skärm

+ utmärkt trippelkamera

+ tjusigt och stabilt chassi

+ bra stereohögtalare

+ lång batteritid

+ exakt GPS

+ många LTE-frekvenser

Emot

- kraftig värmeutveckling vid belastning

- saknar microSD

- ej skyddad mot vatten och damm

- i många spel är 90 Hz-läget är inte aktiverat som standard

Omdöme – Utmärkt teknik med några små brister

Recension av OnePlus 7T. Recensionsex från OnePlus Germany.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

OnePlus har gett OnePlus 7T en stor uppdatering med många funktioner som tidigare varit reserverade för Pro-modellen. Det är bra för köparen eftersom man får mer till ett lägre pris: Den har ännu snabbare WarpCharge 30T-snabbladdning, en bättre kamera, ett tjusigt chassi och förstås, framför allt, en fantastisk 90 Hz-skärm som är en välsignelse när man hanterar menyer till vardags. Tyvärr använder OnePlus ännu inte 90 Hz i spel.

Å ena sidan får man gratulera OnePlus för att de vågar ignorera funktioner som trådlös laddning: Enligt en intervju med deras grundare når tekniken ännu inte upp till kraven på hastighet och pålitlighet. Samtidigt kan vissa användare förstås tycka det är irriterande att även IP-certifiering och lagringsexpansion genom microSD-kort också saknas.

När det kommer till skärmen finns det skillnader gentemot Pro-modellen; OnePlus 7T ligger snarare på den lägsta nivån i toppskiktet och till och med förra årets Pro-modell erbjuder mer när det kommer till upplösning och färgprecision.

OnePlus 7T är ett utmärkt alternativ från toppskiktet. Om du inte bryr dig om trådlös laddning och skydd mot vatten kan du slå till på denna smartphone.

Totalt sett får du mycket för pengarna med OnePlus 7T. Med sin extremt snabba laddning och 90 Hz-skärm är OnePlus 7T en riktigt trevlig kollega i vardagslivet.

OnePlus 7T - 09/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Design

87%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

97%

Anslutningar

44 / 70 → 63%

Vikt

89%

Batteri

90%

Skärm

90%

Spelprestanda

59 / 64 → 92%

Programprestanda

76 / 86 → 88%

Temperatur

84%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

70%

Medel

79%

86%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: OnePlus 7T - En stor mängd förbättringar (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 2019-10-18 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Jämförelseenheter

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

OnePlus 7T audio analysis

OnePlus 7 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme – Utmärkt teknik med några små brister

More articles related to this device

Price comparison