Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 450 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.39 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
134.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.162
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS AMOLED, 2880x1440, 6" | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8" | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.4" | Apple iPhone XS OLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Huawei Mate 10 Pro OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 27% | 18% | 49% | 44% | |
| Brightness middle | 450 | 477 6% | 499 11% | 639 42% | 629 40% |
| Brightness | 455 | 453 0% | 506 11% | 637 40% | 636 40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 86 -3% | 96 8% | 94 6% | 94 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.39 | 2.1 67% | 4.62 28% | 1 84% | 1.7 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.25 | 8.2 33% | 10.91 11% | 2.2 82% | 3.6 71% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 1.6 57% | 2.2 41% | 2.2 41% | 2.4 35% |
| Gamma | 2.162 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.103 105% | 1.9 116% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 7224 90% | 6425 101% | 6115 106% | 6364 102% | 6337 103% |
| Contrast | 1445 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (173653 - 181973, n=8) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Apple iPhone XS | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (152773 - 212278, n=6) | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (8115 - 9326, n=8) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6293 - 7046, n=8) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (33.1 - 58.6, n=8) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=205, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (6692 - 11838, n=8) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (3591 - 6221, n=8) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=162, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone XS (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note 9 (Chrome 68) | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS (Chrome 69) | |
| Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 (119 - 187, n=8) | |
| Huawei Mate 10 Pro (Chrome 61) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro | Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -34% | -30% | -9% | 12% | 196% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 873 | 749 -14% | 805 -8% | 732 -16% | 826 ? -5% | 1834 ? 110% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 241.7 | 171 -29% | 196 -19% | 208.7 -14% | 358 ? 48% | 1422 ? 488% |
| Random Read 4KB | 144.3 | 136 -6% | 134 -7% | 132.3 -8% | 166.6 ? 15% | 278 ? 93% |
| Random Write 4KB | 160.3 | 21.75 -86% | 21 -87% | 164.4 3% | 141.5 ? -12% | 310 ? 93% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.18 ? | 77 ? | 66.8 ? | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.23 ? | 66.7 ? | 56.3 ? |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| min | 31 fps | ||
| high HD | 30 fps | ||
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| High Quality | 30 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 30 fps | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 60.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 60.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 60.3% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei Mate 10 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 77% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1 / 2.7 / 3.8 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
5.9 / 11.5 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Average HiSilicon Kirin 970 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | 17% | 41% | 39% | 20% | 24% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1 | 0.67 33% | 0.9 10% | 0.95 5% | 0.85 15% | 0.978 ? 2% | 0.895 ? 10% |
| Idle Average * | 2.7 | 2.5 7% | 1.9 30% | 1.34 50% | 1.15 57% | 2.12 ? 21% | 1.447 ? 46% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.8 | 2.51 34% | 3.7 3% | 1.48 61% | 1.23 68% | 2.51 ? 34% | 1.608 ? 58% |
| Load Average * | 5.9 | 4.3 27% | 5.3 10% | 4 32% | 4.12 30% | 5.01 ? 15% | 6.41 ? -9% |
| Load Maximum * | 11.5 | 6.87 40% | 7.6 34% | 5.13 55% | 8.42 27% | 8.1 ? 30% | 9.61 ? 16% |
* ... smaller is better
| Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note 9 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone XS 2658 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -21% | 17% | -10% | 24% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1553 | 1347 -13% | 1687 9% | 1442 -7% | 1744 12% |
| H.264 | 754 | 520 -31% | 896 19% | 745 -1% | 929 23% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 683 | 547 -20% | 794 16% | 570 -17% | 818 20% |
| Load | 286 | 235 -18% | 354 24% | 245 -14% | 398 39% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS står ut som den ultimata lyxtelefonen och är ännu dyrare än iPhone XS eller XS Max. Mate RS har en fingeravtrycksläsare som är inbyggd i skärmen, rikligt med minne och utmärka kameror, vilket försöker rättfärdiga enhetens befängda pris. Men enhetens trippelkamerasystem är samma som i P20 Pro och fingeravtrycksläsaren som är inbyggd i skärmen saknar precisionen hos en traditionell sensor.
Mate RS ser tjusig ut med sitt robusta och hållbara hölje. Prestandan är dessutom jämförbar med andra enheter som drivs av en Kirin 970. Men med det sagt så har enheten för många brister för sitt pris. Vår recensionsenhet blir obekvämt varm vid belastning och har kraftig värmestrypning. Energiförbrukningen är dessutom för hög, vilket bidrar till jämförelsevis kort batteritid. Vidare fungerar bildstabiliseringen inte när man spelar in 4K-video och GPS-mottagaren är inte alltid särskilt exakt.
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS kan inte nå upp till de höga förväntningar som kommer med det absurda priset.
Det finns många flaggskeppsenheter som är mer värda pengarna än Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS. Men få har samma nivå av lyx och prestige som Porsche Design-märket för med sig.
Porsche Design Huawei Mate RS
-
10/16/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
