Test: Razer Blade 2016 (sammanfattning)

Name: Razer Blade (2016)
Brand: Razer

Solid som berget. Nya Razer Blade innehåller ett GTX 1060 i ett utmärkt aluminiumchassi. Datorn har bra inmatningsenheter, Thunderbolt 3 och en fantastisk IGZO-panel. Vad kan gå fel? Utöver några småsaker är spelprestandan den största svagheten, men den har åtgärdats med en uppdatering.

Sven Kloevekorn, ✓ Stefanie Voigt, Published 01/01/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Razer DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade (2016) (Blade Serie)

Processor

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Grafikkort

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile - 6 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1405 MHz, Minne: 4000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 369.15, Optimus

Minne

16 GB

, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Dual-Channel, onboard

Skärm

14.00 tum 16:9, 3200 x 1800 pixlar 262 PPI, 10-punkters pekskärm, Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, QHD+, glansig: ja

Moderkort

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Hårddisk

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512, 512 GB

, Platser: 1x m.2 PCIe

Ljudkort

Realtek ALC298 @ Intel Sunrise Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller

Anslutningar

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: headset 3,5 mm, Brightness Sensor

Nätverk

Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 18 x 345 x 235

Batteri

70 Wh Litiumpolymer

Operativsystem

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webbkamera: 2 MP

Övrigt

Högtalare: 2.0 (Dolby Digital Plus), Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Adapter: 165 W

Vikt

1.96 kg, Strömförsörjning: 420 g

Pris

2600 EUR

Länkar

Razer hemsida

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

SCHENKER XMG P406 MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Razer Blade (2016) DIN A4 ❌

Left: power outlet, 2x USB 3.0, audio in/out

Right: USB 3.1 Type-C with Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.0, HDMI 2.0, Kensington lock

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	591 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade (2016) Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	646 MBit/s


337 cd/m²	339 cd/m²	374 cd/m²
312 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	366 cd/m²
259 cd/m²	283 cd/m²	354 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 374 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 328 cd/m² Minimum: 36 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 69 %
Mitt på batteriet: 328 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1491:1 (Svärta: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.91 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.69 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3

Download ICC-fil (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Razer Blade (2016) Sharp LQ140Z1JW01 (SHP1401), IGZO, 3200x1800, 14"	SCHENKER XMG P406 LG Philips 140WF1 (LGD040A), IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Name: LG Philips LP140WF3-SPD1, ID: LGD046D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14"	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T LG Philips LP156WF6-SPB6 (LGD046F), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-9%	-7%	-10%
Display P3 Coverage	66.9	66.2 -1%	65.5 -2%	64.5 -4%
sRGB Coverage	96.8	82.8 -14%	86.4 -11%	83.1 -14%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	68.2	60.5 -11%	63.1 -7%	60.8 -11%
Response Times		-9%	29%	23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(15, 26)	56 ?(22, 34) -37%	31.6 ?(10.4, 21.2) 23%	38 ?(16, 22) 7%
Response Time Black / White *	37 ?(9, 28)	30 ?(8, 22) 19%	24.4 ?(5.2, 19.2) 34%	23 ?(5, 18) 38%
PWM Frequency	200 ?(90)
Screen		-58%	-27%	-58%
Brightness middle	328	282 -14%	288.4 -12%	315 -4%
Brightness	328	266 -19%	282 -14%	290 -12%
Brightness Distribution	69	81 17%	83 20%	85 23%
Black Level *	0.22	0.22 -0%	0.35 -59%	0.32 -45%
Contrast	1491	1282 -14%	824 -45%	984 -34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.91	4.98 -161%	2.61 -37%	4.88 -155%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.23	10.2 -216%	7.34 -127%	8.88 -175%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.69	4.08 -141%	1.18 30%	4.17 -147%
Gamma	2.3 ^96%	2.51 ^88%	2.24 ^98%	2.53 ^87%
CCT	6418 ^101%	5877 ^111%	6506 ^100%	6683 ^97%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	63	54 -14%	56.4 -10%	55 -13%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	97	83 -14%	86.4 -11%	83 -14%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-25% / -41%	-2% / -15%	-15% / -37%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 28 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

200 Hz

≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	147 Points +1%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	146 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	141 Points -3%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	130 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG P406 Intel Core i7-6700HQ	680 Points +1%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points +1%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US Intel Core i7-6700HQ	675 Points +1%
Razer Blade (2016) Intel Core i7-6700HQ	671 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

146 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

671 Points

Hjälp

... jämför

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	4651 Points +36%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4016 Points +18%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	3417 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3371 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	5023 Points +19%
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002	5011 Points +19%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	4796 Points +14%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	4214 Points

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3417 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4214 poäng
Hjälp

	Razer Blade (2016) Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512	SCHENKER XMG P406 Samsung SM951 MZHPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		28%	-63%	-54%
Read Seq	1296	1634 26%	335.3 -74%	485.4 -63%
Write Seq	603	1290 114%	299 -50%	312.4 -48%
Read 512	655	1149 75%	223 -66%	294.8 -55%
Write 512	604	1285 113%	246.7 -59%	287.8 -52%
Read 4k	42.22	43.82 4%	17.68 -58%	21.44 -49%
Write 4k	139.6	110.3 -21%	35.31 -75%	75.7 -46%
Read 4k QD32	573	320.5 -44%	247.4 -57%	149.4 -74%
Write 4k QD32	480	287.3 -40%	156.3 -67%	256.3 -47%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV512

Sequential Read: 1296 MB/s

Sequential Write: 603 MB/s

512K Read: 655 MB/s

512K Write: 604 MB/s

4K Read: 42.22 MB/s

4K Write: 139.6 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 573 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 480 MB/s

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	22022 Points +59%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	14977 Points +8%
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	13891 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	9649 Points -31%

3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	16525 Points +52%
MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	11776 Points +8%
Razer Blade (2016) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	10890 Points
SCHENKER XMG P406 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M	7436 Points -32%

3DMark 11 Performance		11139 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score		9193 poäng
Hjälp

... jämför

Mirror's Edge Catalyst | The Witcher 3

Mirror's Edge Catalyst
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	92 fps +87%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	49.1 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	99.6 fps +74%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	57.4 fps

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	55.2 fps +48%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	37.3 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ	102.4 fps +55%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	66.2 fps

	med.	hög	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)		66.2	37.3
Star Wars Battlefront (2015)			76.5
Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016)	63.6	57.4	49.1
Battlefield 1 (2016)	81.7	59.9	56.4
Dishonored 2 (2016)	52.1	47	44.1

Battlefield 1
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	74.2 fps +32%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	56.4 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Razer Blade (2016) EC 4.00 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	77.2 fps +29%
Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	59.9 fps

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning		31 / 33 / 35 dB(A)
Hög belastning		39 / 51 dB(A)

	30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30 dB(A)

	Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Noise		-6%	-4%	0%
off / environment *	30		29.1 3%	30 -0%
Idle Minimum *	31	30 3%	32 -3%	32 -3%
Idle Average *	33	32 3%	32 3%	33 -0%
Idle Maximum *	35	40 -14%	33.5 4%	34 3%
Load Average *	39	47 -21%	50 -28%	39 -0%
Load Maximum *	51	51 -0%	51.5 -1%	51 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


50.1 °C	48.5 °C	52.7 °C
45.2 °C	47.3 °C	44.4 °C
37.5 °C	39.1 °C	38.1 °C

Max: 52.7 °C
Medel: 44.8 °C


48.4 °C	46.7 °C	48.2 °C
44.9 °C	45.2 °C	40 °C
38.2 °C	38.7 °C	36.2 °C

Max: 48.4 °C
Medel: 42.9 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 48.2 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52.7 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-10.2 °C / -18.4 F).

	Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Heat		-25%	-20%	-3%
Maximum Upper Side *	52.7	55 -4%	55.6 -6%	48 9%
Maximum Bottom *	48.4	58.7 -21%	62.4 -29%	46.8 3%
Idle Upper Side *	29.3	36.9 -26%	33.2 -13%	33.7 -15%
Idle Bottom *	28.4	41.7 -47%	37.2 -31%	30.5 -7%

* ... smaller is better

Razer Blade (2016) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / 0.5 Watt
Låg belastning	9 / 14 / 22 Watt
Hög belastning	72 / 124 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Voltcraft VC940

	Razer Blade (2016) GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	SCHENKER XMG P406 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ
Power Consumption		-22%	-27%	-58%
Idle Minimum *	9	12 -33%	12.1 -34%	20 -122%
Idle Average *	14	16 -14%	19 -36%	24 -71%
Idle Maximum *	22	22 -0%	19.5 11%	29 -32%
Load Average *	72	90 -25%	106.7 -48%	86 -19%
Load Maximum *	124	170 -37%	159 -28%	183 -48%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

WiFi Websurfing

4tim 03min

	Razer Blade (2016) 70 Wh	SCHENKER XMG P406 45 Wh	MSI GS43VR 6RE-006US 61 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VS-FY032T 62 Wh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	243	197 -19%	261 7%	196 -19%

För

+ 6 konfigurationer tillgängliga

+ kompakt och relativt lätt

+ mycket robust aluminiumchassi

+ välbyggd

+ Thunderbolt 3 via USB-C

+ mycket bra WLAN-prestanda

+ konfigurerbara makron

+ mycket bra IGZO-skärm

+ låg strömförbrukning (i kategorin)

Emot

- fingeravtryckskänslig

- ovanlig tangentbordslayout

- dåliga tangentbeteckningar

- många funktioner kräver registrering (Razer Synapse)

- medelmåttiga musknappar

- PWM-flimmer upp till 90% ljusstyrka

- glansig pekyta

- begränsade betraktningsvinklar jämfört med IPS

- svagt visslande ljud vid medelhög till hög fläkthastighet

- högtalarna inget vidare för musik

In review: Razer Blade (2016). Test model provided by Razer Germany.

Läs det mer omfattande originaltestet på engelska här.

Med tanke på den omfattande listan med fördelar kan vi inte låta bli att bli besvikna på CPU-strypningen (som dock kan åtgärdas med en uppdatering). Skärmens PWM-flimmer och långa svarstider kan också få potentiella köpare att tveka. Den obligatoriska registreringen är en annan olägenhet. Fläktljud får man acceptera med tanke på det tunna chassit, men det högfrekventa ljudet från fläktarna kan definitivt orsaka problem för användaren.

En stor fördel är naturligtvis det utmärkta chassit – vi kan inte riktigt föreställa oss hur det skulle kunna förbättras. Layouten kan verka lite udda, men Chroma-tangentbordet är definitivt ett plus tack vare de omfattande anpassningsmöjligheterna. Med snabbt ac-WiFi, Thunderbolt 3 via USB typ C och HDMI 2.0 är Blade framtidssäker. Spelmaskinen har också en ljusstark IGZO panel med hög kontrast och naturtrogna färger.

Razer Blade (2016) - 12/25/2016 v6 ^(old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Design

93 / 98 → 95%

Tangentbord

76%

Mus

89%

Anslutningar

63 / 81 → 77%

Vikt

64 / 10-66 → 96%

Batteri

75%

Skärm

88%

Spelprestanda

89%

Programprestanda

89%

Temperatur

83 / 95 → 88%

Ljudnivå

76 / 90 → 85%

Audio

66%

Camera

71 / 85 → 84%

Medel

79%

85%

Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Razer Blade 2016 (sammanfattning)

Sven Kloevekorn, 2017-01- 1 (Update: 2024-11- 4)