Test: Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus - Den billigare modellen med GeForce MX150 är snabbare (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 13 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.4 kg | 14.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.6 % v6 (old) | 05/2019 | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150 | 1.1 kg | 12.9 mm | 13.90" | 1920x1080 | |
v (old) | 04/2020 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB i7-10710U, GeForce MX250 | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 87 %
Mitt på batteriet: 422.6 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1207:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.95
ΔE Greyscale 1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Sharp LQ133M1JW41, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL LP140WF9-SPE2, IPS LED, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN Tianma XM, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti BOE NV156FHM-N4K, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 5% | 0% | 1% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.2 | 65.5 -1% | 69.9 6% | 66 0% | 67.5 2% | 65.3 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.2 | 96.3 -1% | 99.2 2% | 97.9 1% | 95.8 -1% | 91.8 -6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.1 | 66.3 -1% | 71.5 7% | 67.3 0% | 69 3% | 66.5 -1% |
| Response Times | -10% | -27% | 0% | 11% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.2 ? | 57.6 ? -27% | 47.6 ? -5% | 49.6 ? -10% | 47.2 ? -4% | 13.6 ? 70% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.2 ? | 34 ? -2% | 29.2 ? 12% | 30 ? 10% | 24.8 ? 25% | 10 ? 70% |
| PWM Frequency | 22730 ? | 22730 ? 0% | 2500 ? -89% | 200 ? -99% | ||
| Screen | -6% | -24% | -51% | -23% | -95% | |
| Brightness middle | 422.6 | 429.8 2% | 549.8 30% | 384 -9% | 466 10% | 312.7 -26% |
| Brightness | 404 | 403 0% | 520 29% | 363 -10% | 462 14% | 305 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 86 -1% | 90 3% | 90 3% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.32 9% | 0.39 -11% | 0.17 51% | 0.33 6% | 0.27 23% |
| Contrast | 1207 | 1343 11% | 1410 17% | 2259 87% | 1412 17% | 1158 -4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.02 | 1.08 -6% | 2.12 -108% | 3.5 -243% | 1.93 -89% | 4.57 -348% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.06 | 3.96 -29% | 3.66 -20% | 5.5 -80% | 4.26 -39% | 6.81 -123% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.95 | 1.21 -27% | 1.37 -44% | 1 -5% | 1.99 -109% | 2.91 -206% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.3 -30% | 2.6 -160% | 4.6 -360% | 1.7 -70% | 4.3 -330% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.3 96% | 2.32 95% | 2.15 102% | 2.29 96% |
| CCT | 6502 100% | 6452 101% | 6884 94% | 6884 94% | 6382 102% | 7098 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.1 | 61.4 -1% | 65.4 5% | 62 0% | 62.2 0% | 59.4 -4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.1 | 96.3 -1% | 99.7 3% | 97.7 1% | 95.7 -1% | 91.3 -6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-6% | -15% /
-19% | -17% /
-35% | -4% /
-15% | -28% /
-60% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 22730 Hz | ≤ 24 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 22730 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 22730 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4030 poäng | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5173 poäng | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4609 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 16% | -12% | 106% | 70% | 74% | |
| Seq Read | 1989 | 1617 -19% | 1801 -9% | 2525 27% | 1224 -38% | 1829 -8% |
| Seq Write | 827 | 1017 23% | 1125 36% | 1253 52% | 907 10% | 1315 59% |
| 4K Read | 40.12 | 40.03 0% | 39.7 -1% | 59.1 47% | 41.46 3% | 51.3 28% |
| 4K Write | 135.1 | 103.4 -23% | 67 -50% | 134.1 -1% | 126.2 -7% | 106 -22% |
| 4K-64 Read | 531 | 477.3 -10% | 1253 136% | 1010 90% | 1021 92% | 917 73% |
| 4K-64 Write | 309.9 | 281.5 -9% | 209 -33% | 1461 371% | 1251 304% | 1212 291% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.085 | 0.069 19% | 0.069 19% | 0.052 39% | 0.053 38% | 0.063 26% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.09 | 0.063 30% | 0.625 -594% | 0.029 68% | 0.027 70% | 0.104 -16% |
| Score Read | 770 | 679 -12% | 1472 91% | 1322 72% | 1185 54% | 1152 50% |
| Score Write | 528 | 487 -8% | 388 -27% | 1721 226% | 1468 178% | 1450 175% |
| Score Total | 1644 | 1495 -9% | 2583 57% | 3670 123% | 3250 98% | 3177 93% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1418 | 1595 12% | 1293 -9% | 2016 42% | 1404 -1% | 1539 9% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 382.7 | 485.8 27% | 560 46% | 542 42% | 402.4 5% | 513 34% |
| Copy Game MB/s | 334.2 | 1029 208% | 927 177% | 1278 282% | 902 170% | 1150 244% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4581 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12126 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2883 poäng | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 898 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1280x720 Lowest Preset | |
| MSI GF75 Thin 9SC | |
| Asus GL753VD | |
| Asus TUF FX705GE-EW096T | |
| MSI GL72 7QF | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| Acer Nitro 5 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9380 2019 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| Rocket League | |
| 1280x720 Performance | |
| Schenker XMG A505 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Huawei MateBook 13 i7 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA | |
| 1920x1080 Performance | |
| Schenker XMG A505 | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G6-5TK01EA | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality AA:High FX | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL | |
| Schenker XMG A505 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| Huawei MateBook 13 i7 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Fortnite | |
| 1280x720 Low Preset | |
| Asus GL753VD | |
| MSI GL72 7QF | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| Acer Nitro 5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Asus GL753VD | |
| MSI GL72 7QF | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| Acer Nitro 5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i7 | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset | |
| Asus GL753VD | |
| MSI GL72 7QF | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-53PU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14IWL | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 112.2 | 70.7 | 60.4 | 20.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 58 | 33.8 | 19.1 | 9.6 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 93.2 | 71.3 | 48.5 | |
| Fortnite (2018) | 77 | 32.3 | 25.1 | 15.4 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 30 |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN GeForce MX150, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -1% | 3% | -3% | -13% | |
| off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.4 -0% | 28.1 1% | 29.3 -4% | 28.1 1% | 28.5 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.3 | 28.5 -1% | 28.1 1% | 29.3 -4% | 28.1 1% | 30.3 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 28.3 | 29 -2% | 28.1 1% | 29.3 -4% | 28.1 1% | 30.5 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.3 | 29.1 -3% | 28.1 1% | 29.3 -4% | 29 -2% | 30.5 -8% |
| Load Average * | 33.5 | 42.8 -28% | 31.7 5% | 33.3 1% | 41.1 -23% | 41 -22% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.5 | 41.4 -20% | 43.4 -26% | 41.1 -19% | 48 -39% | |
| Load Maximum * | 49.4 | 41.6 16% | 43.4 12% | 33.3 33% | 41.1 17% | 51.9 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 28.3 / 28.3 / 28.3 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 33.5 / 49.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.72 / 0.8 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 5.9 / 8.1 / 11.2 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
44.3 / 50.2 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Razer Blade Stealth QHD i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | 22% | 10% | 6% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.9 | 6.7 -14% | 2.6 56% | 3.2 46% | 3.4 42% | 5.6 5% |
| Idle Average * | 8.1 | 8.6 -6% | 5.3 35% | 7 14% | 6.3 22% | 7.5 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.2 | 9.4 16% | 7 37% | 8.9 21% | 10.4 7% | 8.4 25% |
| Load Average * | 44.3 | 64.1 -45% | 43.1 3% | 47.6 -7% | 51 -15% | 33.7 24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.9 | 63.7 -52% | 43.1 -3% | 39 7% | 31 26% | |
| Load Maximum * | 50.2 | 64.1 -28% | 49 2% | 63.1 -26% | 62.7 -25% | 34.6 31% |
* ... smaller is better
| Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 53.1 Wh | Razer Blade Stealth i7-8565U i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 53.1 Wh | Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 51 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C940-14IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Asus ZenBook S13 UX392FN i7-8565U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Razer Blade 15 GTX 1660 Ti i7-9750H, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 65 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -2% | -8% | 9% | -13% | -43% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 583 | 571 -2% | 537 -8% | 636 9% | 506 -13% | 330 -43% |
| Reader / Idle | 1230 | 1710 | ||||
| Load | 131 | 64 | 99 |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Basmodellen av Blade Stealth med Ice Lake befinner sig i ett svårt läge. Den efterträder förra årets Blade Stealth Whiskey Lake-U base model men kostar ändå mer än förra årets grafiskt sett överlägsna Blade Stealth med GeForce MX150. Med andra ord får du onekligen en bättre spelupplevelse med den äldre, billigare och tunnare MX150-modellen, vilket gör denna dyrare Ice Lake-baserade modell svårsåld.
Även om du inte alls är intresserad av att spela är WLAN-batteritiden nästan identisk med GeForce MX150-modellen samtidigt som de har samma skärm, tangentbord och portutbud. På så sätt kommer du betala mer för mindre.
För att vara rättvis så har Ice Lake-varianten ett antal mindre fördelar jämfört med med den mer kraftfulla Blade Stealth GeForce MX150. Den nyare versionen är märkbart tystare och svalare när man spelar och processorn har AI-funktioner som inte finns på Whiskey Lake-U. Men Windows använder ännu inte AI-accelerationen vid vardagsarbete så de flesta kommer inte ens märka av detta. Hur sexig den än må se ut erbjuder den Ice Lake-baserade modellen helt enkelt inte tillräckligt mycket mer än GeForce MX150-modellen för att rättfärdiga ett högre utgångspris.
Den kostar 2.000 kronor mer för långsammare spelprestanda och bara aningen bättre rå multitrådad prestanda jämfört med förra årets Blade Stealth GeForce MX150. Om du vill ha Blade Stealth med Ice Lake är det bättre du väljer varianten med GTX 1650 Max-Q istället. Annars kan du hoppa över den Ice Lake-baserade modellen och istället välja den med GeForce MX150.
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1065G7 Iris Plus
- 10/21/2019 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
