Test: Samsung Galaxy A20e - Topputrustning till ett budgetpris
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
LG K40 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
LG K40 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 475 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1357:1 (Svärta: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 8.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
Samsung Galaxy A20e IPS, 1560x720, 5.8" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Nokia 4.2 IPS, 1520x720, 5.7" | LG K40 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Sony Xperia L3 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Motorola Moto G7 Play IPS, 1512x720, 5.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 30% | 13% | 5% | 38% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 475 | 541 14% | 445 -6% | 475 0% | 533 12% | 479 1% |
Brightness | 473 | 540 14% | 424 -10% | 467 -1% | 533 13% | 481 2% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 91 -2% | 91 -2% | 90 -3% | 89 -4% | 94 1% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.33 6% | 0.26 26% | 0.32 9% | 0.25 29% | 0.37 -6% |
Contrast | 1357 | 1639 21% | 1712 26% | 1484 9% | 2132 57% | 1295 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 2.7 60% | 5.9 13% | 5.95 12% | 2.8 59% | 4.91 28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.4 | 4.6 66% | 9.3 31% | 12.62 6% | 5.1 62% | 9.47 29% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.7 | 3.1 64% | 6.8 22% | 7.9 9% | 1.9 78% | 6.4 26% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.331 94% | 2.11 104% | 2.108 104% |
CCT | 9385 69% | 6853 95% | 8443 77% | 8202 79% | 6149 106% | 7292 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 349.7 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 349.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 349.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise | |
↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
LG K40 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6316 - 6902, n=3) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
LG K40 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5136 - 5309, n=3) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | |
Nokia 4.2 | |
LG K40 | |
Sony Xperia L3 | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (89089 - 102121, n=3) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (21.5 - 23.4, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (20.7 - 22.2, n=3) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (45 - 48, n=3) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
LG K40 (Chrome 74) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (6921 - 7470, n=3) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
LG K40 (Chrome 74) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
LG K40 (Chrome 74) | |
Sony Xperia L3 (Chrome 72) | |
Nokia 4.2 (Chrome 74) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7884B (5546 - 5917, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A20e (Chrome 72.0.3626.121) | |
Motorola Moto G7 Play | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 (Chrome 72) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A20e | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 | Nokia 4.2 | LG K40 | Sony Xperia L3 | Motorola Moto G7 Play | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 19% | -41% | -15% | -10% | 76% | -4% | 1070% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 300.4 | 283.4 -6% | 220.4 -27% | 261.7 -13% | 290.9 -3% | 289 -4% | 242 ? -19% | 1839 ? 512% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 103.6 | 204.7 98% | 18.17 -82% | 100.5 -3% | 87.5 -16% | 111 7% | 100.5 ? -3% | 1425 ? 1275% |
Random Read 4KB | 79.8 | 82.9 4% | 17.51 -78% | 52.6 -34% | 28.83 -64% | 74 -7% | 43.2 ? -46% | 277 ? 247% |
Random Write 4KB | 13.18 | 16.06 22% | 4.31 -67% | 10 -24% | 16.36 24% | 73 454% | 22.4 ? 70% | 309 ? 2244% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 79.2 ? | 83.2 ? 5% | 86.7 ? 9% | 77.6 ? -2% | 80.9 ? 2% | 84.7 ? 7% | 71.8 ? -9% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64.3 ? | 59.5 ? -7% | 65.9 ? 2% | 57.4 ? -11% | 61.7 ? -4% | 64.1 ? 0% | 52.9 ? -18% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A20e audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.11 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.66 / 1.63 / 1.67 Watt |
Hög belastning |
2.77 / 3.66 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh | Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh | LG K40 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 7884B | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -50% | -17% | -15% | 1% | -48% | -14% | -64% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.66 | 0.61 8% | 0.74 -12% | 0.68 -3% | 0.57 14% | 1 -52% | 0.67 ? -2% | 0.894 ? -35% |
Idle Average * | 1.63 | 1.95 -20% | 1.9 -17% | 1.53 6% | 1.5 8% | 1.7 -4% | 1.617 ? 1% | 1.456 ? 11% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.67 | 2.03 -22% | 2.21 -32% | 1.95 -17% | 1.51 10% | 2.6 -56% | 1.777 ? -6% | 1.616 ? 3% |
Load Average * | 2.77 | 4.56 -65% | 3.04 -10% | 3.5 -26% | 3.09 -12% | 4.1 -48% | 3.73 ? -35% | 6.45 ? -133% |
Load Maximum * | 3.66 | 9.15 -150% | 4.15 -13% | 4.9 -34% | 4.15 -13% | 6.5 -78% | 4.67 ? -28% | 9.8 ? -168% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A20e 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 4000 mAh | Nokia 4.2 3000 mAh | LG K40 3000 mAh | Sony Xperia L3 3300 mAh | Motorola Moto G7 Play 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 18% | -3% | 4% | 9% | -3% | |
Reader / Idle | 1432 | 1950 36% | 2127 49% | |||
H.264 | 753 | 940 25% | 750 0% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 715 | 768 7% | 696 -3% | 745 4% | 641 -10% | 690 -3% |
Load | 250 | 259 4% | 242 -3% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Mycket smartphone för lite pengar
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Den som har satt upp en liten budget för sin nya smartphone kommer få mycket för pengarna med Samsung Galaxy A20e. Höljet är förvisso av plast och du får uppskatta den lilla formfaktorn. Men om du ändå väljer denna lättviktare på 141 gram belönas du med utförlig utrustning och snabb prestanda.
Ett välavrundat erbjudande: Samsung Galaxy A20e, som för tillfället kostar runt 1.800 kronor, erbjuder förvånansvärt utförlig utrustning och belönar köparen med bra hantverk och en trevlig känsla.
Med en åttakärnig Exynos 7884B SoC och 3 GB RAM har Galaxy A20e tillräckligt med prestanda för vardagsappar som YouTube och Whatsapp. I fråga om kommunikationsteknik är den välutrustad och har dual-SIM, VoLTE, VoWiFi, NFC och Bluetooth 5.0 inklusive stöd för aptX. Men den stödjer inte särskilt många LTE-band. Frekvenstäckningen är dock fullt tillräcklig för bruk inom Europa.
En trevlig egenskap är att den har stöd för DRM Widevine L1, vilket gör att Galaxy A20e kan strömma HD-video från leverantörer som Netflix. Andra fördelar är en dualkamera som tar bra bilder i dagsljus och en snabbladdare som laddar batteriet helt och hållet på en och en halv timma.
Du får dock leva med långsamma WLAN-hastigheter samt en selfie-kamera som bara duger till enklare snabbfoton. Samsung använder dessutom en IPS-skärm i den här billiga instegsenheten. Även om den gör sitt jobb är det en underlägsen teknik jämfört med de AMOLED-paneler som sitter i de dyrare Galaxy A-modellerna.
Samsung Galaxy A20e
- 10/31/2019 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero