Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 (sammanfattning)

Känns bra. Paradgrenen för föregångaren var aluminiumhöljet. I den nya modellen använder Samsung mer glas. Mellanklasslurens skärm har också modifierats: Den är nu lite större och har högre upplösning. Är det en vettig uppdatering?
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 (Galaxy Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7578 4 x 1.5 GHz, Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T720 MP2
Minne
1536 MB 
Skärm
4.70 tum 16:9, 1280 x 720 pixlar, kapacitiv pekskärm, Super AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.7 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm headset, Kortläsare: micro-SD max. 128 GB, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, närhetssensor, stegräknare, gyroskop, kompass, WiFi Direct, DLNA, MirrorLink, USB-OTG, nano-SIM
Nätverk
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM quad-band (850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G quad-band (850/900/1900/2100), LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B40) Cat.4 (max. 150 Mbit/s download & 50 Mbit/s upload), SAR body: 0.492 W/kg, SAR head: 0.621 W/kg, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.4 x 134.5 x 65.2
Batteri
9 Wh, 2300 mAh
Operativsystem
Android 5.1 Lollipop
Camera
Primary Camera: 13 MPix (autofokus f/1.9, 1080p-video @ 30 FPS)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/1.9, 1080p-video @ 30 FPS
Övrigt
Högtalare: monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, in-ear headset, SIM-verktyg, Microsoft Office, Galaxy-appar, MyGalaxy, Smart Manager, Samsung KNOX, S-Voice, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless
Vikt
131 g, Strömförsörjning: 57 g
Pris
329 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 card slot
Samsung Galaxy A3 card slot
Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 front
Samsung Galaxy A3 back
Samsung Galaxy A3 macro
Samsung Galaxy A3 power supply
142.1 mm 72.4 mm 11.6 mm 155 g143 mm 70.6 mm 7.7 mm 133 g142 mm 72.5 mm 8.1 mm 145 g141.9 mm 68.1 mm 5.1 mm 98 g140 mm 69 mm 6.9 mm 138 g134.5 mm 65.2 mm 7.4 mm 131 g130.1 mm 65.5 mm 6.9 mm 110 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - route
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - underpass
Garmin Edge 500 - section
Garmin Edge 500 - section
Samsung Galaxy A3 - route
Samsung Galaxy A3 - route
Samsung Galaxy A3 - underpass
Samsung Galaxy A3 - underpass
Samsung Galaxy A3 - section
Samsung Galaxy A3 - section
Camera software: Auto mode
Camera software: Auto mode
Camera software: Pro mode
Camera software: Pro mode
Camera software: Mode options
Camera software: Mode options

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
Samsung Galaxy A3 - test picture
Samsung Galaxy A3 - test picture
427
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
414
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 427 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 394.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.13 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 386 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.11 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.34 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.12
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
1280x720 px 4.71'' (AMOLED)
Samsung Galaxy A3
940x540 px px 4.5'' (AMOLED)
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
1280x720 px 5.0'' (IPS)
OnePlus X
1920x1080 px 5.0'' (AMOLED)
Huawei P8 lite
1280x720 px 5.0'' (IPS)
Wiko Highway Pure
1280x720 px 4.8'' (AMOLED)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
1920x1080 px 5.1'' (AMOLED)
Screen
-47%
-84%
-203%
-143%
-203%
-59%
Brightness middle
386
434
12%
418
8%
312
-19%
365
-5%
298
-23%
334
-13%
Brightness
394
433
10%
407
3%
314
-20%
353
-10%
298
-24%
341
-13%
Brightness Distribution
88
96
9%
95
8%
91
3%
93
6%
96
9%
91
3%
Black Level *
0.49
0.42
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.11
2.98
-168%
3.92
-253%
6.28
-466%
5.2
-368%
6.81
-514%
2.84
-156%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.35
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.34
2.68
-100%
3.81
-184%
8.24
-515%
5.85
-337%
7.53
-462%
2.91
-117%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.44 90%
2.27 97%
2.12 104%
2.17 101%
2.15 102%
2.01 109%
CCT
6441 101%
6603 98%
7361 88%
8145 80%
7252 90%
8348 78%
6432 101%
Contrast
853
869
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
70.86
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.25

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8698 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 3 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
OnePlus X
40256 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
37854 Points +19%
Huawei P8 lite
34247 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
31762 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
23242 Points -27%
Wiko Highway Pure
21063 Points -34%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 Samsung Exynos 7578, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy A3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541 Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 8 GB eMMC Flash
 
OnePlus X Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AA, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei P8 lite HiSilicon Kirin 620, ARM Mali-450 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Wiko Highway Pure Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916, Qualcomm Adreno 306, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Octane V2 - Total Score
OnePlus X
4810 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
3627 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
3566 Points
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
3296 Points
Wiko Highway Pure
2864 Points
Samsung Galaxy A3
2782 Points
Huawei P8 lite
2483 Points

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB
OnePlus X
14.22 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
11.07 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
10.27 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite
8.32 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3
6 MB/s
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
5.11 MB/s
Wiko Highway Pure
5 MB/s
Random Read 4KB
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.79 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
22.57 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
21.92 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite
18.46 MB/s
OnePlus X
16.31 MB/s
Wiko Highway Pure
14 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3
11 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB
Samsung Galaxy A3
71 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
57.9 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite
52.8 MB/s
OnePlus X
49.31 MB/s
Wiko Highway Pure
39 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
27.27 MB/s
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
22.33 MB/s
Sequential Read 256KB
OnePlus X
235.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
215.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
168.8 MB/s
Huawei P8 lite
139.5 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy A3
132 MB/s
Wiko Highway Pure
132 MB/s
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
131.4 MB/s
Hög belastning
 34.7 °C33.4 °C31.5 °C 
 34.5 °C32.9 °C31.2 °C 
 33.7 °C32.6 °C31 °C 
Max: 34.7 °C
Medel: 32.8 °C
31.3 °C32.5 °C33 °C
31.3 °C32.4 °C32.8 °C
30.5 °C31.1 °C31.6 °C
Max: 33 °C
Medel: 31.8 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  28.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.8 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0 / 0.15 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.96 / 1.39 / 1.45 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 2.65 / 3.51 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
32tim 58min
WiFi Websurfing
10tim 28min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
14tim 23min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 16min
Samsung Galaxy A3 2016
Mali-T720 MP2, 7578, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy A3
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Motorola Moto G 3. Gen 2015 XT1541
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 8 GB eMMC Flash
OnePlus X
Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AA, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei P8 lite
Mali-450 MP4, Kirin 620, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Wiko Highway Pure
Adreno 306, 410 MSM8916, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime
-36%
-25%
-29%
-53%
-41%
-9%
Reader / Idle
1978
1080
-45%
1364
-31%
968
-51%
715
-64%
1235
-38%
1615
-18%
H.264
863
602
-30%
677
-22%
514
-40%
369
-57%
465
-46%
773
-10%
WiFi v1.3
628
526
-16%
549
-13%
351
-44%
472
-25%
546
-13%
Load
376
256
-32%
264
-30%
339
-10%
194
-48%
164
-56%
402
7%
WiFi
568

För

+ Mycket bra hölje
+ Utmärkt skärm
+ Bra telefonifunktioner
+ Exakt pekskärm
+ Minneskortplats
+ NFC och USB-OTG
+ Skaplig högtalare
+ Mycket lång batteritid

Emot

- Kamerans prestanda i dåliga ljusförhållanden
- Ingen LED-notifiering
- Ej 5 GHz-WiFi
- Saknar Miracast och MHL-stöd
- Hal baksida
- Fast batteri
In review: Samsung Galaxy A3 (SM-A310F). Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.
In review: Samsung Galaxy A3 (SM-A310F). Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.

Originalversionen av testet (på engelska) finns här.

Samsungs nya version av Galaxy A3 har många fördelar. En är det vridstyva, välbyggda höljet med rundat glas längs kanterna och en metallram. Nackdelarna med designvalet är det icke utbytbara batteriet och ett lite för halt hölje.

Däremot har mobilen ganska lite att erbjuda rent tekniskt. Det bästa är den utmärkta skärmen, möjligheten att utöka lagringsutrymmet med micro-SD-kort och den mycket långa batteritiden. 

NFC finns, men den integrerade Wi-Fi-modulen stöder tyvärr bara 2,4 GHz-bandet. Samsungs nya fyrkärniga systemkrets slår inga rekord, men övertygar med prestanda som lämpar sig för vardagsbruk.

Kamerorna gör ett blandat intryck. Medan bilder tagna i goda ljusförhållanden är mycket övertygande, med anständig skärpa och bra upplösning, resulterar mindre idealiska förhållanden ofta i besvikelse. Den tröga och ofta felaktiga autofokusfunktionen och tendensen att underexponera bilderna är också graverande.

Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 - 02/29/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Kilian

Design
93%
Tangentbord
67 / 75 → 90%
Mus
89%
Anslutningar
45 / 60 → 74%
Vikt
94%
Batteri
94%
Skärm
91%
Spelprestanda
14 / 63 → 21%
Programprestanda
32 / 70 → 46%
Temperatur
93%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
56 / 91 → 62%
Camera
65%
Medel
72%
85%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy A3 2016 (sammanfattning)
Andreas Kilian, 2016-03-20 (Update: 2016-03-20)