Test: Samsung Galaxy A30s - En frisk fläkt med lekfull design (Sammanfattning)
Jämförelse av enheterna
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.2 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A30s Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2 | 166 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 1560x720 | |
79.1 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A40 Exynos 7904, Mali-G71 MP2 | 140 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 5.90" | 2340x1080 | |
75.7 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Honor 9X Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 197 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.59" | 2340x1080 | |
78.6 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Nokia 7.2 SD 660, Adreno 512 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.30" | 2340x1080 | |
77.3 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | HTC Desire 19+ Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 170 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.20" | 1520x720 | |
78.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2019 | Huawei P30 Lite Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 159 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.15" | 2312x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Honor 9X | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
HTC Desire 19+ | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
HTC Desire 19+ | |
Honor 9X | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 488 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy A30s Super AMOLED, 1560x720, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy A40 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 5.9" | Honor 9X LCD IPS, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Nokia 7.2 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | HTC Desire 19+ IPS, 1520x720, 6.2" | Huawei P30 Lite IPS LCD, 2312x1080, 6.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -127% | -119% | -98% | -72% | -11% | |
Brightness middle | 488 | 358 -27% | 494 1% | 604 24% | 491 1% | 451 -8% |
Brightness | 489 | 370 -24% | 483 -1% | 593 21% | 470 -4% | 430 -12% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 94 1% | 94 1% | 92 -1% | 84 -10% | 90 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.4 | 0.33 | 0.55 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 7.4 -335% | 5.74 -238% | 5.1 -200% | 4.34 -155% | 1.4 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.3 | 12.5 -279% | 10.26 -211% | 10.3 -212% | 8.17 -148% | 4.4 -33% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 4 -100% | 7.3 -265% | 6.4 -220% | 4.3 -115% | 2.5 -25% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.084 106% | 2.086 105% | 2.23 99% | 2.302 96% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6506 100% | 7078 92% | 8572 76% | 8149 80% | 7214 90% | 6422 101% |
Contrast | 969 | 1510 | 1488 | 820 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
HTC Desire 19+ | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5802 - 6923, n=4) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
HTC Desire 19+ | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (5269 - 5474, n=4) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.2 - 24, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7 - 13, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3.8 - 17, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (4.3 - 8.1, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Nokia 7.2 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 () |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Honor 9X | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (101367 - 109906, n=4) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 | |
Huawei P30 Lite | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (71303 - 75333, n=2) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (22.1 - 25.7, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (42.2 - 45.1, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (19.3 - 24.1, n=4) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (43 - 56, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7798 - 9087, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy A30s (Chrome 78) | |
Samsung Galaxy A40 (Chrome 73) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3703 - 5707, n=4) | |
Huawei P30 Lite (Chrome 74) | |
Honor 9X (Chrome 78) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A30s | Samsung Galaxy A40 | Honor 9X | Nokia 7.2 | HTC Desire 19+ | Huawei P30 Lite | Average 64 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -4% | 231% | 7% | 22% | 94% | 25% | 1055% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 291.8 | 295 1% | 860 195% | 290.8 0% | 288 -1% | 293.2 0% | 274 ? -6% | 1887 ? 547% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 101.7 | 99.6 -2% | 196.1 93% | 161.4 59% | 210.8 107% | 158.6 56% | 176.6 ? 74% | 1471 ? 1346% |
Random Read 4KB | 93.2 | 75.7 -19% | 142.3 53% | 79.6 -15% | 76.5 -18% | 71.6 -23% | 59.4 ? -36% | 278 ? 198% |
Random Write 4KB | 13.95 | 13.2 -5% | 159.3 1042% | 13.38 -4% | 20.4 46% | 87.3 526% | 32.2 ? 131% | 311 ? 2129% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 80 ? | 81.2 ? 2% | 76.2 ? -5% | 83.3 ? 4% | 81.8 ? 2% | 76.8 ? -4% | 77.4 ? -3% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 64 ? | 65.2 ? 2% | 67.1 ? 5% | 64 ? 0% | 61.8 ? -3% | 67.8 ? 6% | 58.3 ? -9% |
Arena of Valor
Asphalt 9: Legends
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.9 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A30s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P30 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.02 / 0.57 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.79 / 1.98 / 2.03 Watt |
Hög belastning |
2.37 / 3.68 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy A30s 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | Nokia 7.2 3500 mAh | HTC Desire 19+ 3850 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 7904 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -66% | -126% | -52% | -39% | -51% | -60% | -62% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.79 | 0.8 -1% | 2.3 -191% | 0.77 3% | 1.3 -65% | 0.91 -15% | 1.048 ? -33% | 0.883 ? -12% |
Idle Average * | 1.98 | 1.4 29% | 3 -52% | 2.32 -17% | 2 -1% | 2.41 -22% | 2.51 ? -27% | 1.467 ? 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.03 | 2.3 -13% | 4.2 -107% | 2.41 -19% | 2.9 -43% | 2.43 -20% | 2.8 ? -38% | 1.621 ? 20% |
Load Average * | 2.37 | 7.4 -212% | 5.3 -124% | 4.44 -87% | 3.6 -52% | 4.57 -93% | 5.28 ? -123% | 6.55 ? -176% |
Load Maximum * | 3.68 | 8.6 -134% | 9.4 -155% | 8.79 -139% | 5 -36% | 7.57 -106% | 6.61 ? -80% | 9.9 ? -169% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A30s 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A40 3100 mAh | Honor 9X 4000 mAh | Nokia 7.2 3500 mAh | HTC Desire 19+ 3850 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite 3340 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -9% | 31% | -10% | 25% | -29% | |
H.264 | 982 | 825 -16% | 685 -30% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 634 | 643 1% | 832 31% | 570 -10% | 795 25% | 515 -19% |
Load | 317 | 277 -13% | 198 -38% | |||
Reader / Idle | 1689 | 1248 |
För
Emot
Omdöme - En tjusig smartphone med några få brister
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Galaxy A30s är en skaplig instegstelefon som Samsung satt ett lämpligt pris på. SuperAMOLED-skärmen är ljusstark och har hög färgprecision, även om 720p är en aning lågt jämfört med vad som är standard idag. Exynos 7904 är tillräckligt kraftfull för vardagsuppgifter och klarar till och med av en del spel. Komplexa titlar som Asphalt 9: Legends kommer dock pressa den till bristningsgränsen.
Med tanke på priset lever Samsung Galaxy A30s upp till våra förväntningar. Vi hade bara önskat oss längre batteritid.
Samsung har dock glömt bort att göra en del batteritidsoptimering. Även om A30s fick respektabla resultat i våra tester så klarade sig många av våra jämförelseenheter längre trots mindre batterier. Den långsamma fingeravtrycksläsaren som är inbyggd i skärmen var också en miss, precis som jämförelsevis långsam WiFi-prestanda. Men totalt sett är dessa saker mindre avsteg från vad som i övrigt är en välgjord instegstelefon.
Samsung Galaxy A30s
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker