Test: Samsung Galaxy A32 5G - 5G-smartphone som inte bara går framåt (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.3 % v7 (old) | 03/2021 | Samsung Galaxy A32 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 205 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
77.7 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A31 Helio P65, Mali-G52 MP2 | 185 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
80.1 % v7 (old) | 01/2021 | Oppo A73 5G Dimensity 720, Mali-G57 MP3 | 177 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
80.1 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | Realme 7 5G Dimensity 800U, Mali-G57 MP3 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
81.8 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC SD 732G, Adreno 618 | 215 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
79.9 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | Vivo Y70 SD 665, Adreno 610 | 171 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.44" | 2400x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 | |
Realme 7 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Oppo A73 5G | |
Vivo Y70 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Realme 7 5G | |
Vivo Y70 | |
Oppo A73 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleWide angleLow lightNight modeImage Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Ultra wide angleZoom (5x)Macro
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 85 %
Mitt på batteriet: 543 cd/m²
Kontrast: 862:1 (Svärta: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G TFT-LCD, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A31 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Oppo A73 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Realme 7 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Vivo Y70 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 30% | 24% | 4% | 31% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 543 | 594 9% | 527 -3% | 490 -10% | 623 15% | 573 6% |
Brightness | 512 | 595 16% | 499 -3% | 455 -11% | 600 17% | 572 12% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 99 16% | 87 2% | 84 -1% | 93 9% | 97 14% |
Black Level * | 0.63 | 0.38 40% | 0.69 -10% | 0.54 14% | ||
Contrast | 862 | 1387 61% | 710 -18% | 1154 34% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.9 | 2.02 59% | 3.5 29% | 4.01 18% | 1.8 63% | 2.7 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.6 | 8.11 6% | 7.3 15% | 8.1 6% | 4.7 45% | 4.9 43% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 1.8 71% | 2.9 54% | 2.6 59% | 3.3 48% | 2.9 54% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.098 105% | 2.29 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.19 100% |
CCT | 8120 80% | 6552 99% | 6502 100% | 6828 95% | 6712 97% | 6665 98% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise | |
↘ 21.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
66.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 32 ms rise | |
↘ 34.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Oppo A73 5G | |
Realme 7 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (7158 - 10673, n=2) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 | |
Oppo A73 5G | |
Realme 7 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Vivo Y70 | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (6145 - 7395, n=2) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 | |
Oppo A73 5G | |
Realme 7 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (252308 - 253013, n=2) |
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Oppo A73 5G | |
Realme 7 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (12331 - 13120, n=3) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (34 - 64.6, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87) | |
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 68) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (67.3 - 75.3, n=3) | |
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87) | |
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (35.3 - 54, n=3) | |
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87) | |
Realme 7 5G (Chome 86) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (49 - 57, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (14156 - 19201, n=4) | |
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87) | |
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Realme 7 5G (Chrome 86) | |
Samsung Galaxy A31 (Chrome 87) | |
Oppo A73 5G (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G (Chrome 88) | |
Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 (2346 - 4059, n=4) | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC (Chrome 85) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | Samsung Galaxy A31 | Oppo A73 5G | Realme 7 5G | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC | Vivo Y70 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -51% | -34% | -35% | -40% | -25% | -33% | 138% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 858 | 301.5 -65% | 860 0% | 877 2% | 506 -41% | 509 -41% | 696 ? -19% | 1887 ? 120% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 381.7 | 216.3 -43% | 193 -49% | 188.4 -51% | 173.1 -55% | 218.5 -43% | 224 ? -41% | 1471 ? 285% |
Random Read 4KB | 174.6 | 97.5 -44% | 102.2 -41% | 92.6 -47% | 123.4 -29% | 149.5 -14% | 137.2 ? -21% | 278 ? 59% |
Random Write 4KB | 167.1 | 79.1 -53% | 88.1 -47% | 95.1 -43% | 112.6 -33% | 164.3 -2% | 84.7 ? -49% | 311 ? 86% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 82.7 ? | 84.3 ? | 75.2 ? | 43.11 ? | 68.6 ? | |||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 66.9 ? | 63.7 ? | 55.6 ? | 37.03 ? | 52.2 ? |
3DMark - Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Vivo Y70 | |
Oppo A73 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G | |
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.18 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.64 / 1.95 / 1.98 Watt |
Hög belastning |
6.77 / 11.42 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A31 5000 mAh | Oppo A73 5G 4040 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Vivo Y70 4100 mAh | Average MediaTek Dimensity 720 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 7% | 26% | -9% | 26% | 3% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.64 | 1 -56% | 0.58 9% | 0.93 -45% | 0.83 -30% | 1.005 ? -57% | 0.88 ? -38% |
Idle Average * | 1.95 | 1.6 18% | 1.86 5% | 2.47 -27% | 1.4 28% | 1.878 ? 4% | 1.444 ? 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.98 | 1.9 4% | 1.88 5% | 2.51 -27% | 1.68 15% | 2.04 ? -3% | 1.6 ? 19% |
Load Average * | 6.77 | 5 26% | 3.1 54% | 5.62 17% | 2.61 61% | 4.47 ? 34% | 6.57 ? 3% |
Load Maximum * | 11.42 | 6.7 41% | 5.01 56% | 6.93 39% | 5.12 55% | 7.08 ? 38% | 9.91 ? 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A31 5000 mAh | Oppo A73 5G 4040 mAh | Realme 7 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC 5160 mAh | Vivo Y70 4100 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -13% | 15% | -17% | -17% | -34% | |
Reader / Idle | 2958 | 2453 -17% | 2427 -18% | |||
H.264 | 1323 | 1255 -5% | 1188 -10% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 1235 | 1160 -6% | 1426 15% | 1026 -17% | 1116 -10% | 819 -34% |
Load | 393 | 306 -22% | 280 -29% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - I effektivitetens namn
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Ser vi på den som en fristående produkt är Samsung Galaxy A32 5G en bra 5G-smartphone för under 3.000 kronor som övertygar vid vardagsbruk med bra systemprestanda, lång batteritid och användbara funktioner som ljudanslutning och radiomottagare.
Det största bristen vid en direkt jämförelse med föregångaren är skärmen. Faktum att man inte längre använder en AMOLED-skärm är mindre viktigt, för ett PWM-fritt alternativ är definitivt välkommet i det här prissegmentet. Men TFT LCD-skärmen känns lite slarvigt vald, för den gör att man får kompromissa på alla områden, oavsett om det är ljusstyrka, kontrast eller pixeldensitet.
Men lägre pixeldensitet är också en anledning till att A32 5G har bättre batteritid än Galaxy A31.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G tvingar en att acceptera några kompromisser, men den är en pålitlig kollega för vardagsbruk och har lång batteritid och hög systemprestanda.
Lagringskonfigurationen kunde varit lite mer generös i basversionen; vi hade gärna sett ytterligare två gigabyte RAM för att göra A32 5G mer framtidssäkrad.
Det finns definitivt bättre alternativ än A32 5G till fullpris, men vi förväntar oss att telefonen blir betydligt billigare i framtiden, vilket då kan göra den till ett intressant alternativ.
Samsung Galaxy A32 5G
- 03/11/2021 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt