Test: Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016) smartphone (sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 378 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.95 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.86 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.13
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 10% | -1% | -55% | -18% | -35% | -25% | |
Brightness middle | 378 | 503 33% | 346 -8% | 453 20% | 335 -11% | 451 19% | 334 -12% |
Brightness | 380 | 498 31% | 349 -8% | 439 16% | 345 -9% | 446 17% | 341 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 97 7% | 93 2% | 91 0% | 89 -2% | 90 -1% | 91 0% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.28 | 0.3 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.95 | 2.09 -7% | 1.55 21% | 4.7 -141% | 2.51 -29% | 3.84 -97% | 2.84 -46% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.09 | ||||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.86 | 2.12 -14% | 2.05 -10% | 5.03 -170% | 2.59 -39% | 3.97 -113% | 2.91 -56% |
Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.27 97% | 2.15 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.43 91% | 2.46 89% | 2.01 109% |
CCT | 6376 102% | 6621 98% | 6267 104% | 7439 87% | 6424 101% | 7283 89% | 6432 101% |
Contrast | 1324 | 1618 | 1503 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 72.04 | 58.07 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.14 |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Geekbench 3 | |
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Huawei P8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Huawei P8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
OnePlus 2 |
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
OnePlus 2 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | |
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Samsung Galaxy S6 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
* ... smaller is better
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 | |
Google Nexus 5X | |
HTC One A9 | |
Huawei P8 | |
OnePlus 2 | |
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo |
Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
Inställningar | Värde | ||
very low | 29 fps |
Dead Trigger 2 | |||
Inställningar | Värde | ||
high | 34 fps |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 6% | -3% | 5% | 4% | -23% | 9% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.9 | 34.4 4% | 41.3 -15% | 35.7 1% | 35.6 1% | 45.8 -28% | 33.5 7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 33.8 | 37.4 -11% | 39.8 -18% | 31.3 7% | 35.9 -6% | 43.5 -29% | 34 -1% |
Idle Upper Side * | 32.8 | 28.2 14% | 28.7 12% | 33.2 -1% | 29.4 10% | 38.9 -19% | 27.8 15% |
Idle Bottom * | 31.5 | 25.8 18% | 28.4 10% | 27.6 12% | 28.6 9% | 36.9 -17% | 27.4 13% |
* ... smaller is better
Av/Standby | 0 / 0.22 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.96 / 1.64 / 1.71 Watt |
Hög belastning |
2.98 / 5.08 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Gossen Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -12% | 1% | -26% | 10% | -16% | -40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.96 | 0.55 43% | 0.9 6% | 0.7 27% | 0.4 58% | 0.6 37% | 1.68 -75% |
Idle Average * | 1.64 | 1.44 12% | 1.2 27% | 2 -22% | 0.6 63% | 1.7 -4% | 2.2 -34% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.71 | 1.9 -11% | 1.4 18% | 2.1 -23% | 1.2 30% | 1.8 -5% | 2.33 -36% |
Load Average * | 2.98 | 3.36 -13% | 3.8 -28% | 4.9 -64% | 5 -68% | 5.7 -91% | 4.09 -37% |
Load Maximum * | 5.08 | 9.76 -92% | 5.9 -16% | 7.4 -46% | 6.8 -34% | 6 -18% | 5.92 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016 Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Google Nexus 5X Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash | HTC One A9 Adreno 405, 617 MSM8952, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -31% | -47% | -41% | -37% | -38% | -11% | |
Reader / Idle | 2323 | 1775 -24% | 1154 -50% | 826 -64% | 1300 -44% | 1393 -40% | 1615 -30% |
H.264 | 672 | 555 -17% | 465 -31% | 581 -14% | 580 -14% | 773 15% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 626 | 412 -34% | 368 -41% | 434 -31% | 475 -24% | 356 -43% | 546 -13% |
Load | 483 | 245 -49% | 176 -64% | 215 -55% | 278 -42% | 229 -53% | 402 -17% |
WiFi | 575 |
För
Emot
Samsungs Galaxy A5 (2016) är en framgångsrik utveckling av föregångaren i de flesta avseenden. Mellanklassluren är återigen mycket elegant och bortsett från PWM-flimret har den en av de bästa panelerna i segmentet. Kamerorna har också förbättrats något. Ytterligare pluspoäng får den för den långa batteritiden.
Några större brister är svåra att hitta. Vi hade önskat oss ac-Wi-Fi och höljet är ganska halt på grund av baksidan i glas, vilket minskar helhetsintrycket något. Det största problemet är däremot – precis som med föregångaren – prestandan. Med tanke på priset hade vi hoppats på lite mer kraft.
Galaxy A5 hamnar inte bara efter sina motståndare i prestandatesterna – man märker även av små eftersläpningar och hack under dagligt bruk. Huruvida mellanklassmodellerna från A-serien kommer att uppdateras till Android 6.0 är också en okänd faktor.
Samsung erbjuder återigen en mellanklassmodell av hög kvalitet till ett högt pris med Galaxy A5. Skärmen tillhör de bästa i klassen, men prestandan halkar efter.
Samsung Galaxy A5 2016
-
02/26/2016 v5 (old)
Andreas Osthoff