Test: Samsung Galaxy A50 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Samsung Galaxy A50
Brand: Samsung

Kul med tre kameror?

Tre bakåtriktade kameror och en ljusstark AMOLED-skärm på en mittenskiktstelefon? Det kanske låter som en berusande mix, men kan Samsung Galaxy A50 verkligen nå upp till förväntningarna? Det får du reda på om du läser vidare i den här detaljerade recensionen.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 05/08/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy A50 (Galaxy A55 Serie)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9610 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

6.40 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 403 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, 2.5D, böjd, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 106 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD-kort på upp till 512 GB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, kompass, gyroskop, närhetssensor, USB Typ C

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900. 3G: B1, B2, B5, B8. 4G: B1, B3, B5, B7, B8, B20, B38, B40, B41., Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 158.5 x 74.7

Batteri

15.2 Wh, 4000 mAh Litiumpolymer, Samsung Adaptive Fast Charging, 15 W

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 25 MPix , f/1.7, Fasjämförande AF, LED-blixt, video @ 1080p/30 FPS (Kamera 1); 8.0 MP, f/2.2, vidvinkelslins (Kamera 2); 5.0 MP, f/2.2, Skärpedjup (Kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 25 MPix , f/2.0

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare på enhetens undersida, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, SIM-verktyg, Headset, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: 1.39 W/kg – Kropp, 0.27 W/kg – Huvud. LTE Cat.6 (300 MBit/s nedladdning, 50 MBit/s uppladdning. FM-radio, fanless

Vikt

166 g

Pris

350 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	534 (430^min - 578^max) MBit/s +96%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	320 (164^min - 362^max) MBit/s +18%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	288 (138^min - 294^max) MBit/s +6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	272 (250^min - 285^max) MBit/s
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	232 (217^min - 244^max) MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AX12
Xiaomi Mi 9 Adreno 640, SD 855, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	678 (549^min - 725^max) MBit/s +131%
Nokia 7.1 Adreno 509, SD 636, 32 GB eMMC Flash	334 (311^min - 342^max) MBit/s +14%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Adreno 509, SD 636, 64 GB eMMC Flash	332 (314^min - 341^max) MBit/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy A50 Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9610, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	294 (278^min - 302^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7885, 64 GB eMMC Flash	279 (265^min - 284^max) MBit/s -5%

Samsung Galaxy A50; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø293 (278-302)

Samsung Galaxy A50; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø272 (250-285)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A50

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus OM-D E-M Mark II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A50

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus OM-D E-M Mark II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy A50

Apple iPhone XS Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus OM-D E-M Mark II

ColorChecker Passport: Den nedre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen.


587 cd/m²	600 cd/m²	646 cd/m²
634 cd/m²	644 cd/m²	639 cd/m²
623 cd/m²	638 cd/m²	644 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 646 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 628.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.97 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 644 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.64 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
141.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.024

	Samsung Galaxy A50 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6"	Motorola Moto G7 Plus IPS, 2270x1080, 6.2"	Nokia 7.1 IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8"	Xiaomi Mi 9 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen		23%	-62%	-96%	29%
Brightness middle	644	570 -11%	537 -17%	577 -10%	593 -8%
Brightness	628	565 -10%	525 -16%	550 -12%	587 -7%
Brightness Distribution	91	93 2%	85 -7%	91 0%	94 3%
Black Level *			0.58	0.36
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.64	1.5 43%	6.41 -143%	7.4 -180%	0.9 66%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.23	3.6 61%	10.86 -18%	15 -63%	2 78%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.2 52%	6.7 -168%	10.2 -308%	1.5 40%
Gamma	2.024 ^109%	2.07 ^106%	2.099 ^105%	2.29 ^96%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6649 ^98%	6504 ^100%	8310 ^78%	9657 ^67%	6548 ^99%
Contrast			926	1603

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

119 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1721 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1525 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	1337 Points -22%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1333 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3523 Points +105%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1721 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=84, last 2 years)	5609 Points +226%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5605 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4429 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4992 Points -11%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4902 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10999 Points +96%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	5605 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (4134 - 34246, n=84, last 2 years)	15765 Points +181%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4913 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4026 Points -18%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	4287 Points -13%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4560 Points -7%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7482 Points +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	4913 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 28121, n=61, last 2 years)	12557 Points +156%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	7029 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5625 Points -20%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	7618 Points +8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6343 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10985 Points +56%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	7029 Points 0%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5827 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	5387 Points -8%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6277 Points +8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5663 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9035 Points +55%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	5827 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16037 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15167 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	19525 Points +22%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	19762 Points +23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	62225 Points +288%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	16037 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16593 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	15567 Points -6%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	20953 Points +26%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	20610 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106534 Points +542%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	16593 Points 0%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14353 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	13914 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15766 Points +10%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	17274 Points +20%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25339 Points +77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	14353 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1430 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	960 Points -33%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1462 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7166 Points +401%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1430 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=25, last 2 years)	4239 Points +196%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1279 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	845 Points -34%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1323 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9963 Points +679%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1279 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=25, last 2 years)	4795 Points +275%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2432 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1829 Points -25%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2316 Points -5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3614 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2432 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=25, last 2 years)	3303 Points +36%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1667 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1071 Points -36%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1534 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7449 Points +347%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1667 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=72, last 2 years)	11215 Points +573%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1553 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	954 Points -39%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1396 Points -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10291 Points +563%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1553 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=72, last 2 years)	19933 Points +1184%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2241 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1871 Points -17%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2347 Points +5%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3788 Points +69%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2241 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=72, last 2 years)	5021 Points +124%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1296 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	741 Points -43%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	Points -100%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	945 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5509 Points +325%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1296 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=69, last 2 years)	3014 Points +133%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1149 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	634 Points -45%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	811 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6355 Points +453%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1149 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=69, last 2 years)	3179 Points +177%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2351 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1821 Points -23%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2251 Points -4%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3758 Points +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2351 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=69, last 2 years)	3259 Points +39%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1328 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	737 Points -45%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1009 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5913 Points +345%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1328 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 23762, n=163, last 2 years)	8239 Points +520%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1188 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	629 Points -47%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	869 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7076 Points +496%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1188 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 40163, n=163, last 2 years)	12402 Points +944%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2266 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1845 Points -19%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2310 Points +2%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3754 Points +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2266 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 10632, n=163, last 2 years)	4754 Points +110%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4914 Points
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=68, last 2 years)	2791 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5723 Points
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 7971, n=68, last 2 years)	3021 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3288 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=68, last 2 years)	2684 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	35 fps -3%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	34 fps -6%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +67%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	36 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	86.8 fps +141%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	39 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	36 fps -8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	35 fps -10%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	167 fps +328%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	39 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=173, last 2 years)	297 fps +662%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	21 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	15 fps -29%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	15 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +186%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	21 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	76.3 fps +263%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	23 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	16 fps -30%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	16 fps -30%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +335%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	23 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=173, last 2 years)	175.8 fps +664%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	13 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	9.8 fps -25%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	9.6 fps -26%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	58 fps +346%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	13 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=173, last 2 years)	67 fps +415%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	10 fps -29%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	10 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	69 fps +393%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	14 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=173, last 2 years)	124.9 fps +792%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.1 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6 fps -26%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5.9 fps -27%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +369%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	8.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 154, n=174, last 2 years)	49.7 fps +514%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.9 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	6.3 fps -29%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6.3 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps +372%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	8.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=173, last 2 years)	75.2 fps +745%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	8.2 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.6 fps -32%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	5.5 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +351%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	8.2 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=206, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +521%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	5.4 fps -40%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	6 fps -33%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	41 fps +356%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=206, last 2 years)	85.3 fps +848%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4.9 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2 fps -59%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	3.5 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	24 fps +390%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	4.9 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years)	39.3 fps +702%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.1 fps
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	2.3 fps -26%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	2.2 fps -29%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	16 fps +416%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	3.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years)	34.4 fps +1010%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	144194 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	122826 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 4096	117557 Points -18%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	116496 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	374820 Points +160%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	144194 Points 0%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2193 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2009 Points -8%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1941 Points -11%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4595 Points +110%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2193 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)	6499 Points +196%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5112 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	4506 Points -12%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	4457 Points -13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8441 Points +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	5112 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)	10346 Points +102%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2492 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	2445 Points -2%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1917 Points -23%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4031 Points +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	2492 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)	7058 Points +183%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1957 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1356 Points -31%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1590 Points -19%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9270 Points +374%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	1957 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)	17998 Points +820%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy A50 Samsung Exynos 9610, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	927 Points
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 Samsung Exynos 7885, Mali-G71 MP2, 4096	1090 Points +18%
Nokia 7.1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636, Adreno 509, 3072	1046 Points +13%
Xiaomi Mi 9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1378 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	927 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)	1578 Points +70%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)	124.4 Points
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73)	57.2 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.9 runs/min +335%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	65.7 runs/min +99%
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	33.1 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chome 73)	33.07 runs/min

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	150.2 Points +142%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	108 Points +74%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	62 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	62 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	57 Points -8%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	54 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	54 Points -13%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)	38550 Points +273%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	24534 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	10322 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	10322 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	9165 Points -11%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	8627 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	8368 Points -19%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Motorola Moto G7 Plus	4776 ms * -23%
Nokia 7.1 (Chrome 70)	4562 ms * -17%
Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 (Chrome 70)	4123 ms * -6%
Samsung Galaxy A50 (Chrome 73)	3897 ms *
Average Samsung Exynos 9610 ()	3897 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Mi 9 (Chrome 73.0.3683.75)	1873 ms * +52%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)	1523 ms * +61%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy A50	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018	Motorola Moto G7 Plus	Nokia 7.1	Xiaomi Mi 9	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-18%	43%	-27%	248%	131%	684%
Sequential Read 256KB	507	295.8 -42%	283.6 -44%	250.9 -51%	666 31%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) 50%	1894 ?(226 - 4512, n=197, last 2 years) 274%
Sequential Write 256KB	192.1	104.9 -45%	208.7 9%	126 -34%	388.3 102%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 55%	1476 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=197, last 2 years) 668%
Random Read 4KB	98.9	84 -15%	76.6 -23%	44.9 -55%	149.4 51%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 55%	278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=197, last 2 years) 181%
Random Write 4KB	18.2	15.45 -15%	73.1 302%	11.93 -34%	165.3 808%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) 623%	312 ?(9.4 - 753, n=197, last 2 years) 1614%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	78.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 12%	83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 13%		76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	60.7 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 6%	62.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 2%	61.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 1%		59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43) -2%

Samsung Galaxy A50; Arena of Valor; min; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.8 (55-60)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.28.2.2: Ø59.9 (58-60)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 1.5.3a: Ø29.5 (28-31)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 1.5.3a: Ø28.9 (24-31)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Shadow Fight 3; minimal; 1.18.0: Ø59.2 (52-60)

Samsung Galaxy A50; Shadow Fight 3; high; 1.18.0: Ø59.3 (52-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


42.9 °C	37.4 °C	34.1 °C
41.6 °C	37.1 °C	34.6 °C
40 °C	36.9 °C	34.3 °C

Max: 42.9 °C
Medel: 37.7 °C


31.7 °C	34.7 °C	40.7 °C
32 °C	35 °C	40.1 °C
32.5 °C	35.9 °C	38.1 °C

Max: 40.7 °C
Medel: 35.6 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 39.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 73.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0 / 0.1 Watt
Låg belastning	0.8 / 1.5 / 1.7 Watt
Hög belastning	5.9 / 8.3 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9610	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		10%	-11%	-7%	16%	0%	-7%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.71 11%	1.1 -38%	1.01 -26%	0.67 16%	0.8 ?() -0%	0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=161, last 2 years) -10%
Idle Average *	1.5	1.36 9%	1.7 -13%	2.2 -47%	1.26 16%	1.5 ?() -0%	1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=161, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Maximum *	1.7	1.47 14%	2.1 -24%	2.25 -32%	1.29 24%	1.7 ?() -0%	1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=161, last 2 years) 5%
Load Average *	5.9	5.13 13%	5.1 14%	3.76 36%	3.71 37%	5.9 ?() -0%	6.58 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=155, last 2 years) -12%
Load Maximum *	8.3	7.89 5%	7.9 5%	5.56 33%	9.3 -12%	8.3 ?() -0%	9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=155, last 2 years) -19%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		26tim 27min
WiFi Websurfing		11tim 41min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		14tim 29min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 35min

	Samsung Galaxy A50 4000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 3300 mAh	Motorola Moto G7 Plus 3000 mAh	Nokia 7.1 3060 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 9 3300 mAh
Battery Runtime		-7%	-11%	-44%	-8%
Reader / Idle	1587	1467 -8%		983 -38%	1650 4%
H.264	869	836 -4%	809 -7%	507 -42%	1008 16%
WiFi v1.3	701	605 -14%	715 2%	346 -51%	546 -22%
Load	275	273 -1%	196 -29%	156 -43%	194 -29%

För

+ skaplig prestanda

+ utmärkt skärm

+ rejäl batteritid

+ dedikerad microSD-plats

+ modern design

Emot

- inexakt fingeravtrycksläsare

- inexakt GPS

- framåtriktad kamera med fixfokus

- förinstallerade reklamappar

Recension av Samsung Galaxy A50. Recensionsex från notebooksbilliger.de.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung Galaxy A50 är en utmärkt mittenskiktstelefon. Den rider på sin föregångares framgångar, såsom trippelkameran, men kombinerar detta med en modernare design och en bättre SoC.

A50 har få brister. Men det tar en aning längre tid för fingeravtrycksläsaren att känna igen ett finger och den är dessutom lite sämre på att registrera avtrycket än de flesta sensorer. Vidare än GPS-modulen märkligt oprecis och WiFi-prestandan var ibland sämre än på föregångaren.

Utmärkt skärm, lång batteritid och skapliga kameror. Samsung Galaxy A50 levererar på alla viktiga områden och är i egenskap av mittenskiktstelefon en triumf.

Samsung har också kompromissat på en del områden. LTE-prestandan ligger under vad telefonens SoC skulle kunna uppnå, vilket känns märkligt. Den framåtriktade kameran med fixfokus känns inte heller särskilt genomtänkt.

Men med det sagt tar A50 rejäla steg framåt på andra områden jämfört med Galaxy A7 (2018). Exynos 9610 är ett stort steg upp från Exynos 7885 och knuffar sig till och med före jämförbara Snapdragon-chips. Samsung har också använt ett ca 20% större batteri, vilket hjälper A50 att leverera bättre batteritid än sin föregångare.

För att sammanfatta så är Galaxy A50 ett utmärkt val för den som letar efter en smartphone för ca 3.500 kronor. Men förra årets Galaxy A7 (2018) ger nästan samma upplevelse fast i en äldre design till en bråkdel av det priset.

Samsung Galaxy A50 - 08/31/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Design

84%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

94%

Anslutningar

46 / 70 → 65%

Vikt

91%

Batteri

89%

Skärm

89%

Spelprestanda

14 / 64 → 22%

Programprestanda

57 / 86 → 66%

Temperatur

89%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

79 / 90 → 87%

Camera

60%

Medel

74%

80%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11441 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy A50 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 2019-05- 8 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy A50 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy A7 2018 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison