Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Chinese
MagyarTest: Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 453 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.07
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 Super AMOLED, 1480x720, 5.6" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Motorola Moto G6 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 5.9" | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 26% | 9% | -131% | 27% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 453 | 539 19% | 454 0% | 458 1% | 761 68% | 620 37% |
| Brightness | 459 | 542 18% | 463 1% | 473 3% | 723 58% | 612 33% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 93 0% | 86 -8% | 88 -5% | 90 -3% | 96 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.57 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.6 38% | 2 23% | 7.1 -173% | 2.4 8% | 3.46 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.2 | 2.6 72% | 5.3 42% | 14.5 -58% | 5.2 43% | 7.88 14% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.5 6% | 1.7 -6% | 10.5 -556% | 1.8 -13% | 3.9 -144% |
| Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.28 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.28 96% | 2.21 100% | 2.073 106% |
| CCT | 6356 102% | 6422 101% | 6394 102% | 8951 73% | 6312 103% | 7230 90% |
| Contrast | 898 | 1103 | 1088 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 238.1 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 238.1 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 238.1 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (61794 - 62758, n=4) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (20.8 - 26.4, n=8) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (3721 - 4968, n=8) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (6784 - 11916, n=8) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Motorola Moto G6 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 (Chrome 64.0.3282.137) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 (Samsung Browser 5.4) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa (64 - 91, n=8) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Motorola Moto G6 Plus | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -9% | -10% | 18% | 130% | 51% | 29% | 1485% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 208.4 | 182 -13% | 198.5 -5% | 270.5 30% | 286.6 38% | 270 30% | 242 ? 16% | 1838 ? 782% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 100.6 | 77.1 -23% | 53 -47% | 139.6 39% | 216.1 115% | 194.5 93% | 100.5 ? 0% | 1430 ? 1321% |
| Random Read 4KB | 24.54 | 22.41 -9% | 25.86 5% | 37.97 55% | 58.4 138% | 79.5 224% | 43.2 ? 76% | 278 ? 1033% |
| Random Write 4KB | 10.68 | 12.13 14% | 10.54 -1% | 12.07 13% | 62.8 488% | 7.1 -34% | 22.4 ? 110% | 310 ? 2803% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.4 ? | 73.7 ? -9% | 76.1 ? -7% | 78.7 ? -3% | 83.7 ? 3% | 84.4 4% | 71.8 ? -12% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.7 ? | 56 ? -15% | 63.9 ? -3% | 49.77 ? -24% | 62.1 ? -5% | 59.5 -9% | 52.9 ? -19% |
| Arena of Valor | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high HD | 26 fps | ||
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| Balanced | 13 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.27 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.81 / 1.26 / 1.3 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
2.87 / 4.82 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | 31% | -28% | -13% | -73% | -18% | -54% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.81 | 0.64 21% | 0.39 52% | 0.67 17% | 0.5 38% | 0.7 14% | 0.71 ? 12% | 0.895 ? -10% |
| Idle Average * | 1.26 | 1.36 -8% | 1.06 16% | 1.7 -35% | 1.78 -41% | 2.8 -122% | 1.909 ? -52% | 1.447 ? -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.3 | 1.4 -8% | 1.08 17% | 1.78 -37% | 1.81 -39% | 3.4 -162% | 1.995 ? -53% | 1.608 ? -24% |
| Load Average * | 2.87 | 2.53 12% | 1.82 37% | 4.42 -54% | 3.3 -15% | 4.2 -46% | 3.02 ? -5% | 6.41 ? -123% |
| Load Maximum * | 4.82 | 3.63 25% | 3.21 33% | 6.3 -31% | 5.14 -7% | 7.2 -49% | 4.42 ? 8% | 9.61 ? -99% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A6 2018 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy J7 2017 3600 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Motorola Moto G6 Plus 3200 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 39% | 43% | -2% | 6% | -18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1616 | 2418 50% | 1950 21% | 1840 14% | 1846 14% | |
| H.264 | 868 | 984 13% | 1096 26% | 644 -26% | 542 -38% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 608 | 843 39% | 904 49% | 730 20% | 702 15% | 497 -18% |
| Load | 301 | 467 55% | 525 74% | 254 -16% | 404 34% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Samsung erbjuder en bra mittenskikts-smartphone med sin Galaxy A6 (2018), som får tävla mot kapabla konkurrenter. Den har ett flertal fördelar men också precis lika många nackdelar.
Samsung Galaxy A6 (2018) är en bra mittenskikts-smartphone som presterar sämre än sin föregångare Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) på ett antal områden.
Galaxy A6 (2018) får många poäng för sin utmärkta design, ljusstarka och välkalibrerade skärm och långa batteritid. Den har också uppdaterad Android (8.0 Oreo), riktig Dual SIM-funktionalitet samt utökningsbar lagring (den interna lagringen kan utökas med ett microSD-kort). Kameramodulen presterar inte särskilt bra: Huvudkameran på 16 MP producerar "okej" foton i dagsljus men får kämpa i situationer med lite ljus.
Galaxy A6 (2018) för ca 3000 kronor har en del brister. MicroUSB-porten är kraftigt utdaterad. Andra nackdelar inkluderar: Långsam WiFi, avsaknad av IP-certifiering och att den tar lång tid att ladda. Med sin Exynos 7870 SoC och ARM Mali T830 MP2-grafikenhet så har Galaxy A6 (2018) mer än tillräckligt med prestanda för vardagsanvändning. Men den är inte i närheten av tillräckligt kraftfull för spel. Totalt sett är föregångaren Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) ett bättre val, om du inte behöver stöd för Dual-SIM. Den har bättre prestanda till ett lägre pris.
Samsung Galaxy A6 2018
-
06/28/2018 v6 (old)
Manuel Masiero