Test: Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus (2018) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 519 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.06
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 Super AMOLED, 2220x1080, 6" | Huawei P20 Lite IPS, 2280x1080, 5.8" | HTC U11 Life SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XA2 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 Super AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.2" | BQ Aquaris X Pro IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -106% | -94% | -136% | 8% | -204% | -77% | |
| Brightness middle | 519 | 528 2% | 545 5% | 513 -1% | 539 4% | 458 -12% | 458 -12% |
| Brightness | 513 | 525 2% | 526 3% | 506 -1% | 542 6% | 473 -8% | 463 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 89 -4% | 87 -6% | 93 0% | 93 0% | 88 -5% | 92 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.51 | 0.22 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 4.7 -161% | 4.9 -172% | 5 -178% | 1.6 11% | 7.1 -294% | 4 -122% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.6 | 8.9 -147% | 8.5 -136% | 11.4 -217% | 2.6 28% | 14.5 -303% | 7.4 -106% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 6.4 -327% | 5.4 -260% | 7.8 -420% | 1.5 -0% | 10.5 -600% | 4.7 -213% |
| Gamma | 2.06 107% | 2.22 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.2 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.28 96% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6462 101% | 7987 81% | 7610 85% | 7964 82% | 6422 101% | 8951 73% | 7425 88% |
| Contrast | 1035 | 1298 | 1221 | 898 | 2082 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (56497 - 73468, n=11) | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (5.38 - 5.41, n=2) | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Nokia 7 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (129 - 129, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (22 - 22.7, n=13) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (3470 - 4115, n=14) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (11012 - 11863, n=14) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60) | |
| Sony Xperia XA2 (Chrome 65.0.3325.109) | |
| HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (90 - 103, n=7) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 (Chrome 67) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 (Samsung Browser (Chrome 44)) | |
| BQ Aquaris X Pro (Chrome 59.0.3071.125) | |
| Huawei P20 Lite (Chrome 63) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 | Huawei P20 Lite | HTC U11 Life | Sony Xperia XA2 | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | BQ Aquaris X Pro | Nokia 7 Plus | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 72% | 30% | -4% | -29% | -10% | 20% | -7% | 1052% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 298.8 | 293.9 -2% | 268 -10% | 271.5 -9% | 182 -39% | 270.5 -9% | 283.1 -5% | 242 ? -19% | 1887 ? 532% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 88.5 | 198.3 124% | 120 36% | 127.4 44% | 77.1 -13% | 139.6 58% | 211.6 139% | 100.5 ? 14% | 1471 ? 1562% |
| Random Read 4KB | 72.9 | 48.19 -34% | 39.3 -46% | 43.07 -41% | 22.41 -69% | 37.97 -48% | 54.7 -25% | 43.2 ? -41% | 278 ? 281% |
| Random Write 4KB | 16.1 | 71.1 342% | 50.2 212% | 13.82 -14% | 12.13 -25% | 12.07 -25% | 19.62 22% | 22.4 ? 39% | 311 ? 1832% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 83.4 ? | 83.5 ? 0% | 82.8 ? -1% | 86 ? 3% | 73.7 ? -12% | 78.7 ? -6% | 82.2 -1% | 71.8 ? -14% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 67.8 ? | 69 ? 2% | 59.8 ? -12% | 64.8 ? -4% | 56 ? -17% | 49.77 ? -27% | 62.3 -8% | 52.9 ? -22% |
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| Temple Run 2 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| default | 60 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei P20 Lite audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.22 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.62 / 0.96 / 0.99 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
1.85 / 3.04 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 3500 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -95% | -76% | -45% | -28% | -82% | -102% | -101% | -128% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.62 | 0.98 -58% | 0.63 -2% | 0.39 37% | 0.64 -3% | 0.67 -8% | 0.65 -5% | 0.794 ? -28% | 0.883 ? -42% |
| Idle Average * | 0.96 | 2 -108% | 2.1 -119% | 1.61 -68% | 1.36 -42% | 1.7 -77% | 1.76 -83% | 2.27 ? -136% | 1.467 ? -53% |
| Idle Maximum * | 0.99 | 2.11 -113% | 2.15 -117% | 1.62 -64% | 1.4 -41% | 1.78 -80% | 1.78 -80% | 2.48 ? -151% | 1.621 ? -64% |
| Load Average * | 1.85 | 3.9 -111% | 3.34 -81% | 3.12 -69% | 2.53 -37% | 4.42 -139% | 4.47 -142% | 3.95 ? -114% | 6.55 ? -254% |
| Load Maximum * | 3.04 | 5.62 -85% | 4.83 -59% | 4.92 -62% | 3.63 -19% | 6.3 -107% | 9.13 -200% | 5.38 ? -77% | 9.9 ? -226% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018 3500 mAh | Huawei P20 Lite 3000 mAh | HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh | Sony Xperia XA2 3300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 3000 mAh | BQ Aquaris X Pro 3100 mAh | Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -41% | -10% | 4% | 20% | -17% | -26% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1817 | 750 -59% | 1820 0% | 2503 38% | 2418 33% | 1840 1% | 1703 -6% |
| H.264 | 916 | 470 -49% | 798 -13% | 766 -16% | 984 7% | 644 -30% | 706 -23% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 848 | 582 -31% | 725 -15% | 886 4% | 843 -1% | 730 -14% | 672 -21% |
| Load | 335 | 247 -26% | 303 -10% | 298 -11% | 467 39% | 254 -24% | 158 -53% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I våra tester framstår Samsung Galaxy A6+ som en bra mittenskikts-telefon. Prestandatesternas blandade resultat lämnar A6 Plus i det lägre mittenskiktet vid jämförelse med konkurrenterna, men bra batteritid får den ändå att stå ut från konkurrensen. Det mest betydelsefulla säljargumentet är dess Super AMOLED-skärm. Vanliga IPS-paneler kan inte hålla jämna steg med den här skärmens bildkvalitet.
Samsung Galaxy A6+ står ut med sin OLED-skärm och långa batteritid. Dessutom har den tunn design och smidig systemprestanda, så intresserade köpare kan förvänta sig en gedigen mittenskikts-telefon.
För det rekommenderade priset på ca 3.700 kronor hade Galaxy A6+ inte varit särskilt värd att rekommendera. Men då många onlinebutiker redan erbjuder den för under 3.000 kronor så är den nu en av dom bäst presterande modellerna i det lägre prisskiktet.
Samsung Galaxy A6 Plus 2018
- 06/26/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
