Test: Samsung Galaxy A71 - En XXL-skärm och fyra kameror (Sammanfattning)
Enhetsjämförelse
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.1 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A71 SD 730, Adreno 618 | 179 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
86.1 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Samsung Galaxy A70 SD 675, Adreno 612 | 183 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
79 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition Kirin 710, Mali-G51 MP4 | 159 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.15" | 2312x1080 | |
80.3 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Motorola One Hyper SD 675, Adreno 612 | 210 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.50" | 2340x1080 | |
80.2 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Google Pixel 3a SD 670, Adreno 616 | 147 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 5.60" | 2220x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Motorola One Hyper | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Motorola One Hyper | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 629 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.1
Samsung Galaxy A71 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A70 Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition IPS, 2312x1080, 6.2" | Motorola One Hyper IPS, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Google Pixel 3a P-OLED, 2220x1080, 5.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -19% | -40% | -27% | -35% | |
Brightness middle | 629 | 554 -12% | 507 -19% | 455 -28% | 403 -36% |
Brightness | 646 | 552 -15% | 481 -26% | 444 -31% | 411 -36% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 98 3% | 88 -7% | 78 -18% | 96 1% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.53 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 3.3 -22% | 4.72 -75% | 3.86 -43% | 5.1 -89% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6 | 9.2 -53% | 7.84 -31% | 6.59 -10% | 11 -83% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 3.4 -13% | 5.5 -83% | 4 -33% | 2 33% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.08 106% | 2.158 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6340 103% | 6606 98% | 7596 86% | 7367 88% | 6589 99% |
Contrast | 1334 | 858 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 247.5 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 247.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 247.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (22 - 27, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (24 - 30, n=4) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (247507 - 247877, n=2) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (202586 - 210836, n=2) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (159151 - 171518, n=2) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (36.6 - 50.1, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (65.3 - 87.5, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (32.8 - 46.5, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (60 - 86, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (12771 - 17501, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei P30 Lite New Edition (Chrome 79) | |
Google Pixel 3a | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 (2564 - 3436, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A70 (Chrome 74.0.3729.157) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A71 | Samsung Galaxy A70 | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition | Motorola One Hyper | Google Pixel 3a | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | 53% | 1% | -15% | 2% | 311% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 493 | 508 3% | 800 62% | 492.2 0% | 302 -39% | 530 ? 8% | 1839 ? 273% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 192.4 | 194 1% | 391.1 103% | 190.8 -1% | 253.9 32% | 212 ? 10% | 1425 ? 641% |
Random Read 4KB | 112.3 | 103.8 -8% | 198.7 77% | 129.4 15% | 63.6 -43% | 130.6 ? 16% | 277 ? 147% |
Random Write 4KB | 109.6 | 21.95 -80% | 171.6 57% | 106.9 -2% | 99.9 -9% | 101.2 ? -8% | 309 ? 182% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.4 ? | 76.2 ? 4% | 76.6 ? 4% | 74.3 ? 1% | 68.3 ? -7% | ||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 57.2 ? | 58.8 ? 3% | 66.8 ? 17% | 53.6 ? -6% | 53.2 ? -7% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy A71 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A70 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 33.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.32 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.63 / 1.49 / 1.51 Watt |
Hög belastning |
4.62 / 7.11 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh | Motorola One Hyper 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | -30% | 15% | 6% | -25% | ||
Idle Minimum * | 0.63 | 0.66 -5% | 0.95 -51% | 0.61 3% | 0.643 ? -2% | 0.894 ? -42% | |
Idle Average * | 1.49 | 1.69 -13% | 2.1 -41% | 1.56 -5% | 1.235 ? 17% | 1.456 ? 2% | |
Idle Maximum * | 1.51 | 1.8 -19% | 2.4 -59% | 1.6 -6% | 1.448 ? 4% | 1.616 ? -7% | |
Load Average * | 4.62 | 3.42 26% | 4.2 9% | 2.67 42% | 4.28 ? 7% | 6.45 ? -40% | |
Load Maximum * | 7.11 | 5.88 17% | 7.7 -8% | 4.33 39% | 6.65 ? 6% | 9.8 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A70 4500 mAh | Huawei P30 Lite New Edition 3340 mAh | Motorola One Hyper 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | -22% | -8% | -25% | |
Reader / Idle | 2164 | 2600 20% | 1359 -37% | ||
H.264 | 1164 | 1117 -4% | 802 -31% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 815 | 736 -10% | 719 -12% | 753 -8% | 612 -25% |
Load | 242 | 233 -4% | 223 -8% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Galaxy A71 är en bra telefon från mittenskiktet
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med Galaxy A71 har Samsung skapat en bra mittenskiktstelefon med alla fördelar föregångaren hade och dessutom har de lagt till en del extrasaker. A71 har exempelvis bredare LTE-täckning än Galaxy A70 och den har en extra kamera på baksidan. Huvudkameran har dessutom en sensor på 64 MP, en uppgradering från den sensor på 32 MP som satt i Galaxy A70. Precis som sin föregångare tar A71 bara bra bilder i dagsljus.
Den största höjdpunkten med Galaxy A71 är Super AMOLED-skärmen på 6.7 tum, något den delar med Galaxy A70. A71 har däremot en mer ljusstark panel samtidigt som den har lika bra färgprecision. Vår recensionsenhet har också lika bra batteritid.
Samsung Galaxy A71 gör allt lika bra som sin föregångare men kommer inte direkt med några egentliga innovationer.
Totalt sett är det inte värt att uppgradera från Galaxy A70 till A71. Även om A71 är en bra allt-i-allo gör den knappt något nytt. Galaxy A70 är dessutom ca 1.000 kronor billigare än A71, vilket gör att det knappt finns någon anledning att byta till Samsungs senaste Galaxy A-telefon.
Samsung Galaxy A71
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Manuel Masiero