Test: Samsung Galaxy Fold 5G - En ihopvikbar telefon som andas självförtroende (Sammanfattning)
Enhetsjämförelse
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.4 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Samsung Galaxy Fold SD 855, Adreno 640 | 276 g | 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | 7.30" | 2152x1536 | |
| 87.1 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 226 g | 64 GB SSD | 6.50" | 2688x1242 | |
| 84.5 % v7 (old) | 01/2019 | Huawei Mate 20 X Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10 | 232 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 7.20" | 2244x1080 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12 | 198 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 3040x1440 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2019 | ZTE Axon 10 Pro SD 855, Adreno 640 | 178 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 531 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.15
| Samsung Galaxy Fold Infinity Flex-Display (Dynamic AMOLED, 7,3") und Super AMOLED (4,6"), 2152x1536, 7.3" | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy Note10+ Dynamic AMOLED, 3040x1440, 6.8" | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5" | Huawei Mate 20 X OLED, 2244x1080, 7.2" | ZTE Axon 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -31% | -8% | 20% | 10% | -59% | |
| Brightness middle | 531 | 735 38% | 683 29% | 790 49% | 421 -21% | 402 -24% |
| Brightness | 532 | 735 38% | 694 30% | 790 48% | 418 -21% | 399 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 94 -3% | 96 -1% | 97 0% | 96 -1% | 92 -5% |
| Black Level * | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 3.9 -70% | 2.9 -26% | 1.4 39% | 1.1 52% | 4.1 -78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 10.9 -195% | 4.8 -30% | 3.4 8% | 2.2 41% | 6.5 -76% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.4 7% | 2.2 -47% | 1.9 -27% | 1.4 7% | 3.7 -147% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.09 105% | 2.11 104% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6631 98% | 6549 99% | 6247 104% | 6466 101% | 6723 97% | 7841 83% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (10330 - 14439, n=19) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (8342 - 11440, n=19) | |
| AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (217967 - 398720, n=16) | |
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (239512 - 268271, n=12) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (45.5 - 67, n=16) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samung Browser 10.1) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samung Browser 9.2) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (84.4 - 120, n=17) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (42.5 - 67.9, n=15) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (90 - 129, n=20) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (17011 - 33918, n=21) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Note10+ (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 (1852 - 2611, n=19) | |
| Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold (Samsung Browser 10.1) | |
| ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max (Safari Mobile 13.1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Fold | Huawei Mate 20 X | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G | ZTE Axon 10 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Note10+ | OnePlus 7 Pro | Average 512 GB UFS 3.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 124% | -30% | 108% | 131% | -2% | 142% | 301% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 1303 | 912 -30% | 816 -37% | 769 -41% | 1504 15% | 1468 13% | 1593 ? 22% | 1894 ? 45% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 394.5 | 182.7 -54% | 246.3 -38% | 503 28% | 588 49% | 387 -2% | 565 ? 43% | 1476 ? 274% |
| Random Read 4KB | 158.4 | 144.4 -9% | 135 -15% | 150.4 -5% | 196.2 24% | 174.1 10% | 211 ? 33% | 278 ? 76% |
| Random Write 4KB | 34.41 | 237.6 590% | 23.79 -31% | 189.5 451% | 183.6 434% | 24.8 -28% | 196.5 ? 471% | 312 ? 807% |
PUBG Mobile
Battle Bay
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy Fold audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.19 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.6 / 0.85 / 1 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.47 / 9.02 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Fold 4235 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh | ZTE Axon 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -88% | -50% | -51% | -10% | -43% | -48% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.6 | 0.92 -53% | 0.79 -32% | 0.66 -10% | 0.76 -27% | 0.939 ? -57% | 0.883 ? -47% |
| Idle Average * | 0.85 | 2.9 -241% | 1.72 -102% | 1.82 -114% | 1.15 -35% | 1.506 ? -77% | 1.467 ? -73% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1 | 2.94 -194% | 1.83 -83% | 1.83 -83% | 1.18 -18% | 1.799 ? -80% | 1.621 ? -62% |
| Load Average * | 4.47 | 3.65 18% | 5.53 -24% | 6.11 -37% | 3.95 12% | 4.61 ? -3% | 6.58 ? -47% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.02 | 6.18 31% | 9.85 -9% | 9.81 -9% | 7.49 17% | 9.04 ? -0% | 9.91 ? -10% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy Fold 4235 mAh | Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 3969 mAh | Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh | ZTE Axon 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Note10+ 4300 mAh | OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 41% | 9% | 8% | -1% | -8% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1724 | 2618 52% | 1984 15% | 2340 36% | 1927 12% | 1585 -8% | 1745 1% |
| H.264 | 1027 | 1346 31% | 986 -4% | 1047 2% | 1068 4% | 934 -9% | 802 -22% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 600 | 909 52% | 786 31% | 533 -11% | 680 13% | 532 -11% | 768 28% |
| Load | 316 | 408 29% | 300 -5% | 327 3% | 217 -31% | 305 -3% | 236 -25% |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Ömtålig och innovativ
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Den är äntligen här, den första ihopvikbara telefonen som når Europa och våra kontor. Galaxy Fold är utan tvekan en innovativ produkt - med sin vikbara skärm erbjuder den ett fönster in i framtiden. Huruvida Samsungs design är ideal är dock en fråga om smak. Huawei Mate X ser bra ut, men om skärmen är lika känslig som den i Galaxy Fold måste vi ifrågasätta hur hållbar och praktisk den är.
Föga förvånande är huvudskärmen en av de största bristerna med Galaxy Fold. Den vikbara skärmen är känslig trots förstärkning, så förvänta dig inte att Galaxy Fold ska vara robust eller MIL-STD- eller IP-certifierad. Att bara trycka för hårt eller trycka på den med naglarna kan lämna djupa avtryck i skärmen, vilket kan bli ett problem för barn eller för den som har lösnaglar. Samsung täcker inte nödvändigtvis sådan skada ens med Care+, vilket är värt att tänka på innan du köper Galaxy Fold. Reparationer efter det första året ska vi nog inte ens prata om.
Ihopvikbar, utmärkta tillbehör och många superlativ. Samsung Galaxy Fold är en kraftfull bit teknik, men den kanske bara är för personer med känsliga fingrar.
Mjukvaran, som än så länge bara har anpassats till det här formatet, begränsar också nöjet man får ut av Galaxy Fold. Men eftersom Galaxy Fold är en av de första modellerna av sitt slag kan vi för tillfället ha förbiseende med de mjukvarubaserade bristerna. Totalt sett är Galaxy Fold en riktigt bra och välansluten smartphone. Så om du har pengar över och sköter om dina telefoner väl kan Samsung Galaxy Fold vara värd att överväga.
Samsung Galaxy Fold
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
