Test: Samsung Galaxy M31s – Galaxy-mobil med kraftfullt batteri (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.4 % v7 (old) | 11/2020 | Samsung Galaxy M31s Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 203 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
| 79.8 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Samsung Galaxy M31 Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3 | 191 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
| 81.1 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Realme 7 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 182 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus SD 765, Adreno 620 | 207 g | 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2520x1080 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2340x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
| Realme 7 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
| Realme 7 Pro | |
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main lens - FlowersMain lens - SurroundingsMain lens - Low lightUltra wide angle
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 95 %
Mitt på batteriet: 584 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.084
| Samsung Galaxy M31s Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy M31 Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Realme 7 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus LTPS, 2520x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 1% | 8% | 19% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle | 584 | 622 7% | 507 -13% | 461 -21% | 584 0% |
| Brightness | 586 | 615 5% | 508 -13% | 458 -22% | 583 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 97 2% | 97 2% | 93 -2% | 97 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.52 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.09 | 2.25 -8% | 1.88 10% | 1.01 52% | 1.17 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.96 | 6.22 22% | 3.63 54% | 2.1 74% | 2.95 63% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.7 -23% | 2 9% | 1.5 32% | 1.7 23% |
| Gamma | 2.084 106% | 2.019 109% | 2.338 94% | 2.25 98% | 2.231 99% |
| CCT | 6512 100% | 6810 95% | 6665 98% | 6701 97% | 6341 103% |
| Contrast | 887 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 125 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 125 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 125 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
| Realme 7 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5777 - 6697, n=7) | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
| Realme 7 Pro | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5080 - 5925, n=7) | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.9 - 14, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 16, n=7) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) | |
| AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (152185 - 187087, n=7) | |
| Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) | |
| Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
| Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chome 86) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7) | |
| WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
| Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s (Chrome 86) | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31 (Chrome 83) | |
| Motorola Moto G 5G Plus (Chrome 83) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy M31s | Samsung Galaxy M31 | Realme 7 Pro | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 4% | 9% | 17% | 54% | 18% | 245% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 490.3 | 489.5 0% | 521 6% | 885 81% | 980 100% | 760 ? 55% | 1887 ? 285% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 318.4 | 221.7 -30% | 198.1 -38% | 180.2 -43% | 476.9 50% | 297 ? -7% | 1471 ? 362% |
| Random Read 4KB | 105 | 128.9 23% | 159.8 52% | 138.1 32% | 156.4 49% | 152.9 ? 46% | 278 ? 165% |
| Random Write 4KB | 117.1 | 152.4 30% | 129.1 10% | 119.3 2% | 138.5 18% | 131.6 ? 12% | 311 ? 166% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.6 ? | 74.5 ? 1% | 86.7 ? 18% | 87.1 ? 18% | 76 ? 3% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 59.9 ? | 60.8 ? 2% | 64.9 ? 8% | 65.7 ? 10% | 59.6 ? -1% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.9 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy M31s audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (117.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy M31 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 64.8% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (120.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 88% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0 / 0.1 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  1.4 / 2.2 / 3.4 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
6.3 / 8.9 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy M31s 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M31 6000 mAh | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 9611 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | 1% | 11% | 9% | 22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 1.4 | 1.6 -14% | 1.5 -7% | 1.5 -7% | 1.173 ? 16% | 0.88 ? 37% |
| Idle Average * | 2.2 | 2.3 -5% | 2.1 5% | 2.2 -0% | 2.28 ? -4% | 1.444 ? 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 3.4 | 3.7 -9% | 2.9 15% | 2.9 15% | 2.86 ? 16% | 1.6 ? 53% |
| Load Average * | 6.3 | 6.7 -6% | 6.7 -6% | 4.4 30% | 5.97 ? 5% | 6.57 ? -4% |
| Load Maximum * | 8.9 | 9.4 -6% | 9.2 -3% | 7.2 19% | 7.83 ? 12% | 9.91 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy M31s 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy M31 6000 mAh | Realme 7 Pro 4500 mAh | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 1% | -29% | -37% | -6% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2439 | 2456 1% | 1549 -36% | 1683 -31% | |
| H.264 | 1416 | 1432 1% | 581 -59% | 1403 -1% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1309 | 1324 1% | 931 -29% | 914 -30% | 884 -32% |
| Load | 319 | 326 2% | 252 -21% | 448 40% |
För
Emot
Omdöme – Vissa höjdpunkter, låg styrka
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
I likhet med sin syskonmodell är Samsung Galaxy M31s inte perfekt; den har lite för lite prestanda för sitt prisskikt och kameran behöver förbättras på en del områden.
Det väldigt stora batteriet och den resulterande långa batteritiden vid låg eller mediumbelastning är ett starkt argument för Samsungs mittenskikts-telefon. AMOLED-skärmen med skaplig färgprecision är förstås också bra och vi gillade att telefonen hade en dedikerad microSD-plats samt stöd för ett ganska brett utbud av LTE-frekvenser. Monohögtalaren är inte ett HiFi-system, men den är inte dålig för en mittenskiktstelefon.
Samsung Galaxy M31s har en del höjdpunkter i form av lång batteritid och en stark AMOLED-skärm. Men systemet hade behövt vara mer kraftfullt.
Däremot var positioneringen inte särskilt exakt. Samsung har också installerat en relativt stor mängd bloatware och har vid skrivande stund inte riktigt hållt sin telefon uppdaterad med nya säkerhetspatchar.
Telefonen lämnade ett blandat intryck. Galaxy M31s diskvalificerar sig inte från ett köp och kan dessutom stå ut när det kommer till områden som batteritid. Men det finns också stark konkurrens i det här prisskiktet som har mer prestanda och till viss del också modern 5G-anslutbarhet.
Samsung Galaxy M31s
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
