Test: Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Tillbaka till att vara bäst. Note 8 skiner med en stor, utmärkt Infinity-skärm, hög prestanda och, för första gången, en dual-kamera. Som vanligt får S-pennan plats i höljet och är inkluderad. Huruvida Samsung har tagit fram en ideal "phablet" efter katastrofen som var Note 7 får testet visa.
Uppdatering: Information gällande PWM, skärmens responstid, temperaturer och energikonsumtion har lagts till.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 09/20/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Galaxy Note Serie)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa 8 x 2.3 GHz, Mongoose / Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G71 MP20, Kärna: 850 MHz

Minne

6 GB

, LPDDR4x

Skärm

6.30 tum 2.06:1, 2960 x 1440 pixlar 522 PPI, kapacitiv, 10 punkters multitouch, native pen support, Infinity Display, Super AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 51 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: kombinerat hörlurs/mikrofon jack, Kortläsare: micro-SD max 400 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, position, hjärtrytm, Hall, rotation, närhet, tryck och G sensor, barometer, digital kompass, iris-scanner, ansiktsigenkänning, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, MST, Wifi Direct, Miracast, OTG

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM/GPRS/Edge (850, 900, 1800 och 1900 MHz), UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1880, 1900, 2010, 2100 MHz och AWS), LTE Cat. 16 (band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, AWS och AWS-3), LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.6 x 162.5 x 74.8

Batteri

3300 mAh Litiumjon, Batteritid (enligt tillverkaren): 12 tim, Samtalstid 2G (enligt tillverkaren): 22 tim

Operativsystem

Android 7.1 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-Kamera, 2X Optisk Zoom. Teleobjektivskamera: Upplösning: 12MP AF, Pixelstorlek: 1.0µm, Sensorstorlek: 1/3.6", Sensorförhållande: 4:3, FOV: 45°. F.No (bländare): F2.4. Vidvinkelkamera: Upplösning: Dual pixel 12MP AF, Pixelstorlek: 1.4µm, Sens
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix Sensorstorlek: 1/3.6", Sensorförhållande: 4:3, F1.7 bländare, Pixelstorlek: 1.22µm, FOV: 80°

Övrigt

Högtalare: monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, nätadapter, USB-kabel, AKG headset, två OTG adaptrar, SIM-verktyg, snabbstartsguide, säkerhetsinstruktioner, S Pen, verktyg för S Pen-spetsar, reservspetsar, Samsung Experience UI 8.5, Samsung och Microsoft apps, 24 Månader Garanti, USB Type-C (USB 3.1 Gen1), Bixby, huvud SAR: 0.173 W/kg, kropp SAR: 1.29 W/kg, IP68 certified, fanless

Vikt

195 g, Strömförsörjning: 62 g

Pris

9 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Low-light photo with the primary camera of Samsung's Galaxy Note 8

Low-light photo using the zoom of Samsung's Galaxy Note 8

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

HTC U11

Nokia 8

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

HTC U11

Nokia 8

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note 8

HTC U11

Nokia 8

Canon EOS 70D

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Test chart photo (wide-angle)

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Test chart photo (telephoto lens)

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Test chart photo center (wide-angle)

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Test chart photo center (telephoto lens)


525 cd/m²	522 cd/m²	545 cd/m²
526 cd/m²	530 cd/m²	550 cd/m²
532 cd/m²	534 cd/m²	560 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Infinity Display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 560 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 536 cd/m² Minimum: 1.84 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 530 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.04

	Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Dual Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2"	Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9"	Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5"	Honor 8 Pro IPS, 2560x1440, 5.7"
Screen		12%	20%	-28%	25%	0%	-19%
Brightness middle	530	544 3%	560 6%	696 31%	557 5%	578 9%	541 2%
Brightness	536	523 -2%	562 5%	680 27%	553 3%	568 6%	514 -4%
Brightness Distribution	93	84 -10%	93 0%	93 0%	97 4%	92 -1%	91 -2%
Black Level *				0.42	0.35	0.62	0.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.6	1.9 27%	1.7 35%	4.3 -65%	1.4 46%	2.8 -8%	3.2 -23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.1	4.2 18%	3.4 33%	9.4 -84%	3.1 39%	5.1 -0%	7.2 -41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.7	1.8 33%	1.6 41%	4.8 -78%	1.3 52%	2.8 -4%	4 -48%
Gamma	2.04 ^108%	2.12 ^104%	2.13 ^103%	2.33 ^94%	2.21 ^100%	2.15 ^102%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6206 ^105%	6449 ^101%	6435 ^101%	7255 ^90%	6667 ^97%	6728 ^97%	7120 ^91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		83.92	81.57		63.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100	99.87		99.83
Contrast				1657	1591	932	1803

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

257.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 257.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 257.7 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	173997 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	133845 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	165382 Points -5%
Huawei Mate 9	124087 Points -29%
LG V30	173749 Points 0%
HTC U11	175032 Points +1%
Honor 8 Pro	146044 Points -16%
HP Elite x3	115867 Points -33%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	165399 Points -5%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	6084 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	5115 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5830 Points -4%
Huawei Mate 9	7403 Points +22%
LG V30	6854 Points +13%
HTC U11	8295 Points +36%
Honor 8 Pro	7356 Points +21%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	5096 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5195 Points +2%
Huawei Mate 9	6299 Points +24%
LG V30	5603 Points +10%
HTC U11	6828 Points +34%
Honor 8 Pro	6134 Points +20%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	3338 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	2626 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3301 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 9	2772 Points -17%
LG V30	2702 Points -19%
HTC U11	3034 Points -9%
Honor 8 Pro	2985 Points -11%
HP Elite x3	1499 Points -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3097 Points -7%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	5308 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	3994 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	5319 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 9	3616 Points -32%
LG V30	4238 Points -20%
HTC U11	5570 Points +5%
Honor 8 Pro	4029 Points -24%
HP Elite x3	1384 Points -74%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6582 Points +24%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	3095 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	2532 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3135 Points +1%
Huawei Mate 9	3850 Points +24%
LG V30	2091 Points -32%
HTC U11	2085 Points -33%
Honor 8 Pro	4277 Points +38%
HP Elite x3	2003 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1319 Points -57%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	6121 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	4273 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6126 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 9	3939 Points -36%
LG V30	5949 Points -3%
HTC U11	5976 Points -2%
Honor 8 Pro	4070 Points -34%
HP Elite x3	3974 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	6875 Points +12%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	1235 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	1101 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1163 Points -6%
Huawei Mate 9	1076 Points -13%
LG V30	1009 Points -18%
HTC U11	1221 Points -1%
Honor 8 Pro	1131 Points -8%
HP Elite x3	458 Points -63%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1542 Points +25%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	2028 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2015 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 9	1866 Points -8%
LG V30	1900 Points -6%
HTC U11	1906 Points -6%
Honor 8 Pro	1853 Points -9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	6744 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	6695 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 9	6445 Points -4%
LG V30	6078 Points -10%
HTC U11	6443 Points -4%
Honor 8 Pro	6245 Points -7%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	8310 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	8295 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 9	Points -100%
LG V30	8016 Points -4%
HTC U11	8281 Points 0%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	32399 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	22523 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	29282 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 9	27364 Points -16%
LG V30	34139 Points +5%
HTC U11	40014 Points +24%
Honor 8 Pro	25766 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	37746 Points +17%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	36807 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	23431 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	33077 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 9	35626 Points -3%
LG V30	55271 Points +50%
HTC U11	55725 Points +51%
Honor 8 Pro	32243 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	63386 Points +72%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	22829 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	19834 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	20892 Points -8%
Huawei Mate 9	15104 Points -34%
LG V30	14601 Points -36%
HTC U11	20140 Points -12%
Honor 8 Pro	15129 Points -34%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	15626 Points -32%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	3414 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	2292 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3958 Points +16%
Huawei Mate 9	2367 Points -31%
LG V30	4738 Points +39%
HTC U11	4744 Points +39%
Honor 8 Pro	1865 Points -45%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	3034 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	3928 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	2670 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	4786 Points +22%
Huawei Mate 9	2448 Points -38%
LG V30	5895 Points +50%
HTC U11	5877 Points +50%
Honor 8 Pro	1856 Points -53%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	4235 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	2342 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	1532 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2465 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 9	2123 Points -9%
LG V30	2808 Points +20%
HTC U11	2832 Points +21%
Honor 8 Pro	1896 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1522 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	2584 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	1901 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3188 Points +23%
Huawei Mate 9	2240 Points -13%
LG V30	3635 Points +41%
HTC U11	3590 Points +39%
Honor 8 Pro	1832 Points -29%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	2661 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	2049 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	3479 Points +31%
Huawei Mate 9	2294 Points -14%
LG V30	3903 Points +47%
HTC U11	3883 Points +46%
Honor 8 Pro	1746 Points -34%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	2346 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	1518 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	2466 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 9	2117 Points -10%
LG V30	2931 Points +25%
HTC U11	2841 Points +21%
Honor 8 Pro	2216 Points -6%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	59 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	52 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	58 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 9	60 fps +2%
LG V30	60 fps +2%
HTC U11	58 fps -2%
Honor 8 Pro	59 fps 0%
HP Elite x3	26.42 fps -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	57.7 fps -2%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	105 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	80 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	104 fps -1%
Huawei Mate 9	80 fps -24%
LG V30	113 fps +8%
HTC U11	91 fps -13%
Honor 8 Pro	43 fps -59%
HP Elite x3	47.19 fps -55%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	92 fps -12%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	38 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	25 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	38 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 9	37 fps -3%
LG V30	35 fps -8%
HTC U11	29 fps -24%
Honor 8 Pro	20 fps -47%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	55.2 fps +45%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	51 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	38 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	50 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 9	34 fps -33%
LG V30	59 fps +16%
HTC U11	51 fps 0%
Honor 8 Pro	29 fps -43%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	58.7 fps +15%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	14 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	23 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 9	28 fps +22%
LG V30	19 fps -17%
HTC U11	15 fps -35%
Honor 8 Pro	13 fps -43%
HP Elite x3	16.09 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.5 fps +80%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	42 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	26 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	42 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 9	24 fps -43%
LG V30	40 fps -5%
HTC U11	33 fps -21%
Honor 8 Pro	21 fps -50%
HP Elite x3	34.02 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	41.3 fps -2%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	7.9 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	13 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 9	14 fps +8%
LG V30	13 fps 0%
HTC U11	13 fps 0%
Honor 8 Pro	11 fps -15%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	25 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	15 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 9	fps -100%
LG V30	24 fps -4%
HTC U11	24 fps -4%
Honor 8 Pro	15 fps -40%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	30.86 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	13.33 fps -57%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	25.06 fps -19%
Huawei Mate 9	19.14 fps -38%
HTC U11	36.58 fps +19%

Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	43464 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	41901 Points -4%
Huawei Mate 9	42176 Points -3%
HTC U11	44696 Points +3%
High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	41022 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	19134 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	42335 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 9	31104 Points -24%
HTC U11	38752 Points -6%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	1295 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	714 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	1280 Points -1%
Huawei Mate 9	699 Points -46%
HTC U11	812 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	1177 Points -9%

Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	59.7 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note 7	59.7 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	59.7 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 9	60.5 fps +1%
HTC U11	60 fps +1%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Huawei Mate 9 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

LG V30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

HTC U11 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 (8998), Qualcomm Adreno 540, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Honor 8 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

HP Elite x3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Plus Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)	168.1 Points +142%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	71.6 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)	69.6 Points
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	69.5 Points 0%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)	68.6 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	62.2 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)	61.5 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133)	61.3 Points -12%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)	58.1 Points -17%
HP Elite x3	Points -100%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)	26053 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	14050 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)	13265 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133)	12579 Points -5%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	11945 Points -10%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)	11897 Points -10%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	11781 Points -11%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)	10672 Points -20%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)	10016 Points -24%
HP Elite x3 (Edge 1.14393)	8664 Points -35%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
HP Elite x3 (Edge 1.14393)	4398 ms * -134%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)	3199 ms * -70%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)	3157 ms * -68%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	2760 ms * -47%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)	2734 ms * -46%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	2622 ms * -40%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133)	2569 ms * -37%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	2237 ms * -19%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)	1877 ms *
Apple iPhone 7 Plus (Safari Mobile 10.0)	1103 ms * +41%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPhone 7 Plus	204 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (Chrome Mobile 44.0.2403.133)	177 Points +11%
HTC U11 (Chrome 58)	162 Points +2%
OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59)	161 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (Samsung Browser 6.0)	159 Points
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus (Samsung Browser 5.2)	154 Points -3%
Huawei Mate 9 (Chrome 54)	152 Points -4%
Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59)	149 Points -6%
Honor 8 Pro (Chrome Version 57)	141 Points -11%
HP Elite x3 (Edge 1.14393)	130 Points -18%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy Note 8	Samsung Galaxy Note 7	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	Huawei Mate 9	HTC U11	Honor 8 Pro	Sony Xperia XZ Premium
AndroBench 3-5		-21%	1%	-32%	66%	149%	-22%
Sequential Read 256KB	797	484.6 -39%	788 -1%	594 -25%	717 -10%	738 -7%	687 -14%
Sequential Write 256KB	205.9	135.2 -34%	194.2 -6%	142.9 -31%	206.4 0%	187.1 -9%	194 -6%
Random Read 4KB	122.5	82.7 -32%	127.2 4%	94.7 -23%	91.4 -25%	166.4 36%	74.1 -40%
Random Write 4KB	14.55	14.72 1%	15.27 5%	8.77 -40%	80 450%	151.6 942%	17.2 18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	67.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	72.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 7%	71.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 5%	54 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -20%	68.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 1%	54.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -20%	36.79 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -46%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	59.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	43.84 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -26%	57.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -4%	29.53 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -50%	46.25 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -22%	32.16 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -46%	33.31 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) -44%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


33.2 °C	33 °C	32.4 °C
35 °C	35 °C	33.8 °C
35.7 °C	34.7 °C	33.1 °C

Max: 35.7 °C
Medel: 34 °C


29.8 °C	31.3 °C	31.8 °C
30.6 °C	32.9 °C	34.6 °C
30.6 °C	36.2 °C	36.4 °C

Max: 36.4 °C
Medel: 32.7 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 29 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.06 / 0.13 Watt
Låg belastning	0.73 / 1.44 / 1.53 Watt
Hög belastning	4.56 / 5.09 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Note 8 3300 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note 7 3500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh	Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh	Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh	HP Elite x3 4150 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh
Power Consumption		-9%	9%	-33%	-37%	-37%	-33%
Idle Minimum *	0.73	0.72 1%	0.68 7%	0.78 -7%	0.62 15%	0.86 -18%	0.77 -5%
Idle Average *	1.44	1.37 5%	1.13 22%	2.13 -48%	2.44 -69%	1.46 -1%	2.04 -42%
Idle Maximum *	1.53	1.44 6%	1.16 24%	2.17 -42%	2.59 -69%	1.59 -4%	2.24 -46%
Load Average *	4.56	5.56 -22%	4.69 -3%	6.32 -39%	4.94 -8%	8.1 -78%	4.69 -3%
Load Maximum *	5.09	6.78 -33%	5.24 -3%	6.49 -28%	7.91 -55%	9.35 -84%	8.66 -70%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		18tim 54min
WiFi Websurfing		7tim 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11tim 02min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 06min

	Samsung Galaxy Note 8	Samsung Galaxy Note 7	Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	HP Elite x3	Huawei Mate 9	Apple iPhone 7 Plus	HTC U11	OnePlus 5
Battery Runtime		37%	29%	18%	32%	25%	-3%	10%
Reader / Idle	1134	1429 26%	1565 38%	2205 94%	1538 36%	1835 62%	1250 10%	1534 35%
H.264	662	960 45%	742 12%	760 15%	947 43%	813 23%	498 -25%	623 -6%
WiFi v1.3	474	607 28%	736 55%	422 -11%	758 60%	587 24%	560 18%	518 9%
Load	246	361 47%	275 12%	185 -25%	219 -11%	225 -9%	212 -14%	247 0%

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Huawei Mate 9	677 min +37%
Samsung Galaxy J7 2017	669 min +35%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	533 min +8%
Samsung Galaxy Note 8	495 min
HTC U11	476 min -4%

In review: Samsung Galaxy Note 8. Review sample courtesy of Samsung Germany.

Läs det längre originaltestet på engelska här.

Samsung har återigen lanserat en superb produkt med sin Galaxy Note 8 och det finns inget riktigt "phablet"-alternativ för fans av S-Pennan. Telefonen har en enastående hårdvaru-konfiguration. Tillverkaren kunde med tanke på priset däremot gärna ha fått vara lite generösare med det interna lagringsutrymmet.

Skärm, prestanda och kamera är i toppklass. Säkerhetsorsaker är den enda förklaringen för det mindre batteriet när vi tittar på de första testresultaten. Batteritiden är under förväntan. Dom flesta användare borde dock klara sig en dag. Att Note 8 är tyngre förvirrar oss något.

Samsung's Galaxy Note 8 börjar på ett pris på runt 9 990 kr (999€). En DeX dockningsstation ingår gratis om man förbokar. Telefonen kommer troligen få väldigt bra betyg trots den lägre batteritiden och den inte helt optimala skärmen. Huruvida telefonen får en plats på podiet är dock fortarande osäkert.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Daniel Schmidt, 2017-09-20 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Test: Samsung Galaxy Note 8 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

More articles related to this device

Price comparison