Test: Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - Billigare penn-phablet (Sammanfattning)

Name: Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite
Brand: Samsung

Skissa billigare.

För att vinna fler kunder till sin stylus-utrustade Galaxy Note-serie har Samsung för första gången släppt en billigare version, kallad Galaxy Note 10 Lite. Läs vår recension för att få reda på varför vi tycker det var en bra idé.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Andrea Grüblinger (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 02/16/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Galaxy Note Serie)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9810 8 x - 2.9 GHz, Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G72 MP18

Minne

6 GB

Skärm

6.70 tum 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixlar 393 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 107 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 1 TB, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass, Barometer

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, GSM (850/900/1800/1900), UMTS (850/900/1800/1900), LTE (1,2,3,4,5,7,8,12,14,18,19,20,28,29,30), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.7 x 163.7 x 76.1

Batteri

4500 mAh Litiumjon

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix f/1.7, fasdetekterande AF (dual-pixel), OIS, LED-blixt, Video @2160p/60FPS (kamera 1); 12.0MP, f/2.4, fasdetekterande AF, OIS, teleobjektiv (kamera 2); 12.0MP, f/2.2, vidvinkelslins (kamera 3)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Snabbladdare, USB-kabel, Headset, SIM-verktyg, 24 Månader Garanti, LTE-A pro Cat 18 (1200/150 Mbit/s); SAR-värde: 0.291W/kg (huvud), 1.077W/kg (kropp); Stylus, fanless

Vikt

199 g, Strömförsörjning: 71 g

Pris

599 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Jämförelseenheter

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
82.8 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18	199 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12	168 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.30"	2280x1080
89 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Huawei Mate 30 Pro Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16	198 g	256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.53"	2400x1176
86.5 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU	194 g	64 GB SSD	6.10"	1792x828
83.3 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618	208 g	128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.47"	2340x1080
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	10/2019	OnePlus 7T SD 855+, Adreno 640	190 g	128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite OnePlus 7T Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Huawei Mate 30 Pro Apple iPhone 11 Samsung Galaxy Note10 DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	966 (923^min - 995^max) MBit/s +133%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	637 (584^min - 715^max) MBit/s +53%
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	529 (204^min - 603^max) MBit/s +27%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	440 (245^min - 489^max) MBit/s +6%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	422 (238^min - 447^max) MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	415 (295^min - 452^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	327 (321^min - 333^max) MBit/s -21%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	1010 (912^min - 1092^max) MBit/s +173%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro Mali-G76 MP16, Kirin 990, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	533 (468^min - 602^max) MBit/s +44%
Apple iPhone 11 A13 Bionic GPU, A13 Bionic, 64 GB SSD	563 (490^min - 597^max) MBit/s +52%
OnePlus 7T Adreno 640, SD 855+, 128 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	430 (374^min - 485^max) MBit/s +16%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9825, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	390 (294^min - 447^max) MBit/s +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Mali-G72 MP18, Exynos 9810, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	370 (342^min - 372^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	331 (317^min - 341^max) MBit/s -11%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø356 (315-388)

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø415 (295-452)

GPS Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite – Översikt

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite: 7.97 ∆E min: 1.71 - max: 16.26 ∆E


542 cd/m²	536 cd/m²	536 cd/m²
526 cd/m²	510 cd/m²	551 cd/m²
536 cd/m²	529 cd/m²	560 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 560 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 536.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.6 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 510 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
140.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.242

	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Dynamic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3"	Huawei Mate 30 Pro OLED, 2400x1176, 6.5"	Apple iPhone 11 IPS, 1792x828, 6.1"	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"	OnePlus 7T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"
Screen		35%	29%	49%	15%	29%
Brightness middle	510	764 50%	592 16%	679 33%	625 23%	693 36%
Brightness	536	757 41%	605 13%	671 25%	607 13%	703 31%
Brightness Distribution	91	91 0%	96 5%	93 2%	89 -2%	96 5%
Black Level *				0.68
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.6	2.66 60%	2.5 62%	0.8 88%	4.38 34%	3.42 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	17.56	5.65 68%	5.5 69%	2.4 86%	6.83 61%	6.12 65%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.9	3.2 -10%	2.6 10%	1.1 62%	4.1 -41%	3.3 -14%
Gamma	2.242 ^98%	2.073 ^106%	2.16 ^102%	2.24 ^98%	2.251 ^98%	2.265 ^97%
CCT	6989 ^93%	6326 ^103%	6173 ^105%	6610 ^98%	7251 ^90%	6799 ^96%
Contrast				999

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

229.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 229.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 229.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5 ms rise
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	679 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	822 Points +21%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	783 Points +15%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	1343 Points +98%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	543 Points -20%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	783 Points +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	679 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +37%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2033 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2191 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3059 Points +50%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3463 Points +70%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1723 Points -15%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2753 Points +35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	2033 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +48%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4140 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4593 Points +11%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4442 Points +7%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1128 Points -73%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	2707 Points -35%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	4140 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +1%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3794 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2457 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3222 Points -15%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	891 Points -77%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	3794 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)	3404 Points -10%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6571 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	11011 Points +68%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	13947 Points +112%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	9052 Points +38%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10286 Points +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (5736 - 6571, n=4)	6022 Points -8%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5851 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8801 Points +50%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10322 Points +76%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	7558 Points +29%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8702 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (5184 - 5851, n=4)	5411 Points -8%

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4734 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5096 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6815 Points +44%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3425 Points -28%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8136 Points +72%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3895 - 4734, n=4)	4137 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5586 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5732 Points +3%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7671 Points +37%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3498 Points -37%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10781 Points +93%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (4569 - 5586, n=4)	4905 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3087 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3670 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4900 Points +59%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3191 Points +3%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4377 Points +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2496 - 3087, n=4)	2675 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +7%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3744 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5048 Points +35%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7098 Points +90%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	9199 Points +146%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3535 Points -6%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8531 Points +128%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3744 - 4124, n=4)	3994 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +197%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3958 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5605 Points +42%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	7970 Points +101%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	17853 Points +351%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3646 Points -8%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	11433 Points +189%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3958 - 4904, n=4)	4626 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +398%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3148 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3746 Points +19%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5133 Points +63%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3411 Points +8%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3193 Points +1%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4517 Points +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2561 - 3148, n=4)	2752 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +59%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4022 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5003 Points +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6048 Points +50%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	4400 Points +9%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2394 Points -40%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6319 Points +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3244 - 4022, n=4)	3469 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4422 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5659 Points +28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6478 Points +46%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	5726 Points +29%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2237 Points -49%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7150 Points +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3553 - 4422, n=4)	3808 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3056 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3559 Points +16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	4909 Points +61%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	2429 Points -21%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3171 Points +4%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4492 Points +47%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2469 - 3056, n=4)	2645 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +8%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4291 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5300 Points +24%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6382 Points +49%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	6067 Points +41%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2561 Points -40%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6875 Points +60%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3376 - 4291, n=4)	3634 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +81%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4806 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	6087 Points +27%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6657 Points +39%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	8119 Points +69%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2425 Points -50%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	7977 Points +66%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3697 - 4806, n=4)	4023 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +140%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3120 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3649 Points +17%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5576 Points +79%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	3219 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3188 Points +2%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4635 Points +49%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2546 - 3120, n=4)	2717 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +48%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3613 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4921 Points +36%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5570 Points +54%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2265 Points -37%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5530 Points +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	3613 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	4201 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	6342 Points +51%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6369 Points +52%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2153 Points -49%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	6640 Points +58%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	4201 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points -26%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3120 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2758 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	3870 Points +24%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	2768 Points -11%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	3489 Points +12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	3120 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -13%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	58 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55 fps -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps +3%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +3%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	60 fps +3%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (58 - 60, n=4)	59.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +49%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	80 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	50 fps -37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	152 fps +90%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	322 fps +303%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	84 fps +5%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	185 fps +131%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (80 - 147, n=4)	129.3 fps +62%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +250%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	57 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	57 fps 0%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	60 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +5%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	38 fps -33%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	59 fps +4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (45 - 57, n=4)	48.5 fps -15%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +32%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	73 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	69 fps -5%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	106 fps +45%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	175 fps +140%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	41 fps -44%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	112 fps +53%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (73 - 76, n=4)	74 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +126%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	46 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	45 fps -2%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	73 fps +59%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +30%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	27 fps -41%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	58 fps +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (24 - 46, n=4)	29.8 fps -35%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +43%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	24 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	47 fps +96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	56 fps +133%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	117 fps +388%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	30 fps +25%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	79 fps +229%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (24 - 47, n=4)	40.5 fps +69%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +388%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	25 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	21 fps -16%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	34 fps +36%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +140%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	15 fps -40%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (14 - 25, n=4)	17 fps -32%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +91%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	29 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	21 fps -28%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	41 fps +41%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	73 fps +152%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	17 fps -41%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps +62%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (28 - 29, n=4)	28.3 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +143%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	28 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	35 fps +25%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	40 fps +43%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +114%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	16 fps -43%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	41 fps +46%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	28 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +77%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	31 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38 fps +23%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	49 fps +58%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	87 fps +181%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	18 fps -42%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	47 fps +52%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	31 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +157%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	17 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	29 fps +71%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	26 fps +53%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +253%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps -41%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	27 fps +59%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	17 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +120%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	11 fps
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	18 fps +64%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	19 fps +73%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	33 fps +200%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	10 fps -9%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	18 fps +64%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	11 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +191%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	3393 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4889 Points +44%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	5389 Points +59%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3392 Points 0%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	5124 Points +51%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (3110 - 3393, n=4)	3273 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +86%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	5707 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8014 Points +40%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	9309 Points +63%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	6445 Points +13%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	8988 Points +57%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (5707 - 6413, n=4)	6123 Points +7%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +78%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	2771 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4598 Points +66%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	6130 Points +121%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	4281 Points +54%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	4869 Points +76%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2068 - 2771, n=4)	2533 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +144%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	6444 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9465 Points +47%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	10112 Points +57%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	3878 Points -40%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	10611 Points +65%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (6370 - 6506, n=4)	6423 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +162%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	1300 Points
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Samsung Exynos 9825, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1638 Points +26%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	1462 Points +12%
Apple iPhone 11 Apple A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU, 4096	Points -100%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	1237 Points -5%
OnePlus 7T Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ / 855 Plus, Adreno 640, 8192	1485 Points +14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (1099 - 1300, n=4)	1160 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +20%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	329860 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	483224 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	266417 Points -19%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	329860 Points 0%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	102716 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	151146 Points +47%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	94730 Points -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	102716 Points 0%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	117851 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	160733 Points +36%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	70647 Points -40%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	117851 Points 0%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	51005 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	100390 Points +97%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	51664 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	51005 Points 0%
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite Samsung Exynos 9810, Mali-G72 MP18, 6144	58288 Points
Huawei Mate 30 Pro HiSilicon Kirin 990, Mali-G76 MP16, 8192	70955 Points +22%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 6144	49376 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	58288 Points 0%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	132.9 Points +312%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +273%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	65.9 Points +104%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	65.3 Points +102%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)	47.97 Points +49%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	46.04 Points +43%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	32.3 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	32.26 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	293.4 Points +366%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	120.8 Points +92%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	115.5 Points +84%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)	86.9 Points +38%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	79.2 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (62.9 - 69.6, n=4)	65.8 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	62.9 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	157 runs/min +303%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +249%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	74.1 runs/min +90%
OnePlus 7T (Chome 76)	69.1 runs/min +77%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chome 76)	59.7 runs/min +53%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	43.3 runs/min +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chome 80)	39 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 ()	39 runs/min 0%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	184 Points +156%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +107%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	119 Points +65%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	100 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)	97 Points +35%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	77 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	72 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (63 - 72, n=4)	67.8 Points -6%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	48819 Points +277%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +187%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	25353 Points +96%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	23568 Points +82%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)	18908 Points +46%
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	16241 Points +26%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (12933 - 15233, n=4)	14397 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	12933 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite (Chrome 80)	3189 ms *
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78)	2770 ms * +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9810 (2060 - 3189, n=4)	2509 ms * +21%
Samsung Galaxy Note10 (Chrome 76)	2478 ms * +22%
OnePlus 7T (Chrome 76)	2021 ms * +37%
Huawei Mate 30 Pro (Chrome 78)	1963 ms * +38%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +51%
Apple iPhone 11 (Safari Mobile 13.0)	573 ms * +82%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite	Samsung Galaxy Note10	Huawei Mate 30 Pro	Xiaomi Mi Note 10	OnePlus 7T	Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		95%	71%	-12%	11%	11%	253%
Sequential Read 256KB	777	1478 90%	1781 129%	480.5 -38%	1406 81%	760 ?(427 - 1011, n=113) -2%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 137%
Sequential Write 256KB	190.8	590 209%	401.8 111%	243.6 28%	218.4 14%	297 ?(13.6 - 719, n=113) 56%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 647%
Random Read 4KB	132	194.2 47%	226.4 72%	106.2 -20%	170.1 29%	152.9 ?(92.6 - 239, n=113) 16%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 110%
Random Write 4KB	142	191.9 35%	259.2 83%	118.9 -16%	29.9 -79%	131.6 ?(18.2 - 290, n=113) -7%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 118%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	73.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		82.5 ?(Nano Memory Card) 12%			76 ?(13.4 - 88.3, n=43) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)		69.2 ?(Nano Memory Card) 16%			59.6 ?(8.4 - 72.4, n=43) 0%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.8 (59-60)

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.8 (59-60)

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (25-31)

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.0.5a: Ø29.7 (26-31)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


38.5 °C	35.6 °C	33.2 °C
39.4 °C	35.8 °C	33.2 °C
38.9 °C	35.9 °C	32.4 °C

Max: 39.4 °C
Medel: 35.9 °C


31.2 °C	34.6 °C	35 °C
31.4 °C	34.4 °C	37.5 °C
30.8 °C	34.6 °C	39.1 °C

Max: 39.1 °C
Medel: 34.3 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 38.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.5 °C | Voltcraft IR-260/Fluke t3000 FC

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 70.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (130.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 99% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Note10 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Låg belastning	0.9 / 1.6 / 1.9 Watt
Hög belastning	8.4 / 10.3 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10 3500 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9810	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		5%	18%	-2%	12%	4%	19%	11%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.9 -0%	0.87 3%	0.56 38%	0.7 22%	0.9 -0%	0.783 ?(0.65 - 0.9, n=4) 13%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average *	1.6	1.2 25%	1.75 -9%	2.99 -87%	1.8 -13%	1.4 12%	1.315 ?(0.81 - 1.9, n=4) 18%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum *	1.9	2 -5%	1.83 4%	3.02 -59%	2.2 -16%	2.9 -53%	1.903 ?(0.92 - 3.7, n=4) -0%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 15%
Load Average *	8.4	7.7 8%	3.85 54%	4.17 50%	5.2 38%	4.7 44%	5.76 ?(4.58 - 8.4, n=4) 31%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) 23%
Load Maximum *	10.3	10.5 -2%	6.64 36%	5.44 47%	7.5 27%	8.3 19%	7.06 ?(5.16 - 10.3, n=4) 31%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		36tim 45min
WiFi Websurfing		15tim 04min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17tim 51min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 34min

	Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Note10 3500 mAh	Huawei Mate 30 Pro 4500 mAh	Apple iPhone 11 3110 mAh	Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh	OnePlus 7T 3800 mAh
Battery Runtime		-27%	-7%	6%	24%	-4%
Reader / Idle	2205	1392 -37%	2174 -1%	2765 25%	2134 -3%	2003 -9%
H.264	1071	803 -25%	1098 3%	1147 7%	1423 33%	967 -10%
WiFi v1.3	904	583 -36%	823 -9%	866 -4%	1127 25%	896 -1%
Load	274	246 -10%	219 -20%	267 -3%	387 41%	283 3%

För

+ Fantastisk penna

+ Lång batteritid

+ Bra kamerautrustning

+ Exakt GPS

+ Låg värmeutveckling

Emot

- Stryps vid ihållande belastning

- Plastbaksida av medelmåttig kvalitet

- Ingen IP-certifiering

Omdöme - Billigt insteg med kompromisser

Recension av Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Lite

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite är en billigare version av Samsungs flaggskeppstelefon. Detta framgår omedelbart av att den har ett ganska enkelt plasthölje, en mittenskikts-SoC, en enkel monohögtalare, en skärm med aningen lägre ljusstyrka och har stöd för färre LTE-frekvenser.

Men Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite behöver inte ses som en nerbantad version. Beroende på vilka preferenser man har kan Note10 Lite till och med ha några fördelar, där längre batteritid nog är den mest relevanta. Den som föredrar analogt ljud får en 3.5 mm ljudanslutning och det går att använda ett microSD-kort för att utöka lagringen. Galaxy Note10 saknar båda dessa alternativ.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 är en relativt billig ingång till Galaxy Note-familjen och förtjänar vår rekommendation.

Vidare har kamerorna bra bildkvalitet, den har en exakt GPS, mjukvaran är modern och den utmärkta stylusen är nästan unik såtillvida att den öppnar upp en hel uppsjö av möjligheter och det är bara ett fåtal funktioner som den saknar jämfört med de andra Note10-telefonerna.

Vi rekommenderar Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite till alla som önskat sig en billigare Galaxy Note-telefon. Men det kan också vara värt att ta en titt på Galaxy Note 9. Även om den är några månader äldre har den ungefär samma pris som Note10 Lite.

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - 09/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Design

76%

Tangentbord

65 / 75 → 87%

Mus

96%

Anslutningar

51 / 70 → 72%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

85%

Spelprestanda

42 / 64 → 66%

Programprestanda

63 / 86 → 74%

Temperatur

90%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

72 / 90 → 80%

Camera

73%

Medel

76%

83%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite - Billigare penn-phablet (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 2020-02-16 (Update: 2020-02-16)

Jämförelseenheter

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy Note10 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme - Billigt insteg med kompromisser

More articles related to this device

Price comparison