Test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - En superladdad S10 med en toppmodern nyhet

Name: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
Brand: Samsung

Först!

Samsung utannonserade Galaxy S10 5G på MWC 19, men det har tagit lite tid för den att komma till Europa. Den är större, har fler kameror och har ett större batteri än sina S10-syskon, men några saker har också uteslutits. Samsung har heller inte lyckats bli av med de problem som resten av S10-serien lider av. Läs vidare i den här detaljerade recensionen för att få reda på mer.

Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 07/31/2019 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Galaxy S Touchscreen Smartphone

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Galaxy S Serie)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9820 8 x 1.9 - 2.7 GHz, Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G76 MP12

Minne

8 GB

, LPDDR4x, 2,093 MHz

Skärm

6.70 tum 19:9, 3040 x 1440 pixlar 502 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, 10 punkters multitouch, Dual Edge Dynamic AMOLED, OLED, glansig: ja, HDR

Hårddisk

256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 226.1 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning och USB Typ C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyrosensor, Geomagnetisk sensor, Hall-sensor, Hjärtfrekvens-sensor, Närhetssensor, MST, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, Samsung DeX

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0, Samsung Exynos 5100 5G Modem: GSM/GPRS/Edge: 850, 900, 1,800, 1,900 MHz. UMTS/HSPA+: 850, 900, 1,880, 1,900, 2,010, 2,100, AWS. LTE Cat. 20: Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 66. 5G: N78., LTE, 5G, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.9 x 162.6 x 77.1

Batteri

17.33 Wh, 4500 mAh Litiumjon, 3.85 V

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operativsystem

Android 9.0 Pie

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (Dual-pixel autofokus, 77°, f/1.5 och f/2.4, 1/2.55", 1.4 μm, OIS). 12 MPix teleobjektiv, 2x förstoring, PDAF, 45°, f/2.4, 1/3.6", OIS. 16 MPix ultravidvinkelslins, fixfokus, 123°, f/2.2, 1/3.1". ToF-kamera (f/1.2, 1/6.0". UHD-video
Secondary Camera: 10 MPix (Dual-pixel autofokus, 80°, f/1.9, 1/3.24". ToF-kamera (f/1.6, 1/6.0"); Camera2 API: Fullständigt

Övrigt

Högtalare: Stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, One UI 1.1, 24 Månader Garanti, SAR-värden: Kropp – 1.55 W/kg, Huvud - 0.264 W/kg. VoLTE, VoWiFi, IP68-certifiering, Bixby, fanless, waterproof

Vikt

198 g

Pris

1199 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Storleksjämförelse

Huawei Mate 20 X OnePlus 7 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10 5G ZTE Axon 10 Pro Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Apple iPhone Xs Max LG G8s ThinQ DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei Mate 20 X Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (564^min - 663^max) MBit/s +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	602 MBit/s +10%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	548 (399^min - 599^max) MBit/s
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	527 (481^min - 556^max) MBit/s -4%
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	502 (465^min - 517^max) MBit/s -8%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	471 (438^min - 506^max) MBit/s -14%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	457 (398^min - 508^max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	633 (561^min - 684^max) MBit/s +12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max A12 Bionic GPU, A12 Bionic, 64 GB eMMC Flash	624 MBit/s +10%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	613 (284^min - 694^max) MBit/s +8%
LG G8s ThinQ Adreno 640, SD 855, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	578 (474^min - 617^max) MBit/s +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Mali-G76 MP12, Exynos 9820, 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	567 (371^min - 667^max) MBit/s
Huawei Mate 20 X Mali-G76 MP10, Kirin 980, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	566 (514^min - 586^max) MBit/s 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Adreno 640, SD 855, 256 GB UFS 3.0 Flash	467 (375^min - 519^max) MBit/s -18%

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø567 (371-667)

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø548 (399-599)

GPS-test: Garmin Edge 500 – Cykeltur runt en sjö

GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G – Cykeltur runt en sjö

GPS-test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - Slinga

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3 Scene 4

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G

Huawei Mate 20 Pro

Apple iPhone XS

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G

Huawei Mate 20 Pro

Apple iPhone XS

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G

Huawei Mate 20 Pro

Apple iPhone XS

Canon EOS 70D

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G

Huawei Mate 20 Pro

Apple iPhone XS

Canon EOS 70D

Foto av vår testkarta taget med standardkameran

ColorChecker Passport: Den nedre halvan av varje färgområde visar referensfärgen

Foto av vår testkarta taget med standardkameran vid 1 lux


710 cd/m²	737 cd/m²	751 cd/m²
719 cd/m²	735 cd/m²	753 cd/m²
725 cd/m²	737 cd/m²	745 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Dual Edge Dynamic AMOLED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 753 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 734.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.62 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 735 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.09

	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G OLED, 3040x1440, 6.7"	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4"	Huawei Mate 20 X OLED, 2244x1080, 7.2"	ZTE Axon 10 Pro AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"	OnePlus 7 Pro AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Apple iPhone Xs Max OLED, 2688x1242, 6.5"	LG G8s ThinQ P-OLED, 2248x1080, 6.2"
Screen		0%	11%	-37%	15%	14%	-13%
Brightness middle	735	710 -3%	421 -43%	402 -45%	586 -20%	656 -11%	539 -27%
Brightness	735	721 -2%	418 -43%	399 -46%	584 -21%	659 -10%	556 -24%
Brightness Distribution	94	97 3%	96 2%	92 -2%	97 3%	88 -6%	88 -6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.9	3.7 5%	1.1 72%	4.1 -5%	1.39 64%	1.7 56%	3.78 3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.9	10.3 6%	2.2 80%	6.5 40%	2.7 75%	2.8 74%	6.95 36%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.4	1.5 -7%	1.4 -0%	3.7 -164%	1.6 -14%	1.7 -21%	2.2 -57%
Gamma	2.09 ^105%	2.1 ^105%	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2.243 ^98%	1.998 ^110%	2.274 ^97%
CCT	6549 ^99%	6611 ^98%	6723 ^97%	7841 ^83%	6672 ^97%	6487 ^100%	6013 ^108%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240.4 Hz

≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN: Gråskala – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Blandade färger – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Färgrymd – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Adaptiv profil (Justerad): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Gråskala – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Blandade färger – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Färgrymd – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Adaptiv profil (Standard): DCI-P3 färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Gråskala – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Blandade färger – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Färgrymd – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål

CalMAN: Färgmättnad – Naturlig profil: sRGB färgrymd som mål

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3234 Points -29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3476 Points -23%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3472 Points -23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4774 Points +5%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3406 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4505 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4499 - 4529, n=4)	4510 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5486 Points +21%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10489 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9852 Points -6%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10765 Points +3%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10812 Points +3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11244 Points +7%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10274 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10259 Points -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10162 - 10553, n=4)	10366 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	15064 Points +44%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10192 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5759 Points -43%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7553 Points -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7470 Points -27%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7442 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	10177 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (10128 - 10192, n=4)	10167 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=58, last 2 years)	11998 Points +18%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9557 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	9867 Points +3%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11857 Points +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	11766 Points +23%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	11890 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	9793 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (9557 - 10008, n=4)	9777 Points +2%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7704 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7772 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9664 Points +25%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9974 Points +29%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9125 Points +18%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7812 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7595 - 7966, n=4)	7769 Points +1%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	54087 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	34035 Points -37%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60279 Points +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	64389 Points +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	77599 Points +43%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	65945 Points +22%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	55740 Points +3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54087 - 56465, n=4)	55454 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	66990 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	42579 Points -36%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	106799 Points +59%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	106829 Points +59%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	159735 Points +138%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	97354 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	70318 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (66990 - 72022, n=4)	70156 Points +5%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32308 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	19993 Points -38%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	23877 Points -26%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	26936 Points -17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	27717 Points -14%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	30972 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32302 Points 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (31297 - 32308, n=4)	32016 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2567 Points -51%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7407 Points +43%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7501 Points +45%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	5205 Points 0%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5251 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4465 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4015 - 5186, n=3)	4555 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	6058 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2347 Points -61%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9932 Points +64%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9845 Points +63%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	7055 Points +16%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6122 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5303 Points -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4507 - 6058, n=3)	5289 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3448 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3816 Points +11%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3919 Points +14%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4091 Points +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2713 Points -21%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3505 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2875 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2875 - 3448, n=3)	3076 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4766 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2525 Points -47%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7716 Points +62%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7955 Points +67%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	6667 Points +40%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5268 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4052 Points -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4052 - 4766, n=3)	4380 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points +133%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5307 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2536 Points -52%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	10279 Points +94%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	10420 Points +96%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	10374 Points +95%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6358 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4449 Points -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4449 - 5307, n=3)	4881 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points +271%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3513 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2488 Points -29%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4120 Points +17%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4352 Points +24%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2961 Points -16%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3293 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3087 Points -12%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (3077 - 3513, n=3)	3226 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points +42%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4579 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3575 Points -22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5661 Points +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5581 Points +22%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3544 Points -23%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5068 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4452 Points -3%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4383 - 4579, n=4)	4473 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5152 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3528 Points -32%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6356 Points +23%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6248 Points +21%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3726 Points -28%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6040 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5186 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5152 - 5206, n=4)	5180 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3296 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3751 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4093 Points +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4063 Points +23%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	3027 Points -8%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3242 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2977 Points -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2854 - 3296, n=4)	3033 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4821 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	3599 Points -25%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6162 Points +28%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	6270 Points +30%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4121 Points -15%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4604 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4529 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4529 - 4821, n=4)	4630 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +61%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5418 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4103 Points -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	7083 Points +31%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	7115 Points +31%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4828 Points -11%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5184 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5371 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5358 - 5418, n=4)	5379 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	3480 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	2517 Points -28%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4235 Points +22%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4429 Points +27%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2723 Points -22%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3309 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2925 Points -16%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2925 - 3480, n=4)	3123 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4515 Points
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4866 Points +8%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Points +10%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3800 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4348 Points -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4348 - 4515, n=2)	4432 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points -37%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5565 Points
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5779 Points +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5794 Points +4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4236 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	5530 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (5530 - 5565, n=2)	5548 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2720 Points
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	3134 Points +15%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	3317 Points +22%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	2794 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	2488 Points -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (2488 - 2720, n=2)	2604 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	59 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	58 fps -2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	59 fps 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	60 fps +2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	60 fps +2%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	60 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	58 fps -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (58 - 60, n=4)	59.3 fps +1%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +46%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	97 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	119 fps +23%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	166 fps +71%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	166 fps +71%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	226 fps +133%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	85 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	96 fps -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (96 - 143, n=4)	119.3 fps +23%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +189%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	58 fps +9%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	59 fps +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	55 fps +4%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	59 fps +11%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	51 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	53 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 59, n=4)	54.5 fps +3%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +42%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	85 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	78 fps -8%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	100 fps +18%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	101 fps +19%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	107 fps +26%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	50 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (67 - 85, n=4)	80.5 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +94%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	50 fps +35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	57 fps +54%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36 fps -3%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	58.9 fps +59%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	36 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	37 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (30 - 53, n=4)	39.3 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +78%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	53 fps -21%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	70 fps +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	71 fps +6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	69.3 fps +3%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	35 fps -48%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	67 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (53 - 67, n=4)	60 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +75%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	28 fps +22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	37 fps +61%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	21 fps -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	31 fps +35%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	21 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	23 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (23 - 40, n=4)	27.3 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +108%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	28 fps -35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps -2%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps -2%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	40 fps -7%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	43 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (35 - 43, n=4)	41 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +64%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	29 fps +12%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	38 fps +46%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	23 fps -12%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	47 fps +81%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	26 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 26, n=4)	23.3 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +90%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	30 fps -35%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	42 fps -9%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	42 fps -9%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	36.8 fps -20%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	22 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	46 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (41 - 46, n=4)	44.3 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +73%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	20 fps +25%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	25 fps +56%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	15 fps -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	32.1 fps +101%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	14 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	16 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 28, n=4)	19 fps +19%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +134%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	13 fps -24%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	17 fps 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	16 fps -6%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	16.3 fps -4%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8.5 fps -50%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	17 fps 0%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (16 - 17, n=4)	16.8 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +88%

Basemark GPU 1.1
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	36.29 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	38.5 (9.69^min - 72.94^max) fps
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (38.4 - 38.6, n=3)	38.5 fps
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	22.73 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	27.18 (8.36^min - 46.5^max) fps
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (27.2 - 36.2, n=3)	30.2 fps
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	37.3 fps
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	32.26 (8.31^min - 85.07^max) fps
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (32.3 - 33, n=3)	32.6 fps

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	327454 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	273409 Points -17%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	371848 Points +14%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	369294 Points +13%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	302955 Points -7%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	321145 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	333277 Points +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (327454 - 333277, n=4)	329572 Points +1%

VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4969 Score
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4967 Score
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 ()	4967 Score
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years)	5819 Score

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4226 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	4104 Points -3%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	5188 Points +23%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	4982 Points +18%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	4895 Points +16%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4389 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4520 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4226 - 4548, n=4)	4404 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +49%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	7793 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	7923 Points +2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8652 Points +11%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9143 Points +17%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	11675 Points +50%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8718 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8344 Points +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7476 - 8344, n=4)	7861 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +30%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4502 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5700 Points +27%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	6253 Points +39%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	5243 Points +16%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1815 Points -60%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	4324 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	4306 Points -4%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (4306 - 4570, n=4)	4463 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +50%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8981 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	5070 Points -44%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	9361 Points +4%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	9421 Points +5%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	15659 Points +74%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	8414 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	8401 Points -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7361 - 8981, n=4)	8307 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +88%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1012 Points
Huawei Mate 20 X HiSilicon Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10, 6144	1239 Points +22%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1431 Points +41%
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1364 Points +35%
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	1731 Points +71%
LG G8s ThinQ Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1171 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1383 Points +37%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1012 - 1439, n=4)	1305 Points +29%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +55%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 10 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 6144	1421 Points
OnePlus 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Adreno 640, 12288	1425 Points
Apple iPhone Xs Max Apple A12 Bionic, A12 Bionic GPU, 4096	2407 Points
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Samsung Exynos 9820, Mali-G76 MP12, 8192	1928 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1927 - 1937, n=3)	1931 Points
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +171%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	62.5 Points +41%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	53.8 Points +21%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	52.7 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samung Browser 9.2)	44.35 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (44.1 - 44.4, n=2)	44.2 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samung Browser 9.0)	44.13 Points 0%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +139%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	66.3 runs/min +16%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chome 75)	64.1 runs/min +12%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chome 74)	61.5 runs/min +8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	57 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	56 runs/min -2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (54 - 57, n=3)	55.7 runs/min -2%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	155 Points +35%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +29%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	115 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G	115 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2)	115 Points 0%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	111 Points -3%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	107 Points -7%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	98 Points -15%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	86 Points -25%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	43114 Points +109%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +80%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	25640 Points +24%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	24730 Points +20%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	23830 Points +15%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	21208 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	20849 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	20653 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4)	20121 Points -3%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	2145 ms * -18%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	2036 ms * -12%
OnePlus 7 Pro (Chrome 74)	1965 ms * -8%
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4)	1961 ms * -8%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	1857 ms * -2%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	1852 ms * -2%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	1823 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +14%
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	603 ms * +67%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPhone Xs Max (Safari 12)	273 Points +200%
ZTE Axon 10 Pro (Chrome 74)	118.3 Points +30%
LG G8s ThinQ (Chrome 75)	94.1 Points +4%
Huawei Mate 20 X (hrome 71)	93.2 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0)	91.8 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (Samsung Browser 9.2)	90.9 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (84 - 91.8, n=3)	88.9 Points -2%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G	Huawei Mate 20 X	ZTE Axon 10 Pro	OnePlus 7 Pro	LG G8s ThinQ	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus	Average 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		223%	202%	43%	-1%	-1%	141%	477%
Sequential Read 256KB	816	912 12%	769 -6%	1468 80%	791 -3%	811 -1%	826 ?(496 - 984, n=22) 1%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 125%
Sequential Write 256KB	246.3	182.7 -26%	503 104%	387 57%	182.4 -26%	249.1 1%	358 ?(198.5 - 914, n=22) 45%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 479%
Random Read 4KB	135	144.4 7%	150.4 11%	174.1 29%	138 2%	135.2 0%	166.6 ?(108.4 - 265, n=22) 23%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 105%
Random Write 4KB	23.79	237.6 899%	189.5 697%	24.8 4%	29.6 24%	22.7 -5%	141.5 ?(22.1 - 280, n=22) 495%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 1199%

PUBG Mobile & Arena of Valor

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G; PUBG Mobile; 0.13.0: Ø37.3 (28-41)

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G; Arena of Valor; 1.30.2.4: Ø57.2 (48-60)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


34.2 °C	33.2 °C	31.2 °C
34.2 °C	35.2 °C	29.7 °C
33.8 °C	33.2 °C	29 °C

Max: 35.2 °C
Medel: 32.6 °C


25.3 °C	31 °C	30.5 °C
27.7 °C	30.3 °C	31.8 °C
27.3 °C	30 °C	31.4 °C

Max: 31.8 °C
Medel: 29.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 25.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei Mate 20 X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.08 Watt
Låg belastning	0.66 / 1.82 / 1.83 Watt
Hög belastning	6.11 / 9.81 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh	ZTE Axon 10 Pro 4000 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9820	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-1%	23%	-13%	7%	-13%	-0%	8%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	0.66	0.79 -20%	0.76 -15%	0.9 -36%	1 -52%	1.2 -82%	0.73 -11%	0.65 ?(0.6 - 0.73, n=4) 2%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -35%
Idle Average *	1.82	1.72 5%	1.15 37%	1.8 1%	1.4 23%	1.6 12%	1.53 16%	1.455 ?(1.2 - 1.82, n=4) 20%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Maximum *	1.83	1.83 -0%	1.18 36%	2.9 -58%	1.7 7%	2 -9%	2.07 -13%	1.675 ?(1.3 - 2.07, n=4) 8%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 12%
Load Average *	6.11	5.53 9%	3.95 35%	5.5 10%	4.6 25%	5 18%	6.03 1%	5.88 ?(5.2 - 6.17, n=4) 4%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -6%
Load Maximum *	9.81	9.85 -0%	7.49 24%	8.2 16%	6.7 32%	10 -2%	9.18 6%	9.44 ?(8.55 - 10.2, n=4) 4%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -0%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		39tim 00min
WiFi Websurfing (Samsung Browser 9.2)		8tim 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17tim 27min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		5tim 27min

	Samsung Galaxy S10 5G 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh	Huawei Mate 20 X 5000 mAh	Apple iPhone Xs Max 3174 mAh	LG G8s ThinQ 3550 mAh	ZTE Axon 10 Pro 4000 mAh	OnePlus 7 Pro 4000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-24%	5%	-15%	-16%	-6%	-8%
Reader / Idle	2340	1560 -33%	1984 -15%	1305 -44%	1689 -28%	1927 -18%	1745 -25%
H.264	1047	921 -12%	986 -6%	801 -23%	753 -28%	1068 2%	802 -23%
WiFi v1.3	533	483 -9%	786 47%	742 39%	693 30%	680 28%	768 44%
Load	327	187 -43%	300 -8%	223 -32%	203 -38%	217 -34%	236 -28%

För

+ utmärkt design

+ lyxiga material

+ imponerande kameror

+ riktigt ljusstark AMOLED-skärm

+ IP68-certifiering

+ 3D-ansiktsigenkänning

+ ultraljudsbaserad fingeravtrycksläsare

+ omvändbar trådlös laddning

+ ultrasnabb trådbunden laddning

+ hörlursanslutning

+ kraftfull SoC

Emot

- ryckig bilduppdatering i krävande spel

- SoC som stryps vid ihållande belastning

- PWM

- saknar aptX HD

- saknar microSD-kortplats

- skräniga högtalare

- batteritiden var en besvikelse

- bara enkel-SIM

- operatörsmärkt

- bloatware

Recension av Samsung Galaxy S10 5G (SM-G977B).

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Det är fler saker än 5G-modemet som får Galaxy S10 5G att stå ut gentemot sina gelikar. Men modemet överskuggar många komponenter som annars hade varit trevliga att se på andra telefoner. Ett exempel är batteriet på 4.500 mAh, som är större än på alla motsvarande aktuella modeller med undantag för batteriet som sitter i Mate 20 X. 4.500 mAh är ett imponerande stort batteri på papperet, men 5G-modemet äter igenom det, vilket ger vår recensionsenhet en batteritid på under 10 timmar av WiFi-användning mellan laddningarna. Dessutom säljer Samsung för tillfället bara en operatörsmärkt version av S10 5G, vilket vi inte uppskattar.

Samsung vägrar dessutom fortfarande att inkludera stöd för aptX HD, och även om Exynos 9820 är en kraftfull SoC så klarar dess ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU inte av att spela krävande spel utan ryckighet. Vi förstår att detta är ett mindre problem, men vi förväntar oss ändå mer av en telefon som kostar 13.000 kronor. Det är också svårt att svälja att den saknar en microSD-kortplats, särskilt med tanke på att Samsung har inkluderat en sådan på alla andra modeller i S10-serien. Högtalarna kommer heller inte vinna några priser.

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G är en stark premiär för den nya mobilstandarden, men ett par krångligheter hindrar den från att överraska oss.

Generellt sett har S10 5G i princip alla funktioner man kan önska av ett modernt flaggskepp. Den gigantiska AMOLED-skärmen är extremt ljusstark med levande och exakt färgåtergivning. Samsung har också gjort ett utmärkt jobb med kamerorna och vi uppskattade att ToF-sensorer ingår. Den ultraljudsbaserade fingeravtrycksläsaren fungerar precis lika bra som den gjorde på S10 och S10+ och det är bra att ha 3D-ansiktsigenkänning som ett alternativ. Det är också trevligt med en 3.5 mm hörlursanslutning.

Galaxy S10 5G är ett utmärkt val om du letar efter en phablet, även om du bortser från möjligheten till 5G. Men den känns riktigt dyr bredvid sina S10-syskon samtidigt som några få men tydliga brister kan få den som är intresserad att istället leta på annat håll.

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - 09/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Daniel Schmidt

Design

91%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 90%

Mus

98%

Anslutningar

67 / 70 → 96%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

88%

Skärm

90%

Spelprestanda

52 / 64 → 81%

Programprestanda

73 / 86 → 85%

Temperatur

95%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

72 / 90 → 80%

Camera

79%

Medel

82%

87%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Alex Alderson - Senior Tech Writer - 11244 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

contact me via: @aldersonaj

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S10 5G - En superladdad S10 med en toppmodern nyhet

Daniel Schmidt, 2019-07-31 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

PUBG Mobile & Arena of Valor

Samsung Galaxy S10 5G audio analysis

Huawei Mate 20 X audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison