Test: Samsung Galaxy S10e Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Honor View 20 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Honor View 20 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 426 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.111
Samsung Galaxy S10e AMOLED, 2280x1080, 5.8" | OnePlus 6T Optic AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Honor View 20 LTPS, 2310x1080, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy S10 OLED, 3040x1440, 6.1" | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus OLED, 3040x1440, 6.4" | Apple iPhone XR IPS, 1792x828, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -7% | -21% | -22% | -22% | 23% | |
Brightness middle | 426 | 437 3% | 492 15% | 701 65% | 710 67% | 672 58% |
Brightness | 427 | 442 4% | 475 11% | 705 65% | 721 69% | 641 50% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 95 -1% | 94 -2% | 98 2% | 97 1% | 92 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.35 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.14 | 2.21 -3% | 2.4 -12% | 3.7 -73% | 3.7 -73% | 1.3 39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.29 | 4.27 -30% | 5.2 -58% | 10.3 -213% | 10.3 -213% | 2.7 18% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.1 -17% | 3.2 -78% | 1.4 22% | 1.5 17% | 2.2 -22% |
Gamma | 2.111 104% | 2.307 95% | 2.06 107% | 2.1 105% | 2.1 105% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6329 103% | 6353 102% | 7125 91% | 6553 99% | 6611 98% | 6868 95% |
Contrast | 1230 | 1920 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 232 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 232 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 232 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Honor View 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (9557 - 10008, n=4) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Honor View 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (7595 - 7966, n=4) |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (38.4 - 38.6, n=3) | |
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (27.2 - 36.2, n=3) | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (32.3 - 33, n=3) |
AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Honor View 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (327454 - 333277, n=4) |
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Honor View 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (269219 - 283270, n=4) |
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value) | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 () | |
Average of class Smartphone (2523 - 10071, n=6, last 2 years) |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e | |
OnePlus 6T | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | |
Apple iPhone XR | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1927 - 1937, n=3) | |
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (18697 - 20849, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (1823 - 2240, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (115 - 115, n=2) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone XR (Safari Mobile 12.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus (Samsung Browser 9.0) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 9820 (292 - 325, n=3) | |
Samsung Galaxy S10e (Chrome 73) | |
Honor View 20 (Chrome 71) | |
OnePlus 6T (Chrome 70) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S10e | OnePlus 6T | Honor View 20 | Samsung Galaxy S10 | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus | Apple iPhone XR | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -3% | 134% | 3% | 4% | 85% | 522% | ||
Sequential Read 256KB | 792 | 735 -7% | 847 7% | 832 5% | 811 2% | 760 ? -4% | 1887 ? 138% | |
Sequential Write 256KB | 194.1 | 204.4 5% | 250.1 29% | 193.2 0% | 249.1 28% | 297 ? 53% | 1471 ? 658% | |
Random Read 4KB | 136.9 | 138.5 1% | 168.9 23% | 137.4 0% | 135.2 -1% | 152.9 ? 12% | 278 ? 103% | |
Random Write 4KB | 24.1 | 22 -9% | 138.9 476% | 24.44 1% | 22.7 -6% | 131.6 ? 446% | 311 ? 1190% | |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 73.2 ? | 77.9 ? 6% | 73 ? 0% | 76 ? 4% | ||||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 60.7 ? | 64.8 ? 7% | 60.7 ? 0% | 59.6 ? -2% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy S10e audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.2% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0 / 0.2 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.6 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt |
Hög belastning |
5.2 / 10.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Honor View 20 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh | Average Samsung Exynos 9820 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -2% | -48% | 0% | -19% | -28% | -9% | -20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.6 | 0.7 -17% | 0.97 -62% | 0.61 -2% | 0.73 -22% | 0.61 -2% | 0.65 ? -8% | 0.883 ? -47% |
Idle Average * | 1.2 | 1.1 8% | 2.58 -115% | 1.27 -6% | 1.53 -28% | 2.67 -123% | 1.455 ? -21% | 1.467 ? -22% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.5 | 2.1 -40% | 2.63 -75% | 1.3 13% | 2.07 -38% | 2.69 -79% | 1.675 ? -12% | 1.621 ? -8% |
Load Average * | 5.2 | 4.2 19% | 5.24 -1% | 6.17 -19% | 6.03 -16% | 4.34 17% | 5.88 ? -13% | 6.58 ? -27% |
Load Maximum * | 10.2 | 8.3 19% | 8.73 14% | 8.55 16% | 9.18 10% | 5.66 45% | 9.44 ? 7% | 9.91 ? 3% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy S10e 3100 mAh | OnePlus 6T 3700 mAh | Honor View 20 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 3400 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 4100 mAh | Apple iPhone XR 2942 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 61% | 62% | 5% | 20% | 91% | |
Reader / Idle | 1185 | 1936 63% | 1928 63% | 1259 6% | 1560 32% | 2969 151% |
H.264 | 795 | 903 14% | 932 17% | 842 6% | 921 16% | 1011 27% |
WiFi v1.3 | 416 | 865 108% | 969 133% | 427 3% | 483 16% | 910 119% |
Load | 164 | 261 59% | 222 35% | 170 4% | 187 14% | 270 65% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Samsung Galaxy S10e är en förstklassig smartphone som är väl värd att överväga framför de betydligt dyrare modellerna Galaxy S10 och S10+. Det finns en del kompromisser, som att den saknar en tredje bakåtriktad kamera eller alternativ för keramisk baksida, men du får ändå en enhet med lyxig design som har en hörlursanslutning, snabbt LTE, en kraftfull SoC och en kamera som kan tävla med andra flaggskeppstelefoner.
Du får klara dig med mindre lagring och RAM, men för de flesta bör det inte vara särskilt betungande. Men en mörkare skärm, sämre batteritid och högre yttemperaturer är värt att överväga om du väljer mellan S10e och Galaxy S10. Vi rekommenderar också att du ser upp för problem med den tryckkänsliga skärmen när du spelar "Arena of Valor", vilket vi noterade i vårt test. Vi har inte sett några liknande problem när vi spelat det spelet på andra enheter. Att Samsung vägrar stödja aptX HD på S10e och dess syskon är en större anledning till frustration, vilket känns obstinat mer än något annat.
Den billigaste medlemmen i S10-familjen är ett utmärkt alternativ till sina dyrare syskon. Men du får klara dig med färre flashiga funktioner såsom en fingeravtrycksläsare inbyggd i skärmen. Du får däremot fortfarande en flaggskeppstelefon som levererar på rätt områden.
För att sammanfatta; S10e kommer inte med något nytt, men det gör inte heller Galaxy S10 eller S10+. Den levererar däremot en gedigen flaggskeppsupplevelse och presterar bra på de flesta områden. Vi ser däremot gärna ett större steg framåt i bildkvalitet för nästa generations Galaxy S-enheter, för konkurrenterna har börjat gå om Samsungs S10-serie, särskilt i situationer med lite ljus. I korthet, S10e är mer prisvärd än både Galaxy S10 och S10+.
Samsung Galaxy S10e
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt