Test: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo smartphone (sammanfattning)

Name: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo
Brand: Samsung

Nygammal. Galaxy S5 Neo från Samsung är en ny version av det äldre flaggskeppet Galaxy S5. Är den ett prisvärt alternativ till Galaxy S6?

Andreas Osthoff, ✓ Stefanie Voigt, Published 01/05/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo (Galaxy S Serie)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-T720 MP2

Minne

2048 MB

Skärm

5.10 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar, Kapacitiv, 10 beröringspunkter, Super AMOLED, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB

, 10.1 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3,5 mm kombo, Kortläsare: microSD (upp till 128 GB), Sensorer: Positionssensor, accelerometer, ljussensor, gyroskop, närhetssensor, magnetometer, Wi-Fi Direct, ANT+, NFC, USB-OTG, GPS, GLOANSS, SAR kropp: 0.583 W/kg huvud-SAR: 0.457 W/kg, FM-radio

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1, GSM (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (800, 850, 900, 1800, 2100, 2600 MHz)

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8.1 x 142 x 72.5

Batteri

11 Wh Litiumjon, 2800 mAh, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 15 tim

Operativsystem

Android 5.1 Lollipop

Camera

Webbkamera: 5 MP, Bak: 16 MP (autofocus, LED-blixt) video: FHD @30 fps

Övrigt

Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, modular PSU (7.75 Watts), USB cable, headset, quick-start guide, Galaxy Apps, S Health, S Planner, S Voice, Smart Manager, Microsoft OneNote, 24 Månader Garanti

Vikt

145 g, Strömförsörjning: 53 g

Pris

400 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

OnePlus 2

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

OnePlus 2

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo

Canon EOS 70D

Apple iPhone 6S Plus

OnePlus 2


361 cd/m²	340 cd/m²	328 cd/m²
357 cd/m²	334 cd/m²	327 cd/m²
356 cd/m²	339 cd/m²	327 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 341 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 334 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.84 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.91 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.01

	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Screen		-28%	4%	-15%	-1%	-4%
Brightness middle	334	358 7%	335 0%	453 36%	451 35%	641 92%
Brightness	341	364 7%	345 1%	439 29%	446 31%	620 82%
Brightness Distribution	91	82 -10%	89 -2%	91 0%	90 -1%	93 2%
Black Level *				0.28	0.3	0.4
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.84	5.28 -86%	2.51 12%	4.7 -65%	3.84 -35%	5.37 -89%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.91	4.65 -60%	2.59 11%	5.03 -73%	3.97 -36%	6.01 -107%
Gamma	2.01 ^109%	2.48 ^89%	2.43 ^91%	2.27 ^97%	2.46 ^89%	2.44 ^90%
CCT	6432 ^101%	7690 ^85%	6424 ^101%	7439 ^87%	7283 ^89%	7806 ^83%
Contrast				1618	1503	1603
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)				72.04	58.07
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)					90.14

* ... smaller is better

AnTuTu v5 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	37854 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	60804 Points +61%
Huawei P8	45927 Points +21%
OnePlus 2	58535 Points +55%
Motorola Moto X Play	29699 Points -22%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3330 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	2885 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S6	5073 Points +52%
Huawei P8	2955 Points -11%
OnePlus 2	4154 Points +25%
32 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	721 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	941 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy S6	1146 Points +59%
Huawei P8	698 Points -3%
OnePlus 2	1066 Points +48%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8	3458 Points
OnePlus 2	4804 Points
Motorola Moto X Play	2558 Points
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Huawei P8	864 Points
OnePlus 2	1140 Points
Motorola Moto X Play	717 Points

3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	1350 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	1777 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	1660 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	1267 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	2686 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
OnePlus 2	2151 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	1503 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1320 Points -12%
OnePlus 2	1517 Points +1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	169 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1152 Points +582%
OnePlus 2	846 Points +401%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	211 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1186 Points +462%
OnePlus 2	938 Points +345%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	1453 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1553 Points +7%
OnePlus 2	1414 Points -3%
Motorola Moto X Play	974 Points -33%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	272 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1492 Points +449%
OnePlus 2	1854 Points +582%
Motorola Moto X Play	178 Points -35%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	332 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6	1505 Points +353%
OnePlus 2	1734 Points +422%
Motorola Moto X Play	218 Points -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	10424 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	15198 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy S6	18649 Points +79%
Huawei P8	10494 Points +1%
OnePlus 2	10985 Points +5%
Motorola Moto X Play	6839 Points -34%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	7536 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	19530 Points +159%
Samsung Galaxy S6	23193 Points +208%
Huawei P8	8743 Points +16%
OnePlus 2	31858 Points +323%
Motorola Moto X Play	7796 Points +3%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	8030 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5	18367 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy S6	22002 Points +174%
Huawei P8	9080 Points +13%
OnePlus 2	22400 Points +179%
Motorola Moto X Play	7561 Points -6%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	10270 Points
Huawei P8	9404 Points -8%
Motorola Moto X Play	6841 Points -33%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4449 Points
Huawei P8	6064 Points +36%
Motorola Moto X Play	5082 Points +14%
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	5090 Points
Huawei P8	6584 Points +29%
Motorola Moto X Play	5390 Points +6%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	10466 Points
Huawei P8	9337 Points -11%
Motorola Moto X Play	6799 Points -35%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	8304 Points
Huawei P8	10515 Points +27%
Motorola Moto X Play	10194 Points +23%
1280x720 Ice Storm Standard Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	8704 Points
Huawei P8	10228 Points +18%
Motorola Moto X Play	9176 Points +5%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5	11.7 fps +144%
Samsung Galaxy S6	16 fps +233%
Huawei P8	5.8 fps +21%
OnePlus 2	23 fps +379%
Motorola Moto X Play	6.2 fps +29%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4.8 fps
Samsung Galaxy S5	11.8 fps +146%
Samsung Galaxy S6	22 fps +358%
Huawei P8	5.5 fps +15%
OnePlus 2	23 fps +379%
Motorola Moto X Play	5.8 fps +21%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3.4 fps
OnePlus 2	19 fps +459%
Motorola Moto X Play	4.4 fps +29%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3.1 fps
OnePlus 2	19 fps +513%
Motorola Moto X Play	4.2 fps +35%

PCMark for Android
Computer Vision score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play	1756 Points
Storage score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play	3900 Points
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Motorola Moto X Play	3293 Points
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	4134 Points
Huawei P8	4479 Points +8%
OnePlus 2	4282 Points +4%
Motorola Moto X Play	3589 Points -13%

Smartbench 2012
Gaming Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	3500 points
Samsung Galaxy S5	4432 points +27%
Huawei P8	4340 points +24%
OnePlus 2	4325 points +24%
Motorola Moto X Play	2523 points -28%
Productivity Index (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	6719 points
Samsung Galaxy S5	9054 points +35%
Huawei P8	5433 points -19%
OnePlus 2	10472 points +56%
Motorola Moto X Play	3820 points -43%

BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	733 Points
Huawei P8	694 Points -5%
OnePlus 2	923 Points +26%
Motorola Moto X Play	710 Points -3%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	488 Points
Huawei P8	882 Points +81%
OnePlus 2	2631 Points +439%
Motorola Moto X Play	785 Points +61%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	569 Points
Huawei P8	1216 Points +114%
OnePlus 2	1297 Points +128%
Motorola Moto X Play	595 Points +5%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	2095 Points
Huawei P8	1860 Points -11%
OnePlus 2	2536 Points +21%
Motorola Moto X Play	1177 Points -44%
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	808 Points
Huawei P8	1085 Points +34%
OnePlus 2	1681 Points +108%
Motorola Moto X Play	701 Points -13%

Linpack Android / IOS
Multi Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	247.7 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy S5	678 MFLOPS +174%
Huawei P8	272.5 MFLOPS +10%
OnePlus 2	819 MFLOPS +231%
Motorola Moto X Play	275 MFLOPS +11%
Single Thread (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo	95.6 MFLOPS
Samsung Galaxy S5	355 MFLOPS +271%
Huawei P8	122 MFLOPS +28%
OnePlus 2	630 MFLOPS +559%
Motorola Moto X Play	134 MFLOPS +40%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Samsung Exynos 7580 Octa, ARM Mali-T720 MP2, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC, Qualcomm Adreno 330, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Huawei P8 HiSilicon Kirin 930, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 16 GB eMMC Flash

OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto X Play Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939, Qualcomm Adreno 405, 16 GB eMMC Flash

Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	735 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	408.7 ms * +44%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	546 ms * +26%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1164 ms * -58%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	740 ms * -1%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1235 ms * -68%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3627 Points
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3875 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	8518 Points +135%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4084 Points +13%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6955 Points +92%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3764 Points +4%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11603 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	6302 ms * +46%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11808 ms * -2%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	6585 ms * +43%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11694 ms * -1%

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3765 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	4419 Points +17%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	7650 Points +103%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	3917 Points +4%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	68 Points
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	70 Points +3%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	80 Points +18%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	56 Points -18%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	23.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	49.19 Points +113%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	44.29 Points +92%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	24.51 Points +6%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	11.07 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	1 MB/s -91%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	19.9 MB/s +80%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	10.04 MB/s -9%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	13.94 MB/s +26%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	16 MB/s +45%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.57 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	8.5 MB/s -62%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	80 MB/s +254%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	22.46 MB/s 0%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	21.87 MB/s -3%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	16 MB/s -29%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	57.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	19.05 MB/s -67%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	138.9 MB/s +140%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	39.58 MB/s -32%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	125.5 MB/s +117%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	75 MB/s +30%
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	215.9 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	83.5 MB/s -61%
Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	319 MB/s +48%
Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	139.9 MB/s -35%
OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	234.2 MB/s +8%
Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash	139 MB/s -36%

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


33 °C	33 °C	31.4 °C
33.5 °C	32.7 °C	31.3 °C
32.4 °C	31.2 °C	30.2 °C

Max: 33.5 °C
Medel: 32.1 °C


31.3 °C	34 °C	32.5 °C
30.8 °C	31 °C	30.5 °C
29.7 °C	30.2 °C	30.1 °C

Max: 34 °C
Medel: 31.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 28.9 °C | Rumstemperatur 22.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.02 / 0.08 Watt
Låg belastning	1.68 / 2.2 / 2.33 Watt
Hög belastning	4.09 / 5.92 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Gossen Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption		46%	32%	6%	14%	11%
Idle Minimum *	1.68	0.3 82%	0.4 76%	0.7 58%	0.6 64%	0.9 46%
Idle Average *	2.2	0.5 77%	0.6 73%	2 9%	1.7 23%	1.6 27%
Idle Maximum *	2.33	1.1 53%	1.2 48%	2.1 10%	1.8 23%	1.8 23%
Load Average *	4.09	3.1 24%	5 -22%	4.9 -20%	5.7 -39%	4.9 -20%
Load Maximum *	5.92	6.2 -5%	6.8 -15%	7.4 -25%	6 -1%	7.2 -22%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		26tim 55min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 38)		9tim 06min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12tim 53min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		6tim 42min

	Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Mali-T720 MP2, 7580 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S5 Adreno 330, 801 MSM8974AC, 16 GB eMMC Flash	Samsung Galaxy S6 Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Huawei P8 Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 930, 16 GB eMMC Flash	OnePlus 2 Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash	Motorola Moto X Play Adreno 405, 615 MSM8939, 16 GB eMMC Flash
Battery Runtime		-20%	-21%	-36%	-29%	-17%
Reader / Idle	1615	1695 5%	1300 -20%	826 -49%	1393 -14%	1145 -29%
H.264	773	556 -28%		581 -25%	580 -25%	742 -4%
WiFi v1.3	546		475 -13%	434 -21%	356 -35%	674 23%
Load	402	253 -37%	278 -31%	215 -47%	229 -43%	174 -57%
WiFi		613	575

För

+ Robust hölje

+ Damm- och vattenskyddad

+ Utmärkt skärm

+ Bra kamera

+ Utbytbart batteri

+ minneskortplats

+ Bra batteritid

+ Låga temperaturer

Emot

- Sämre prestanda än föregångaren

- Strypning under längre belastning

- Begränsade videoalternativ

- Ingen fingeravtrycksläsare

In review: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo. Test model provided by Notebooksbilliger.de

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo är återvinning på hög nivå. Det tidigare flaggskeppet har förbättrats i vissa avseenden, men prestandan är lägre och vissa funktioner har plockats bort

Positivt med Galaxy S5 Neo är ett robust hölje, en stor skärm, bra mjukvara och lång batteritid. Mobilen är fortfarande vattentät, men använder inte irriterande flikar längre. Samsung har också förbättrat kamerorna, även om videoalternativen är begränsade. Till skillnad från det nuvarande flaggskeppet från S6-serien kan du byta ut batteriet och utöka lagringen med microSD-kort.

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo är en sofistikerad smartphone med bra grundfunktioner. Om du är nöjd med plasthöljet och inte behöver marknadens snabbaste smartphone, kan S5 Neo leverera mycket för pengarna.

Vi kunde inte hitta några allvarliga problem. Det är ganska synd att 3D-prestandan är betydligt sämre än föregångaren och att vissa andra funktioner fått stryka på foten. Vi skulle åtminstone ha uppskattat fingeravtrycksläsaren.

För priset är S5 Neo ett intressant alternativ. S5 Neo kan i skrivande stund hittas för ca 3 500 kr, medan gamla Galaxy S5 kostar något mer. Om du uppskattar nyheterna och kan avvara funktionerna som bantats bort är Galaxy S5 Neo ett bra val.

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo - 12/04/2015 v4 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Design

87%

Tangentbord

69 / 75 → 92%

Mus

94%

Anslutningar

46 / 60 → 77%

Vikt

93%

Batteri

95%

Skärm

87%

Spelprestanda

57 / 63 → 90%

Programprestanda

38 / 70 → 54%

Temperatur

92%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

63 / 91 → 69%

Camera

79%

Medel

77%

87%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1702 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo smartphone (sammanfattning)

Andreas Osthoff, 2016-01- 5 (Update: 2016-01- 5)