Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (sammanfattning)

Sätter nya standarder. Galaxy S7 Edge består inte av en mängd banbrytande innovationer, men kombinerar modern hårdvara i ett stilrent hölje och klassas därför med rätta som en referensmodell i klassen. Trots det hittar vi några punkter där det finns utrymme för förbättring.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (Galaxy Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa 8 x 2.6 GHz, Mongoose / Cortex-A53
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T880 MP12, Kärna: 650 MHz, Vulkan, OpenGL ES 3.1
Minne
4 GB 
, LP-DDR4 RAM
Skärm
5.50 tum 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixlar, kapacitiv pekskärm 10 punkter, "dual-edge"-skärm, Super AMOLED, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 32 GB 
, 24.4 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: headset, Kortläsare: micro-SD max. 200 GB (SD, SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: närhetssensor, accelerometer, positionssensor, ljussensor, rotationssensor, orientations-sensor, g-sensor, digital kompass, barometer, pulsmätare, OTG, Ant+, MST
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.7 x 150.9 x 72.6
Batteri
13.86 Wh, 3600 mAh Litiumjon, 3.85 volts
Operativsystem
Android 6.0 Marshmallow
Camera
Primary Camera: 12.2 MPix (Sony-IMX260-sensor, f/1.7, autofokus, bildstabilisering, tracking-fokus, HDR, UHD-video, slow motion, fast motion, RAW-stöd)
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (fix focus, f/1.7, HDR, Beauty Mode
Övrigt
Högtalare: mono, Tangentbord: virtuellt, headset, TouchWiz UI, Gear, Galaxy apps, S Health, S Voice, diktafon, S Planner, myGalaxy, upday, 24 Månader Garanti, IP68-certifierad, huvud-SAR: 0.264 W/kg, kropp-SAR: 0.507 W/kg, snabbladdning, trådlös laddning (WPC/PMA), fanless
Vikt
157 g
Pris
799 Kr
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

159.3 mm 77.8 mm 7.5 mm 178 g158.2 mm 77.9 mm 7.3 mm 192 g154.4 mm 76 mm 7.8 mm 181 g151.8 mm 74.9 mm 9.85 mm 178 g154.4 mm 75.8 mm 6.9 mm 153 g151.9 mm 78.4 mm 8.3 mm 165 g149.8 mm 78 mm 9.2 mm 169 g148.9 mm 76.1 mm 9.8 mm 155 g150.9 mm 72.6 mm 7.7 mm 157 g149.89 mm 75.35 mm 7.2 mm 156 g142.1 mm 70.1 mm 7 mm 132 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
555
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
555
cd/m²
543
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
532
cd/m²
557
cd/m²
554
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 557 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 551.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.77 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 96 %
Mitt på batteriet: 554 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.59 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.01 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
82.12% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
93.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.01
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5"
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Google Nexus 6P
AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.7"
Huawei Mate 8
IPS-NEO, 1920x1080, 6"
Screen
-21%
-202%
-35%
-36%
-14%
-79%
Brightness middle
554
343
-38%
560
1%
297
-46%
583
5%
363
-34%
514
-7%
Brightness
552
338
-39%
541
-2%
297
-46%
560
1%
365
-34%
513
-7%
Brightness Distribution
96
94
-2%
85
-11%
93
-3%
91
-5%
90
-6%
94
-2%
Black Level *
0.45
0.46
0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.59
2.2
-38%
9.19
-478%
2.67
-68%
3.55
-123%
2.34
-47%
5.08
-219%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.56
15.01
-486%
3.98
-55%
8.28
-223%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.01
2.37
-18%
10.58
-426%
2.81
-40%
3.88
-93%
1.03
49%
5.49
-173%
Gamma
2.01 109%
2.41 91%
2.7 81%
2.08 106%
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
2.08 106%
CCT
6321 103%
6425 101%
9760 67%
6379 102%
7280 89%
6429 101%
7254 90%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
82.12
87.77
7%
73.19
-11%
66.31
-19%
59.05
-28%
79.95
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.98
99.79
0%
92.8
-7%
99.84
0%
Contrast
1244
1267
1469

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Geekbench 3
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2170 (2120min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1503 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 8
1721 Points -21%
Huawei Mate S
941 Points -57%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2538 Points +17%
OnePlus 2
1140 Points -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1335 Points -38%
Google Nexus 6P
1335 Points -38%
LG G4
1107 Points -49%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2376 Points +9%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6480 (6415min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
5619 Points -13%
Huawei Mate 8
6265 Points -3%
Huawei Mate S
3970 Points -39%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4429 Points -32%
OnePlus 2
4804 Points -26%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
4492 Points -31%
Google Nexus 6P
4587 Points -29%
LG G4
3556 Points -45%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
5500 Points -15%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2710 (2421min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1505 Points -44%
Huawei Mate 8
1244 Points -54%
Huawei Mate S
373 Points -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3316 Points +22%
OnePlus 2
1734 Points -36%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2009 Points -26%
Google Nexus 6P
1877 Points -31%
LG G4
1324 Points -51%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
3015 (2895min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1492 Points -51%
Huawei Mate 8
1092 Points -64%
Huawei Mate S
315 Points -90%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4557 Points +51%
OnePlus 2
1854 Points -39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2336 Points -23%
Google Nexus 6P
2302 Points -24%
LG G4
1399 Points -54%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2002 (1539min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1553 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 8
2432 Points +21%
Huawei Mate S
1052 Points -47%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1697 Points -15%
OnePlus 2
1414 Points -29%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1348 Points -33%
Google Nexus 6P
1142 Points -43%
LG G4
1115 Points -44%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2204 (1923min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1186 Points -46%
Huawei Mate 8
945 Points -57%
Huawei Mate S
311 Points -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2318 Points +5%
OnePlus 2
938 Points -57%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1132 Points -49%
Google Nexus 6P
1519 Points -31%
LG G4
513 Points -77%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2207 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2229 (2043min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1152 Points -48%
Huawei Mate 8
801 Points -64%
Huawei Mate S
259 Points -88%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2601 Points +17%
OnePlus 2
846 Points -62%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1074 Points -52%
Google Nexus 6P
1589 Points -29%
LG G4
440 Points -80%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2773 Points +24%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2121 (1594min) Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1320 Points -38%
Huawei Mate 8
2552 Points +20%
Huawei Mate S
1051 Points -50%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1676 Points -21%
OnePlus 2
1517 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1402 Points -34%
Google Nexus 6P
1317 Points -38%
LG G4
1216 Points -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
1288 Points -39%
PCMark for Android - Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4660 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
5050 Points +8%
Huawei Mate 8
7344 Points +58%
Huawei Mate S
4872 Points +5%
OnePlus 2
4282 Points -8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5094 Points +9%
Google Nexus 6P
4716 Points +1%
LG G4
4579 Points -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
6590 Points +41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2074 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1821 Points -12%
Huawei Mate 8
2046 Points -1%
Huawei Mate S
1222 Points -41%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
2206 Points +6%
OnePlus 2
1681 Points -19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1649 Points -20%
Google Nexus 6P
1405 Points -32%
LG G4
1596 Points -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2410 Points +16%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
4080 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
3989 Points -2%
Huawei Mate 8
4064 Points 0%
Huawei Mate S
2129 Points -48%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
3925 Points -4%
OnePlus 2
2536 Points -38%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
2737 Points -33%
Google Nexus 6P
1798 Points -56%
LG G4
2368 Points -42%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
3600 Points -12%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2072 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
1426 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 8
2339 Points +13%
Huawei Mate S
1304 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1124 Points -46%
OnePlus 2
1297 Points -37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
876 Points -58%
Google Nexus 6P
1136 Points -45%
LG G4
1558 Points -25%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
2035 Points -2%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2203 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
2489 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 8
1636 Points -26%
Huawei Mate S
962 Points -56%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4299 Points +95%
OnePlus 2
2631 Points +19%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
3137 Points +42%
Google Nexus 6P
2424 Points +10%
LG G4
1995 Points -9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
4710 Points +114%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
8049 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
8438 Points +5%
Huawei Mate 8
6990 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
7975 Points -1%
OnePlus 2
6462 Points -20%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
7332 Points -9%
LG G4
7695 Points -4%
CPU Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
225427 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
176225 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 8
270825 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
47850 Points -79%
OnePlus 2
126720 Points -44%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
127736 Points -43%
LG G4
103512 Points -54%
Disk Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
36364 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
68872 Points +89%
Huawei Mate 8
74503 Points +105%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
96768 Points +166%
OnePlus 2
44133 Points +21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
34121 Points -6%
LG G4
67837 Points +87%
Memory Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6136 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
6924 Points +13%
Huawei Mate 8
7338 Points +20%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
18062 Points +194%
OnePlus 2
6632 Points +8%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
6631 Points +8%
LG G4
6223 Points +1%
2D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
6382 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
5274 Points -17%
Huawei Mate 8
6747 Points +6%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
4818 Points -25%
OnePlus 2
5395 Points -15%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5907 Points -7%
LG G4
4850 Points -24%
3D Graphics Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
2131 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
2345 Points +10%
Huawei Mate 8
1548 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
1972 Points -7%
OnePlus 2
1534 Points -28%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
1857 Points -13%
LG G4
2179 Points +2%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
733 Points
Huawei Mate 8
347 Points -53%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
858 Points +17%
OnePlus 2
427 Points -42%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
478 Points -35%
Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.31 fps
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
9.97 fps -25%
Huawei Mate 8
7.9 fps -41%
OnePlus 2
15.68 fps +18%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
14.52 fps +9%
LG G4
8.74 fps -34%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
22.7 fps +71%
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
128749 Points
Huawei Mate 8
93767 Points -27%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
133626 Points +4%
OnePlus 2
65936 Points -49%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
78324 Points -39%
Google Nexus 6P
79502 Points -38%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
131327 Points +2%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
6.1 fps -59%
Huawei Mate 8
11 fps -27%
Huawei Mate S
4.4 fps -71%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps +87%
OnePlus 2
19 fps +27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
19 fps +27%
Google Nexus 6P
9.5 fps -37%
LG G4
5.7 fps -62%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
15 fps 0%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
13 fps -54%
Huawei Mate 8
10 fps -64%
Huawei Mate S
3.9 fps -86%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
28 fps 0%
OnePlus 2
19 fps -32%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
18 fps -36%
Google Nexus 6P
16 fps -43%
LG G4
10 fps -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
31 fps +11%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
7.9 fps
Huawei Mate 8
6.7 fps -15%
OnePlus 2
11 fps +39%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
6.1 fps -23%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
9.4 fps +19%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
15 fps
Huawei Mate 8
6.2 fps -59%
OnePlus 2
11 fps -27%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
5.8 fps -61%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
18 fps +20%

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge Samsung Exynos 7420 Octa, ARM Mali-T760 MP8, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
 
Huawei Mate 8 HiSilicon Kirin 950, ARM Mali-T880 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mate S HiSilicon Kirin 935, ARM Mali-T628 MP4, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPhone 6S Plus Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
 
OnePlus 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash
 
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Google Nexus 6P Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994, Qualcomm Adreno 430, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
LG G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992, Qualcomm Adreno 418, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530,
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
163 Points
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
139 Points -15%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
73 Points -55%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
190 Points +17%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
80 Points -51%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
106 Points -35%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
116 Points -29%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
82 Points -50%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
108 Points -34%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
113 Points -31%
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
13191 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
8650 Points -34%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11329 Points -14%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4106 Points -69%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
15967 Points +21%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6955 Points -47%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8851 Points -33%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8804 Points -33%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7832 (6791min) Points -41%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
10559 Points -20%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
8395 Points -36%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8059 Points -39%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
75.1 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
49.19 Points -35%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
65 Points -13%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
25.41 Points -66%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
118.7 Points +58%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44.29 Points -41%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
48.2 Points -36%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
47.4 Points -37%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
43.12 Points -43%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
64 Points -15%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
55 Points -27%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
46 Points -39%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2564 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
4037 ms * -57%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3643 ms * -42%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11029 ms * -330%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1743 ms * +32%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
6585 ms * -157%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4377 ms * -71%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4193 ms * -64%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4771 ms * -86%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
6310 ms * -146%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
2460 ms * +4%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5553 ms * -117%
BaseMark OS II - Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
994 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
778 Points -22%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1127 Points +13%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
834 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1199 Points +21%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
923 Points -7%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
986 Points -1%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
791 Points -20%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
881 Points -11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
985 Points -1%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
837 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

AndroBench 3-5
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
487.3 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
319.3 MB/s -34%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
238.3 MB/s -51%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
144 MB/s -70%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
234.2 MB/s -52%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
256.8 MB/s -47%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
236.3 MB/s -52%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
251 MB/s -48%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
439 MB/s -10%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
145.1 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
139.1 MB/s -4%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
124.8 MB/s -14%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
103.4 MB/s -29%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
125.5 MB/s -14%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
99.4 MB/s -31%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
122.5 MB/s -16%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
153 MB/s +5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
142 MB/s -2%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
86.7 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
77.4 MB/s -11%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
24.98 MB/s -71%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
27.25 MB/s -69%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
21.87 MB/s -75%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
19.11 MB/s -78%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20.1 MB/s -77%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
31.5 MB/s -64%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
101 MB/s +16%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
15.79 MB/s
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
19.84 MB/s +26%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15.74 MB/s 0%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
17.74 MB/s +12%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
13.94 MB/s -12%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14.53 MB/s -8%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11.79 MB/s -25%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 MB/s -5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
12.9 MB/s -18%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
76.4 MB/s
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
50.4 MB/s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - Disk Tests (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
36364 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
68872 Points +89%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
74503 Points +105%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
96768 Points +166%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
44133 Points +21%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
34121 Points -6%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
67837 Points +87%
BaseMark OS II - Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
2072 Points
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
1426 Points -31%
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2339 Points +13%
Huawei Mate S
Mali-T628 MP4, Kirin 935, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1304 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
1124 Points -46%
OnePlus 2
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1297 Points -37%
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
876 Points -58%
Google Nexus 6P
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1136 Points -45%
LG G4
Adreno 418, 808 MSM8992, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1558 Points -25%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MDP
Adreno 530, 820 MSM8996
2035 Points -2%
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1945 Points -6%
Asphalt 8: Airborne
 InställningarVärde
 high31 fps
 very low30 fps
Real Racing 3
 InställningarVärde
 high44 fps
Temple Run 2
 InställningarVärde
 default60 fps
Dead Trigger 2
 InställningarVärde
 high56 fps
Hög belastning
 40 °C39.8 °C37.2 °C 
 39 °C38.7 °C35.5 °C 
 37.3 °C36 °C33.6 °C 
Max: 40 °C
Medel: 37.5 °C
35.4 °C37.6 °C39.1 °C
34.7 °C36.7 °C35.4 °C
33.9 °C34 °C34.3 °C
Max: 39.1 °C
Medel: 35.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  30.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.8 °C | Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.01 / 0.09 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.63 / 1.1 / 1.56 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 5.95 / 6.7 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Gossen Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
Mali-T760 MP8, Exynos 7420, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
Motorola Moto X Force
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, Apple AP0064K (iPhone NVMe)
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
Adreno 430, 810 MSM8994, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Huawei Mate 8
Mali-T880 MP4, Kirin 950, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Power Consumption
18%
-22%
-9%
-144%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
0.63
0.5
21%
0.96
-52%
0.5
21%
2.85
-352%
0.85
-35%
Idle Average *
1.1
0.9
18%
1.35
-23%
1.9
-73%
2.95
-168%
2.07
-88%
Idle Maximum *
1.56
1.3
17%
1.4
10%
2.2
-41%
3.26
-109%
2.28
-46%
Load Average *
5.95
3.8
36%
6.11
-3%
3.2
46%
8.92
-50%
3.91
34%
Load Maximum *
6.7
6.8
-1%
9.43
-41%
6.4
4%
9.39
-40%
4.69
30%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
27tim 43min
WiFi Websurfing
12tim 12min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15tim 14min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 32min
Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge
13.86 Wh, 95
Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge
10 Wh, 92
Samsung Galaxy S7
11.55 Wh, 92.6
Huawei Mate 8
 Wh, 96
Microsoft Lumia 950 XL
13 Wh, 89.8
Apple iPhone 6S Plus
10 Wh, 91.9
Motorola Moto X Force
 Wh, 91
Sony Xperia Z5 Premium
13 Wh, 91
Battery Runtime
-36%
-17%
0%
-43%
-26%
-21%
-43%
Reader / Idle
1663
1349
-19%
1810
9%
1872
13%
1078
-35%
1655
0%
1610
-3%
1277
-23%
H.264
914
417
-54%
892
-2%
963
5%
611
-33%
714
-22%
710
-22%
411
-55%
WiFi v1.3
732
534
-27%
456
-38%
865
18%
369
-50%
513
-30%
426
-42%
372
-49%
Load
392
224
-43%
242
-38%
256
-35%
179
-54%
197
-50%
330
-16%
210
-46%

För

+ superb kamera
+ blixtsnabb systemkrets
+ minneskortplats
+ damm- och vattensäker (IP68)
+ fantastisk skärm
+ utmärkt batteritid
+ snabbladdning och trådlös laddning
+ bra headset ingår
+ OTG-adapter ingår

Emot

- ingen infraröd sändare
- ingen FM-mottagare
- Live View i Pro Mode inte alltid tillförlitligt
- endast micro-USB 2.0
- ej MHL eller SlimPort-stöd
In review: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge. Review sample courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

Läs en längre version av testet på engelska här

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge är en enastående smartphone visuellt och tekniskt. Den koreanska tillverkaren kunde ha erbjudit fler anslutningsmöjligheter i form av modernare LTE och framförallt vad gäller gränssnitten. Särskilt tråkig är avsaknaden av USB typ C.

I övrigt gör Samsung nästan allt rätt. Skärmen är i skrivande stund den bästa som vi någonsin har testat i en smartphone och kameran tar utmärkta bilder även i svagt ljus. Men det som verkligen ger mervärde jämfört med standardmodellen av Galaxy S7 är den exceptionella batteritiden. Kantskärmarna ser bra ut, men är mest en smaksak. 

Samsungs Galaxy S7 Edge kombinerar bra prestanda, en briljant skärm, en utmärkt kamera och riktigt bra batteritid. Därför kan Samsung med rätta försvara sin topposition bland nuvarande smartphones med sin nya Galaxy S7-uppställning. Visserligen kan de nya modellerna ses mer som produktuppdateringar än lysande innovationer.

Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge - 12/09/2016 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Design
94%
Tangentbord
72 / 75 → 96%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
51 / 60 → 85%
Vikt
92%
Batteri
95%
Skärm
92%
Spelprestanda
59 / 63 → 93%
Programprestanda
60 / 70 → 86%
Temperatur
91%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
69 / 91 → 76%
Camera
94%
Medel
82%
91%
Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (sammanfattning)
Daniel Schmidt, 2016-04-19 (Update: 2024-11- 4)