Test: Samsung Galaxy S8+ (Plus, SM-G955F) (sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 (Klaus I211) | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG G6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 560 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
81.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
92.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.13
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Super AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Huawei Mate 9 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.9" | Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | Google Pixel XL 2016 AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5" | HTC U Ultra SLCD 5, 2560x1440, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 1% | -81% | 3% | -83% | -21% | -149% | |
| Brightness middle | 560 | 554 -1% | 696 24% | 557 -1% | 402 -28% | 485 -13% | 470 -16% |
| Brightness | 562 | 552 -2% | 680 21% | 553 -2% | 408 -27% | 490 -13% | 445 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 96 3% | 93 0% | 97 4% | 85 -9% | 92 -1% | 88 -5% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.35 | 0.22 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 1.59 6% | 4.3 -153% | 1.4 18% | 4 -135% | 2.1 -24% | 5.5 -224% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 2.56 25% | 9.4 -176% | 3.1 9% | 10.1 -197% | 5.5 -62% | 11.9 -250% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.01 -26% | 4.8 -200% | 1.3 19% | 3.2 -100% | 2.6 -63% | 7.6 -375% |
| Gamma | 2.13 103% | 2.01 109% | 2.33 94% | 2.21 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6435 101% | 6321 103% | 7255 90% | 6667 97% | 7037 92% | 6843 95% | 7454 87% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 81.57 | 82.12 1% | 63.1 -23% | 88.14 8% | |||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.87 | 99.98 0% | 99.83 0% | 100 0% | |||
| Contrast | 1657 | 1591 | 2136 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 250 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Geekbench 4.4 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG G6 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| LG G6 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.0 | |
| on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| GFXBench 3.1 | |
| on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| PCMark for Android | |
| Work performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Vellamo 3.x - Browser (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| HTC U Ultra | |
| LG G6 | |
| Google Pixel XL 2016 | |
| Lenovo Moto Z | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge | Sony Xperia XZ | HTC U Ultra | Google Pixel XL 2016 | Lenovo Moto Z | Huawei Mate 9 | Apple iPhone 7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -16% | -45% | -12% | -40% | 53% | -32% | ||
| Sequential Read 256KB | 788 | 487.3 -38% | 281 -64% | 423.9 -46% | 258.2 -67% | 439.7 -44% | 594 -25% | |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 194.2 | 145.1 -25% | 138 -29% | 164.7 -15% | 83.4 -57% | 168.3 -13% | 142.9 -26% | |
| Random Read 4KB | 127.2 | 86.7 -32% | 71.5 -44% | 84.2 -34% | 87.7 -31% | 117.2 -8% | 94.7 -26% | |
| Random Write 4KB | 15.27 | 15.79 3% | 10.5 -31% | 13.7 -10% | 14.56 -5% | 74.9 391% | 8.77 -43% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 71.1 | 76.4 7% | 33.5 -53% | 82.8 16% | 78.5 10% | 54 -24% | ||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 57.2 | 50.4 -12% | 29.8 -48% | 67.6 18% | 45.64 -20% | 29.53 -48% | ||
| PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 | -50% | -27% | -18% | 38% | 55% | |||
| Disk Tests | 92548 | 36364 -61% | 44706 -52% | 68378 -26% | 117939 27% | 48907 -47% | ||
| Memory Tests | 9844 | 6136 -38% | 9673 -2% | 8912 -9% | 14580 48% | 25299 157% | ||
| BaseMark OS II | ||||||||
| Memory | 3135 | 2072 -34% | 1434 -54% | 1581 -50% | 1677 -47% | 2190 -30% | 3850 23% | 1319 -58% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -33% /
-26% | -50% /
-46% | -31% /
-17% | -38% /
-37% | 2% /
28% | 10% /
-10% | -2% /
17% |
| Asphalt 8: Airborne | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
| very low | 30 fps | ||
| Dead Trigger 2 | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| high | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPhone 7 Plus audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Teufel Boomster audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.02 / 0.13 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.68 / 1.13 / 1.16 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.69 / 5.24 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | -33% | -77% | -1% | -50% | -50% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.68 | 0.63 7% | 0.62 9% | 1 -47% | 0.53 22% | 0.77 -13% | 0.78 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 1.13 | 1.1 3% | 1.43 -27% | 2.41 -113% | 1.07 5% | 2.04 -81% | 2.13 -88% |
| Idle Maximum * | 1.16 | 1.56 -34% | 1.48 -28% | 2.46 -112% | 1.12 3% | 2.24 -93% | 2.17 -87% |
| Load Average * | 4.69 | 5.95 -27% | 5.52 -18% | 6.8 -45% | 5.53 -18% | 4.69 -0% | 6.32 -35% |
| Load Maximum * | 5.24 | 6.7 -28% | 10.47 -100% | 8.9 -70% | 6.26 -19% | 8.66 -65% | 6.49 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life | |
| Samsung Galaxy A5 2017 | |
| Huawei Mate 9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ | |
| Samsung Galaxy S7 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus 3500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge 3600 mAh | HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh | Google Pixel XL 2016 3450 mAh | LG G6 3300 mAh | Huawei Mate 9 4000 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ 2900 mAh | Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 18% | -17% | -24% | 1% | 2% | -33% | -11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1565 | 1663 6% | 1568 0% | 1333 -15% | 1789 14% | 1538 -2% | 1125 -28% | 1371 -12% |
| H.264 | 742 | 914 23% | 605 -18% | 505 -32% | 779 5% | 947 28% | 502 -32% | 724 -2% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 736 | 732 -1% | 546 -26% | 505 -31% | 692 -6% | 758 3% | 438 -40% | 407 -45% |
| Load | 275 | 392 43% | 214 -22% | 230 -16% | 252 -8% | 219 -20% | 187 -32% | 320 16% |
För
Emot
Läs det fullständiga originaltestet på engelska här.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus är en utmärkt smartphone utan några allvarliga brister. Den nya och nästan ramfria designen ser bra ut på bild och är ännu mer imponerande när du håller den i handen. Infinity-skärmen övertygar i alla avseenden vad gäller färgreproduktion, ljusstyrka och reflexer. Prestandan med Samsungs nya Exynos 8895 är också utmärkt och kan till och med utmana Apples A10-krets.
Anslutningsmöjligheterna går heller knappt att kritisera. Röstkvaliteten är bra och du får väldigt snabbt Wi-Fi och Gigabit-LTE. Det sistnämna kunde haft stöd för fler frekvenser, då du kan få problem om du reser mycket i Nordamerika eller Asien. De lokala restriktionerna från tillverkaren är irriterande och det finns ingen dual-SIM-modell i Europa heller.
Vi skulle vilja se fler valmöjligheter i allmänhet. 128 GB-versionen kommer inte att bli tillgänglig i Europa, vilket också gäller några av färgerna.
Samsung har också implementerat många säkerhetsfunktioner. Det är dock enkelt att överlista ansiktsigenkänningen, så den kan vi inte rekommendera. Och fingeravtrycksläsaren på baksidan är knepig att nå.
Sammantaget har Samsung utvecklat en bra smartphone, som övertygar med sin snygga design, enastående kamera, långa batteritid och magnifika skärm. Tyvärr är Plus-varianten betydligt dyrare än den mindre S8-modellen.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus
- 04/13/2017 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
