Test: Samsung Galaxy S8 (sammanfattning)

Name: Samsung Galaxy S8
Brand: Samsung

Mindre och mer välpolerad. Samsungs uppföljare till Galaxy S7 drar till sig blicken med sitt nya formspråk: smalare kanter och mer skärm. Galaxy S8 är också en något mer välbalanserad produkt än systermodellen, och priset är lägre.

Marcus Herbrich, Daniel Schmidt, Published 07/06/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Smartphone Android Touchscreen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy S8 (Galaxy S Serie)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa 8 x 2.3 GHz, Mongoose / Cortex-A53

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G71 MP20, Kärna: 850 MHz

Minne

4 GB

, LPDDR4

Skärm

5.80 tum 2.06:1, 2960 x 1440 pixlar 568 PPI, kapacitiv pekskärm, Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5, Super AMOLED, Mobile HDR Premium, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 64 GB

, 52.3 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Ljudanslutningar: headset 3,5 mm, Kortläsare: micro-SD max. 256 GB (SDHC, SDXC), 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: accelerometer, position, hjärtfrekvens, Hall, rotation, närhet, tryck och G-sensor, barometer, digital kompass, iris-scanner, ansiktsigenkänning, BeiDou, Galileo, Ant+, MST, Wifi Direct, Miracast

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, LTE Cat. 16, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 8 x 148.9 x 68.1

Batteri

3000 mAh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Android 7.0 Nougat

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix (dual-pixel, OIS, f/1.7, 1,4 μm, UHD-video)
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix (autofokus, f/1.7)

Övrigt

Högtalare: monohögtalare, Tangentbord: virtuellt, adapter, USB-kable, AKG-headset, två OTG-adaptrar, SIM-verktyg, pamfletter, Samsung Experience UI 8.1, 24 Månader Garanti, USB-C (USB 3.1 Gen.1), Bixby, huvud-SAR: 0.315 W/kg, kropps-SAR: 1.27 W/kg, IP68-certifierad, fanless

Vikt

155 g, Strömförsörjning: 62 g

Pris

799 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	651 MBit/s
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	485 MBit/s -25%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	435 MBit/s -33%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	343 (154^min) MBit/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	335 MBit/s -49%
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	220 MBit/s -66%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPhone 7 A10 Fusion GPU, A10 Fusion, 128 GB NVMe (Klaus I211)	532 MBit/s +62%
Google Pixel XL 2016 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB eMMC Flash	515 MBit/s +57%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Mali-G71 MP20, Exynos 8895, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	329 MBit/s
LG G6 Adreno 530, SD 821, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	325 MBit/s -1%
Huawei P10 Mali-G71 MP8, Kirin 960, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	308 (48.8^min) MBit/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy S7 Mali-T880 MP12, Exynos 8890, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	281 MBit/s -15%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


543 cd/m²	566 cd/m²	574 cd/m²
561 cd/m²	566 cd/m²	570 cd/m²
563 cd/m²	562 cd/m²	575 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

Infinity Display, Corning Gorilla Glas 5 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 575 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 564.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.7 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 566 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.87% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
81.57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
Gamma: 2.15

	Samsung Galaxy S8 Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 5.8"	Samsung Galaxy S7 SAMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.1"	LG G6 IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7"	Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1"	Apple iPhone 7 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Lenovo Moto Z AMOLED, 2560x1440, 5.5"	OnePlus 3T Optic-AMOLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		6%	-27%	-33%	16%	2%	-88%
Brightness middle	566	350 -38%	646 14%	547 -3%	557 -2%	485 -14%	421 -26%
Brightness	564	351 -38%	611 8%	556 -1%	553 -2%	490 -13%	430 -24%
Brightness Distribution	94	98 4%	89 -5%	86 -9%	97 3%	92 -2%	84 -11%
Black Level *			0.23	0.43	0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.7	2.04 24%	4.5 -67%	4.8 -78%	1.4 48%	2.1 22%	7.1 -163%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.4	3.25 40%	8.3 -54%	8.8 -63%	3.1 43%	5.5 -2%	15.3 -183%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	1.63 47%	6 -94%	4.5 -45%	1.3 58%	2.6 16%	6.8 -119%
Gamma	2.15 ^102%	2.07 ^106%	2.27 ^97%	2.39 ^92%	2.21 ^100%	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6335 ^103%	6391 ^102%	7996 ^81%	7194 ^90%	6667 ^97%	6843 ^95%	7866 ^83%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	81.57	86.86 6%	67.74 -17%		63.1 -23%	88.14 8%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	99.87	99.35 -1%	99.05 -1%		99.83 0%	100 0%
Contrast			2809	1272	1591

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2 ms rise
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.8 ms rise
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	171884 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	127902 Points -26%
Huawei P10	140084 Points -19%
LG G6	151751 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 7	142532 Points -17%
HTC U Ultra	139017 Points -19%
Sony Xperia XZ	129317 Points -25%
Lenovo Moto Z	129197 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	148698 Points -13%
OnePlus 3T	159866 Points -7%
Google Pixel XL 2016	138641 Points -19%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	1970 Points
Huawei P10	1935 Points -2%
Apple iPhone 7	3490 Points +77%
HTC U Ultra	1643 Points -17%
Sony Xperia XZ	1647 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto Z	1480 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	1728 Points -12%
OnePlus 3T	1881 Points -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1513 Points -23%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	6300 Points
Huawei P10	6036 Points -4%
Apple iPhone 7	5585 Points -11%
HTC U Ultra	3983 Points -37%
Sony Xperia XZ	3701 Points -41%
Lenovo Moto Z	3946 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	4292 Points -32%
OnePlus 3T	4236 Points -33%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4167 Points -34%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	1997 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	1810 Points -9%
Huawei P10	1899 Points -5%
LG G6	1831 Points -8%
Apple iPhone 7	3527 Points +77%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	6711 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	5354 Points -20%
Huawei P10	6521 Points -3%
LG G6	4369 Points -35%
Apple iPhone 7	5922 Points -12%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	31532 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	29015 Points -8%
Huawei P10	27692 Points -12%
LG G6	29276 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 7	37676 Points +19%
HTC U Ultra	29668 Points -6%
Sony Xperia XZ	28603 Points -9%
Lenovo Moto Z	25135 Points -20%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	30606 Points -3%
OnePlus 3T	30810 Points -2%
Google Pixel XL 2016	27766 Points -12%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	36347 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	33348 Points -8%
Huawei P10	35964 Points -1%
LG G6	32128 Points -12%
Apple iPhone 7	63974 Points +76%
HTC U Ultra	33446 Points -8%
Sony Xperia XZ	32056 Points -12%
Lenovo Moto Z	26659 Points -27%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	34202 Points -6%
OnePlus 3T	34494 Points -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32652 Points -10%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	21543 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	19944 Points -7%
Huawei P10	15341 Points -29%
LG G6	22335 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7	15450 Points -28%
HTC U Ultra	21263 Points -1%
Sony Xperia XZ	20772 Points -4%
Lenovo Moto Z	20948 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	22372 Points +4%
OnePlus 3T	22426 Points +4%
Google Pixel XL 2016	18222 Points -15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	4015 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2715 Points -32%
Huawei P10	2649 Points -34%
LG G6	3282 Points -18%
Apple iPhone 7	2964 Points -26%
HTC U Ultra	2947 Points -27%
Sony Xperia XZ	3275 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto Z	3023 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	3580 Points -11%
OnePlus 3T	2577 Points -36%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3180 Points -21%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	4923 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	3018 Points -39%
Huawei P10	2816 Points -43%
LG G6	4121 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 7	4057 Points -18%
HTC U Ultra	3807 Points -23%
Sony Xperia XZ	4522 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z	3718 Points -24%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	4746 Points -4%
OnePlus 3T	3310 Points -33%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3935 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	2440 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2010 Points -18%
Huawei P10	2193 Points -10%
LG G6	1961 Points -20%
Apple iPhone 7	1525 Points -37%
HTC U Ultra	1646 Points -33%
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points -32%
Lenovo Moto Z	1828 Points -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	1927 Points -21%
OnePlus 3T	1452 Points -40%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1902 Points -22%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	3194 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2170 Points -32%
Huawei P10	2274 Points -29%
LG G6	2669 Points -16%
HTC U Ultra	2225 Points -30%
Sony Xperia XZ	2548 Points -20%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -31%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	2598 Points -19%
OnePlus 3T	2221 Points -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2560 Points -20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	3472 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2216 Points -36%
Huawei P10	2409 Points -31%
LG G6	2980 Points -14%
HTC U Ultra	2405 Points -31%
Sony Xperia XZ	2853 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto Z	2336 Points -33%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	2933 Points -16%
OnePlus 3T	2418 Points -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2820 Points -19%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	2494 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2022 Points -19%
Huawei P10	1902 Points -24%
LG G6	1955 Points -22%
HTC U Ultra	1763 Points -29%
Sony Xperia XZ	1667 Points -33%
Lenovo Moto Z	1797 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	1857 Points -26%
OnePlus 3T	1728 Points -31%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1935 Points -22%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	60 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	53 fps -12%
Huawei P10	55 fps -8%
LG G6	46 fps -23%
Apple iPhone 7	57.7 fps -4%
HTC U Ultra	46 fps -23%
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps +47%
Lenovo Moto Z	53 fps -12%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	60 fps 0%
OnePlus 3T	59 fps -2%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55 fps -8%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	121 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	84 fps -31%
Huawei P10	69 fps -43%
LG G6	75 fps -38%
Apple iPhone 7	110.3 fps -9%
HTC U Ultra	74 fps -39%
Sony Xperia XZ	88 fps -27%
Lenovo Moto Z	77 fps -36%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	93 fps -23%
OnePlus 3T	91 fps -25%
Google Pixel XL 2016	91 fps -25%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	41 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	27 fps -34%
Huawei P10	32 fps -22%
LG G6	27 fps -34%
Apple iPhone 7	58.5 fps +43%
HTC U Ultra	23 fps -44%
Sony Xperia XZ	39 fps -5%
Lenovo Moto Z	26 fps -37%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	48 fps +17%
OnePlus 3T	45 fps +10%
Google Pixel XL 2016	30 fps -27%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	62 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	40 fps -35%
Huawei P10	30 fps -52%
LG G6	38 fps -39%
Apple iPhone 7	60.7 fps -2%
HTC U Ultra	26 fps -58%
Sony Xperia XZ	40 fps -35%
Lenovo Moto Z	41 fps -34%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	49 fps -21%
OnePlus 3T	46 fps -26%
Google Pixel XL 2016	48 fps -23%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	23 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps -35%
Huawei P10	25 fps +9%
LG G6	16 fps -30%
Apple iPhone 7	59.4 fps +158%
HTC U Ultra	12 fps -48%
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps +35%
Lenovo Moto Z	15 fps -35%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	32 fps +39%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +39%
Google Pixel XL 2016	17 fps -26%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	24 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	28 fps +17%
Huawei P10	24 fps 0%
LG G6	29 fps +21%
Apple iPhone 7	42.2 fps +76%
HTC U Ultra	12 fps -50%
Sony Xperia XZ	31 fps +29%
Lenovo Moto Z	27 fps +13%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	32 fps +33%
OnePlus 3T	32 fps +33%
Google Pixel XL 2016	32 fps +33%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	13 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	7.9 fps -39%
Huawei P10	16 fps +23%
LG G6	11 fps -15%
HTC U Ultra	8.4 fps -35%
Sony Xperia XZ	19 fps +46%
Lenovo Moto Z	9.8 fps -25%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	19 fps +46%
OnePlus 3T	20 fps +54%
Google Pixel XL 2016	11 fps -15%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	25 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	15 fps -40%
Huawei P10	15 fps -40%
LG G6	20 fps -20%
HTC U Ultra	15 fps -40%
Sony Xperia XZ	20 fps -20%
Lenovo Moto Z	16 fps -36%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	19 fps -24%
OnePlus 3T	20 fps -20%
Google Pixel XL 2016	19 fps -24%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	6035 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	4826 Points -20%
Huawei P10	7341 Points +22%
LG G6	5703 Points -6%
HTC U Ultra	5217 Points -14%
Sony Xperia XZ	5058 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto Z	7637 Points +27%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	5121 Points -15%
OnePlus 3T	5664 Points -6%
Google Pixel XL 2016	4739 Points -21%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	5370 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	3550 Points -34%
Huawei P10	6206 Points +16%
LG G6	5152 Points -4%
HTC U Ultra	5217 Points -3%
Sony Xperia XZ	5616 Points +5%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	3277 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	1987 Points -39%
Huawei P10	2621 Points -20%
LG G6	2496 Points -24%
Apple iPhone 7	2999 Points -8%
HTC U Ultra	2078 Points -37%
Sony Xperia XZ	2165 Points -34%
Lenovo Moto Z	2356 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	2345 Points -28%
OnePlus 3T	2218 Points -32%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2378 Points -27%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	5386 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	4217 Points -22%
Huawei P10	3830 Points -29%
LG G6	3646 Points -32%
Apple iPhone 7	6097 Points +13%
HTC U Ultra	2834 Points -47%
Sony Xperia XZ	3047 Points -43%
Lenovo Moto Z	3398 Points -37%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	3387 Points -37%
OnePlus 3T	3130 Points -42%
Google Pixel XL 2016	3889 Points -28%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	3039 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	2244 Points -26%
Huawei P10	2778 Points -9%
LG G6	1930 Points -36%
Apple iPhone 7	1257 Points -59%
HTC U Ultra	1581 Points -48%
Sony Xperia XZ	1434 Points -53%
Lenovo Moto Z	2190 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	1740 Points -43%
OnePlus 3T	1954 Points -36%
Google Pixel XL 2016	1677 Points -45%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	6096 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	1723 Points -72%
Huawei P10	4115 Points -32%
LG G6	5138 Points -16%
Apple iPhone 7	6896 Points +13%
HTC U Ultra	4591 Points -25%
Sony Xperia XZ	4716 Points -23%
Lenovo Moto Z	4321 Points -29%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	5033 Points -17%
OnePlus 3T	4444 Points -27%
Google Pixel XL 2016	5017 Points -18%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	1156 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	957 Points -17%
Huawei P10	1077 Points -7%
LG G6	1073 Points -7%
Apple iPhone 7	1531 Points +32%
HTC U Ultra	907 Points -22%
Sony Xperia XZ	1066 Points -8%
Lenovo Moto Z	959 Points -17%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	1020 Points -12%
OnePlus 3T	891 Points -23%
Google Pixel XL 2016	977 Points -15%

Basemark X 1.1
Medium Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	43852 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	40252 Points -8%
Huawei P10	43782 Points 0%
LG G6	37621 Points -14%
Lenovo Moto Z	41445 Points -5%
Google Pixel XL 2016	34695 Points -21%
High Quality (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	42183 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	30097 Points -29%
Huawei P10	37968 Points -10%
LG G6	35449 Points -16%
Lenovo Moto Z	33028 Points -22%
Google Pixel XL 2016	30724 Points -27%

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	1276 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	732 Points -43%
Huawei P10	664 Points -48%
LG G6	647 Points -49%
Apple iPhone 7	1322 Points +4%
Apple iPhone 7	1059 Points -17%
Lenovo Moto Z	542 Points -58%
Google Pixel XL 2016	621 Points -51%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	30.64 fps
Samsung Galaxy S7	13.86 fps -55%
Huawei P10	23.56 fps -23%
LG G6	24.34 fps -21%
Lenovo Moto Z	24.33 fps -21%

Legend

Samsung Galaxy S8 Samsung Exynos 8895 Octa, ARM Mali-G71 MP20, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Samsung Galaxy S7 Samsung Exynos 8890 Octa, ARM Mali-T880 MP12, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Huawei P10 HiSilicon Kirin 960, ARM Mali-G71 MP8, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Apple iPhone 7 Apple A10 Fusion, Apple A10 Fusion GPU / PowerVR, 128 GB NVMe

HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XZ Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Xiaomi Mi 5s Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash

Google Pixel XL 2016 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro, Qualcomm Adreno 530, 32 GB eMMC Flash

WebXPRT 2015 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | JetStream 1.1

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	194 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	166 Points -14%
Huawei P10	136 Points -30%
LG G6	122 Points -37%
Apple iPhone 7	202 Points +4%
Sony Xperia XZ	90 Points -54%
Lenovo Moto Z	112 Points -42%
OnePlus 3T	135 Points -30%
Google Pixel XL 2016	126 Points -35%

Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	12941 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	13161 Points +2%
Huawei P10	10236 Points -21%
LG G6	9113 Points -30%
Apple iPhone 7	24875 Points +92%
HTC U Ultra	5511 Points -57%
Sony Xperia XZ	9069 Points -30%
Lenovo Moto Z	7771 Points -40%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	9378 Points -28%
OnePlus 3T	9798 Points -24%
Google Pixel XL 2016	8690 Points -33%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	1887 ms *
Samsung Galaxy S7	2562 ms * -36%
Huawei P10	3129 ms * -66%
LG G6	2464 ms * -31%
Apple iPhone 7	1113 ms * +41%
HTC U Ultra	4141 ms * -119%
Sony Xperia XZ	2768 ms * -47%
Lenovo Moto Z	3155 ms * -67%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	2580 ms * -37%
OnePlus 3T	2719 ms * -44%
Google Pixel XL 2016	2654 ms * -41%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy S8	65.8 Points
Samsung Galaxy S7	74 Points +12%
Huawei P10	57.9 Points -12%
LG G6	56.6 Points -14%
Apple iPhone 7	165.9 Points +152%
HTC U Ultra	45.08 Points -31%
Sony Xperia XZ	54.2 Points -18%
Lenovo Moto Z	47.5 Points -28%
Xiaomi Mi 5s	57 Points -13%
OnePlus 3T	54.5 Points -17%
Google Pixel XL 2016	55.4 Points -16%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy S8	Samsung Galaxy S7	Huawei P10	LG G6	HTC U Ultra	Sony Xperia XZ	Lenovo Moto Z	OnePlus 3T	Xiaomi Mi 5s	Google Pixel XL 2016
AndroBench 3-5		-13%	145%	-13%	-8%	-44%	56%	82%	-23%	-40%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	53.5	53.6 0%	32.19 -40%	53.3 0%	67.6 26%	29.8 -44%	45.64 -15%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	63.9	72.3 13%	54.2 -15%	77.6 21%	82.8 30%	33.5 -48%	78.5 23%
Random Write 4KB	15.25	16.01 5%	152.3 899%	16.58 9%	13.7 -10%	10.5 -31%	74.9 391%	74.4 388%	15.08 -1%	14.56 -5%
Random Read 4KB	127.2	85.9 -32%	168.4 32%	95.2 -25%	84.2 -34%	71.5 -44%	117.2 -8%	123.6 -3%	100.3 -21%	87.7 -31%
Sequential Write 256KB	193.2	145.7 -25%	189.8 -2%	122.8 -36%	164.7 -15%	138 -29%	168.3 -13%	165.3 -14%	153.5 -21%	83.4 -57%
Sequential Read 256KB	793	483.8 -39%	738 -7%	428.7 -46%	423.9 -47%	281 -65%	439.7 -45%	436.4 -45%	412.7 -48%	258.2 -67%

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	29 fps
	very low	30 fps

... jämför

Temple Run 2
	Inställningar	Värde
	default	60 fps

Temple Run 2
	Inställningar	Värde
	default	60 fps

... jämför

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


35 °C	36.7 °C	34.2 °C
34.7 °C	35.4 °C	34.5 °C
34.2 °C	34.4 °C	34.1 °C

Max: 36.7 °C
Medel: 34.8 °C


35.2 °C	37.5 °C	32.8 °C
34.5 °C	36.2 °C	32.1 °C
33.9 °C	35.4 °C	32.7 °C

Max: 37.5 °C
Medel: 34.5 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 30.6 °C | Rumstemperatur 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 59% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

LG G6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Huawei P10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 49% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.02 / 0.14 Watt
Låg belastning	0.78 / 1.1 / 1.16 Watt
Hög belastning	4.15 / 5.12 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	LG G6 3300 mAh	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 1960 mAh	OnePlus 3T 3400 mAh	Xiaomi Mi 5s 3200 mAh
Power Consumption		-6%	-35%	-65%	-5%	-54%	-36%
Idle Minimum *	0.78	0.68 13%	0.62 21%	0.83 -6%	0.54 31%	0.61 22%	0.4 49%
Idle Average *	1.1	1.02 7%	1.43 -30%	2.1 -91%	1.51 -37%	1.77 -61%	1.7 -55%
Idle Maximum *	1.16	1.14 2%	1.48 -28%	2.18 -88%	1.54 -33%	1.81 -56%	1.81 -56%
Load Average *	4.15	4.73 -14%	5.52 -33%	6.57 -58%	3.75 10%	6.67 -61%	5.84 -41%
Load Maximum *	5.12	7.16 -40%	10.47 -104%	9.32 -82%	5.01 2%	10.98 -114%	9.12 -78%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		27tim 47min
WiFi Websurfing		11tim 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		12tim 51min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 24min

PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 battery life
Huawei Mate 9	677 min +28%
Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus	533 min +1%
Samsung Galaxy S8	527 min
Sony Xperia XZ	482 min -9%
Lenovo ZUK Z2	481 min -9%
HTC 10	387 min -27%
Samsung Galaxy S7	371 min -30%

	Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S7 3000 mAh	Apple iPhone 7 Plus 2915 mAh	LG G6 3300 mAh	Huawei P10 3200 mAh	Lenovo Moto Z 2600 mAh	HTC U Ultra 3000 mAh
Battery Runtime		-5%	-5%	-0%	-8%	-12%	-18%
Reader / Idle	1667	1810 9%	1835 10%	1789 7%	1540 -8%	1371 -18%	1568 -6%
H.264	771	892 16%	813 5%	779 1%	582 -25%	724 -6%	605 -22%
WiFi v1.3	719	456 -37%	587 -18%	692 -4%	966 34%	407 -43%	546 -24%
Load	264	242 -8%	225 -15%	252 -5%	176 -33%	320 21%	214 -19%

För

+ utmärkt skärm

+ tilltalande design

+ snabb SoC

+ mycket bra GPS

+ snabbt WiFi

+ Gigabit-LTE

+ skaplig samtalskvalitet

+ bra sensorkonfiguration

+ USB 3.1 med DP, HDMI och OTG

+ bra batteritid

+ snabbladdning och trådlös laddning

+ vatten- och dammtålig

+ mycket bra kamera ...

Emot

- ... som inte är så mycket bättre än föregångaren

- ej dual-SIM

- fingeravtryckssensorn svår att hitta via beröring

- SoC-strypning under permanent belastning

- garantin täcker inte vätskerelaterade skador

Läs det kompletta originaltestet på engelska här: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-Galaxy-S8-Smartphone-Review.209502.0.html

Med Galaxy S8 har Samsung skapat en suverän produkt som samlar ännu fler poäng än den större systermodellen Galaxy S8+. S7-serien var annorlunda, men nu är Plus-modellen tyngre och kan inte utnyttja sitt större batteri. Dessutom är fingeravtrycksskannerns positionering inte lika bekväm. Alltså kan man spara en tusenlapp om inte den större skärmen är ett måste.

Själva luren övertygar med snygg design och den nya Infinity-skärmen imponerar med exakt färgåtergivning, hög ljusstyrka och få reflektioner, vilket också är höjdpunkten i Galaxy S8. Den nya processorn levererar också en prestandaökning och en Gigabit LTE-modul är installerad. Men det är synd att Samsung inte säljer en dual-SIM-variant på våra breddgrader.

De olika säkerhetsfunktionerna är ett annat plus, men ansiktsigenkänningen bör inte användas om telefonen verkligen måste vara säker – metoden är lätt att lura. Tyvärr är assistenten Bixby fortfarande ofullständig.

Vi skulle allmänt önska att Samsung gav sina konsumenter mer frihet. Till exempel kommer 128 GB-modellen (med 6 GB RAM) inte att lanseras i Europa. Kunder utanför Asien kan heller inte välja bland alla tillgängliga färger.

Hursomhelst har Samsung lyckats riktigt bra med att uppgradera sin premium-smartphone. Galaxy S8 övertygar med snygg design, en lika bra kamera som tidigare, mycket bra batteritid och en utmärkt skärm.

Samsung Galaxy S8 - 09/03/2022 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich, Daniel Schmidt

Design

91%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

97%

Anslutningar

67 / 70 → 95%

Vikt

92%

Batteri

89%

Skärm

91%

Spelprestanda

36 / 64 → 56%

Programprestanda

58 / 86 → 68%

Temperatur

93%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 84%

Camera

66%

Medel

79%

85%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy S8 (sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, Daniel Schmidt, 2017-07- 6 (Update: 2024-11- 4)

Test: Samsung Galaxy S8 (sammanfattning)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis

LG G6 audio analysis

Huawei P10 audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison