Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 401 cd/m²
Kontrast: 802:1 (Svärta: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.36
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 TFT, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Lenovo Tab M10 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N IPS, 1920x1200, 10.5" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 Super AMOLED, 2560x1600, 10.5" | Apple iPad 6 2018 IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -5% | -5% | -37% | -41% | 35% | 25% | 29% | |
Brightness middle | 401 | 542 35% | 426 6% | 514 28% | 339 -15% | 556 39% | 452 13% | 530 32% |
Brightness | 396 | 520 31% | 399 1% | 492 24% | 327 -17% | 514 30% | 453 14% | 513 30% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 91 6% | 80 -7% | 86 0% | 87 1% | 90 5% | 92 7% |
Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.68 -36% | 0.38 24% | 0.96 -92% | 0.42 16% | 0.42 16% | 0.61 -22% | |
Contrast | 802 | 797 -1% | 1121 40% | 535 -33% | 807 1% | 1324 65% | 869 8% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 4.2 -45% | 4.5 -55% | 5.42 -87% | 5.8 -100% | 1.8 38% | 1.7 41% | 1.2 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 6.7 -16% | 7.9 -36% | 9.84 -70% | 11.6 -100% | 3.2 45% | 3.7 36% | 3.2 45% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 4.8 -17% | 5.2 -27% | 6.5 -59% | 8.6 -110% | 2.2 46% | 2.4 41% | 1 76% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.42 91% | 2.23 99% | 2.216 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.26 97% | 2.07 106% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 7263 89% | 7434 87% | 6875 95% | 6780 96% | 8718 75% | 6819 95% | 6337 103% | 6588 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8782 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
52.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise | |
↘ 26 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33 ms). |
Basemark GPU 1.1 | |
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 () | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
Vulkan Medium Native | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 () | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (6.21 - 8.72, n=2) |
VRMark - Amber Room | |
Average of class Tablet (1183 - 2909, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 () |
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score | |
Average of class Tablet (309 - 9739, n=13, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (241 - 301, n=2) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (22.1 - 25.7, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samung Browser 9.2) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (42.2 - 45.1, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 10) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (43 - 56, n=4) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (IOS 12.1.1) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (19.3 - 24.1, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (7798 - 9087, n=4) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N (Chrome 69.0.3497.100) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 (Chrome 52.0.2743.98) | |
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite (Chrome 67) | |
Average Samsung Exynos 7904 (3703 - 5707, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 (Samsung Browser 9.2) | |
Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 (Amazon Silk 61.2) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 (Chrome 74.0.3729.136) | |
Apple iPad 6 2018 (Safari Mobile 11.3) |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 | Lenovo Tab M10 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 | Average 32 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 5% | -31% | 101% | -18% | -12% | 32% | 5% | 614% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 300 | 285.6 -5% | 215.8 -28% | 308.1 3% | 262.2 -13% | 279.9 -7% | 294.4 -2% | 242 ? -19% | 943 ? 214% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 90.7 | 103.3 14% | 45.88 -49% | 82.6 -9% | 147.7 63% | 52.6 -42% | 197.1 117% | 100.5 ? 11% | 632 ? 597% |
Random Read 4KB | 62.6 | 71.1 14% | 23.46 -63% | 73.5 17% | 27.72 -56% | 52.5 -16% | 79.2 27% | 43.2 ? -31% | 183.2 ? 193% |
Random Write 4KB | 11.37 | 13.39 18% | 10.01 -12% | 77.3 580% | 9.37 -18% | 11.32 0% | 18.79 65% | 22.4 ? 97% | 176.2 ? 1450% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 81.2 ? | 80.6 ? -1% | 75.5 ? -7% | 83.7 ? 3% | 55.5 ? -32% | 83.5 ? 3% | 76.1 ? -6% | 71.8 ? -12% | |
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 65.6 ? | 60.4 ? -8% | 50.1 ? -24% | 72.8 ? 11% | 30.14 ? -54% | 61.2 ? -7% | 60.8 ? -7% | 52.9 ? -19% |
PUBG Mobile
Asphalt 9
Battle Bay
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MediaPad M5 lite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 63.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (116% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 99% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.01 / 0.13 Watt |
Låg belastning | 1.66 / 4.28 / 4.44 Watt |
Hög belastning |
7.53 / 9.09 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 6150 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 17% | 12% | 4% | 3% | -60% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.66 | 1.26 24% | 1.18 29% | 2.8 -69% | 1.55 7% | 2.2 -33% | 2.07 -25% |
Idle Average * | 4.28 | 4.22 1% | 4.65 -9% | 3.3 23% | 4.17 3% | 7.8 -82% | 3.94 8% |
Idle Maximum * | 4.44 | 4.29 3% | 4.74 -7% | 3.9 12% | 4.25 4% | 7.9 -78% | 3.96 11% |
Load Average * | 7.53 | 5.48 27% | 5.75 24% | 5.2 31% | 7.13 5% | 12.6 -67% | 4.07 46% |
Load Maximum * | 9.09 | 6.57 28% | 6.97 23% | 7.2 21% | 9.63 -6% | 12.8 -41% | 5.73 37% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019 6150 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2016 SM-T585 7300 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.5 SM-T590N 7300 mAh | Amazon Fire HD 10 2017 6300 mAh | Huawei MediaPad M5 lite 7500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e SM-T720 7040 mAh | Apple iPad 6 2018 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 30% | 22% | -28% | 15% | -10% | -24% | |
Reader / Idle | 1500 | 2634 76% | 1960 31% | 960 -36% | 2162 44% | 1263 -16% | |
H.264 | 838 | 893 7% | 963 15% | 585 -30% | 934 11% | 864 3% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 723 | 826 14% | 938 30% | 542 -25% | 852 18% | 623 -14% | 714 -1% |
Load | 347 | 428 23% | 385 11% | 274 -21% | 299 -14% | 300 -14% | 185 -47% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 (2019) är en billig surfplatta på instegsnivå som redan går att få tag på för under 2.000 kronor. Detta gäller också dess föregångare, som hade en bättre skärm, bättre högtalare och mer RAM. Vidare hade Tab A 10.5 längre batteritid och stöd för det tangentbord som fanns som tillval. Tab 10.1 har istället en bättre SoC och en nyare version av Android på sin sida. Det sista är värt att nämna då surfplattor inte alltid får mjukvaruuppdateringar lika ofta som smartphones får.
Valet mellan Tab A 10.1 eller dess föregångare beror på vad du tycker är viktigt på en surfplatta. Prisskillnaden mellan de två enheterna kommer troligen krympa framöver, vilket skulle göra Tab A 10.1 till ett mer tilltalande alternativ.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 är en bergssäker budgetplatta som är prisvärd och passar bra för familjer med små barn.
2 GB RAM och 32 GB lagring är ganska tight för ett system som kör Android 9.0 Pie, särskilt eftersom Samsung positionerar Tab A 10.1 som en familjeenhet med stöd för flera användarkonton. Bristen på en ljussensor och ett inbyggt läsläge känns också som en kostnadsbesparing. För att sammanfatta så är Tab A 10.1 en skaplig budgetsurfplatta, men Samsung har i vårt tyckte sparat in på lite väl mycket.
Samsung Galaxy Tab A 10.1 2019
-
11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt