Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)

Affärer i farten. Det tog Samsung nästan tre år att uppgradera Galaxy Tab Active. Som innan är den vatten- och damm-beständig och borde stå sig ganska bra mot fall. LTE och stöd för stylus-inmatning gjorde föregångaren väldig populär hos dom som gillar att vara utomhus och vår recension avslöjar att Samsung bara har förbättrat Galaxy Tab Active 2 en aning.
Tablet Android
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 (Galaxy Tab Serie)
Processor
Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa 8 x 1.6 GHz, A53
Grafikkort
ARM Mali-T830 MP1
Minne
3 GB 
, LPDDR3
Skärm
8.00 tum 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixlar 189 PPI, kapacitiv, native pen support, TFT LCD, glansig: ja
Hårddisk
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 9.5 GB ledigt
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: hörlursuttag, Kortläsare: microSD, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: fingeravtrycksläsare, accelerometer, gyroskop, närhetssensor, kompass
Nätverk
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, LTE (Cat.6), HSPA+, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS , LTE, GPS
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 13 x 238 x 133
Batteri
16.91 Wh, 4450 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, Batteritid (enligt tillverkaren): 11 tim, Samtalstid 3G (enligt tillverkaren): 23 tim
Operativsystem
Android 7.1 Nougat
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: stereohögtalare, Tangentbord: på skärmen, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, S Pen, Samsung Flow, Samsung Notes, 24 Månader Garanti, fanless, ruggedized
Vikt
512 g, Strömförsörjning: 60 g
Pris
500 Kr
Länkar
Samsung kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

❌
238 mm 133 mm 13 mm 512 g240 mm 169.5 mm 7.5 mm 478 g214 mm 128 mm 9.7 mm 369 g213.1 mm 126.2 mm 9.75 mm 393 g213.3 mm 123.3 mm 7.5 mm 310 g211 mm 124 mm 8.2 mm 310 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
389 MBit/s +50%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
260 MBit/s
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
86 MBit/s -67%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
45.2 MBit/s -83%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
41.5 MBit/s -84%
iperf3 receive AX12
Apple iPad (2017)
A9 / PowerVR GT7600, A9, 128 GB NVMe
465 MBit/s +48%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Mali-T830 MP1, 7870 Octa, 16 GB eMMC Flash
315 MBit/s
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
Mali-T720, MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, 16 GB eMMC Flash
99.3 MBit/s -68%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
Adreno 308, 425, 16 GB eMMC Flash
46.5 MBit/s -85%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
Adreno 505, 435, 16 GB eMMC Flash
42.7 MBit/s -86%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500
Garmin Edge 500

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1Scene 2Scene 3
orginal image
click to load images
471
cd/m²		473
cd/m²		486
cd/m²
471
cd/m²		509
cd/m²		490
cd/m²
462
cd/m²		466
cd/m²		467
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 509 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 477.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5.4 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 509 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1060:1 (Svärta: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.11
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
TFT LCD, 1280x800, 8"		Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
TFT, 1280x800, 8"		Lenovo Tab 4 8
IPS, 1280x800, 8"		Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
IPS, 1920x1200, 8"		Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
IPS, 1280x800, 8"		Apple iPad (2017)
IPS, 2048x1536, 9.7"
Screen
-31%
-38%
-26%
-57%
21%
Brightness middle
509
424
-17%
455
-11%
409.1
-20%
419
-18%
514
1%
Brightness
477
426
-11%
446
-6%
402
-16%
412
-14%
485
2%
Brightness Distribution
91
85
-7%
91
0%
92
1%
91
0%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.48
0.7
-46%
0.51
-6%
0.56
-17%
0.39
19%
0.46
4%
Contrast
1060
606
-43%
892
-16%
731
-31%
1074
1%
1117
5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.45
5.7
-65%
5.5
-59%
4.1
-19%
8.5
-146%
1.4
59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.17
14.8
-186%
9.6
-86%
13.8
-167%
2.9
44%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.5
5.76
-28%
5.5
-22%
5.3
-18%
10.3
-129%
2.1
53%
Gamma
2.11 104%
2.36 93%
2.23 99%
2.2 100%
2.6 85%
2.22 99%
CCT
7171 91%
7236 90%
7852 83%
7603 85%
6216 105%
6647 98%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17 ms rise
↘ 11 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23 ms rise
↘ 19 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).
AnTuTu v6 | PCMark for Android | BaseMark OS II | Geekbench 4.4 | 3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
128706 Points +182%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
46126 Points +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
45573 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
36893 Points -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
34714 Points -24%
PCMark for Android
Work performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4945 Points
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4843 Points -2%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
4457 Points -10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
4125 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
2769 Points -44%
Work 2.0 performance score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3789 Points
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
3744 Points -1%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
3312 Points -13%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2907 Points -23%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Apple iPad (2017)
2441 Points +143%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1072 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1005 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
796 Points -21%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
640 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
496 Points -51%
System
Apple iPad (2017)
4680 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2337 Points
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1980 Points -15%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1477 Points -37%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1152 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
881 Points -62%
Memory
Apple iPad (2017)
1341 Points +14%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1224 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1176 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
784 Points -33%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
736 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
324 Points -72%
Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
4569 Points +762%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
777 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
530 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
447 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
355 Points -33%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
334 Points -37%
Web
Apple iPad (2017)
1213 Points +74%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
773 Points +11%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
702 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
699 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
595 Points -15%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
593 Points -15%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
726 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
688 Points -5%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
670 Points -8%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
628 Points -13%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3710 Points
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
2821 Points -24%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1908 Points -49%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
1683 Points -55%
Compute RenderScript Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2369 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
1324 Points -44%
3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score
Apple iPad (2017)
29326 Points +246%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
9948 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
8481 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
6144 Points -28%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5986 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
4644 Points -45%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score
Apple iPad (2017)
44645 Points +478%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
10163 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
7720 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5496 Points -29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5435 Points -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
4166 Points -46%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
Apple iPad (2017)
13324 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
12947 Points
Lenovo Tab 4 8
10458 Points -19%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9274 Points -28%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
9264 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
7763 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Apple iPad (2017)
2584 Points +442%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
620 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
477 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
234 Points -51%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
53 Points -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
4320 Points +983%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
538 Points +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
399 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
193 Points -52%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
42 Points -89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1522 Points
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1332 Points -12%
Apple iPad (2017)
1074 Points -29%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
881 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
874 Points -43%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Apple iPad (2017)
1957 Points +561%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
320 Points +8%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
296 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
150 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Apple iPad (2017)
2519 Points +954%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
263 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
239 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
121 Points -49%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
1721 Points
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
1324 Points -23%
Apple iPad (2017)
1098 Points -36%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
878 Points -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
56 fps +195%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
19 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
17 fps -11%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
16 fps -16%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
14 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
10 fps -47%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
80.8 fps +573%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
17 fps +42%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
12 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
9.9 fps -17%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
7.8 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
5.8 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad (2017)
28.7 fps +212%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
9.2 fps
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
7.6 fps -17%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
7.1 fps -23%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
5.9 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
3.5 fps -62%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
40.6 fps +696%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
6.9 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
5.1 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
3.6 fps -29%
Lenovo Tab 4 8
2.8 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
1.6 fps -69%
GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
18.5 fps +176%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
6.7 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
5 fps -25%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4.6 fps -31%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad (2017)
28.5 fps +791%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4.9 fps +53%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3.2 fps
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
2.3 fps -28%
GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
3.7 fps
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
2.5 fps -32%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
2.7 fps +35%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
2 fps

Legend

 
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa, ARM Mali-T830 MP1, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab 4 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917), Qualcomm Adreno 308, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, Qualcomm Adreno 505, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz, ARM Mali-T720, 16 GB eMMC Flash
 
Apple iPad (2017) Apple A9, Apple A9 / PowerVR GT7600, 128 GB NVMe
Octane V2 | WebXPRT 2015 | JetStream 1.1 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
18148 Points +281%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4768 Points
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (Google Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
3049 Points -36%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
2903 Points -39%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
2826 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active (Chrome 40)
1891 Points -60%
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
Apple iPad (2017)
205 Points +206%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
69 Points +3%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (Google Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
69 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
67 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
57 Points -15%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad (2017)
128.6 Points +393%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
26.1 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
19.52 Points -25%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
18.36 Points -30%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (Google Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
17.68 Points -32%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active (Chrome 40)
17356 ms * -156%
Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8 (Google Chrome 61.0.3163.98)
12635 ms * -86%
Lenovo Tab 4 8 (Chrome 61)
12033 ms * -77%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2017 (Amazon Silk 58.2.3029.83.10)
11818 ms * -74%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
6786 ms *
Apple iPad (2017)
1458 ms * +79%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2Samsung Galaxy Tab ActiveLenovo Tab 4 8Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
AndroBench 3-5
-21%
16%
-21%
-22%
Sequential Read 256KB
218.1
151.8
-30%
265.1
22%
135.1
-38%
159.1
-27%
Sequential Write 256KB
54
42.81
-21%
72.3
34%
38.01
-30%
47.23
-13%
Random Read 4KB
25.96
20.24
-22%
44
69%
35
35%
21.55
-17%
Random Write 4KB
10.98
9.76
-11%
7.1
-35%
7.64
-30%
11.51
5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
78.6
84.8
8%
87.7
12%
51.1
-35%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
64.3
61.1
-5%
14.6
-77%
34.15
-47%
Hög belastning
 33.3 °C29.5 °C28.3 °C 
 35.5 °C30 °C28.2 °C 
 33.6 °C29.5 °C28.3 °C 
Max: 35.5 °C
Medel: 30.7 °C
28 °C28.9 °C31.9 °C
28.9 °C30.1 °C33.2 °C
28.2 °C30.2 °C34.4 °C
Max: 34.4 °C
Medel: 30.4 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  36.4 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.9 °C | Voltcraft IR-350
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.7 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.9 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.428.327.42529.428.329.43129.931.129.94039.329.439.35027.427.227.4632625.7268026.724.726.710035.324.835.312544.828.544.816050.221.850.220053.22253.225052.222.452.231556.422.756.440060.323.360.350065.924.465.963066.219.666.280065.51865.5100065.617.665.6125066.118.466.1160071.216.771.2200075.716.375.7250077.915.677.9315076.615.876.6400076.515.376.5500074.315.374.3630075.815.375.8800071.515.171.51000069.915.269.9125007515.2751600077.715.177.7SPL86.129.886.1N62.31.362.3median 66.2median 17.6median 66.2Delta9.63.79.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad (2017)
Apple iPad (2017) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 46% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.16 / 0.22 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 0.89 / 3.13 / 3.36 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 3.93 / 5.45 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
 mAh		Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh		Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4800 mAh		Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh		Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Power Consumption
23%
-19%
-141%
-0%
-131%
Idle Minimum *
0.89
0.6
33%
1.1
-24%
4.02
-352%
0.99
-11%
2.06
-131%
Idle Average *
3.13
2.2
30%
3.51
-12%
6
-92%
2.74
12%
7.42
-137%
Idle Maximum *
3.36
2.5
26%
4.14
-23%
6.64
-98%
2.83
16%
7.47
-122%
Load Average *
3.93
3.7
6%
4.86
-24%
7.34
-87%
4.51
-15%
9.45
-140%
Load Maximum *
5.45
4.3
21%
6.13
-12%
9.6
-76%
5.69
-4%
12.31
-126%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
22tim 37min
Surfa med WLAN
0tim 00min
WiFi Websurfing
14tim 55min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8tim 13min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
6tim 36min
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2
4450 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab Active
 mAh		Lenovo Tab 4 8
4850 mAh		Huawei Mediapad M3 Lite 8
4800 mAh		Amazon Fire HD 8 2017
 mAh		Apple iPad (2017)
8.827 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-17%
7%
22%
6%
Reader / Idle
1357
1640
21%
1207
-11%
1382
2%
2032
50%
1496
10%
H.264
493
771
56%
603
22%
744
51%
845
71%
WiFi v1.3
895
452
-49%
877
-2%
770
-14%
764
-15%
Load
396
306
-23%
276
-30%
480
21%
393
-1%
225
-43%
WiFi
861

För

+ hyfsad kvalitet
+ stabilt och hållbart hölje
+ batteri som kan bytas av användaren
+ S-pen ingår
+ stöd för MicroSD-kort upp till 256 GB
+ ljusstark skärm
+ håller sig sval

Emot

- medioker batteritid
- lågupplöst skärm
- långsamt lagringsminne
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2. Review unit courtesy of Samsung Germany.
Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2. Review unit courtesy of Samsung Germany.

Ingen tvekan: Galaxy Tab Active 2 är en väldigt tålig och mångsidig enhet. Operativsystemet är smidigt och enheten borde med lätthet kunna hantera vardagliga uppgifter. Det interna lagringsutrymmet är dock väldigt begränsat och även om systemet i teorin inte behöver mer lagringsutrymme så kommer ett extra MicroSD-kort snabbt att bli nödvändigt. Den stödjer åtminstone MicroSD-kort med en storlek på upp till 256 GB.

Under dess hårda och tjocka skinn finns en surfplatta från mittenskiktet. Den är full tillräckligt utrustad och presumtiva köpare kommer troligen köpa den oavsett på grund av bristen på konkurrens för tåliga utomhusmodeller.

Huruvida Galaxy Tab Active 2 kommer komma till nytta i en verkstad, ett garage eller på en byggarbetsplats återstår att se. Den är definitivt tuffare och mer robust än majoriteten av sin konkurrens och kan vara en väldigt pålitlig följeslagare på hajk eller i fält. Skärmen kan fortfarande användas med handskar och den inkluderade S-pennan tillåter väldigt exakt och precis tryckkänslig inmatning.

Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 - 12/22/2017 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker

Design
86%
Tangentbord
72 / 80 → 90%
Mus
87%
Anslutningar
43 / 65 → 66%
Vikt
83 / 40-88 → 89%
Batteri
90%
Skärm
86%
Spelprestanda
16 / 68 → 23%
Programprestanda
45 / 76 → 59%
Temperatur
92%
Ljudnivå
100%
Audio
44 / 91 → 48%
Camera
71 / 85 → 83%
Medel
70%
81%
Tablet - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy Tab Active 2 Surfplatta (Sammanfattning)
Mike Wobker, 2018-01-15 (Update: 2018-01-15)