Test: Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Utomhustelefon med utbytbart batteri (Sammanfattning)

Name: Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro
Brand: Samsung

Utbytbart batteri för proffs.

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro är en robust telefon byggd för tuffa omgivningar. Utöver ett robust hölje försöker den i huvudsak vinna över intresserade köpare med sin kamera. Vi tar en närmare titt på denna utomhustelefon i vår recension.

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 03/06/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android ARM Touchscreen Smartphone

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Galaxy XCover Serie)

Processor

Samsung Exynos 9611 8 x 1.7 - 2.3 GHz, Exynos 7 Series

Grafikkort

ARM Mali-G72 MP3

Minne

4 GB

Skärm

6.30 tum 19.5:9, 2340 x 1080 pixlar 409 PPI, Kapacitiv tryckkänslig, IPS, glansig: ja, 60 Hz

Hårddisk

64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash, 64 GB

, 48 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, Ljudanslutningar: 3.5 mm ljudanslutning, Kortläsare: microSD upp till 512 GB, dedikerad, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: Accelerometer, Gyroskop, Närhetssensor, Kompass

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 9.94 x 159.9 x 76.7

Batteri

4050 mAh Litiumjon, removeable

Operativsystem

Android 10

Camera

Primary Camera: 25 MPix f/1.7, Fasdetekerande AF, Dubbel LED-blixt, video @1080p/30FPS (kamera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.2, vidvinkelslins (kamera 2)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0

Övrigt

Högtalare: Monohögtalare på undre kanten, Tangentbord: Virtuellt tangentbord, Laddare, USB-kabel, Headset, 24 Månader Garanti, FM-radio, IP68-certifierad, MIL-STD-810G certifierad; LTE-hastigheter: 600 MB/s (nerladdning), 150 MB/s (uppladdning); SAR-värden: 0.468 W/kg (huvud), 1.231 W/kg (kropp), fanless, ruggedized, waterproof

Vikt

218 g, Strömförsörjning: 49 g

Pris

499 Kr

Länkar

Samsung kategori

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Jämförelseenheter

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
78 % v7 ^(old)	03/2020	Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3	218 g	64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
74 % v7 ^(old)	08/2019	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2	172 g	32 GB eMMC Flash	5.00"	1280x720
77.2 % v7 ^(old)	12/2019	CAT S52 Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320	210 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	5.65"	1440x720
77 % v7 ^(old)	01/2020	Blackview BV9800 Pro Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3	322 g	128 GB eMMC Flash	6.30"	2340x1080
78 % v7 ^(old)	02/2019	Crosscall Trekker-X4 SD 660, Adreno 512	250 g	64 GB eMMC Flash	5.50"	1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

Blackview BV9800 Pro Crosscall Trekker-X4 Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro CAT S52 Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s DIN A6 ❌

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	337 (198^min - 368^max) MBit/s
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB eMMC Flash	302 (173^min - 415^max) MBit/s -10%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	275 (268^min - 279^max) MBit/s -18%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	263 (227^min - 296^max) MBit/s -22%
CAT S52 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash	256 (138^min - 284^max) MBit/s -24%
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Exynos 9611, 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	349 (244^min - 361^max) MBit/s
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	322 (301^min - 330^max) MBit/s -8%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mali-G72 MP3, Helio P70, 128 GB eMMC Flash	315 (204^min - 334^max) MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Mali-G71 MP2, Exynos 7884B, 32 GB eMMC Flash	274 (197^min - 295^max) MBit/s -21%
CAT S52 PowerVR GE8320, Helio P35 MT6765, 64 GB eMMC Flash	259 (188^min - 274^max) MBit/s -26%

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø349 (244-361)

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø337 (198-368)

GPS Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Översikt

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

click to load images

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro

Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max

OnePlus 6T

Olympus E-M10 II

ColorChecker Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro: 6.93 ∆E min: 2.35 - max: 16.77 ∆E


539 cd/m²	578 cd/m²	553 cd/m²
551 cd/m²	569 cd/m²	591 cd/m²
542 cd/m²	558 cd/m²	574 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 591 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 561.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.17 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 569 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1355:1 (Svärta: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.14 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 7.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.256

	Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s IPS (PLS), 1280x720, 5"	CAT S52 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7"	Blackview BV9800 Pro IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3"	Crosscall Trekker-X4 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Screen		-8%	47%	-9%	-18%
Brightness middle	569	525 -8%	521 -8%	511 -10%	374 -34%
Brightness	562	513 -9%	530 -6%	508 -10%	352 -37%
Brightness Distribution	91	90 -1%	91 0%	89 -2%	86 -5%
Black Level *	0.42	0.52 -24%	0.16 62%	0.29 31%	0.35 17%
Contrast	1355	1010 -25%	3256 140%	1762 30%	1069 -21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.14	6 2%	2.69 56%	8.1 -32%	7.46 -21%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.92	10.9 -0%	5.07 54%	15.2 -39%	13.27 -22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.9	7.8 1%	1.8 77%	10.9 -38%	9.8 -24%
Gamma	2.256 ^98%	2.53 ^87%	2.243 ^98%	2.08 ^106%	2.152 ^102%
CCT	8696 ^75%	8605 ^76%	6622 ^98%	9859 ^66%	10554 ^62%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

≤ 30 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 30 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 25 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Geekbench 5.0
5.0 Single-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	345 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	173 Points -50%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	295 Points -14%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (345 - 349, n=3)	347 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (703 - 1668, n=10, last 2 years)	928 Points +169%
5.0 Multi-Core (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1063 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1002 Points -6%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1399 Points +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1063 - 1326, n=3)	1229 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (1908 - 4353, n=10, last 2 years)	3014 Points +184%
OpenCL Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1439 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1259 Points -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1393 - 1522, n=3)	1451 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (498 - 9123, n=6, last 2 years)	4173 Points +190%
Vulkan Score 5.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1055 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1191 Points +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (663 - 1079, n=3)	932 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (261 - 7988, n=5, last 2 years)	3404 Points +223%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5886 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6316 Points +7%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	7739 Points +31%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	11419 Points +94%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6651 Points +13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5777 - 6697, n=7)	6166 Points +5%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5351 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	5309 Points -1%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	5794 Points +8%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8074 Points +51%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	6135 Points +15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5080 - 5925, n=7)	5572 Points +4%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	13688 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	12927 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	19508 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	26356 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (16738 - 24052, n=6)	21849 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	13711 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	12064 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	20321 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	29055 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15971 - 25625, n=6)	23092 Points
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	13610 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	17243 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	17113 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	19890 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (13103 - 20393, n=6)	18907 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	876 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	802 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1457 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2053 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1595 - 2110, n=6)	1958 Points
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	766 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	736 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1278 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1914 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1468 - 2092, n=6)	1944 Points
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1756 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1172 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2856 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2751 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 2286, n=6)	2079 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	937 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	880 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1793 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2130 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1662 - 2074, n=6)	1903 Points
Average of class Smartphone (883 - 23024, n=73, last 2 years)	11109 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	826 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	816 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1606 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2001 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1601 - 2021, n=6)	1873 Points
Average of class Smartphone (840 - 45492, n=73, last 2 years)	19708 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1768 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1212 Points
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3029 Points
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2748 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1402 - 2336, n=6)	2087 Points
Average of class Smartphone (1075 - 8749, n=73, last 2 years)	5001 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1555 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	654 Points -58%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	510 Points -67%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1279 Points -18%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1356 Points -13%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1342 - 1601, n=7)	1524 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)	3084 Points +98%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1450 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	555 Points -62%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	439 Points -70%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1104 Points -24%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1185 Points -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1203 - 1478, n=7)	1422 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)	3263 Points +125%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2080 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1747 Points -16%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1173 Points -44%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2869 Points +38%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2731 Points +31%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1415 - 2258, n=7)	2084 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)	3286 Points +58%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1620 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	588 Points -64%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	563 Points -65%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1268 Points -22%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1437 Points -11%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1390 - 1659, n=7)	1588 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)	7767 Points +379%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1527 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	498 Points -67%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	488 Points -68%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1093 Points -28%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1266 Points -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1267 - 1533, n=7)	1488 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)	11536 Points +655%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2058 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1554 Points -24%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1210 Points -41%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2883 Points +40%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2724 Points +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1463 - 2332, n=7)	2115 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)	4613 Points +124%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1540 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	576 Points -63%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1256 Points -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1442 - 1557, n=7)	1525 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (365 - 6635, n=72, last 2 years)	2846 Points +85%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1436 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	477 Points -67%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1095 Points -24%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1320 - 1442, n=7)	1414 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (298 - 8601, n=72, last 2 years)	3095 Points +116%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2061 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	2105 Points +2%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2585 Points +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1972 - 2163, n=7)	2099 Points +2%
Average of class Smartphone (1667 - 4198, n=72, last 2 years)	2704 Points +31%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	37 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	41 fps +11%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	29 fps -22%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	38 fps +3%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	49 fps +32%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (25 - 44, n=7)	35.1 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	86.3 fps +133%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	40 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	25 fps -37%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	21 fps -47%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	42 fps +5%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	50 fps +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (28 - 48, n=7)	39.1 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=169, last 2 years)	280 fps +600%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	22 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	27 fps +23%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	19 fps -14%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	21 fps -5%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	23 fps +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (15 - 24, n=7)	19.9 fps -10%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=169, last 2 years)	75.5 fps +243%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	20 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	13 fps -35%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	11 fps -45%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	23 fps +15%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	22 fps +10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (17 - 26, n=7)	20.4 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=169, last 2 years)	165.3 fps +727%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	14 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	19 fps +36%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	12 fps -14%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	12 fps -14%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	15 fps +7%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.9 - 14, n=7)	13.3 fps -5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=169, last 2 years)	65.7 fps +369%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	16 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	8.1 fps -49%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	6.6 fps -59%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	14 fps -12%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	15 fps -6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 16, n=7)	14.7 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=169, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +633%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.2 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	12 fps +30%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4.9 fps -47%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7.4 fps -20%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	9.4 fps +2%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 9.6, n=7)	8.53 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=170, last 2 years)	47.8 fps +420%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	4.3 fps -57%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	2.8 fps -72%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8.1 fps -19%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	9 fps -10%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (6.4 - 10, n=7)	9.43 fps -6%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=169, last 2 years)	70.6 fps +606%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	9.4 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	10 fps +6%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	7.4 fps -21%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	7.7 fps -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (8.8 - 9.7, n=7)	9.26 fps -1%
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)	49.5 fps +427%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	10 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	5 fps -50%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	3.9 fps -61%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	8.5 fps -15%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7.8 - 10, n=7)	9.66 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)	79.8 fps +698%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	5.6 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	6.4 fps +14%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	4.7 fps -16%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	4.6 fps -18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (5.5 - 8.3, n=7)	6.01 fps +7%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)	37.4 fps +568%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	3.5 fps
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1.8 fps -49%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1.5 fps -57%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2.9 fps -17%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (3.5 - 3.6, n=7)	3.56 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)	32 fps +814%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2057 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1658 Points -19%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1203 Points -42%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2057 Points 0%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2428 Points +18%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (634 - 2191, n=7)	1418 Points -31%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +206%
System (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	4029 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	3507 Points -13%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	2390 Points -41%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	3915 Points -3%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	5048 Points +25%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2839 - 4978, n=7)	4361 Points +8%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +152%
Memory (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1717 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1985 Points +16%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	1141 Points -34%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	2559 Points +49%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2799 Points +63%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (1291 - 2122, n=7)	1706 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +294%
Graphics (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	2150 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	1113 Points -48%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	866 Points -60%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1712 Points -20%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	2247 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (2127 - 2168, n=7)	2149 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +686%
Web (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	1202 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s Samsung Exynos 7884B, Mali-G71 MP2, 3072	977 Points -19%
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	887 Points -26%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	1045 Points -13%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Adreno 512, 4096	1095 Points -9%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (10 - 1202, n=7)	620 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points +30%

AnTuTu v8
Total Score (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	175661 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	102966 Points -41%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	183710 Points +5%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (152185 - 187087, n=7)	175473 Points 0%
CPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	57481 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	46624 Points -19%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	74929 Points +30%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (43473 - 63005, n=7)	57908 Points +1%
GPU (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	36903 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	6340 Points -83%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	37197 Points +1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (34020 - 46247, n=7)	38422 Points +4%
MEM (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	38461 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	32868 Points -15%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	37952 Points -1%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (29687 - 44128, n=7)	38664 Points +1%
UX (sort by value)
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro Samsung Exynos 9611, Mali-G72 MP3, 4096	42816 Points
CAT S52 Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320, 4096	17134 Points -60%
Blackview BV9800 Pro Mediatek Helio P70, Mali-G72 MP3, 6144	33632 Points -21%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (33717 - 44600, n=7)	40479 Points -5%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +335%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (27.5 - 30.6, n=7)	28.2 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)	27.67 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)	22.46 Points -19%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Crosscall Trekker-X4 (Chrome 71)	55.5 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)	51 Points
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (47.5 - 51.9, n=7)	50.5 Points -1%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)	47.51 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)	37.94 Points -26%
CAT S52 (Chrome 79)	26.22 Points -49%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +370%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chome 80)	29 runs/min
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (26.6 - 30.5, n=7)	29 runs/min 0%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s	22.15 runs/min -24%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +223%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (46 - 57, n=7)	53.4 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s	48 Points +4%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)	47 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)	46 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +399%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 (Chrome 71)	10573 Points +42%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (7442 - 10687, n=7)	9667 Points +30%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)	8520 Points +14%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)	7442 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)	7065 Points -5%
CAT S52 (Chrome 79)	4494 Points -40%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
CAT S52 (Chrome 79)	10849 ms * -75%
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro (Chrome 80)	6212 ms *
Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s (Chrome 75)	5827 ms * +6%
Average Samsung Exynos 9611 (4332 - 6212, n=7)	4863 ms * +22%
Blackview BV9800 Pro (Chrome 79)	4845 ms * +22%
Crosscall Trekker-X4 (Chrome 71)	3954 ms * +36%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * +75%

* ... smaller is better

	Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s	CAT S52	Blackview BV9800 Pro	Crosscall Trekker-X4	Average 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-35%	-21%	-22%	-24%	-3%	328%
Sequential Read 256KB	508	298.6 -41%	286.2 -44%	286.5 -44%	272.4 -46%	513 ?(272 - 687, n=18) 1%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 262%
Sequential Write 256KB	181.1	85.4 -53%	195.4 8%	185.9 3%	194.7 8%	175.2 ?(80.4 - 251, n=18) -3%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 687%
Random Read 4KB	108.6	59.6 -45%	76.6 -29%	86.7 -20%	71.5 -34%	117.1 ?(60.6 - 167.2, n=18) 8%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) 155%
Random Write 4KB	100.5	10.38 -90%	21.3 -79%	20.74 -79%	14.3 -86%	81.1 ?(13.6 - 195.8, n=18) -19%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 207%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard	72.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	79.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 10%	82.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 14%	77.2 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 7%	83.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 15%	73.4 ?(36.8 - 85.4, n=10) 1%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard	59.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	64.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 8%	61.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 4%	61.1 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401) 3%	59.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) 0%	55.4 ?(33.3 - 65.3, n=10) -7%

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro; Arena of Valor; min; 1.33.1.5: Ø60 (59-60)

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro; Arena of Valor; high HD; 1.33.1.5: Ø59.9 (53-60)

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 2.0.5a: Ø29.5 (24-31)

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 2.0.5a: Ø28.2 (20-31)

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


40.4 °C	36.1 °C	34.5 °C
40.2 °C	36.1 °C	35.4 °C
38.4 °C	36 °C	34.5 °C

Max: 40.4 °C
Medel: 36.8 °C


31 °C	35.4 °C	39.5 °C
31.6 °C	35.5 °C	38.8 °C
31.1 °C	35.8 °C	37.4 °C

Max: 39.5 °C
Medel: 35.1 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 42.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated); Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 77% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 77% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 77% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (118% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

CAT S52 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 67.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 67.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 67.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (121.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 2% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 97% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.1 / 0.3 Watt
Låg belastning	0.9 / 1.8 / 2.3 Watt
Hög belastning	5.4 / 6.9 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro 4050 mAh	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s 2800 mAh	CAT S52 3100 mAh	Blackview BV9800 Pro 6580 mAh	Crosscall Trekker-X4 4400 mAh	Average Samsung Exynos 9611	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		29%	5%	4%	16%	-21%	-2%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.65 28%	1 -11%	0.87 3%	0.7 22%	1.173 ?(0.9 - 1.6, n=7) -30%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average *	1.8	1.62 10%	1.9 -6%	1.91 -6%	1.4 22%	2.28 ?(1.7 - 4.24, n=7) -27%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Maximum *	2.3	1.66 28%	2.7 -17%	2.03 12%	2.2 4%	2.86 ?(1.8 - 4.34, n=7) -24%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 30%
Load Average *	5.4	3.03 44%	3.6 33%	4.4 19%	4.1 24%	5.97 ?(5 - 6.99, n=7) -11%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -19%
Load Maximum *	6.9	4.34 37%	5.2 25%	7.49 -9%	6.4 7%	7.83 ?(6.3 - 9.4, n=7) -13%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -42%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		20tim 59min
WiFi Websurfing		12tim 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		13tim 22min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		4tim 28min

	Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro 4050 mAh	Samsung Galaxy XCover 4s 2800 mAh	CAT S52 3100 mAh	Blackview BV9800 Pro 6580 mAh	Crosscall Trekker-X4 4400 mAh
Battery Runtime		-18%	-13%	104%	15%
Reader / Idle	1259	1199 -5%
H.264	802	598 -25%
WiFi v1.3	731	619 -15%	637 -13%	1492 104%	839 15%
Load	268	200 -25%

För

+ Skyddad mot vatten och damm

+ Inställningsbara knappar

+ Utbytbart batteri

+ Snabb lagring

+ Modern mjukvara

+ Nedtonad design

+ Snabbt WiFi

+ Exakt GPS

+ Skapliga kameror

Emot

- Prestandan varierar vid belastning

- Problem med kamerans skärpa i vårt labbtest

- Blå skärmton

- Medioker samtalskvalitet

- Högtalaren har för mycket diskant

Omdöme – Utomhustelefon med många styrkor

Recension av Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Recensionsex från:

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro är en modern utomhustelefon. Detta gäller inte bara utsidan utan insidan innehåller också funktioner som man oftast inte hittar på andra robusta enheter: Den har en USB Typ C-port, snabb UFS 2.0-lagring och en fingeravtrycksläsare som praktiskt nog är inbyggd i hem-knappen.

XCover Pro är också tillräckligt robust för hårda miljöer och mjukvaran har ett modernt gränssnitt. Vi blev också glada av att se en del gammaldags kvaliteter göra en återkomst, som ett utbytbart batteri och en 3.5 mm ljudanslutning.

Med ett pris på ca 5.000 kronor kan den inte tävla mot traditionella smartphones i fråga om minneskonfiguration eller systemprestanda eftersom en del av budgeten gick till ökad hållbarhet. Galaxy XCover har också många viktiga företagsfunktioner som inställningsbara knappar, en nedtonad utsida och stöd för dockningsstationer. Detta gör den också till ett intressant alternativ för privatpersoner som ibland vill ta sig ut i grövre terräng, exempelvis vid träning.

Med ett utbytbart batteri är den moderna utomhustelefonen Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro ett framgångsrikt koncept.

Batteritiden kunde förvisso varit bättre och kvaliteten på högtalare och samtal är inte fantastisk. Men vi kan ändå rekommendera XCover Pro tack vare snabbt WiFi, bra GPS och skapliga kameror.

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro - 03/02/2020 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Design

89%

Tangentbord

69 / 75 → 92%

Mus

95%

Anslutningar

47 / 70 → 67%

Vikt

88%

Batteri

89%

Skärm

84%

Spelprestanda

17 / 64 → 27%

Programprestanda

53 / 86 → 62%

Temperatur

90%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

50 / 90 → 56%

Camera

59%

Medel

72%

78%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro – Utomhustelefon med utbytbart batteri (Sammanfattning)

Florian Schmitt, 2020-03- 6 (Update: 2020-03- 6)

Jämförelseenheter

Storleksjämförelse

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro audio analysis

CAT S52 audio analysis

För

Emot

Omdöme – Utomhustelefon med många styrkor

More articles related to this device

Price comparison