Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Schenker Key 16 (Clevo P960EN-K) - En tunn laptop som övertygar med mycket datorkraft

Elegant och tunn gamer.

Schenker Key 16 har kraftfull hårdvara som kan visa alla moderna spel smidigt på den matta 16.1-tumsskärmen (FHD, IPS, 144 Hz). Schenker erbjuder individuella konfigurationsalternativ, exempelvis upp till tre lagringsenheter (2x M.2-2280, 1x 2.5 tum) och upp till 64 GB arbetsminne. Dessutom är det möjligt att undervolta CPU och iGPU i BIOS.
SCHENKER Key 16
Processor
Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 735 MHz, Minne: 1500 MHz, GDDR6, 256-bitars anslutning, ForceWare 431.60, Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, två minnesplatser (båda upptagna), max. 64 GB
Skärm
16.10 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 137 PPI, Chi Mei N161HCA-GA1 (CMN1602), IPS, 144 Hz, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Cannon Lake HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2x M.2-platser (RAID 0/1), 1x 2.5-tumsplats, 890 GB ledigt
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Anslutningar
2 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: Hörlursport, mikrofonport, Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 19.9 x 380 x 252
Batteri
62 Wh, 3680 mAh Litiumjon, 15.2 V
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: Stereo, Tangentbord: Chiclet, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 180 Watt, Återställnings-DVD, DVD med drivrutiner, Rengöringsduk, Manual, Control Center, ett års licens för Bullguard Internet Security, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.2 kg, Strömförsörjning: 486 g
Pris
2547 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

380 mm 252 mm 19.9 mm 2.2 kg360 mm 263 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg363 mm 275 mm 21 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 248 mm 18 mm 2 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Höger sida: hörlursanslutning, 2-i-1 ljud (mikrofon in + S/PDIF optisk), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A), minneskortsläsare (SD), Gigabit Ethernet, plats för kabellås
Höger sida: hörlursanslutning, 2-i-1 ljud (mikrofon in + S/PDIF optisk), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A), minneskortsläsare (SD), Gigabit Ethernet, plats för kabellås
Vänster sida: ström, HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4 (stöd för G-Sync), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Typ C), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A)
Vänster sida: ström, HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4 (stöd för G-Sync), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Typ C), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Typ A)
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER Key 16
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188 MB/s
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
166 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s -49%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
78.4 MB/s -58%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER Key 16
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
210 MB/s
SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
208 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)
120 MB/s -43%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85.3 MB/s -59%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
718 MBit/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s +1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
676 MBit/s
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
620 MBit/s -8%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
601 (562min - 639max) MBit/s -11%
Alienware m15 P79F
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
387 MBit/s -43%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
694 MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
688 MBit/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s -3%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Cannon Lake-H/S CNVi: WiFi
666 (597min - 686max) MBit/s -4%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
659 MBit/s -5%
Alienware m15 P79F
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
652 MBit/s -6%
286
cd/m²
266
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
296
cd/m²
265
cd/m²
274
cd/m²
267
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
Chi Mei N161HCA-GA1 (CMN1602) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 296 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 270.9 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 88 %
Mitt på batteriet: 296 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1138:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.24 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.72
ΔE Greyscale 2.76 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
SCHENKER Key 16
Chi Mei N161HCA-GA1 (CMN1602), IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1"
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Alienware m15 P79F
Samsung SDCA029, 156WR04, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Sharp LQ156M1JW03 (SHP14C5), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
5%
-0%
-1%
38%
4%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
63.8
67.6
6%
64.2
1%
63.8
0%
99.9
57%
66.9
5%
63.5
0%
sRGB Coverage
94.9
97.5
3%
92.6
-2%
93.4
-2%
100
5%
98.1
3%
93.1
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
65.9
68.9
5%
65.7
0%
65
-1%
100
52%
68.5
4%
64.5
-2%
Response Times
0%
24%
8%
21%
7%
-11%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
18 ?(8.8, 9.2)
13.6 ?(8, 5.6)
24%
8 ?(4, 4)
56%
14 ?(7, 7)
22%
2.6 ?(1.2, 1.4)
86%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
29%
16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6)
9%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
12 ?(7.6, 4.4)
-15%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-8%
11 ?(7, 4)
-6%
2.3 ?(1, 1.3)
78%
10.4 ?(6, 4.4)
-0%
13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2)
-31%
PWM Frequency
25510 ?(20)
23260 ?(19)
-9%
60.2 ?(100)
-100%
23810 ?(10)
-7%
Screen
3%
-44%
-23%
-29%
-3%
5%
Brightness middle
296
282.3
-5%
304
3%
316
7%
452.1
53%
293
-1%
250
-16%
Brightness
271
269
-1%
299
10%
295
9%
452
67%
270
0%
235
-13%
Brightness Distribution
88
90
2%
89
1%
84
-5%
90
2%
87
-1%
85
-3%
Black Level *
0.26
0.32
-23%
0.27
-4%
0.42
-62%
0.29
-12%
0.29
-12%
Contrast
1138
882
-22%
1126
-1%
752
-34%
1010
-11%
862
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.24
1.17
48%
4.66
-108%
2.7
-21%
6.34
-183%
1.69
25%
1.46
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.04
3.29
19%
9.65
-139%
5.65
-40%
12.97
-221%
3.37
17%
2.47
39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.72
1.06
-47%
1.72
-139%
1.58
-119%
1.24
-72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.76
1.3
53%
5.53
-100%
2.35
15%
2.8
-1%
2.3
17%
1.27
54%
Gamma
2.52 87%
2.2 100%
2.5 88%
2.41 91%
2.21 100%
2.3 96%
2.4 92%
CCT
6830 95%
6643 98%
8028 81%
6904 94%
6114 106%
6758 96%
6749 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
63.8
6%
60
0%
60
0%
91
52%
63
5%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
97.5
-2%
93
-6%
93
-6%
100
1%
98.5
-1%
93
-6%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / 2%
-7% / -27%
-5% / -15%
10% / -4%
3% / 0%
-2% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 25510 Hz ≤ 20 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 25510 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 25510 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
060120180240300360420480540600660720780840900960102010801140Tooltip
SCHENKER Key 16 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (993.22-1135.62)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1110 (975.73-1185.01)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1006 (997.68-1086.13)
Alienware m15 P79F Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1123 (1106.07-1188.78)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1056 (1046.13-1175)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
CPU-klockfrekvenser vid körning av CB15-loopen (Entertainment Mode)
CPU-klockfrekvenser vid körning av CB15-loopen (Entertainment Mode)
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years)
277 Points +62%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points +2%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
171 Points
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
168 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -3%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years)
3413 Points +206%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
1192 Points +7%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H
1185 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H
1175 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points +4%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
1116 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
1082 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points -9%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)
9755 Points +48%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
6579 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
6351 Points -3%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)
63783 Points +94%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
33923 Points +3%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
32846 Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=188, last 2 years)
725 Points +74%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
416 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=188, last 2 years)
8290 Points +255%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
2333 Points
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
22635 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
21358 Points -6%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
4163 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
3741 Points -10%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)
54312 Points +134%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
23213 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
18716 Points -19%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)
8126 Points +58%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H
5146 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4810 Points -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1138 ms * -3%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1137 ms * -3%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H
1136 ms * -3%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1107 ms *
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1079 ms * +3%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
847 ms * +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 674, n=177, last 2 years)
504 ms * +54%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 115768, n=56, last 2 years)
95460 Points +174%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
37088 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
36865 Points +6%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
34874 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
34660 Points -1%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
33931 Points -3%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33659 Points -3%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years)
526 Points +106%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
265.7 Points +4%
SCHENKER Key 16
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
255 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Intel Core i7-9750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
252.1 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
245.4 Points -4%
Alienware m15 P79F
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
245.1 Points -4%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Intel Core i7-8750H
218.1 Points -14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6579
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
32846
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7982
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1116 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
108.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2333 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
416 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 7 Score
6701 poäng
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4277 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4037 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5617 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
5694 poäng
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years)
7789 Points +37%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5839 Points +3%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5725 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5694 Points
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5609 Points -1%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
5485 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points -6%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points +22%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5077 Points +19%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4454 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4380 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
4277 Points
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
3570 Points -17%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points +9%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
5857 Points +4%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5751 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5749 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points 0%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5617 Points
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
4465 Points -21%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Sequential Read: 2251 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1744 MB/s
512K Read: 1095 MB/s
512K Write: 1186 MB/s
4K Read: 63.3 MB/s
4K Write: 135.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 565 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 475.4 MB/s
SCHENKER Key 16
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ
Alienware m15 P79F
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-7%
-2%
-15%
6%
4%
-14%
Write 4K
112.5
91.3
-19%
93.6
-17%
50.2
-55%
148.4
32%
137.2
22%
97.1
-14%
Read 4K
43.79
40.73
-7%
38.82
-11%
35.32
-19%
49.65
13%
46.82
7%
53.7
23%
Write Seq
1944
1915
-1%
2455
26%
991
-49%
1139
-41%
1221
-37%
1526
-22%
Read Seq
1656
2051
24%
2107
27%
1526
-8%
2353
42%
1217
-27%
2020
22%
Write 4K Q32T1
324.6
308.3
-5%
298.7
-8%
445.1
37%
484.7
49%
527
62%
285.6
-12%
Read 4K Q32T1
407
417.4
3%
338.7
-17%
526
29%
542
33%
614
51%
321.8
-21%
Write Seq Q32T1
3296
1922
-42%
2902
-12%
1647
-50%
1139
-65%
1986
-40%
1533
-53%
Read Seq Q32T1
3555
3395
-5%
3536
-1%
3427
-4%
3108
-13%
3234
-9%
2351
-34%
3D Mark 11 (Nätadapter)
3D Mark 11 (Nätadapter)
3D Mark 11 (Batteridrift)
3D Mark 11 (Batteridrift)
3DMark 06 Standard Score
36601 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
20298 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
116851 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
34938 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17301 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
7484 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)
31415 Points +53%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20718 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
20565 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
18962 Points -8%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18443 Points -10%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
11563 Points -44%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)
13118 Points +69%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7840 Points +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7775 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
7266 Points -7%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
7105 Points -9%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points -16%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)
43810 Points +63%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
27762 Points +4%
SCHENKER Key 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
26822 Points
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
24926 Points -7%
Alienware m15 P79F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
23819 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points -18%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
14723 Points -45%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)
128.3 fps +66%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
78.3 fps +1%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
77.4 fps
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
76.5 (63min) fps -1%
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
66.9 fps -14%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
64.4 fps -17%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
58.3 (48min) fps -25%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
170 fps +3%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
165.7 fps
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
156.9 fps -5%
Alienware m15 P79F
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
153.7 fps -7%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
127.7 fps -23%
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
115.8 fps -30%
Far Cry New Dawn - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (120 - 131, n=2, last 2 years)
125.5 fps +55%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
81 fps
Rage 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (Resolution Scale Off)
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
91.9 fps
For Honor - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
123.4 fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (31.5 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
107.8 fps +44%
SCHENKER Key 16
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
74.8 fps
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
61.6 fps -18%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
SCHENKER Key 16 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø73.3 (69-80)
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø67.7 (62-73)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)
Alienware m15 P79F GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G: Ø63.5 (59-69)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø72.8 (68-80)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)
GPU-mätvärden under The Witcher 3-testet
GPU-mätvärden under The Witcher 3-testet
lågmed.högultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 297.6 268 255.1 165.7
The Witcher 3 (2015) 294.7 236.6 146.6 77.4
For Honor (2017) 267.2 165.2 156.5 123.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 125.2 100.1 75.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 101.9 89.2 74.8
Far Cry 5 (2018) 122 103 97 93
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) 110 95 90 81
Rage 2 (2019) 204.2 111 93.5 91.9
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 224.8 126.1 88.8 65.5
F1 2019 (2019) 188 165 137 114

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30 / 31 / 34 dB(A)
Hög belastning
47 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
SCHENKER Key 16
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m15 P79F
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
4%
2%
0%
-10%
11%
-0%
10%
off / environment *
30
28.3
6%
29
3%
30.5
-2%
28.2
6%
28.3
6%
30
-0%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.4
-1%
30
-0%
32.8
-9%
30.3
-1%
28.8
4%
32
-7%
Idle Average *
31
30.5
2%
32
-3%
32.8
-6%
35.4
-14%
28.8
7%
34
-10%
Idle Maximum *
34
30.6
10%
34
-0%
32.8
4%
50.3
-48%
29
15%
36
-6%
Load Average *
47
37.6
20%
44
6%
42.5
10%
50.3
-7%
33.5
29%
42
11%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
46
4%
46
4%
50.2
-5%
45
6%
44
8%
Load Maximum *
49
55.1
-12%
47
4%
47.5
3%
50.2
-2%
45.2
8%
48
2%

* ... smaller is better

 50 °C50 °C51 °C 
 48 °C48 °C41 °C 
 44 °C43 °C30 °C 
Max: 51 °C
Medel: 45 °C
50 °C57 °C59 °C
42 °C54 °C53 °C
34 °C45 °C43 °C
Max: 59 °C
Medel: 48.6 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  43 °C | Rumstemperatur 23 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44 °C / 111.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-15.1 °C / -27.2 F).
SCHENKER Key 16
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m15 P79F
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
10%
3%
-0%
-7%
12%
5%
10%
Maximum Upper Side *
51
45.6
11%
49
4%
47.6
7%
55.6
-9%
47
8%
56
-10%
Maximum Bottom *
59
53.8
9%
58
2%
59.6
-1%
62.4
-6%
49.2
17%
66
-12%
Idle Upper Side *
32
28.6
11%
33
-3%
33.8
-6%
36
-13%
28.6
11%
27
16%
Idle Bottom *
36
33.2
8%
33
8%
36.5
-1%
36
-0%
31.4
13%
27
25%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.341.92538.244.73130.9354034.435.65029.737.26326.434.18026.130.210025.525.212529.226.416026.332.320023.126.825020.938.331520.146.240019.258.150019.265.163018.471.780017.874.4100017.674.4125018.268.2160017.968200017.572.3250017.771.9315017.771.5400017.672.9500017.671.5630017.672.1800017.769.61000017.667.21250017.457.61600017.466SPL30.283.3N1.456.7median 17.8median 68Delta1.411.943.349.239.641.246.232.134.245.427.334.226.730.824.433.628.536.924.829.124.22725.431.327.136.120.641.519.95018.95617.762.819.564.919.567.317.666.517.463.916.867.817.264.117.662.217.262.417.360.417.160.21761.21758.71760.516.854.730.375.81.435median 17.6median 60.41.910.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER Key 16SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER Key 16 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 35.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER Key 15 Coffee Lake audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.3 / 1.2 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 10 / 15 / 22 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 88 / 191 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER Key 16
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Alienware m15 P79F
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-30%
-24%
-8%
-3%
-8%
-9%
-27%
Idle Minimum *
10
18.3
-83%
16
-60%
14.7
-47%
10.9
-9%
12.5
-25%
16
-60%
Idle Average *
15
22
-47%
22
-47%
18.6
-24%
12.3
18%
15.3
-2%
18
-20%
Idle Maximum *
22
28.8
-31%
32
-45%
22.6
-3%
19
14%
20.7
6%
23
-5%
Load Average *
88
93
-6%
89
-1%
90
-2%
96
-9%
90.2
-3%
88
-0%
Witcher 3 ultra *
145
142.6
2%
147
-1%
161.7
-12%
162
-12%
120
17%
Load Maximum *
191
215.9
-13%
173
9%
120
37%
229.1
-20%
209.3
-10%
167
13%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
9tim 45min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
5tim 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5tim 58min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 9min
SCHENKER Key 16
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 62 Wh
MSI GS65 Stealth 9SG
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh
HP Omen 15-dc1303ng
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 70 Wh
Alienware m15 P79F
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 90 Wh
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2080 Max-Q
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 80 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
10%
-23%
-30%
-6%
43%
41%
12%
Reader / Idle
585
335
-43%
301
-49%
953
63%
549
-6%
H.264
358
364
2%
WiFi v1.3
329
362
10%
190
-42%
197
-40%
309
-6%
393
19%
382
16%
Load
69
81
17%
69
0%
102
48%
174
152%

För

+ matt IPS-skärm
+ 144 Hz-panel
+ elegant och tunt hölje
+ återhållsam vikt
+ NMVe SSD
+ undervoltning i BIOS
+ upp till 3 lagringsenheter
+ individuell konfiguration

Emot

- hög temperatur och ljudnivå vid belastning
- service kunde varit enklare
- saknar Thunderbolt 3
- mediokert ljud
Schenker Key 16, recensionsex från Schenker Technologies.
Schenker Key 16, recensionsex från Schenker Technologies.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Med sin Key 16 erbjuder Schenker en tunn bärbar speldator som får poäng för sitt eleganta metallhölje. Trots att den har en skärm på 16.1 tum är den knappt större än de vanliga enheterna på 15.6 tum.

Kombinationen av en Core i7-8750H processor och en GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q grafikkärna klarar av att visa alla moderna datorspel på den matta Full HD-skärmen. Det går alltid att välja höga eller maximala grafikinställningar.

Schenker har fått plats med mycket datorkraft i ett elegant och tunt hölje.

En snabb NVMe SSD säkrar att systemet körs snabbt och smidigt. Det finns dessutom plats för ytterligare en M.2 SSD (NVMe eller SATA). Om du använder två NVMe SSD-enheter kan de kopplas samman i en RAID-konfiguration (0 eller 1). Det går också att lägga till en lagringsenhet på 2.5 tum. Uppgraderingar eller service kräver dock att man öppnar höljet, vilket visade sig vara ganska komplicerat.

IPS-skärmen med 144 Hz bilduppdatering får poäng för korta responstider, stabila betraktningsvinklar, bra kontrast och utmärkt färgåtergivning. Men skärmen kunde haft bättre ljusstyrka även om den räcker till för användning inomhus.

Även om batteritiden inte är särskilt inspirerande är den okej för en laptop i den här prestandaklassen. Chiclet-tangentbordet (RGB-belyst) visar sig passa bra för vardagsuppgifter. Detta åtföljs av en välavvägd mängd portar. Vi saknar dock en Thunderbolt 3-anslutning.

SCHENKER Key 16 - 09/20/2019 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
79 / 98 → 81%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
92%
Anslutningar
65 / 80 → 81%
Vikt
62 / 10-66 → 92%
Batteri
65 / 95 → 69%
Skärm
87%
Spelprestanda
92%
Programprestanda
90%
Temperatur
75 / 95 → 79%
Ljudnivå
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
57%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Medel
74%
84%
Gaming - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Schenker Key 16 (Clevo P960EN-K) - En tunn laptop som övertygar med mycket datorkraft
Sascha Mölck, 2019-08-21 (Update: 2019-08-21)