Test: Schenker Vision 15 (Intel NUC M15) : Intels svar på XPS 15 och MacBook Pro? (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.7 % v7 (old) | 12/2020 | SCHENKER Vision 15 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 15 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
89.7 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M | 2 kg | 16.2 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630 | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1200 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) R5 4600H, Vega 6 | 1.7 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 94 %
Mitt på batteriet: 478 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1770:1 (Svärta: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
SCHENKER Vision 15 BOE08F5, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Sharp LQ156N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.6" | Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) N161HCA-EA3, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | LG Gram 15Z90N LP156WF9-SPN1, .2 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 12% | -10% | -3% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 69.3 | 81.5 18% | 67.5 -3% | 66 -5% | |
sRGB Coverage | 94 | 100 6% | 69.7 -26% | 96.4 3% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.8 | 79.6 12% | 69.7 -2% | 66.8 -6% | |
Response Times | 12% | 28% | 36% | 42% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 60 ? | 52.4 ? 13% | 42 ? 30% | 37.6 ? 37% | 36 ? 40% |
Response Time Black / White * | 39 ? | 34.9 ? 11% | 28.8 ? 26% | 25.6 ? 34% | 22 ? 44% |
PWM Frequency | 131700 | 25250 ? | |||
Screen | 15% | 0% | 24% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 478 | 519 9% | 592 24% | 337 -29% | 366 -23% |
Brightness | 462 | 477 3% | 565 22% | 312 -32% | 342 -26% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 86 -9% | 85 -10% | 89 -5% | 88 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.39 -44% | 0.46 -70% | 0.2 26% | 0.28 -4% |
Contrast | 1770 | 1331 -25% | 1287 -27% | 1685 -5% | 1307 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 2.28 29% | 3.19 -0% | 0.8 75% | 2.68 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.4 | 6.54 22% | 5.45 35% | 1.1 87% | 5.25 37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2 | 0.86 57% | 2.03 -2% | 0.7 65% | 1.08 46% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 0.9 80% | 3.9 13% | 1 78% | 2.4 47% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2145 0% | 2.25 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6788 96% | 6572 99% | 6522 100% | 6538 99% | 6474 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.1 | 78 24% | 71.6 13% | 63.8 1% | 61 -3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93.6 | 100 7% | 99.5 6% | 96 3% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 14% /
14% | 13% /
6% | 17% /
19% | 15% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
60 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 29.2 ms rise | |
↘ 30.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=81) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=81) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=78) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=86) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=80) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=80) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=80) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=77) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=77) | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=80) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=78) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=80) | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5364 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 7573 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3169 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5158 poäng | |
Hjälp |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER Vision 15 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER Vision 15 Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | LG Gram 15Z90N SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -53% | -62% | -49% | -44% | -1% | |
Write 4K | 238.1 | 55.5 -77% | 93.3 -61% | 156.9 -34% | 177.1 -26% | 220 ? -8% |
Read 4K | 79.2 | 16.21 -80% | 45.9 -42% | 48.81 -38% | 47.88 -40% | 85.1 ? 7% |
Write Seq | 4139 | 1959 -53% | 1211 -71% | 1050 -75% | 2182 -47% | 3911 ? -6% |
Read Seq | 4133 | 1763 -57% | 1633 -60% | 2517 -39% | 1900 -54% | 3999 ? -3% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 697 | 398.5 -43% | 273.1 -61% | 408.7 -41% | 448.4 -36% | 551 ? -21% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 758 | 648 -15% | 356 -53% | 504 -34% | 470.3 -38% | 977 ? 29% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 5187 | 2727 -47% | 1198 -77% | 1087 -79% | 2228 -57% | 4932 ? -5% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 7117 | 3242 -54% | 2269 -68% | 3407 -52% | 3454 -51% | 6842 ? -4% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1283 | 1390 ? | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1052 | 2134 ? | ||||
AS SSD | -82% | -265% | -39% | -46% | -9% | |
Seq Read | 5427 | 2531 -53% | 1423 -74% | 2749 -49% | 2842 -48% | 4838 ? -11% |
Seq Write | 3886 | 2289 -41% | 766 -80% | 2348 -40% | 974 -75% | 3490 ? -10% |
4K Read | 72.9 | 15.85 -78% | 42.21 -42% | 44.22 -39% | 50.5 -31% | 72 ? -1% |
4K Write | 219.3 | 39.88 -82% | 74.8 -66% | 140.5 -36% | 147.5 -33% | 188.8 ? -14% |
4K-64 Read | 2209 | 1267 -43% | 973 -56% | 1450 -34% | 1191 -46% | 2234 ? 1% |
4K-64 Write | 2265 | 1749 -23% | 218.8 -90% | 2346 4% | 1275 -44% | 2622 ? 16% |
Access Time Read * | 0.033 | 0.122 -270% | 0.125 -279% | 0.079 -139% | 0.043 -30% | 0.04075 ? -23% |
Access Time Write * | 0.02 | 0.095 -375% | 0.552 -2660% | 0.027 -35% | 0.027 -35% | 0.03363 ? -68% |
Score Read | 2825 | 1536 -46% | 1157 -59% | 1769 -37% | 1526 -46% | 2811 ? 0% |
Score Write | 2873 | 2018 -30% | 370 -87% | 2721 -5% | 1520 -47% | 3159 ? 10% |
Score Total | 7069 | 4317 -39% | 2094 -70% | 5376 -24% | 3741 -47% | 7334 ? 4% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2775 | 1995 -28% | 1151 -59% | 1135 -59% | 2688 ? -3% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 662 | 584 -12% | 499.4 -25% | 346 -48% | 568 ? -14% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1655 | 1135 -31% | 733 -56% | 665 -60% | 1346 ? -19% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -68% /
-72% | -164% /
-191% | -44% /
-43% | -45% /
-45% | -5% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 7478 poäng | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 72171 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5238 poäng | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1804 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 97.8 | 63.1 | 35.4 | 15.5 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 76.5 | 76.2 | 53.6 | 49.7 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 46.4 | 39.3 | 34.4 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 63 | 30 | 28 | 26 |
F1 2020 (2020) | 93 | 50 | 38 | 24 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 29.8 / 29.8 / 31.1 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 40.5 / 40.5 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM-1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29.8 dB(A) |
SCHENKER Vision 15 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171 | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 UHD Graphics 630, i5-10300H, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) Vega 6, R5 4600H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | 9% | 8% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 29.8 | 29.8 -0% | 28 6% | 29.7 -0% | 30.7 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.8 | 29.9 -0% | 28 6% | 29.7 -0% | 30.7 -3% |
Idle Average * | 29.8 | 29.9 -0% | 28 6% | 29.7 -0% | 30.7 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.1 | 29.9 4% | 28 10% | 30.5 2% | 31.9 -3% |
Load Average * | 40.5 | 43 -6% | 28 31% | 31 23% | 34 16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.5 | 45.4 -12% | 31.3 23% | ||
Load Maximum * | 40.5 | 46.1 -14% | 41.9 -3% | 36.7 9% | 34.2 16% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.9 °C / 78.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
SCHENKER Vision 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.41 / 0.94 Watt |
Låg belastning | 3.5 / 6.3 / 6.8 Watt |
Hög belastning |
43.2 / 67.7 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
SCHENKER Vision 15 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16" | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.6" | Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) R5 4600H, Vega 6, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), .2 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -85% | -12% | -10% | 1% | -31% | -82% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.7 -6% | 2.9 17% | 4.2 -20% | 2.9 17% | 5.34 ? -53% | 6.78 ? -94% |
Idle Average * | 6.3 | 12.1 -92% | 7.6 -21% | 8.4 -33% | 7.7 -22% | 8.55 ? -36% | 11.3 ? -79% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 17 -150% | 8 -18% | 9.7 -43% | 11.4 -68% | 10.8 ? -59% | 13.4 ? -97% |
Load Average * | 43.2 | 91.5 -112% | 41.7 3% | 39.5 9% | 31.5 27% | 45.3 ? -5% | 71.1 ? -65% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 52 | 103 -98% | 39.1 25% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 67.7 | 102.3 -51% | 94.8 -40% | 67.1 1% | 32 53% | 67.5 ? -0% | 117.3 ? -73% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER Vision 15 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 73 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 i5-10300H, UHD Graphics 630, 56 Wh | Honor MagicBook Pro (AMD) R5 4600H, Vega 6, 56 Wh | LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 80 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -32% | -10% | -27% | 54% | -11% | |
H.264 | 1122 | 580 -48% | 633 -44% | 674 -40% | 821 ? -27% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 912 | 718 -21% | 556 -39% | 619 -32% | 728 -20% | 625 ? -31% |
Load | 78 | 58 -26% | 93 19% | 74 -5% | 252 223% | 97.8 ? 25% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 54 | 76.3 ? | ||||
Reader / Idle | 1581 | 1536 | 1168 ? |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Övertygande första försök
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Intels referenslaptop, som utvecklats tillsammans med NUC-teamet, förvånade onekligen många användare. Den verkar lyxig och med ett instegspris på 15.000 kronor positionerar Intel enheten som en konkurrent till andra lyxigare multimedialaptops från exempelvis Dell och Apple. Att den saknar en dedikerad GPU är inte nödvändigtvis ett problem med tanke på den nya iGPU:ns prestanda och långt ifrån alla vill spela spel på sin laptop.
Schenker Vision 15 som vi recenserar är den första konsumentmodellen baserad på NUC M15-designen. Processorn är en aktuell Tiger Lake i7 och prestandan utnyttjas väldigt bra här. Vi uppskattade särskilt att alla prestanda- och fläktkontroller går att styra direkt från Windows power slider, vilket är enkelt och bekvämt. Vi uppskattade också kyllösningen. Yttemperaturerna håller sig väldigt långa även vid belastning. Men med den aktuella BIOS-versionen är fläktarna väldigt känsliga för belastning och börjar snabbt att snurra även när så inte är nödvändigt. Vi tycker att detta borde kunna bli bättre i den färdiga produkten.
Hög prestanda, moderna portar, utmärkt chassi och lång batteritid: Intels referensdesign utgör en bra grund, det är bara skärmen som inte riktigt kan nå upp till förväntningarna det höga priset sätter. Intel borde dessutom justera fläktkontrollen.
Det helgjutna aluminiumchassit ger ett intryck av väldigt hög kvalitet och är riktigt robust. Du får dessutom moderna portar med Thunderbolt 4 som är praktiskt placerade (det går att ladda från båda sidorna). Däremot finns det tyvärr ingen SD-kortsläsare. Vidare gillade vi inmatningsenheterna och du får riktigt lång batteritid från batteriet på 73 Wh.
Skärmvalet matchar inte riktigt det höga priset. Den tryckkänsliga 1080p-skärmen är inte på något sätt dålig, men den har en del brister. Vi är en aning förvånade över att Intel helt och hållet ignorerar trenden att gå mot 16:10-skärmar. Panelen lider också av långsamma responstider och färgprecisionen är inte perfekt.
Schenker Vision 15 lämnar ändå ett riktigt gott intryck totalt sett och är definitivt ett intressant alternativ om du letar efter en multimedialaptop av hög kvalitet och inte behöver en dedikerad GPU för spel.
SCHENKER Vision 15
- 12/02/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff