Test: Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Core i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070) Tongfang GK7CP7S Laptop (Sammanfattning)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 8SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE75 8SF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 90 %
Mitt på batteriet: 304 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1169:1 (Svärta: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.65 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.75 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 BOEhydis NV173FHM-N44 (BOE07B6), IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 1920x1080 | MSI GE75 8SF Chi Mei N173HCE-G33, IPS, 1920x1080 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -1% | -2% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.2 | 62.9 -4% | 63.1 -3% | 64 -2% | 62.9 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 92.2 | 87.1 -6% | 94.4 2% | 90.4 -2% | 87.8 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 63.7 -4% | 65.2 -2% | 64.8 -3% | 63.9 -4% |
| Response Times | 7% | 872% | 5% | 41% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18.8 ? | 17.6 ? 6% | 9.6 ? 49% | 15.6 ? 17% | 7.2 ? 62% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 12 ? | 11.2 ? 7% | 10.4 ? 13% | 12.8 ? -7% | 9.6 ? 20% |
| PWM Frequency | 971 ? | 25770 ? 2554% | |||
| Screen | -6% | 19% | -42% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 304 | 295 -3% | 370.4 22% | 299.1 -2% | 288 -5% |
| Brightness | 289 | 291 1% | 348 20% | 273 -6% | 287 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 96 7% | 89 -1% | 81 -10% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.24 8% | 0.29 -12% | 0.27 -4% | 0.2 23% |
| Contrast | 1169 | 1229 5% | 1277 9% | 1108 -5% | 1440 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.65 | 3.2 -21% | 1.26 52% | 5.07 -91% | 2.33 12% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.11 | 6.64 -9% | 3.02 51% | 10.55 -73% | 5.34 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 2.52 -68% | 1.21 19% | 3.31 -121% | 2.47 -65% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.75 | 2.16 21% | 1.4 49% | 6.8 -147% | 1.19 57% |
| Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.46 89% | 2.2 100% | 2.46 89% | 2.41 91% |
| CCT | 6763 96% | 6872 95% | 6747 96% | 7805 83% | 6710 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60 | 57 -5% | 59.7 0% | 58.5 -2% | 57 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 92 | 87 -5% | 94.4 3% | 89.9 -2% | 88 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-4% | 297% /
166% | -13% /
-29% | 14% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 971 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 971 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 971 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | MSI GE75 8SF Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -57% | -80% | -41% | -16% | |
| Seq Read | 2359 | 1315 -44% | 949 -60% | 1153 -51% | 911 -61% |
| Seq Write | 2469 | 927 -62% | 823 -67% | 1328 -46% | 2347 -5% |
| 4K Read | 53.5 | 52.4 -2% | 25.36 -53% | 35.05 -34% | 53 -1% |
| 4K Write | 117.6 | 122.8 4% | 67.1 -43% | 96 -18% | 122.5 4% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1579 | 326.5 -79% | 748 -53% | 727 -54% | 1577 0% |
| 4K-64 Write | 2048 | 727 -65% | 650 -68% | 1212 -41% | 1734 -15% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.048 | 0.11 -129% | 0.173 -260% | 0.063 -31% | 0.08 -67% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.03 | 0.045 -50% | 0.059 -97% | 0.04 -33% | 0.031 -3% |
| Score Read | 1869 | 510 -73% | 869 -54% | 878 -53% | 1721 -8% |
| Score Write | 2413 | 942 -61% | 799 -67% | 1441 -40% | 2091 -13% |
| Score Total | 5248 | 1715 -67% | 2109 -60% | 2784 -47% | 4771 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18150 poäng | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 29348 poäng | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 15686 poäng | |
Hjälp | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX | |
| Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 | |
| Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
| MSI GE75 8SF | |
| låg | med. | hög | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 137 | 73 | 49.5 | |||
| Apex Legends (2019) | 143 | 134 | 132 | 88.2 | 45.4 | |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 94 | 92 | 82 | 74 | 42 | |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 87.9 | 66.4 | 54.1 | 42 | 26.1 | |
| Anthem (2019) | 88.8 | 85.4 | 79.8 | 62 | 35.5 | |
| Dirt Rally 2.0 (2019) | 143 | 117 | 75.2 | 62.1 | ||
| The Division 2 (2019) | 113 | 95 | 78 | 60 | 33 |
Ljudnivå
| Låg belastning |
| 29 / 32 / 33 dB(A) |
| Hög belastning |
| 42 / 49 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -5% | 6% | -2% | 7% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 29 -0% | 28.3 2% | 28.3 2% | 29 -0% | 24 ? 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 29 -0% | 33.5 -16% | 31.5 -9% | 29 -0% | 25.5 ? 12% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 32 -0% | 33.6 -5% | 31.6 1% | 32 -0% | 27.2 ? 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33 | 40 -21% | 35 -6% | 31.6 4% | 33 -0% | 30.2 ? 8% |
| Load Average * | 42 | 46 -10% | 38 10% | 32.3 23% | 47 -12% | 42.5 ? -1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 51 -4% | 50 -2% | 43 12% | 49 -0% | |
| Load Maximum * | 49 | 52 -6% | 56.9 -16% | 45.5 7% | 51 -4% | 53.4 ? -9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -14% | 9% | 4% | 1% | -1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 59 -26% | 41.2 12% | 38.6 18% | 53 -13% | 46.1 ? 2% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 56 | 54 4% | 46 18% | 43.6 22% | 50 11% | 49.2 ? 12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 33 -18% | 26.2 6% | 30.2 -8% | 27 4% | 31.2 ? -11% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30 | 35 -17% | 30.2 -1% | 35 -17% | 30 -0% | 32.2 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby | 0.5 / 1.8 Watt |
| Låg belastning | 13 / 16 / 21 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
96 / 191 Watt |
   
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -27% | -19% | -22% | -23% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13 | 19 -46% | 16.4 -26% | 20.2 -55% | 19 -46% | 13.5 ? -4% |
| Idle Average * | 16 | 22 -38% | 21.9 -37% | 27.2 -70% | 22 -38% | 18.9 ? -18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 21 | 29 -38% | 25.4 -21% | 28.7 -37% | 30 -43% | 26.7 ? -27% |
| Load Average * | 96 | 102 -6% | 90.7 6% | 90.8 5% | 104 -8% | 106.6 ? -11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 172 | 190 -10% | 203.3 -18% | 152.1 12% | 167 3% | |
| Load Maximum * | 191 | 231 -21% | 222.9 -17% | 165.4 13% | 203 -6% | 249 ? -30% |
* ... smaller is better
| SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 46.74 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 66 Wh | MSI GE75 8SF GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, 65 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus S GX701GX GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 76 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 15% | -5% | -15% | -2% | 67% | |
| Reader / Idle | 315 | 372 18% | 298 -5% | 565 ? 79% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 224 | 235 5% | 212 -5% | 190 -15% | 230 3% | 376 ? 68% |
| Load | 55 | 67 22% | 52 -5% | 85.3 ? 55% | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 52 | 78.3 ? |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Schenker XMG Neo 17 är i stort en utmärkt spellaptop på 17 tum. Skärmen är en fröjd för ögat med ett högt kontrastförhållande och bilduppdatering i 144 Hz tillsammans med en tunn infattning. Vidare imponerande den på oss i våra speltester tack vare en RTX 2070 GPU samtidigt som det mekaniska RGB-belysta tangentbordet var ett nöje att skriva på.
Neo 17 går dessutom att konfigurera så gott som helt fritt och den kommer med massor av tillbehör, vilket alltid är välkommet. Höljet från Tongfang Barebone är dessutom jämförelsevis kompakt och lätt även om det är en aning tjockt.
Men Schenker behöver åtgärda ett antal saker för att få toppbetyg. För det första behöver efterföljaren till Neo 17 åtminstone ett större batteri som alternativ tillsammans med en bättra styrplatta och bättre högtalare. Vidare skulle de behöva byta plats på WiFi-kortet så att det kan få ut mer av sin potential samt justera fläktkontrollen så att datorn kan använda CPU-turbo i det balanserade fläktläget. Totalt sett hindrar inte dessa brister XMG Neo 17 från att få ett skapligt genomsnittsbetyg, men de hindrar den från att vara den spellaptop på 17 tum som andra kommer att se upp till under året.
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
