Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PB51RF-G) - Lek och spel (Sammanfattning)

En ulv i fårakläder.

XMG Pro 15 kanske inte verkar särskilt spännande vid en första anblick, men den är riktigt kraftfull. Schenker Technologies har kombinerat en sexkärnig processor med ett GeForce RTX 2070 vilket säkrar smidig bilduppdatering även i moderna spel. I vår detaljerade recension kan du läsa om vilka andra styrkor och svagheter denna 15-tumslaptop har.
Coffee Lake Geforce Gaming Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Processor
Intel Core i7-9750H 6 x 2.6 - 4.5 GHz, Coffee Lake-H
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1215 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, ForceWare 442.19, Optimus
Minne
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, Dubbla kanaler, alla platser upptagna, max. 64 GB
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, Full-HD, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel HM370
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, 500 GB 
, Platser: 2x M.2 Typ 2280 & 1x 2.5 tum
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Cannon Point PCH
Anslutningar
3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: 1 mikrofon, 1 hörlurar, Kortläsare: SD,SDHC,SDXC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare
Nätverk
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 30 x 359 x 258
Batteri
62 Wh, 5500 mAh Litiumjon
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: HD
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.0, Tangentbord: Chiclet RGB, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 230 Watt, USB-minne, Användarmanual, Rengöringsduk, DVD med drivrutiner, 2.5 tums-tillbehör, Control Center, 24 Månader Garanti
Vikt
2.53 kg, Strömförsörjning: 680 g
Pris
2104 EUR
Länkar
SCHENKER hemsida
SCHENKER kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
83.3 %
v7 (old)
02/2020
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.5 kg30 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.1 %
v7 (old)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.4 kg25 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.3 %
v7 (old)
05/2019
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.1 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
v7 (old)
12/2019
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		2.3 kg26.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
87 %
v6 (old)
03/2019
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		3.5 kg38 mm15.60"1920x1080

Storleksjämförelse

❌
386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg359 mm 258 mm 30 mm 2.5 kg360 mm 275 mm 25 mm 2.4 kg357.7 mm 248 mm 26.9 mm 2.3 kg360 mm 252 mm 19 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Vänster: Kensington-lås, USB-A 3.0, Mikrofon, Hörlurar
Vänster: Kensington-lås, USB-A 3.0, Mikrofon, Hörlurar
Höger: USB-C 3.1 Gen2 (Thunderbolt 3), USB-A 3.0
Höger: USB-C 3.1 Gen2 (Thunderbolt 3), USB-A 3.0
Baksidan: RJ45-LAN, HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, USB-C 3.1 Gen2 (DisplayPort), USB-A 3.0, AC-adapter
Baksidan: RJ45-LAN, HDMI 2.0, Mini-DisplayPort 1.4, USB-C 3.1 Gen2 (DisplayPort), USB-A 3.0, AC-adapter
Framsidan: Kortläsare
Framsidan: Kortläsare
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
204 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s -53%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
25.9 MB/s -87%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
224 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s -47%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
29.8 MB/s -87%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 MBit/s
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
683 MBit/s -51%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s -53%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
580 (497min - 619max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1330 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s -48%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
680 MBit/s -49%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
640 (541min - 677max) MBit/s -52%
ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
21.4 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
29.9 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
21 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
1.2 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
19 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Pro 15: 18.43 ∆E min: 1.18 - max: 29.9 ∆E
Testkarta - Schenker XMG Pro 15
Testkarta - Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
357
cd/m²		352
cd/m²		335
cd/m²
331
cd/m²		346
cd/m²		324
cd/m²
365
cd/m²		366
cd/m²		336
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 345.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 346 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1236:1 (Svärta: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.58
ΔE Greyscale 4.95 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
AU Optronics B156HAN (AUO80ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Sharp LQ156M1JW09 (SHP14D3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Sharp LQ156M1JW03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display
0%
-3%
4%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
66.7
66.2
-1%
64.9
-3%
69.3
4%
66.1
-1%
sRGB Coverage
94.4
97.1
3%
91
-4%
98.9
5%
92.6
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
68.1
67.6
-1%
65.9
-3%
70.7
4%
67.1
-1%
Response Times
17%
40%
12%
-8%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.2 ?(8, 9.2)
15 ?(8, 7)
13%
7.2 ?(3.8, 3.4)
58%
13.2 ?(7.2, 6)
23%
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
9 ?(5, 4)
20%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
21%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
-0%
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
-14%
PWM Frequency
250 ?(20)
23150 ?(19)
Screen
-7%
0%
9%
1%
Brightness middle
346
309
-11%
286
-17%
277.4
-20%
263
-24%
Brightness
346
284
-18%
275
-21%
264
-24%
264
-24%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
90
1%
90
1%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.28
0.42
-50%
0.37
-32%
0.24
14%
0.17
39%
Contrast
1236
736
-40%
773
-37%
1156
-6%
1547
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.62
3.99
14%
2.19
53%
1.51
67%
4.45
4%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.93
8.3
7%
4.4
51%
4.93
45%
8.33
7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.58
1.12
29%
2.27
-44%
1.77
-12%
1.93
-22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.95
5.43
-10%
2.2
56%
3.7
25%
4.77
4%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.57 86%
2.41 91%
2.23 99%
2.52 87%
CCT
7733 84%
7767 84%
6405 101%
7061 92%
7767 84%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61
63
3%
59
-3%
65.1
7%
60
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
97
3%
91
-3%
99.1
5%
93
-1%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
3% / -3%
12% / 5%
8% / 9%
-3% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 9.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
AS SSD Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark
LatencyMon
0651301952603253904555205856507157808459109751040110511701235Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1023 (1010.13-1155.97)
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1177 (1160.19-1270.77)
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1040 (1017.76-1182)
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R20
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +59%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points +17%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
198 Points +14%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
178 Points +2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
177 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
174 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +194%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
1623 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points +27%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1288 Points +11%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
1182 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
1156 (1010.13min - 1155.97max) Points
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)
722 Points +71%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
474 Points +13%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
430 Points +2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
423 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)
8240 Points +242%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Intel Core i9-9880H
3505 Points +45%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel Core i7-9750H
2753 Points +14%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
Intel Core i7-9750H
2507 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Intel Core i7-9750H
2410 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1156 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
174 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
2410 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
421 Points
Hjälp
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points +37%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6452 Points +29%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, 2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)
5654 Points +13%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
5625 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
5013 Points
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
2x Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 (RAID 0)		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-32%
-19%
-6%
-12%
Write 4K
120.6
133.3
11%
97
-20%
125.7
4%
129.9
8%
Read 4K
46.13
55.3
20%
49.58
7%
45.04
-2%
47.15
2%
Write Seq
2900
980
-66%
1838
-37%
2361
-19%
1840
-37%
Read Seq
2929
1406
-52%
2421
-17%
1987
-32%
1775
-39%
Write 4K Q32T1
372.2
286.3
-23%
326.9
-12%
407.1
9%
294.5
-21%
Read 4K Q32T1
422.2
331.5
-21%
372.9
-12%
537
27%
373.6
-12%
Write Seq Q32T1
3245
976
-70%
1894
-42%
2398
-26%
3295
2%
Read Seq Q32T1
3565
1520
-57%
2828
-21%
3309
-7%
3535
-1%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3565 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3245 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 422.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 372.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2929 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2900 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.13 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 120.6 MB/s
3DMark 11 Performance
20935 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
37846 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17762 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
7508 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +50%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20997 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20762 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20759 Points 0%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19846 Points -4%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
19123 Points -8%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)
8661 Points +94%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4474 Points
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4467 Points 0%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4346 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4155 Points -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
3958 Points -12%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +66%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26975 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26140 Points
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25845 Points -1%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
25500 Points -2%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
24267 Points -7%
051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø75.8 (68-80)
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +71%
MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i9-9880H
78.4 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
74.4 (62min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K
73 (60min) fps -2%
Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
72 (61min - 84max) fps -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9750H
70.2 (58min) fps -6%
lågmed.högultra
The Witcher 3 (2015) 142 74.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 153 140 130 122
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 110 95.5 81.1
Anno 1800 (2019) 68.5 41.1
Rage 2 (2019) 103 100
FIFA 20 (2019) 190 189
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) 89 67
GRID 2019 (2019) 104 75.4
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) 113 92.9
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 83.5 78.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 92.2 90.7
Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) 66.8 42.4
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.534.933.734.936.32544.14440.739.539.83134.833.635.930.733.14039.536.135.233.337.35033.435.331.530.441.46339.734.530.827.941.28048.232.230.825.648.910033.730.527.426.636.212534.633.626.727.536.816037.632.627.425.139.220035.93124.823.637.425039.130.623.922.84031541.131.625.222.942.540041.828.521.919.842.850043.529.123.51944.663044.528.82117.44480042.927.9191842.6100044.829.219.117.844.7125045.529.81918.845.5160046.330.918.818.246.4200046.330.619.518.546250046.329.419.218.345.9315043.223.8191843.140004322.219.418.243.3500042.221.619.818.641.6630039.120.519.918.53980003420.320.118.8341000032.420.320.819.132.11250029.920.62119.4301600024.521.321.519.824.9SPL55.939.932.330.855.8N10.93.41.81.511median 41.8median 29.1median 20.8median 18.8median 42.5Delta5421.84hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 15

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
30 / 32 / 40 dB(A)
Hög belastning
56 / 56 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
9%
2%
6%
-1%
17%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
30
-0%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Minimum *
30
30.6
-2%
31
-3%
33
-10%
32
-7%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Average *
32
30.6
4%
33
-3%
33
-3%
33
-3%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years)
15%
Idle Maximum *
40
37.7
6%
38
5%
33.1
17%
36
10%
30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years)
24%
Load Average *
56
36.5
35%
50
11%
38
32%
55
2%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years)
24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55
52.1
5%
53
4%
52.9
4%
57
-4%
Load Maximum *
56
48.1
14%
56
-0%
57.8
-3%
59
-5%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years)
5%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 42 °C42 °C43 °C 
 39 °C41 °C42 °C 
 29 °C30 °C30 °C 
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 37.6 °C
41 °C42 °C42 °C
43 °C41 °C39 °C
33 °C31 °C31 °C
Max: 43 °C
Medel: 38.1 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  50 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.4 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
-14%
-16%
-17%
-5%
-9%
Maximum Upper Side *
43
45.6
-6%
54
-26%
45
-5%
45
-5%
46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years)
-7%
Maximum Bottom *
43
55.5
-29%
47
-9%
53
-23%
48
-12%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years)
-14%
Idle Upper Side *
29
31.8
-10%
33
-14%
31.2
-8%
30
-3%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years)
-8%
Idle Bottom *
30
33.3
-11%
34
-13%
39
-30%
30
-0%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years)
-7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.933.62539.542.33130.733.34033.335.85030.431.36327.932.88025.631.210026.629.812527.531.716025.130.520023.635.125022.850.531522.960.740019.870.75001969.363017.468.38001874.7100017.877.1125018.874.5160018.274.5200018.576.4250018.376.731501874.2400018.268.3500018.671.8630018.570.1800018.8711000019.170.21250019.467.51600019.861.9SPL30.885.7N1.564.9median 18.8median 70.1Delta1.810.243.544.238.639.731.232.235.237.428.428.826.329.125.830.326.736.524.237.422.750.525.658.326.361.721.763.72061.518.859.91858.918.261.817.96419.164.718.162.917.265.517.767.417.767.617.565.517.76517.665.817.563.817.56117.35817.349.330.576.81.440.8median 18median 61.81.54.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Pro 15SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1.4 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 15 / 19 / 26 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 101 / 245 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
13%
-24%
1%
-61%
0%
Idle Minimum *
15
11.4
24%
24
-60%
15
-0%
35
-133%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
10%
Idle Average *
19
13.5
29%
27
-42%
18.5
3%
39
-105%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
1%
Idle Maximum *
26
21.6
17%
33
-27%
20.2
22%
47
-81%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
-3%
Load Average *
101
106
-5%
129
-28%
110.9
-10%
117
-16%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
177
186
-5%
176
1%
187.3
-6%
196
-11%
Load Maximum *
245
196
20%
216
12%
260
-6%
299
-22%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
-2%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
5tim 12min
WiFi Websurfing
3tim 28min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 12min
SCHENKER XMG Pro 15
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 62 Wh		Asus Strix Scar III G531GW-AZ062T
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh		Asus Zephyrus S GX502GW
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 76 Wh		MSI GE65 Raider 9SF-049US
i9-9880H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 51 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
60%
2%
-9%
-16%
60%
Reader / Idle
312
353
13%
371
19%
194
-38%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
81%
WiFi v1.3
208
333
60%
220
6%
216
4%
157
-25%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
81%
Load
72
62
-14%
35
-51%
83
15%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
18%
H.264
154
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)

För

+ Går att konfigurera individuellt
+ Återhållsamma temperaturer
+ G-Sync eller Optimus
+ RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ Tunn infattning
+ 144 Hz

Emot

- Riktigt hög ljudnivå vid belastning
- Ljudet kunde varit bättre
- Mager batteritid
Recension av Schenker XMG Pro 15. Recensionsex från bestware.com
Recension av Schenker XMG Pro 15. Recensionsex från bestware.com

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

XMG Pro 15 fyller utmärkt gapet mellan utbudet av tunna och lätta modeller och klassiska desktop-ersättningar. Den som föredrar ett kompakt hölje men inte vill vara utan hög prestanda har hittat rätt.

En Core i7-9750H och ett GeForce RTX 2070 kan visa alla moderna titlar med full detalj och passar perfekt för hardcore-gamers. Vidare har vår recensionsenhet ett matchande RGB-bakgrundsbelyst tangentbord, många uppgraderingsmöjligheter och konfigurationsalternativ samt ett brett utbud av portar inklusive Thunderbolt 3. Den responsiva 144 Hz-skärmen med hög kontrast var också trevlig.

Tyvärr underminerar kylfläktarna ett i övrigt utmärkt koncept. Vi har redan tidigare klagat på att fläktarna ibland går på utan anledning och att 3D-drift generellt ger en för hög ljudnivå på Clevos barebone-modeller. Svag batteritid påverkar också vårt totala omdöme.

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 - 02/19/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser

Design
74 / 98 → 76%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
78%
Anslutningar
73 / 80 → 92%
Vikt
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Batteri
55 / 95 → 57%
Skärm
84%
Spelprestanda
93%
Programprestanda
91%
Temperatur
89 / 95 → 93%
Ljudnivå
56 / 90 → 62%
Audio
75%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Medel
73%
83%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

SCHENKER XMG Pro 15 (XMG Pro 15 Serie)
Test
•
Schenker XMG Pro 15 E23 (PD50S...
|
Test
•
Recension av Schenker XMG Pro ...
|
Test
•
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PC5...

Price comparison

Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Schenker XMG Pro 15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Clevo PB51RF-G) - Lek och spel (Sammanfattning)
Florian Glaser, 2020-02-24 (Update: 2020-02-24)