Notebookcheck Logo

Test: Schenker XMG Ultra 15 (i7-9700K, RTX 2070) Clevo P751TM1-G Laptop (Sammanfattning)

Uppgraderingsbar toppskiktsenhet som presterar.

Schenkers XMG Ultra 15 har kraftfull hårdvara som är kapabel att köra alla aktuella spel smidigt. Dessutom har den utförliga möjligheter till underhåll och uppgraderingar - inklusive möjligheten att byta både CPU och GPU.
Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Thunderbolt Laptop / Notebook
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Processor
Intel Core i7-9700K 8 x 3.6 - 4.9 GHz, Coffee Lake-R, i sockel
Grafikkort
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Kärna: 1215 MHz, Minne: 1750 MHz, 256-bit GDDR6, ForceWare 419.17, no Optimus
Minne
32 GB 
, SO-DIMM DDR4-2666, dubbla kanaler, totalt fyra platser (två används)
Skärm
15.60 tum 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixlar 141 PPI, AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 144 Hz, G-Sync, glansig: nej
Moderkort
Intel Z370 (Kaby Lake)
Hårddisk
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2 st M.2-platser (RAID 0/1 kapabel), 2 st SATA III-platser (RAID 0/1 kapabel)
Ljudkort
Realtek ALC898 @ Intel Kaby Point PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Anslutningar
1 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensingtonlås, Ljudanslutningar: line-in, line-ut, mikrofoningång, 2-i-1 ljudutgång (hörlurar + optisk S/PDIF), Kortläsare: SD, SDHC, SDXC, Mini SD, MMC, RSMMC, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, TPM 2.0
Nätverk
Killer E2500 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5
Storlek
höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 38 x 386 x 262
Batteri
82 Wh, 5400 mAh Litiumjon, removeable, 14.8 V
Operativsystem
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webbkamera: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Övrigt
Högtalare: 2.1, Tangentbord: Chiclet, RGB med 3 zoner, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, Nätadapter på 330 W, återställnings-DVD, DVD med drivrutiner, 16 GB USB-minne, manual, nyckelring, ett års licens för Bullguard Internet Security, Control Center, 36 Månader Garanti
Vikt
3.52 kg, Strömförsörjning: 1.246 kg
Pris
3248 Euro
Länkar
SCHENKER hemsida
SCHENKER kategori
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Storleksjämförelse

❌
390 mm 266 mm 39.8 mm 3.1 kg386 mm 262 mm 38 mm 3.5 kg389 mm 305 mm 25 mm 3.5 kg359 mm 255 mm 18 mm 2.1 kg356 mm 250 mm 18.9 mm 2.1 kg355 mm 235 mm 17.8 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Höger: line-in, mikrofon-in, line-ut, 2-i-1 ljud (hörlurar + optisk S/PDIF), USB 2.0 Type-A, USB 3.1 Gen 1 Typ A, kabellås
Höger: line-in, mikrofon-in, line-ut, 2-i-1 ljud (hörlurar + optisk S/PDIF), USB 2.0 Type-A, USB 3.1 Gen 1 Typ A, kabellås
Vänster: Gigabit Ethernet, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.1 Gen 2 Typ C, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Typ A, kortläsare
Vänster: Gigabit Ethernet, Thunderbolt 3, USB 3.1 Gen 2 Typ C, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 Typ A, kortläsare
Baksidan: HDMI 2.0, 2x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, ström
Baksidan: HDMI 2.0, 2x Mini DisplayPort 1.4, ström
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
200 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
185 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)
95.5 MB/s -51%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
242 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)
119.3 MB/s -44%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Alienware 15 R4
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
692 MBit/s +6%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
683 MBit/s +4%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
680 MBit/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
655 MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
654 MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
641 MBit/s -2%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
693 MBit/s
Alienware 15 R4
Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter
690 MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Wireless-AC 9260
686 MBit/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Wireless-AC 9560
684 MBit/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
678 MBit/s -2%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)
671 MBit/s -3%
265
cd/m²		281
cd/m²		275
cd/m²
251
cd/m²		263
cd/m²		256
cd/m²
261
cd/m²		258
cd/m²		269
cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Max: 281 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 264.3 cd/m² Minimum: 12 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 263 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1547:1 (Svärta: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.77 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.52
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
AU Optronics B156HAN07.0 (AUO70ED), IPS, 1920x1080		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
AU Optronics B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), TN, 1920x1080		Alienware 15 R4
LG Philips LP156WF6 (LGD0540), IPS, 1920x1080		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 1920x1080		Acer Predator Triton 500
AU Optronics B156HAN08.2 (AUO82ED), IPS, 1920x1080
Display
-1%
-5%
-2%
0%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
66.1
66.8
1%
65.7
-1%
63.5
-4%
65.3
-1%
64.2
-3%
sRGB Coverage
92.6
90.7
-2%
86.4
-7%
93.1
1%
94.9
2%
92.6
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.1
66.3
-1%
63.1
-6%
64.5
-4%
66.3
-1%
65.7
-2%
Response Times
-1%
-101%
1%
7%
34%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17.6 ?(9.2, 8.4)
24.2 ?(13.4, 10.8)
-38%
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
-114%
16.4 ?(8.8, 7.6)
7%
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
5%
8 ?(4, 4)
55%
Response Time Black / White *
12.8 ?(7.6, 5.2)
8 ?(5.6, 2.4)
37%
24 ?(13.2, 10.8)
-88%
13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2)
-6%
11.6 ?(7.2, 4.4)
9%
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
12%
PWM Frequency
20830 ?(99)
Screen
-47%
-14%
8%
-0%
-8%
Brightness middle
263
363
38%
292
11%
250
-5%
314.7
20%
304
16%
Brightness
264
365
38%
278
5%
235
-11%
312
18%
299
13%
Brightness Distribution
89
74
-17%
88
-1%
85
-4%
90
1%
89
0%
Black Level *
0.17
0.58
-241%
0.29
-71%
0.29
-71%
0.38
-124%
0.27
-59%
Contrast
1547
626
-60%
1007
-35%
862
-44%
828
-46%
1126
-27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.45
8.7
-96%
4.9
-10%
1.46
67%
2.56
42%
4.66
-5%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.33
12.91
-55%
10.08
-21%
2.47
70%
4.89
41%
9.65
-16%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.93
2.36
-22%
2.27
-18%
1.71
11%
1.72
11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.77
9.26
-94%
4.89
-3%
1.27
73%
3.4
29%
5.53
-16%
Gamma
2.52 87%
2.16 102%
2.36 93%
2.4 92%
2.3 96%
2.5 88%
CCT
7767 84%
9390 69%
7598 86%
6749 96%
6435 101%
8028 81%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60
59
-2%
56
-7%
60
0%
60.7
1%
60
0%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
91
-2%
86
-8%
93
0%
94.6
2%
93
0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -32%
-40% / -23%
2% / 5%
2% / 1%
8% / -1%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
LatencyMon
Intel XTU
 
075150225300375450525600675750825900975105011251200127513501425Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing Intel Core i7-9700K, Intel Core i7-9700K: Ø1449 (1441.6-1465.07)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Intel Core i5-8600K, Intel Core i5-8600K: Ø988 (976.37-994.09)
Alienware 15 R4 Intel Core i9-8950HK, Intel Core i9-8950HK: Ø1064 (1038.8-1083)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1095 (1087.31-1156.25)
Acer Predator Triton 500 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø980 (961.82-1019.05)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø922 (913.2-999)
CPU-klockfrekvenser när vi körde CB15-loopen
CPU-klockfrekvenser när vi körde CB15-loopen
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7682
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
42677
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
14667
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
203 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1465 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
140.9 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Hjälp
Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R10 | Geekbench 3 | Geekbench 4.0 | Geekbench 4.4 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | Octane V2 | JetStream 1.1
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)
276 Points +36%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
203 Points
Alienware 15 R4
Intel Core i9-8950HK
197 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
181 Points -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
176 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
174 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
166 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)
3394 Points +132%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
1465 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
1156 Points -21%
Alienware 15 R4
Intel Core i9-8950HK
1083 Points -26%
Acer Predator Triton 500
Intel Core i7-8750H
1019 Points -30%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H
999 Points -32%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
991 Points -32%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)
9755 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
7682 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
6875 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
6351 Points -17%
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)
63783 Points +49%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
42677 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
33923 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
32863 Points -23%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
27774 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
21358 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
18970 Points -32%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
4825 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K
4217 Points -13%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
3741 Points -22%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31808 - 41034, n=3, last 2 years)
36990 Points +40%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
26471 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
17795 Points -33%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (6453 - 7348, n=3, last 2 years)
6951 Points +21%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
5744 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4692 Points -18%
Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)
54312 Points +89%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
28792 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
18716 Points -35%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming
  (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)
8126 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K
5925 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H
4810 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
1138 ms * -20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
1126 ms * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K (Edge 41)
1022 ms * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K (Edge 44)
948 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 779, n=179, last 2 years)
506 ms * +47%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (69893 - 115768, n=57, last 2 years)
95118 Points +127%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K (Edge 44)
41962 Points
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
33659 Points -20%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
30594 Points -27%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming
  (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years)
526 Points +77%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Intel Core i7-9700K (Edge 44)
297.2 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44.17763.1.0)
255.9 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Intel Core i5-8600K (Edge 41)
255.6 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)
245.4 Points -17%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score
8114 poäng
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5485 poäng
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6780 poäng
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
6258 poäng
PCMark 10 Score
6868 poäng
Hjälp
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10 - Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)
7774 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6868 Points
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
6008 Points -13%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
5883 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5779 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5416 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5353 Points -22%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5541 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5512 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5485 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)
5223 Points -5%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
4338 Points -21%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
4150 Points -24%
Work Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6258 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)
6102 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8
5645 Points -10%
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G
5632 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe
5618 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
5607 Points -10%
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Sequential Read: 1895 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1773 MB/s
512K Read: 1155 MB/s
512K Write: 1320 MB/s
4K Read: 68.1 MB/s
4K Write: 160 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 620 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 522 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe		Alienware 15 R4
Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ		Acer Predator Triton 500
2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-5%
-27%
-15%
-16%
-2%
Write 4K
129.9
147.7
14%
96.8
-25%
97.1
-25%
93.9
-28%
93.6
-28%
Read 4K
47.15
44.02
-7%
35.73
-24%
53.7
14%
40.56
-14%
38.82
-18%
Write Seq
1840
1641
-11%
362.3
-80%
1526
-17%
1468
-20%
2455
33%
Read Seq
1775
1830
3%
2110
19%
2020
14%
1540
-13%
2107
19%
Write 4K Q32T1
294.5
325.9
11%
318.6
8%
285.6
-3%
293.5
0%
298.7
1%
Read 4K Q32T1
373.6
369.1
-1%
366.7
-2%
321.8
-14%
346
-7%
338.7
-9%
Write Seq Q32T1
3295
1847
-44%
351
-89%
1533
-53%
1941
-41%
2902
-12%
Read Seq Q32T1
3535
3344
-5%
2813
-20%
2351
-33%
3266
-8%
3536
0%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
43781 poäng
3DMark 11 Performance
22748 poäng
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
227837 poäng
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
43983 poäng
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18616 poäng
3DMark Time Spy Score
7832 poäng
Hjälp
3DMark | 3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)
31245 Points +51%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
20759 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
18935 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
18153 Points -13%
Alienware 15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
17675 Points -15%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
17598 Points -15%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)
13034 Points +67%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
7815 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6728 Points -14%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
6562 Points -16%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (371 - 14592, n=114, last 2 years)
8661 Points +108%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
4155 Points
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3679 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
3557 Points -14%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)
43521 Points +61%
Acer Predator Triton 500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
28083 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
26975 Points
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
24873 Points -8%
Alienware 15 R4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
23308 Points -14%
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22723 Points -16%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
22089 Points -18%
lågmed.högultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 400.7 346 320.9 187.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 331.2 223.1 128.4 73
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) 214 202 159 108
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) 112.4 102 98.6
Civilization VI (2016) 224.1 163.6 129.8 121.1
Destiny 2 (2017) 206.1 181.2 169.5 144.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 128.4 114.1 92.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 147 125 115 109
The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite | Far Cry 5
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)
126.9 fps +74%
Acer Predator Triton 500
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H
76.5 (63min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K
73 (60min) fps
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
68.9 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K
65.3 fps -11%
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK
59.5 fps -18%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
58.3 (48min) fps -20%
BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K
187.8 fps
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
152.5 fps -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
127.7 fps -32%
Far Cry 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=103, last 2 years)
130.5 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K
109 fps
Alienware 15 R4
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK
88 fps -19%
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H
67 fps -39%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-9700K, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø74.3 (70-77)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i5-8600K, Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe: Ø62.6 (59-67)
Alienware 15 R4 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i9-8950HK, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G: Ø59.6 (54-64)
Acer Predator Triton 500 GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, 2x WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1014 (RAID 0): Ø76.1 (70-81)
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ: Ø62.2 (57-70)
Gigabyte Aero 15-X9 GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8: Ø51.3 (44-61)

Ljudnivå

Låg belastning
32 / 33 / 36 dB(A)
Hög belastning
55 / 59 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
tyst
40 dB(A)
hörbar
50 dB(A)
högt ljud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Alienware 15 R4
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Noise
3%
-0%
11%
9%
18%
18%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
29
3%
29
3%
30
-0%
28.8
4%
24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=157, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Minimum *
32
32
-0%
32
-0%
30
6%
32
-0%
28.8
10%
25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=158, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Average *
33
33
-0%
33
-0%
32
3%
34
-3%
28.8
13%
27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=158, last 2 years)
18%
Idle Maximum *
36
35
3%
50
-39%
34
6%
36
-0%
29.4
18%
30.2 ?(23 - 47, n=158, last 2 years)
16%
Load Average *
55
46
16%
50
9%
44
20%
42
24%
35.7
35%
42.5 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=158, last 2 years)
23%
Witcher 3 ultra *
57
54
5%
51
11%
46
19%
44
23%
42.5
25%
Load Maximum *
59
62
-5%
51
14%
47
20%
48
19%
45
24%
53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=158, last 2 years)
9%

* ... smaller is better

Hög belastning
 43 °C44 °C37 °C 
 44 °C45 °C38 °C 
 32 °C34 °C27 °C 
Max: 45 °C
Medel: 38.2 °C
45 °C43 °C48 °C
40 °C39 °C36 °C
26 °C27 °C26 °C
Max: 48 °C
Medel: 36.7 °C
Strömförsörjning (max.)  45 °C | Rumstemperatur 20 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.7 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Alienware 15 R4
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Heat
2%
-30%
-13%
-11%
3%
-4%
Maximum Upper Side *
45
42
7%
53
-18%
49
-9%
56
-24%
49
-9%
46.1 ?(28.2 - 60, n=156, last 2 years)
-2%
Maximum Bottom *
48
50
-4%
68
-42%
58
-21%
66
-38%
49
-2%
49.2 ?(33.6 - 66, n=156, last 2 years)
-3%
Idle Upper Side *
30
29
3%
39
-30%
33
-10%
27
10%
25.4
15%
31.2 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=156, last 2 years)
-4%
Idle Bottom *
30
29
3%
39
-30%
33
-10%
27
10%
27.2
9%
32.2 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=156, last 2 years)
-7%

* ... smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.544.22538.639.73131.232.24035.237.45028.428.86326.329.18025.830.310026.736.512524.237.416022.750.520025.658.325026.361.731521.763.74002061.550018.859.96301858.980018.261.8100017.964125019.164.7160018.162.9200017.265.5250017.767.4315017.767.6400017.565.5500017.765630017.665.8800017.563.81000017.5611250017.3581600017.349.3SPL30.576.8N1.440.8median 18median 61.8Delta1.54.73839.734.236.729.430.734.833.427.427.225.128.226.83126.936.226.638.324.151.6276027.663.122.762.820.163.318.860.818.560.717.961.518.463.217.362.217.263.717.16717.766.417.565.917.363.617.363.417.464.317.462.217.559.217.453.517.351.530.4761.539.4median 17.7median 62.22.74.641.544.434.337.529.231.333.933.22831.724.73528.131.227.337.624.939.222.745.523.550.324.357.3216219.265.118.568.518.472.217.778.517.880.417.279.7177517.175.517.172.217.370.717.173.717.274.417.271.417.168.417.269.51768.316.961.729.887.11.369.7median 17.3median 69.71.96.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 TuringSCHENKER XMG Ultra 15Alienware 15 R4
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Alienware 15 R4 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning
Av/Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1.1 Watt
Låg belastningdarkmidlight 35 / 39 / 47 Watt
Hög belastning midlight 117 / 299 Watt
 color bar
Förklaring: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Alienware 15 R4
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
11%
24%
37%
45%
47%
36%
Idle Minimum *
35
28
20%
23
34%
16
54%
16
54%
10.4
70%
13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years)
61%
Idle Average *
39
31
21%
26
33%
22
44%
18
54%
14.6
63%
18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years)
52%
Idle Maximum *
47
38
19%
30
36%
32
32%
23
51%
16.3
65%
26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years)
43%
Load Average *
117
100
15%
111
5%
89
24%
88
25%
88.5
24%
106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years)
9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
196
206
-5%
182
7%
147
25%
120
39%
155.4
21%
Load Maximum *
299
309
-3%
222
26%
173
42%
167
44%
182.4
39%
249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years)
17%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid
Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)
3tim 14min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)
2tim 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
2tim 34min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)
1tim 23min
SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing
i7-9700K, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 82 Wh		SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15
i5-8600K, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 82 Wh		Alienware 15 R4
i9-8950HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh		Acer Predator Triton 500
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 82 Wh		Gigabyte Aero 15-X9
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 94.24 Wh		Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q
i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, 80 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
25%
52%
31%
143%
135%
125%
Reader / Idle
194
220
13%
370
91%
335
73%
549
183%
682
252%
565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years)
191%
H.264
154
186
21%
364
136%
408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years)
165%
WiFi v1.3
157
194
24%
304
94%
190
21%
382
143%
387
146%
376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years)
139%
Load
83
119
43%
58
-30%
81
-2%
174
110%
88
6%
85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years)
3%

För

+ matt IPS-skärm
+ 144 Hz-panel
+ går att konfigurera individuellt
+ går att uppgradera och underhålla
+ ledig M.2-plats
+ två HDD-platser på 2.5 tum
+ CPU och GPU som går att byta ut
+ massor av prestanda
+ tangentbord med RGB-bakgrundsbelysning
+ skapliga högtalare
+ redo för LTE
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ G-Sync

Emot

- skärmen lider av bleeding
- kraftigt och klumpigt hölje
- hög energiförbrukning
- låter för mycket vid belastning
- dålig batteritid
Schenker XMG Ultra 15. Recensionsex från Schenker.
Schenker XMG Ultra 15. Recensionsex från Schenker.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Schenkers XMG Ultra 15 är ett massivt stycke. Dess enorma storlek och vikt beror på en specialförmåga som sällan återfinns på moderna bärbara datorer: CPU och GPU placerade i socklar som därmed går att byta ut (den sistnämnda som en MXM-modul).

Schenkers senaste utgåva av XMG Ultra 15 är en välgjord toppskiktslaptop för spel som passar den som kan dra nytta av uppgraderingsmöjligheterna.

Kombinationen av en åttakärnig Core-i7 9700K CPU och en GeForce RTX 2070 GPU var mer än tillräckligt för att visa alla moderna spel smidigt på den matta FHD-skärmen med hög eller till och med maximal detalj. GPU:n var tydligt kapabel att klara av ännu högre upplösningar.

Tack vare Nvidias G-Sync och en 144 Hz IPS-skärm var resultatet otroligt smidigt. Skärmen hade ett utmärkt kontrastförhållande, korta responstider och breda betraktningsvinklar. Det enda vi har att klaga på är att ljusstyrkan var för låg. En blixtsnabb NVMe SSD säkrade smidig och kvick systemprestanda och höljet hade plats för ytterligare en M.2 SSD-enhet samt två HDD-enheter på 2.5 tum. Det RGB-belysta tangentbordet var förvånansvärt bra och anslutbarheten var riktigt skaplig. I gengäld var batteritiden så dålig att den knappt är värd att nämna.

När det kommer till fläkthanteringen finns det definitivt rum för förbättring. Vid belastning körs fläktarna mycket snabbare än nödvändigt för att säkra tillräcklig kylning. Vi misstänker att kylsystemet var designat och utvecklat för en mycket kraftigare SKU (Core i9-9900K, GeForce RTX 2080).

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing - 03/04/2019 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Design
75 / 98 → 77%
Tangentbord
83%
Mus
81%
Anslutningar
76 / 81 → 93%
Vikt
53 / 10-66 → 77%
Batteri
66%
Skärm
85%
Spelprestanda
100%
Programprestanda
100%
Temperatur
89 / 95 → 93%
Ljudnivå
55 / 90 → 61%
Audio
80%
Medel
78%
87%
Gaming - Vägt medel

More articles related to this device

SCHENKER XMG Ultra 15 Turing (XMG Ultra Serie)
Test
•
Test: Schenker XMG Ultra 15 (C...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Schenker XMG Ultra 15 (i7-9700K, RTX 2070) Clevo P751TM1-G Laptop (Sammanfattning)
Sascha Mölck, 2019-03-14 (Update: 2024-11- 4)