Test: Sony Xperia XZ1 Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| LG G6 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple iPhone 8 Plus | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | |
| OnePlus 5 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| LG G6 | |
| Huawei P10 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 93 %
Mitt på batteriet: 620 cd/m²
Kontrast: 785:1 (Svärta: 0.79 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.02
| Sony Xperia XZ1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact IPS, 1280x720, 4.6" | Honor 9 IPS/LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.2" | Huawei P10 LTPS, 1920x1080, 5.1" | Apple iPhone 8 Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5" | LG G6 IPS LCD, 2880x1440, 5.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -10% | 18% | -0% | 36% | 28% | |
| Brightness middle | 620 | 566 -9% | 550 -11% | 547 -12% | 559 -10% | 646 4% |
| Brightness | 610 | 560 -8% | 535 -12% | 556 -9% | 538 -12% | 611 0% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 98 5% | 92 -1% | 86 -8% | 90 -3% | 89 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.79 | 0.53 33% | 0.42 47% | 0.43 46% | 0.38 52% | 0.23 71% |
| Contrast | 785 | 1068 36% | 1310 67% | 1272 62% | 1471 87% | 2809 258% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 4.6 -10% | 3.3 21% | 4.8 -14% | 1.3 69% | 4.5 -7% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 9.4 -62% | 4.5 22% | 8.8 -52% | 2.7 53% | 8.3 -43% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 6.5 -67% | 3.6 8% | 4.5 -15% | 1.8 54% | 6 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.02 109% | 2.14 103% | 2.38 92% | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 7086 92% | 8189 79% | 7226 90% | 7194 90% | 6797 96% | 7996 81% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 67.74 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.05 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2358 Hz | ≤ 24 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2358 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 24 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2358 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 31.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Google Pixel 2 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Basemark X 1.1 | |
| Medium Quality (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| High Quality (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Google Pixel 2 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| Epic Citadel - Ultra High Quality (sort by value) | |
| HTC U11 | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
| Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| Xiaomi Mi 6 (Chrome Version 58) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone 8 | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S8 (Samsung Browser 5.2) | |
| Google Pixel 2 (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 (Chrome 61) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact (Chrome 62.0.3202.84) | |
| HTC U11 (Chrome 58) | |
| OnePlus 5 (Chrome 59) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| LG V30 (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ (Chrome 52) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ1 | Sony Xperia XZ Premium | HTC U11 | Xiaomi Mi 6 | Google Pixel 2 | Samsung Galaxy S8 | Huawei Mate 10 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -19% | 67% | 16% | 10% | 1% | 249% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 679 | 687 1% | 717 6% | 728 7% | 758 12% | 793 17% | 732 8% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 204.4 | 194 -5% | 206.4 1% | 196.7 -4% | 196.2 -4% | 193.2 -5% | 208.7 2% |
| Random Read 4KB | 156.6 | 74.1 -53% | 91.4 -42% | 143.5 -8% | 173.1 11% | 127.2 -19% | 132.3 -16% |
| Random Write 4KB | 14.93 | 17.2 15% | 80 436% | 25.19 69% | 18.03 21% | 15.25 2% | 164.4 1001% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 65.5 ? | 36.79 ? -44% | 68.8 ? 5% | 63.9 ? -2% | |||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 47.71 ? | 33.31 ? -30% | 46.25 ? -3% | 53.5 ? 12% |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
LG G6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.03 / 0.31 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.51 / 2.16 / 2.23 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
7.45 / 9.28 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact 2700 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S8 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -0% | 8% | 16% | 7% | 27% | 22% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.51 | 0.62 -22% | 0.58 -14% | 0.85 -67% | 0.73 -43% | 0.78 -53% | 0.45 12% | 0.73 -43% |
| Idle Average * | 2.16 | 2.44 -13% | 1.76 19% | 1.15 47% | 1.96 9% | 1.1 49% | 1.67 23% | 1.44 33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.23 | 2.59 -16% | 1.81 19% | 1.23 45% | 1.98 11% | 1.16 48% | 1.69 24% | 1.5 33% |
| Load Average * | 7.45 | 4.94 34% | 6.33 15% | 4.12 45% | 4.82 35% | 4.15 44% | 4.07 45% | 6.91 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 9.28 | 7.91 15% | 9.18 1% | 8.42 9% | 7.15 23% | 5.12 45% | 8.54 8% | 8.51 8% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ1 2700 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Huawei Mate 10 Pro 4000 mAh | Google Pixel 2 2700 mAh | HTC U11 3000 mAh | Xiaomi Mi 6 3350 mAh | OnePlus 5 3300 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 25% | 59% | -6% | -5% | 23% | 8% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1612 | 1754 9% | 1744 8% | 1457 -10% | 1250 -22% | 1534 -5% | |
| H.264 | 580 | 802 38% | 929 60% | 564 -3% | 498 -14% | 623 7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 601 | 695 16% | 818 36% | 575 -4% | 560 -7% | 739 23% | 518 -14% |
| Load | 172 | 236 37% | 398 131% | 161 -6% | 212 23% | 247 44% |
För
Emot
Xperia-smartphones går fortfarande lätt att känna igen tack vare sin unika design, och XZ1 passar perfekt in i detta. Tyvärr är den breda infattningen nedanför och ovanför skärmen nedslående och borde hänvisats till det förflutna. På plussidan så är materialvalet och tillverkningskvaliteten lika bra som vi förväntar oss från Sony, och den höga nivån av damm och vattenskydd som XZ1 har är inte så vanlig hos moderna smartphones som vi hade hoppats. Från en teknisk synvinkel finns det en del brister här och där, såsom dålig GPS-mottagning inomhus och ganska dålig uthållighet vid belastning. På grund av detta kan vi inte rekommendera enheten till den som ofta använder telefonen på fri fot. Den verkar dock vara en perfekt telefon för den som reser utomlands ofta tack vare sitt breda stöd för olika 3G- och 4G/LTE-band. Men det sagt, Dual-SIM modellen finns nu tillgänglig från Sony och borde passa den kategorin användare ännu bättre.
Modern på insidan snarare än utsidan. På plussidan, Xperia XZ1 kommer med ett uppdaterat operativsystem, en snabb processor, stereohögtalare och en bra kamera. Höljet är damm och vattenbeständigt men dess gammaldags infattning ovanför och nedanför skärmen får den att se utdaterad och otrendig ut.
Funktioner som fingeravtrycksläsare förväntar vi oss av XZ1:s pris på runt 5 000 SEK ($600), men telefonens interna lagring känns nästan för litet vid jämförelse. Stereohögtalare har alltid varit sällsynta hos smartphones och stöd för DLNA har också blivit mer sällsynt och kan därmed ses som ett stort plus för dom som har motsvarande mediaservrar och mottagare hemma, särskilt för cineasterna bland våra läsare. Synd bara att högtalarna inte är särskilt bra.
Kameran är sofistikerad och hyfsad och den tämligen mångsidiga kamera-appen kommer inte göra någon användare besviken. Men om du tycker kameran är en av dom viktigaste, eller kanske till och med den viktigaste, faktorn hos en smartphone så föreslår vi att du tar en titt på alternativen från Apple, Samsung, Huawei och OnePlus.
Vad som vände det hela i slutändan var ZX1:s ljusa och intensiva skärm och dess höga prestanda, som båda är viktiga att överväga för gamers. Den unika kompatibiliteten med Playstation 4-kontroller är värd att nämna igen vid det här tillfället. Det kanske inte är ny funktion eller det viktigaste säljargumentet med tanke på att i princip vilken smartphone som helst kan användas i kombination med en tredjeparts-kontroll, men det är definitivt en fördel om du redan råkar ha en PS4-kontroll.
Sony Xperia XZ1
- 11/28/2017 v6 (old)
Inge Schwabe
Price comparison
