Test: Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium Smartphone (Sammanfattning)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 477 cd/m²
Kontrast: 1445:1 (Svärta: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium LCD-IPS, 3840x2160, 5.8" | Sony Xperia XZ Premium IPS, 3840x2160, 5.5" | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus Super AMOLED, 2960x1440, 6.2" | Apple iPhone X Super AMOLED, 2436x1125, 5.8" | Huawei P20 Pro OLED, 2240x1080, 6.1" | OnePlus 6 Optic AMOLED, 2280x1080, 6.3" | Google Pixel 2 XL P-OLED, 2880x1440, 6" | HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | -18% | 11% | 29% | 28% | -5% | -18% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 477 | 578 21% | 565 18% | 600 26% | 569 19% | 430 -10% | 415 -13% | 395 -17% |
| Brightness | 453 | 568 25% | 571 26% | 606 34% | 578 28% | 437 -4% | 420 -7% | 402 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 92 7% | 96 12% | 94 9% | 95 10% | 87 1% | 87 1% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.62 -88% | 0.37 -12% | |||||
| Contrast | 1445 | 932 -36% | 1068 -26% | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.8 -33% | 2.3 -10% | 1.2 43% | 1.3 38% | 2.3 -10% | 2.7 -29% | 1.6 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 5.1 38% | 4.8 41% | 3 63% | 2.1 74% | 4.6 44% | 4.3 48% | 3.4 59% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 2.8 -75% | 1.9 -19% | 1.6 -0% | 1.6 -0% | 2.4 -50% | 3.3 -106% | 1.1 31% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.15 102% | 2.16 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.28 96% | 2.36 93% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6425 101% | 6728 97% | 6332 103% | 6707 97% | 6401 102% | 6160 106% | 6787 96% | 6536 99% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2381 Hz | ≤ 31 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 2381 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 31 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2381 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro | |
| Apple iPhone X | |
| OnePlus 6 | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (1169 - 1201, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.1) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (22.5 - 90.9, n=25) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (3991 - 18275, n=28) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (2154 - 11204, n=28) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) | |
| Apple iPhone X (IOS 11.1.2) | |
| WebXPRT 2015 - Overall | |
| Apple iPhone X (Safari Mobile 11.0) | |
| HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66) | |
| OnePlus 6 (Chrome 66) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 (96 - 291, n=23) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium (Chrome 68) | |
| Google Pixel 2 XL (Chrome 62) | |
| Huawei P20 Pro (Chrome 65) | |
| Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus (Samsung Browser 7.0) | |
| Sony Xperia XZ Premium (Chrome 59) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium | Sony Xperia XZ Premium | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus | OnePlus 6 | Google Pixel 2 XL | Huawei P20 Pro | Average 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -7% | 47% | 4% | 6% | 168% | 81% | 587% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 749 | 687 -8% | 819 9% | 726 -3% | 760 1% | 832 11% | 696 ? -7% | 1887 ? 152% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 171 | 194 13% | 204.9 20% | 201.4 18% | 195.3 14% | 196.7 15% | 224 ? 31% | 1471 ? 760% |
| Random Read 4KB | 136 | 74.1 -46% | 129.7 -5% | 137 1% | 170.6 25% | 144.3 6% | 137.2 ? 1% | 278 ? 104% |
| Random Write 4KB | 21.75 | 17.2 -21% | 22.74 5% | 21.8 0% | 17.84 -18% | 160.5 638% | 84.7 ? 289% | 311 ? 1330% |
| Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 34.18 ? | 36.79 ? 8% | 79.2 ? 132% | 68.6 ? 101% | ||||
| Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 30.23 ? | 33.31 ? 10% | 67.2 ? 122% | 52.2 ? 73% |
| PUBG Mobile | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| HD | 40 fps | ||
| Asphalt 9: Legends | |||
| Inställningar | Värde | ||
| High Quality | 30 fps | ||
| Standard / low | 30 fps | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 34.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Google Pixel 2 XL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 46% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| Av/Standby |   0.01 / 0.16 Watt |
| Låg belastning |  0.67 / 2.5 / 2.51 Watt |
| Hög belastning |
4.3 / 6.87 Watt |
    
| |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -5% | 31% | -4% | 16% | -17% | -9% | 27% | -6% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 0.67 | 0.62 7% | 0.84 -25% | 1.03 -54% | 0.6 10% | 0.77 -15% | 1.28 -91% | 0.68 -1% | 0.862 ? -29% | 0.88 ? -31% |
| Idle Average * | 2.5 | 2.44 2% | 1.54 38% | 2.4 4% | 1 60% | 2.18 13% | 1.87 25% | 0.95 62% | 1.728 ? 31% | 1.444 ? 42% |
| Idle Maximum * | 2.51 | 2.59 -3% | 1.57 37% | 2.6 -4% | 1.6 36% | 2.21 12% | 1.89 25% | 1.09 57% | 2.07 ? 18% | 1.6 ? 36% |
| Load Average * | 4.3 | 4.94 -15% | 2.47 43% | 2.96 31% | 4.3 -0% | 6.25 -45% | 3.73 13% | 4.58 -7% | 4.87 ? -13% | 6.57 ? -53% |
| Load Maximum * | 6.87 | 7.91 -15% | 2.49 64% | 6.6 4% | 8.6 -25% | 10.16 -48% | 8.08 -18% | 5.16 25% | 9.27 ? -35% | 9.91 ? -44% |
* ... smaller is better
| Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium 3540 mAh | Huawei P20 Pro 4000 mAh | Apple iPhone X 2716 mAh | OnePlus 6 3300 mAh | HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh | Google Pixel 2 XL 3520 mAh | Sony Xperia XZ Premium 3230 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus 3500 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 41% | -1% | 33% | -3% | 23% | 28% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1347 | 1727 28% | 1292 -4% | 1806 34% | 1452 8% | 1706 27% | 1754 30% | 1343 0% |
| H.264 | 520 | 784 51% | 634 22% | 791 52% | 464 -11% | 672 29% | 802 54% | 674 30% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 547 | 744 36% | 564 3% | 762 39% | 507 -7% | 581 6% | 695 27% | 521 -5% |
| Load | 235 | 345 47% | 180 -23% | 246 5% | 230 -2% | 302 29% | 236 0% | 237 1% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium är en riktig tungviktare, något som gäller både fysiskt och för dess hårdvara. Vårt enda klagomål på hårdvaran är att Sony har valt att utelämna en hörlursanslutning.
UHD-skärmen bör tilltala den som strömmar mycket film och vill uppleva sitt innehåll i högsta möjliga upplösning. Det är dumt att Netflix och Amazons utlovade UHD-stöd för tillfället inte fungerar på en av de få enheter som har 4K-stöd, men det är svårt att säga vems fel det är. De dynamiska vibrationerna är definitivt en trevlig funktion, men Sonys beslut att begränsa dem till endast musik och video gör funktionen till ganska mycket av en gimmick. Dessutom tenderar vår testenhet att vibrera iväg längs platta ytor när den spelar musik med dynamisk vibration aktiverad.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium följer designuppfräschningen från XZ2 och lyckas med att leverera en upplevelse som i huvudsak känns som att den kommer från ett flaggskepp, om än med ett par brister. UHD-skärmen bör få en del entusiaster att reagera.
Den stora 16:9-skärmen och en kraftfull SoC bör göra smartphone-gamers nöjda samtidigt som ljudentusiaster kommer uppskatta det högupplösta ljudet och stödet för populära kodecs som kompletterar XZ2 Premiums underhållningsfunktioner. Enheten har dessutom bra kameror även om de inte kan matcha de bästa telefonerna på marknaden. På samma sätt ser videoinspelningarna bra ut, men det bör vara mer effektivt med EIS i UHD-läge.
En stor nackdel med XZ2 Premium är batteritiden. Vår testenhet har sämre batteritid än sin föregångare trots att den har ett större batteri. XZ2 Premium hamnar även efter den batteritid som våra jämförelseenheter kan uppnå. Vi misstänker dock att den undermåliga batteritiden kan förbättras med en mjukvaruuppdatering. Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium kan vara en utmärkt kollega i vardagen om du kan förlåta dess stora fotavtryck och undermåliga batteritid.
Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium
- 09/14/2018 v6 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
