Test: Surface Book 3 13.5 - Microsofts omvandlingsbara börjar så sakteliga kännas gammal (Sammanfattning)
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
85 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89.8 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
88.1 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 790 g | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % v6 (old) | 12/2017 | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile | 1.6 kg | 23 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 86 %
Mitt på batteriet: 391 cd/m²
Kontrast: 2058:1 (Svärta: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.52
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Panasonic MEI96A2 , IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T AU AUO323D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS AU Optronics B140QAN02.2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx AU Optronics AUO5E2D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | -7% | 3% | 8% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63.5 | 67.9 7% | 60.1 -5% | 66.6 5% | 69.6 10% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.1 | 95.7 1% | 85.5 -10% | 95.9 1% | 98.9 4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65.7 | 69.4 6% | 61.1 -7% | 67.5 3% | 71.5 9% |
Response Times | 14% | 32% | 41% | -2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 57 ? | 52.8 ? 7% | 36 ? 37% | 32 ? 44% | 60.8 ? -7% |
Response Time Black / White * | 38 ? | 30 ? 21% | 28 ? 26% | 23.6 ? 38% | 36.8 ? 3% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 10% | -30% | -7% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 391 | 385 -2% | 280 -28% | 284.6 -27% | 447.4 14% |
Brightness | 367 | 372 1% | 286 -22% | 269 -27% | 420 14% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 78 -9% | 86 0% | 85 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.21 -11% | 0.208 -9% | 0.28 -47% | 0.31 -63% |
Contrast | 2058 | 1833 -11% | 1346 -35% | 1016 -51% | 1443 -30% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.07 | 1.6 48% | 3.97 -29% | 2.07 33% | 4.23 -38% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.74 | 4.5 5% | 8.29 -75% | 3.75 21% | 9.34 -97% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.52 | 3.42 -125% | 2.05 -35% | 1.32 13% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 1.5 58% | 2.83 21% | 1.7 53% | 6.1 -69% |
Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.34 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 6330 103% | 6502 100% | 6556 99% | 6627 98% | 6136 106% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 64 5% | 56 -8% | 61.7 1% | 64.8 6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95 | 95.9 1% | 85 -11% | 95.8 1% | 98.9 4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 10% /
9% | -2% /
-18% | 12% /
1% | -5% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
57 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 28 ms rise | |
↘ 29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 755, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (1081 - 2024, n=31) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (141 - 190, n=35) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T | |
Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (288 - 836, n=36) | |
HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average of class Convertible (193 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (10406 - 22898, n=24) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2003, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 20.1, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22) | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3369 poäng | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4466 poäng | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4184 poäng | |
Hjälp |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS | |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T |
* ... smaller is better
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Microsoft Surface Book 2 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe | Average SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 17% | -0% | 94% | 45% | 65% | 4% | |
Write 4K | 88.4 | 140.6 59% | 54.6 -38% | 152 72% | 112.6 27% | 131.3 49% | 95.5 ? 8% |
Read 4K | 39.53 | 43.62 10% | 28.19 -29% | 45.96 16% | 131 231% | 52.4 33% | 38.3 ? -3% |
Write Seq | 691 | 343.3 -50% | 840 22% | 2069 199% | 458.9 -34% | 1613 133% | 759 ? 10% |
Read Seq | 1032 | 1452 41% | 905 -12% | 1708 66% | 1355 31% | 1613 56% | 1022 ? -1% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 279.6 | 344.4 23% | 409.5 46% | 465.4 66% | 341.3 22% | 411.6 47% | 303 ? 8% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 261.6 | 457.2 75% | 292.4 12% | 410.1 57% | 320.6 23% | 415.6 59% | 317 ? 21% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 868 | 344.3 -60% | 1038 20% | 2713 213% | 1219 40% | 2340 170% | 885 ? 2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2075 | 2885 39% | 1607 -23% | 3399 64% | 2462 19% | 1568 -24% | 1803 ? -13% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 410.9 | 306 ? | |||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1033 | 698 ? | |||||
AS SSD | -22% | 38% | -37% | -19% | 4% | ||
Seq Read | 1707 | 1336 -22% | 1939 14% | 1039 -39% | 1881 10% | 1323 ? -22% | |
Seq Write | 510 | 653 28% | 1380 171% | 310.1 -39% | 703 38% | 697 ? 37% | |
4K Read | 38.77 | 26.65 -31% | 41.38 7% | 76 96% | 52.3 35% | 40.4 ? 4% | |
4K Write | 100.9 | 52.7 -48% | 154.9 54% | 118 17% | 154.1 53% | 100.8 ? 0% | |
4K-64 Read | 630 | 644 2% | 970 54% | 371.8 -41% | 1048 66% | 686 ? 9% | |
4K-64 Write | 707 | 482.9 -32% | 990 40% | 469.5 -34% | 703 -1% | 660 ? -7% | |
Access Time Read * | 0.085 | 0.074 13% | 0.055 35% | 0.067 21% | 0.069 19% | 0.06071 ? 29% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.035 | 0.072 -106% | 0.07 -100% | 0.138 -294% | 0.221 -531% | 0.037 ? -6% | |
Score Read | 839 | 804 -4% | 1205 44% | 552 -34% | 1288 54% | 858 ? 2% | |
Score Write | 859 | 601 -30% | 1283 49% | 618 -28% | 927 8% | 830 ? -3% | |
Score Total | 2077 | 1786 -14% | 3083 48% | 1448 -30% | 2826 36% | 2107 ? 1% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2074 | 764 | 1160 | 802 ? | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 630 | 465.8 | 454.7 | 265 ? | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 1326 | 764 | 991 | 487 ? | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
17% | -11% /
-13% | 66% /
62% | 4% /
-2% | 23% /
16% | 4% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Kontinuerlig läsning: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 9665 poäng | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 15476 poäng | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6602 poäng | |
Hjälp |
låg | med. | hög | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 141.5 | 83.2 | 41.5 | 30.1 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 61.2 | 85.6 | 81.6 | 68.3 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 83.5 | 57.2 | 51.8 |
Ljudnivå
Låg belastning |
| 30.2 / 30.2 / 30.2 dB(A) |
Hög belastning |
| 32.4 / 33.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB tyst 40 dB(A) hörbar 50 dB(A) högt ljud |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm avstånd) environment noise: 30.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41.8 °C / 107.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-13.7 °C / -24.6 F).
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (61.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.4 / 1.1 Watt |
Låg belastning | 4.8 / 9.4 / 11.2 Watt |
Hög belastning |
72 / 90 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Toshiba KBG40ZNS256G NVMe, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | 29% | 35% | 36% | 20% | -31% | 13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 4.7 2% | 3.6 25% | 3.5 27% | 3.9 19% | 4.4 8% | 7.75 ? -61% | 5.21 ? -9% |
Idle Average * | 9.4 | 10.6 -13% | 7.5 20% | 5.6 40% | 6.3 33% | 8.7 7% | 11.8 ? -26% | 8.16 ? 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.2 | 12.3 -10% | 9.4 16% | 6.5 42% | 6.8 39% | 9.6 14% | 16.6 ? -48% | 11.1 ? 1% |
Load Average * | 72 | 81 -13% | 42 42% | 42.7 41% | 32.6 55% | 44 39% | 75.2 ? -4% | 46.2 ? 36% |
Load Maximum * | 90 | 100.3 -11% | 51 43% | 66.5 26% | 59 34% | 61 32% | 105.5 ? -17% | 67 ? 26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 97 | 25.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 69 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 75 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 14 UX463FA-AI039T i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13-aw0013dx i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 60 Wh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 39% | 16% | 4% | 53% | -7% | 16% | |
Reader / Idle | 991 | 1469 48% | 1195 21% | 2223 124% | 690 -30% | 1344 ? 36% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 396 | 663 67% | 461 16% | 553 40% | 594 50% | 586 48% | 594 ? 50% |
Load | 188 | 190 1% | 95 -49% | 160 -15% | 115 -39% | 114.9 ? -39% | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 230 | 90 ? |
För
Emot
Omdöme - Vi förväntade oss mer från Surface Book 3
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 har till stor del samma kvaliteter som den mindre omvandlingsbara modellen. Hantverket är utmärkt och gångjärnet är unikt i hur det ansluter till och håller uppe skärmen. Men det börjar ändå kännas som en vana då knappt något med Surface Book har förändrats. En uppfräschning av designen hade varit till fördel för denna Windows-enhet.
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5 är en högkvalitativ enhet, men prestandan används inte optimalt.
Microsoft vill uppmuntra kunder att köpa enheten med den senaste hårdvaran. Men för det första är processorn inte kraftigare än på den föregående modellen och de kraftiga prispåslagen för RAM och större SSD kommer inte direkt få plånboken att jubla av glädje. Det är därför bara värt att köpa Surface Book 3 13.5 om man verkligen gillar konceptet och kan tänka sig att betala ett högre pris för en ovanlig enhet. Har man den tidigare modellen borde man bara fundera på att byta om man är intresserad av högre grafikprestanda. I fråga om allmän systemprestanda och batteritid finns det inga fördelar.
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
- 06/29/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker