Test: Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G Smartphone - Pris/prestanda-mästare för 3.000 kronor (Sammanfattning)
Testgrupp
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 192 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2340x1080 | |
82.1 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Samsung Galaxy A71 SD 730, Adreno 618 | 179 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
82.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 209 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
79.6 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Realme 6 Pro SD 720G, Adreno 618 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
82.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 204 g | 64 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
82.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Huawei P40 Lite 5G Kirin 820, Mali-G57 MP6 | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
83.6 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | OnePlus Nord SD 765G, Adreno 620 | 184 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.44" | 2440x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraLow lightUltra wide-angleMain camera
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 97 %
Mitt på batteriet: 584 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.231
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy A71 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Realme 6 Pro IPS, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Huawei P40 Lite 5G IPS, 2400x1080, 6.5" | OnePlus Nord AMOLED, 2440x1080, 6.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -49% | -18% | -159% | 16% | -42% | -32% | |
Brightness middle | 584 | 629 8% | 610 4% | 442 -24% | 605 4% | 466 -20% | 529 -9% |
Brightness | 583 | 646 11% | 579 -1% | 419 -28% | 608 4% | 457 -22% | 531 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 95 -2% | 92 -5% | 90 -7% | 95 -2% | 91 -6% | 94 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.61 | ||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.17 | 2.7 -131% | 1.8 -54% | 6.1 -421% | 0.84 28% | 2.2 -88% | 2.53 -116% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.95 | 6 -103% | 3 -2% | 9.7 -229% | 1.8 39% | 4.6 -56% | 4.52 -53% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 3 -76% | 2.5 -47% | 5.9 -247% | 1.3 24% | 2.7 -59% | 1.7 -0% |
Gamma | 2.231 99% | 2.1 105% | 2.31 95% | 2.35 94% | 2.211 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.249 98% |
CCT | 6341 103% | 6340 103% | 6864 95% | 7631 85% | 6310 103% | 6633 98% | 6462 101% |
Contrast | 1649 | 1195 | 764 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 241.5 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 241.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 241.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (15.8 - 60.5, n=12) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (10.8 - 96.9, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (9 - 54.9, n=9) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (20 - 101, n=13) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (3592 - 19143, n=14) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (2359 - 15230, n=14) | |
Samsung Galaxy A71 (Chrome 79.0.3945.136) | |
Realme 6 Pro (Chrome 83) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite (Chrome 83.0.4103.106) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro (Chrome 80.0.3987.99) | |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G (Chrome83) | |
Huawei P40 Lite 5G (Huawei Browser 10.0.2.331) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G | Samsung Galaxy A71 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro | Realme 6 Pro | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite | Huawei P40 Lite 5G | Average 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -40% | -38% | -23% | -32% | 1% | -17% | 126% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 980 | 493 -50% | 498.1 -49% | 513 -48% | 501 -49% | 905 -8% | 760 ? -22% | 1887 ? 93% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 476.9 | 192.4 -60% | 171.1 -64% | 203.3 -57% | 213.2 -55% | 188 -61% | 297 ? -38% | 1471 ? 208% |
Random Read 4KB | 156.4 | 112.3 -28% | 122.6 -22% | 158.7 1% | 134.6 -14% | 146.1 -7% | 152.9 ? -2% | 278 ? 78% |
Random Write 4KB | 138.5 | 109.6 -21% | 112.9 -18% | 154 11% | 125.8 -9% | 249.7 80% | 131.6 ? -5% | 311 ? 125% |
PUBG mobile
Asphalt 9 Legends
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 66% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A71 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
Låg belastning | 1.5 / 2.2 / 2.9 Watt |
Hög belastning |
4.4 / 7.2 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh | Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 27% | 20% | 13% | 33% | 20% | 11% | 21% | 7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.5 | 0.63 58% | 0.75 50% | 0.92 39% | 0.8 47% | 0.65 57% | 1.8 -20% | 0.965 ? 36% | 0.882 ? 41% |
Idle Average * | 2.2 | 1.49 32% | 2.19 -0% | 1.79 19% | 1.1 50% | 2.25 -2% | 2.1 5% | 1.899 ? 14% | 1.448 ? 34% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.9 | 1.51 48% | 2.24 23% | 1.88 35% | 1.8 38% | 2.29 21% | 2.3 21% | 2.07 ? 29% | 1.603 ? 45% |
Load Average * | 4.4 | 4.62 -5% | 3.88 12% | 5.41 -23% | 3.7 16% | 3.7 16% | 3.4 23% | 3.98 ? 10% | 6.57 ? -49% |
Load Maximum * | 7.2 | 7.11 1% | 5.97 17% | 7.59 -5% | 6.1 15% | 6.46 10% | 5.2 28% | 6.19 ? 14% | 9.92 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G 4160 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A71 4500 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5020 mAh | Realme 6 Pro 4300 mAh | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite 5260 mAh | Huawei P40 Lite 5G 4000 mAh | OnePlus Nord 4115 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | 5% | 17% | 8% | 18% | -12% | |
Reader / Idle | 1683 | 2164 29% | 2336 39% | 2249 34% | 2003 19% | ||
H.264 | 1403 | 1164 -17% | 1096 -22% | 1370 -2% | 1064 -24% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 884 | 815 -8% | 1175 33% | 1031 17% | 1095 24% | 1047 18% | 869 -2% |
Load | 448 | 242 -46% | 303 -32% | 337 -25% | 261 -42% |
För
Emot
Omdöme för Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G - Xiaomi har ett totalt sett starkt erbjudande
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Med tanke på hur många modeller Xiaomi redan släppt under året är det svårt att hålla koll på dem alla. Som tur är verkar Xiaomi inte utgå från "kvantitet framför kvalitet", för Mi 10 Lite visade sig vara en riktigt bra mittenskiktstelefon.
Med tanke på priset har Mi 10-seriens Lite-modell knappt några svagheter värda att nämna. Batteritiden är utmärkt, MiUI 12 blev bra, hantverket och materialvalen ligger på en bra nivå och den har snabbt WLAN. Dessutom har den riktigt bra utrustning som exempelvis stöd för 5G samt en kraftfull Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SoC, och en tilltalande OLED-skärm. Vi blev dessutom positivt överraskade av huvudkameran i testet. Huruvida detta beror på själva OmniVision-sensorn eller på bra kameramjukvara vet vi inte, men Xiaomi har inte varit särskilt framgångsrika när det gäller kamera-algoritmer förräns nu. Resultatet från 48 MP-kameran är av hög kvalitet.
Den som nöjer sig med 60 Hz får en utmärkt mittenskiktstelefon i form av Mi 10 Lite.
Men Mi 10 Lite är fortfarande en mittenskiktsenhet. Vid låg ljusnivå var kamerans resultat tillräckligt som bäst, när man använder vidvinkelskameran får man sänka sina förväntningar redan i dagsljus och lyxfunktioner som trådlös laddning och WiFi 6 finns inte. Mi 10 Lite har heller ingen IP-certifiering eller stöd för SD-kort. Vi hoppas dessutom att nästa Mi Lite-generation har bilduppdatering på över 60 Hz, med tanke på att konkurrenterna aldrig vilar.
Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite 5G
- 08/31/2022 v7 (old)
Marcus Herbrich