Test: Xiaomi Mi 6X (Mi A2) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Name: Xiaomi Mi 6X
Brand: Xiaomi

Varför betala mer om du inte måste? Mi 6X (Mi A2), den nya mittenskiktstelefonen från Xiaomi, erbjuder allt en smartphoneanvändare kan tänkas önska sig - och allt det för under 2.500 kronor. I den här utförliga recensionen kan du få reda på hur Xiaomi Mi 6X (Mi A2) står sig mot konkurrensen.

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Tanja Hinum (översatt av Daniel Eriksson), Published 07/10/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Mi A2 (Mi 6 Serie)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 8 x 2.2 GHz, Kryo 260

Grafikkort

Qualcomm Adreno 512

Minne

6 GB

Skärm

5.99 tum 2:1, 2160 x 1080 pixlar 403 PPI, Multitouch, kapacitiv, LCD IPS, glansig: ja

Hårddisk

64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB

, eMMC 5.1, 50.3 GB ledigt

Anslutningar

1 USB 2.0, 1 Infraröd, Ljudanslutningar: USB Typ C, 1 Fingeravtrycksläsare, Brightness Sensor, Sensorer: närhetssensor, gyroskop, accelerometer, e-kompass, Hall-sensor, OTG, Miracast, Status-LED

Nätverk

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, Nätverksstandard 4G, FDD LTE: Band 1/3/5/7/8; Nätverksstandard 3G, WCDMA: 850/900/1900/2100 MHz; Nätverksstandard 2G, GSM: 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, Dual SIM, LTE, GPS

Storlek

höjd x bredd x djup (i mm) 7.3 x 158.6 x 75.4

Batteri

3010 mAh Litiumjon

Operativsystem

Android 8.1 Oreo

Camera

Primary Camera: 12 MPix 12+20 MP, 12MP, SONY IMX486, 1.25 µm Pixel, f/1,75; 20MP, SONY IMX376, 2 µm Pixel, f/1,75
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/1.75, SONY IMX376, 2 µm Pixel

Övrigt

Högtalare: Mono, Tangentbord: Virtuellt, Tangentbordsbelysning: ja, USB-kabel, Kinesisk laddare + (EU-kontakt), MiUI, 12 Månader Garanti, fanless

Vikt

168 g, Strömförsörjning: 35 g

Pris

230 Kr

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HTC U12 Plus Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	573 MBit/s +72%
Motorola Moto X4 Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	336 MBit/s +1%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	333 MBit/s
Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	307 MBit/s -8%
HTC U11 Life Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	274 MBit/s -18%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash	182 MBit/s -45%
Sony Xperia XA1 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash	112 MBit/s -66%
TP-Link Neffos N1 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 64 GB eMMC Flash	102 MBit/s -69%
iperf3 receive AX12
HTC U12 Plus Adreno 630, SD 845, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	579 MBit/s +135%
Motorola Moto X4 Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	337 MBit/s +37%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus Adreno 505, 430, 64 GB eMMC Flash	270 MBit/s +10%
Nokia 7 Plus Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	247 MBit/s 0%
Xiaomi Mi 6X Adreno 512, SD 660, 64 GB eMMC Flash	246 MBit/s
HTC U11 Life Adreno 508, SD 630, 32 GB eMMC Flash	224 MBit/s -9%
Sony Xperia XA1 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 32 GB eMMC Flash	108 MBit/s -56%
TP-Link Neffos N1 Mali-T880 MP2, Helio P20 MT6757, 64 GB eMMC Flash	101 MBit/s -59%

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Scene 1 Scene 2 Scene 3

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images


418 cd/m²	451 cd/m²	432 cd/m²
433 cd/m²	459 cd/m²	441 cd/m²
436 cd/m²	461 cd/m²	440 cd/m²

Distribution av ljusstyrkan

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Max: 461 cd/m² (Nits) Medel: 441.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.28 cd/m²
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 91 %
Mitt på batteriet: 459 cd/m²
Kontrast: 977:1 (Svärta: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28

	Xiaomi Mi 6X LCD IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	TP-Link Neffos N1 IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	BQ Aquaris VS Plus IPS, 1920x1080, 5.5"	Sony Xperia XA1 IPS, 1280x720, 5"	Nokia 7 Plus IPS, 2160x1080, 6"	HTC U11 Life SLCD, 1920x1080, 5.2"	Motorola Moto X4 LTPS IPS, 1920x1080, 5.2"	HTC U12 Plus Super LCD 6, 2880x1440, 6"
Screen		23%	12%	-3%	34%	18%	9%	29%
Brightness middle	459	580 26%	634 38%	522 14%	458 0%	545 19%	469 2%	395 -14%
Brightness	441	560 27%	635 44%	499 13%	463 5%	526 19%	479 9%	402 -9%
Brightness Distribution	91	94 3%	96 5%	92 1%	92 1%	87 -4%	86 -5%	90 -1%
Black Level *	0.47	0.3 36%	0.49 -4%	0.74 -57%	0.22 53%	0.42 11%	0.37 21%	0.37 21%
Contrast	977	1933 98%	1294 32%	705 -28%	2082 113%	1298 33%	1268 30%	1068 9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.8	5.6 3%	5.9 -2%	4.2 28%	4 31%	4.9 16%	5.5 5%	1.6 72%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.7	11.2 -5%	11.6 -8%	11.5 -7%	7.4 31%	8.5 21%	10.7 -0%	3.4 68%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	7.3	7.4 -1%	7.8 -7%	6.4 12%	4.7 36%	5.4 26%	6.7 8%	1.1 85%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.22 ^99%	2.16 ^102%	2.18 ^101%	2.19 ^100%	2.31 ^95%	2.1 ^105%	2.14 ^103%
CCT	7984 ^81%	8584 ^76%	8464 ^77%	7044 ^92%	7425 ^88%	7610 ^85%	8064 ^81%	6536 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1174 Hz

≤ 21 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1174 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 21 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1174 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.8 ms rise
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 14.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23.6 ms rise
50.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 26.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

AnTuTu v6 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	110680 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	66472 Points -40%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	46651 Points -58%
Sony Xperia XA1	59082 Points -47%
Nokia 7 Plus	117165 Points +6%
HTC U11 Life	73617 Points -33%
Motorola Moto X4	70445 Points -36%
HTC U12 Plus	221971 Points +101%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (105973 - 120479, n=11)	116194 Points +5%

AnTuTu v7 - Total Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	140714 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	57974 Points -59%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	58282 Points -59%
Nokia 7 Plus	141701 Points +1%
HTC U12 Plus	255739 Points +82%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (116346 - 143551, n=10)	137699 Points -2%

PCMark for Android
Work performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	6723 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	5893 Points -12%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	4709 Points -30%
Sony Xperia XA1	4759 Points -29%
Nokia 7 Plus	6825 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life	5818 Points -13%
Motorola Moto X4	5919 Points -12%
HTC U12 Plus	10264 Points +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (6274 - 7026, n=11)	6676 Points -1%
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	5995 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	4634 Points -23%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	3623 Points -40%
Sony Xperia XA1	Points -100%
Nokia 7 Plus	6077 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life	4835 Points -19%
Motorola Moto X4	4887 Points -18%
HTC U12 Plus	8601 Points +43%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (5789 - 6426, n=13)	6050 Points +1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2343 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	1393 Points -41%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	323 Points -86%
Sony Xperia XA1	1284 Points -45%
Nokia 7 Plus	2369 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life	1368 Points -42%
Motorola Moto X4	1536 Points -34%
HTC U12 Plus	4252 Points +81%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1905 - 2428, n=12)	2307 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=152, last 2 years)	6257 Points +167%
System (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	4797 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	3063 Points -36%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	1805 Points -62%
Sony Xperia XA1	2969 Points -38%
Nokia 7 Plus	4976 Points +4%
HTC U11 Life	3215 Points -33%
Motorola Moto X4	3279 Points -32%
HTC U12 Plus	7862 Points +64%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3745 - 5282, n=11)	4927 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=152, last 2 years)	10131 Points +111%
Memory (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2470 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	1467 Points -41%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	778 Points -69%
Sony Xperia XA1	1063 Points -57%
Nokia 7 Plus	2503 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life	838 Points -66%
Motorola Moto X4	1405 Points -43%
HTC U12 Plus	3641 Points +47%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1737 - 2799, n=11)	2349 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=152, last 2 years)	6714 Points +172%
Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2295 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	1117 Points -51%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	788 Points -66%
Sony Xperia XA1	1016 Points -56%
Nokia 7 Plus	2298 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life	1515 Points -34%
Motorola Moto X4	1519 Points -34%
HTC U12 Plus	7945 Points +246%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1970 - 2332, n=11)	2241 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=152, last 2 years)	16761 Points +630%
Web (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1108 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	749 Points -32%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	10 Points -99%
Sony Xperia XA1	847 Points -24%
Nokia 7 Plus	1101 Points -1%
HTC U11 Life	858 Points -23%
Motorola Moto X4	795 Points -28%
HTC U12 Plus	1437 Points +30%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1027 - 1334, n=11)	1114 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=152, last 2 years)	1557 Points +41%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1620 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	839 Points -48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	681 Points -58%
Sony Xperia XA1	828 Points -49%
Nokia 7 Plus	1646 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life	877 Points -46%
Motorola Moto X4	870 Points -46%
HTC U12 Plus	2429 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1431 - 1646, n=11)	1598 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (844 - 9574, n=82, last 2 years)	5422 Points +235%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	5843 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	3539 Points -39%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2601 Points -55%
Sony Xperia XA1	3621 Points -38%
Nokia 7 Plus	5867 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life	4193 Points -28%
Motorola Moto X4	4115 Points -30%
HTC U12 Plus	8812 Points +51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4895 - 5913, n=11)	5694 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (2630 - 30323, n=82, last 2 years)	14892 Points +155%
Compute RenderScript Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	5486 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	2576 Points -53%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2190 Points -60%
Sony Xperia XA1	2747 Points -50%
HTC U11 Life	3956 Points -28%
Motorola Moto X4	3894 Points -29%
HTC U12 Plus	12493 Points +128%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (4983 - 5811, n=9)	5524 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (5192 - 18534, n=57, last 2 years)	11924 Points +117%

3DMark
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	26731 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	13897 Points -48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	9949 Points -63%
Sony Xperia XA1	13734 Points -49%
Nokia 7 Plus	26610 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life	16859 Points -37%
Motorola Moto X4	16767 Points -37%
HTC U12 Plus	62152 Points +133%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (22145 - 26731, n=12)	25633 Points -4%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	28984 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	13879 Points -52%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	10262 Points -65%
Sony Xperia XA1	13125 Points -55%
Nokia 7 Plus	29333 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life	18469 Points -36%
Motorola Moto X4	18355 Points -37%
HTC U12 Plus	81726 Points +182%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (25561 - 29496, n=12)	28454 Points -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	21016 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	13959 Points -34%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	8990 Points -57%
Sony Xperia XA1	16394 Points -22%
Nokia 7 Plus	20085 Points -4%
HTC U11 Life	12919 Points -39%
Motorola Moto X4	12870 Points -39%
HTC U12 Plus	33810 Points +61%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (15088 - 21016, n=12)	19093 Points -9%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2023 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	921 Points -54%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	596 Points -71%
Sony Xperia XA1	945 Points -53%
Nokia 7 Plus	2035 Points +1%
HTC U11 Life	1336 Points -34%
Motorola Moto X4	1351 Points -33%
HTC U12 Plus	4585 Points +127%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1825 - 2104, n=13)	2021 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (812 - 7285, n=26, last 2 years)	4204 Points +108%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1891 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	832 Points -56%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	527 Points -72%
Sony Xperia XA1	827 Points -56%
Nokia 7 Plus	1895 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life	1257 Points -34%
Motorola Moto X4	1259 Points -33%
HTC U12 Plus	5637 Points +198%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1711 - 1986, n=13)	1893 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (756 - 9451, n=26, last 2 years)	4740 Points +151%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2680 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	1469 Points -45%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	1103 Points -59%
Sony Xperia XA1	1892 Points -29%
Nokia 7 Plus	2734 Points +2%
HTC U11 Life	1711 Points -36%
Motorola Moto X4	1816 Points -32%
HTC U12 Plus	2774 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (2383 - 2834, n=13)	2672 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (1093 - 4349, n=26, last 2 years)	3303 Points +23%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1335 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	702 Points -47%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	316 Points -76%
Sony Xperia XA1	677 Points -49%
Nokia 7 Plus	1332 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life	839 Points -37%
Motorola Moto X4	835 Points -37%
HTC U12 Plus	3419 Points +156%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1124 - 1374, n=15)	1328 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)	3077 Points +130%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	1164 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	624 Points -46%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	262 Points -77%
Sony Xperia XA1	574 Points -51%
Nokia 7 Plus	1161 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life	729 Points -37%
Motorola Moto X4	724 Points -38%
HTC U12 Plus	3488 Points +200%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1061 - 1206, n=14)	1172 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)	3252 Points +179%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	2757 Points
TP-Link Neffos N1	1246 Points -55%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	1134 Points -59%
Sony Xperia XA1	1804 Points -35%
Nokia 7 Plus	2749 Points 0%
HTC U11 Life	1779 Points -35%
Motorola Moto X4	1811 Points -34%
HTC U12 Plus	3197 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (1883 - 2759, n=14)	2587 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)	3288 Points +19%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	48 fps
TP-Link Neffos N1	22 fps -54%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	14 fps -71%
Sony Xperia XA1	33 fps -31%
Nokia 7 Plus	48 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life	29 fps -40%
Motorola Moto X4	31 fps -35%
HTC U12 Plus	59 fps +23%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (42 - 59, n=14)	48.1 fps 0%
Average of class Smartphone (23 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	85.7 fps +79%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	50 fps
TP-Link Neffos N1	24 fps -52%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	18 fps -64%
Sony Xperia XA1	22 fps -56%
Nokia 7 Plus	50 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life	30 fps -40%
Motorola Moto X4	30 fps -40%
HTC U12 Plus	98 fps +96%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (43 - 51, n=14)	48.4 fps -3%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 791, n=170, last 2 years)	279 fps +458%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	21 fps
TP-Link Neffos N1	11 fps -48%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	7.5 fps -64%
Sony Xperia XA1	19 fps -10%
Nokia 7 Plus	22 fps +5%
HTC U11 Life	14 fps -33%
Motorola Moto X4	15 fps -29%
HTC U12 Plus	35 fps +67%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (19 - 40, n=14)	22.6 fps +8%
Average of class Smartphone (6.8 - 165, n=170, last 2 years)	75 fps +257%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	23 fps
TP-Link Neffos N1	11 fps -52%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	7.6 fps -67%
Sony Xperia XA1	9.6 fps -58%
Nokia 7 Plus	23 fps 0%
HTC U11 Life	14 fps -39%
Motorola Moto X4	14 fps -39%
HTC U12 Plus	72 fps +213%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (20 - 23, n=14)	22.1 fps -4%
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 482, n=170, last 2 years)	164.1 fps +613%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	14 fps
TP-Link Neffos N1	6.9 fps -51%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	4.8 fps -66%
Sony Xperia XA1	15 fps +7%
Nokia 7 Plus	15 fps +7%
HTC U11 Life	9.8 fps -30%
Motorola Moto X4	11 fps -21%
HTC U12 Plus	31 fps +121%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (12 - 30, n=15)	14.7 fps +5%
Average of class Smartphone (3.7 - 158, n=170, last 2 years)	65.2 fps +366%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	15 fps
TP-Link Neffos N1	6.8 fps -55%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2.4 fps -84%
Sony Xperia XA1	3.4 fps -77%
Nokia 7 Plus	14 fps -7%
HTC U11 Life	9.7 fps -35%
Motorola Moto X4	9.6 fps -36%
HTC U12 Plus	39 fps +160%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8.2 - 15, n=14)	13.6 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 341, n=170, last 2 years)	116.5 fps +677%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	8.6 fps
TP-Link Neffos N1	4.1 fps -52%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2.7 fps -69%
Sony Xperia XA1	7.9 fps -8%
Nokia 7 Plus	9.1 fps +6%
HTC U11 Life	5.4 fps -37%
Motorola Moto X4	5.7 fps -34%
HTC U12 Plus	20 fps +133%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (7.5 - 18, n=15)	9.13 fps +6%
Average of class Smartphone (5 - 119, n=171, last 2 years)	47.5 fps +452%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	9 fps
TP-Link Neffos N1	4.1 fps -54%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	2.7 fps -70%
Sony Xperia XA1	3.7 fps -59%
Nokia 7 Plus	8.3 fps -8%
HTC U11 Life	5.5 fps -39%
Motorola Moto X4	5.3 fps -41%
HTC U12 Plus	35 fps +289%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8 - 9.1, n=14)	8.84 fps -2%
Average of class Smartphone (3.1 - 216, n=170, last 2 years)	70.3 fps +681%

Lightmark - 1920x1080 1080p (sort by value)
Sony Xperia XA1	4.88 fps
Nokia 7 Plus	15.07 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 ()	15.1 fps

Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal - offscreen Overall Score (sort by value)
Xiaomi Mi 6X	353 Points
Sony Xperia XA1	191 Points -46%
Nokia 7 Plus	349 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (349 - 353, n=2)	351 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (205 - 7616, n=56, last 2 years)	2316 Points +556%

Legend

Xiaomi Mi 6X Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash

TP-Link Neffos N1 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 64 GB eMMC Flash

BQ Aquaris VS Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937), Qualcomm Adreno 505, 64 GB eMMC Flash

Sony Xperia XA1 Mediatek Helio P20 (LP4) MT6757, ARM Mali-T880 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Nokia 7 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, Qualcomm Adreno 512, 64 GB eMMC Flash

HTC U11 Life Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Motorola Moto X4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 630, Qualcomm Adreno 508, 32 GB eMMC Flash

HTC U12 Plus Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, Qualcomm Adreno 630, 64 GB UFS 2.1 Flash

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

Average of class Smartphone

JetStream 1.1 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 | WebXPRT 2015

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)	87 Points +67%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	53.9 Points +3%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	52.1 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (45.3 - 55.5, n=12)	52 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)	30.81 Points -41%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)	29.02 Points -44%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)	28.99 Points -44%
Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58)	28.45 Points -45%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)	36733 Points +268%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)	16285 Points +63%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	10945 Points +10%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	9995 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (8463 - 10945, n=14)	9973 Points 0%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)	5050 Points -49%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)	4893 Points -51%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)	4797 Points -52%
Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58)	3956 Points -60%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus	3305 Points -67%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)	13541 ms * -184%
TP-Link Neffos N1 (Chrome 62)	9701 ms * -103%
Sony Xperia XA1	9506 ms * -99%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)	9493 ms * -99%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)	8396 ms * -76%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	4769 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (3796 - 4769, n=13)	4115 ms * +14%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	3937 ms * +17%
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)	2410 ms * +49%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=161, last 2 years)	1583 ms * +67%

WebXPRT 2015 - Overall
HTC U12 Plus (Chrome 66)	257 Points +49%
Xiaomi Mi 6X (Chrome 67)	173 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (159 - 182, n=8)	170.9 Points -1%
Nokia 7 Plus (Chrome 60)	168 Points -3%
HTC U11 Life (Chrome 63)	100 Points -42%
Motorola Moto X4 (Chrome 63)	86 Points -50%
Sony Xperia XA1 (Chrome 58)	78 Points -55%
BQ Aquaris VS Plus (Chrome 65)	78 Points -55%

* ... smaller is better

	Xiaomi Mi 6X	TP-Link Neffos N1	BQ Aquaris VS Plus	Sony Xperia XA1	Nokia 7 Plus	HTC U11 Life	Motorola Moto X4	HTC U12 Plus	Average 64 GB eMMC Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		132%	-10%	9%	42%	135%	157%	408%	83%	1465%
Sequential Read 256KB	272	262.1 -4%	274.3 1%	248.5 -9%	283.1 4%	268 -1%	281.6 4%	709 161%	274 ?(95.6 - 704, n=203) 1%	1838 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 576%
Sequential Write 256KB	203.7	184.6 -9%	205.1 1%	127.8 -37%	211.6 4%	120 -41%	120.5 -41%	195.8 -4%	176.2 ?(40 - 274, n=203) -14%	1430 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 602%
Random Read 4KB	73	57.4 -21%	48.3 -34%	66.2 -9%	54.7 -25%	39.3 -46%	45.4 -38%	118.1 62%	59.4 ?(9.58 - 148.5, n=203) -19%	278 ?(22.2 - 543, n=192, last 2 years) 281%
Random Write 4KB	6.89	45.48 560%	6.4 -7%	13.2 92%	19.62 185%	50.2 629%	55.3 703%	104.2 1412%	32 ?(2.34 - 146.9, n=203) 364%	310 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 4399%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard		75.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	84.5 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	78.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	82.2	82.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	83.9 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	84.3 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	77.4 ?(21.1 - 107.6, n=144)
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard		67.4 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	68 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401)	62.3	59.8 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	60 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	63.6 ?(Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)	58.3 ?(11.2 - 83.3, n=144)

World of Tanks Blitz
	Inställningar	Värde
	high, 0xAA, 0xAF	60 fps

Dead Trigger 2
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	30 fps

Asphalt 8: Airborne
	Inställningar	Värde
	high	28 fps

Hög belastning

Låg belastning


36.9 °C	34.6 °C	37 °C
37.2 °C	34.4 °C	36.3 °C
35.7 °C	33 °C	34.5 °C

Max: 37.2 °C
Medel: 35.5 °C


33.5 °C	36 °C	36.5 °C
33.9 °C	36 °C	36.7 °C
32.9 °C	35.2 °C	36.1 °C

Max: 36.7 °C
Medel: 35.2 °C

Strömförsörjning (max.) 32.3 °C | Rumstemperatur 21.6 °C | Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.5 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HTC U11 Life audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Strömförbrukning

Av/Standby	0.01 / 0.11 Watt
Låg belastning	0.65 / 1.94 / 1.97 Watt
Hög belastning	4.65 / 5.93 Watt


Förklaring: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Xiaomi Mi 6X 3010 mAh	TP-Link Neffos N1 3260 mAh	BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh	Sony Xperia XA1 2300 mAh	Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh	HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh	Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh	HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 660	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		19%	-8%	43%	-6%	7%	13%	-29%	-41%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	0.65	0.69 -6%	0.79 -22%	0.64 2%	0.65 -0%	0.63 3%	0.65 -0%	0.77 -18%	1.052 ?(0.56 - 2.9, n=14) -62%	0.895 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=153, last 2 years) -38%
Idle Average *	1.94	1.64 15%	2.29 -18%	0.81 58%	1.76 9%	2.1 -8%	1.51 22%	2.18 -12%	2.62 ?(1.4 - 8.6, n=14) -35%	1.447 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=153, last 2 years) 25%
Idle Maximum *	1.97	1.67 15%	2.3 -17%	0.86 56%	1.78 10%	2.15 -9%	1.57 20%	2.21 -12%	2.88 ?(1.54 - 8.9, n=14) -46%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=153, last 2 years) 18%
Load Average *	4.65	2.59 44%	3.84 17%	2.09 55%	4.47 4%	3.34 28%	3.88 17%	6.25 -34%	5.1 ?(3.47 - 9.4, n=14) -10%	6.41 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=148, last 2 years) -38%
Load Maximum *	5.93	4.36 26%	5.95 -0%	3.31 44%	9.13 -54%	4.83 19%	5.47 8%	10.16 -71%	9.08 ?(5.93 - 18.5, n=14) -53%	9.61 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=148, last 2 years) -62%

* ... smaller is better

Batteritid

Låg belastning (utan WLAN, min. ljusstyrka)		17tim 26min
WiFi Websurfing		8tim 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10tim 08min
Hög belastning (maximal ljusstyrka)		3tim 12min

	Xiaomi Mi 6X 3010 mAh	TP-Link Neffos N1 3260 mAh	BQ Aquaris VS Plus 3400 mAh	Sony Xperia XA1 2300 mAh	Nokia 7 Plus 3800 mAh	HTC U11 Life 2600 mAh	Motorola Moto X4 3000 mAh	HTC U12 Plus 3500 mAh
Battery Runtime		57%	30%	33%	24%	52%	39%	9%
Reader / Idle	1046			1433 37%	1703 63%	1820 74%	1652 58%	1452 39%
H.264	608			751 24%	706 16%	798 31%	688 13%	464 -24%
WiFi v1.3	495	776 57%	644 30%	675 36%	672 36%	725 46%	659 33%	507 2%
Load	192			256 33%	158 -18%	303 58%	289 51%	230 20%

För

+ utmärkt konstruktionskvalitet

+ bra kameror

+ exakt GPS

+ bra prestanda

Emot

- högtalaren

- låg skärmljusstyrka

- batteritiden

- (mjukvara + tillgänglighet)

Recenseras: Xiaomi Mi 6X. Recensionsex från: TradingShenzhen.

Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.

Xiaomi Mi 6X är en kraftfull mittenskiktstelefon som kostar mindre än andra likvärdigt utrustade telefoner som finns tillgängliga i Europa. Prestandan och anslutbarhetsalternativen är imponerande för en smartphone i det här prisskiktet. Konstruktionskvaliteten och aluminiumhöljet är även de på en annan nivå.

Xiaomi har gjort några nedskärningar när det kommer till högtalaren, den saknade SD-kortplatsen och den ganska låga batterikapaciteten. Ansiktsigenkänningen fungerar väldigt dåligt och dualkameran får kämpa i situationer med lite ljus.

Begränsad tillgång, Kinesisk mjukvara och otillräcklig LTE-täckning gör det svårt att rekommendera Mi 6X till användare i Tyskland. Allt detta kommer att ändras när Mi A2 kommer till Europa.

Xiaomi Mi 6X kommer bli intressant så snart dess syskonmodell Mi A2 kommer till den Europeiska marknaden, vilket borde hända i början av Augusti. Mi A2 använder Android One och ska enligt rapporter stödja LTE-band 20. Mi 6X är en välavrundad smartphone som har kraftfull hårdvara och få eftergifter jämfört med andra enheter i detta prisskikt.

Xiaomi Mi 6X - 2018-07-02 07/02/2018 v6 ^(old)
Marcus Herbrich

Design

87%

Tangentbord

67 / 75 → 89%

Mus

92%

Anslutningar

43 / 60 → 72%

Vikt

91%

Batteri

91%

Skärm

83%

Spelprestanda

54 / 63 → 86%

Programprestanda

60 / 70 → 85%

Temperatur

91%

Ljudnivå

100%

Audio

70 / 91 → 77%

Camera

75%

Medel

77%

86%

Smartphone - Vägt medel

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Bärbara datorer, laptops - tester och nyheter > Tester > Test: Xiaomi Mi 6X (Mi A2) Smartphone (Sammanfattning)

Marcus Herbrich, 2018-07-10 (Update: 2018-07-10)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Xiaomi Mi 6X audio analysis

HTC U11 Life audio analysis

För

Emot

More articles related to this device

Price comparison