Test: Xiaomi Mi Note 10 – Billig kamerakung (Sammanfattning)
Jämförelseenheter
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83.3 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Xiaomi Mi Note 10 SD 730G, Adreno 618 | 208 g | 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | 6.47" | 2340x1080 | |
89.4 % v6 (old) | v6 (old) | 08/2019 | Honor 20 Kirin 980, Mali-G76 MP10 | 174 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.26" | 2340x1080 | |
86 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL SD 855, Adreno 640 | 190 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
80.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Google Pixel 3a XL SD 670, Adreno 616 | 167 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.00" | 2160x1080 | |
84.2 % v6 (old) | v6 (old) | 04/2019 | Sony Xperia 10 Plus SD 636, Adreno 509 | 180 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 2520x1080 |
Topp 10...
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara allround/multimediadatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara speldatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara budget/kontorsdatorer
» Topp 10: Bästa bärbara kontors/premiumdatorerna
» Topp 10: Bärbara arbetsstationer
» Topp 10: De bästa små/kompakta bärbara datorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa ultrabooks
» Topp 10: Bästa hybriddatorerna
» Topp 10: Bästa surfplattorna
» Topp 10: Marknadens bästa smartphones
Storleksjämförelse
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
Honor 20 | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
Honor 20 |
|
Distribution av ljusstyrkan: 89 %
Mitt på batteriet: 625 cd/m²
Kontrast: ∞:1 (Svärta: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
137.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.251
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5" | Honor 20 IPS, 2340x1080, 6.3" | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL IPS, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Google Pixel 3a XL OLED, 2160x1080, 6" | Sony Xperia 10 Plus IPS, 2520x1080, 6.5" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 29% | -4% | 23% | -30% | |
Brightness middle | 625 | 481 -23% | 569 -9% | 409 -35% | 572 -8% |
Brightness | 607 | 481 -21% | 537 -12% | 410 -32% | 580 -4% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 95 7% | 79 -11% | 96 8% | 96 8% |
Black Level * | 0.55 | 0.31 | 0.4 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.38 | 1.1 75% | 3.5 20% | 1.3 70% | 4.5 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.83 | 2.1 69% | 6 12% | 2.3 66% | 12.2 -79% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 1.3 68% | 5.1 -24% | 1.5 63% | 7.9 -93% |
Gamma | 2.251 98% | 2.12 104% | 2.36 93% | 2.22 99% | 2.16 102% |
CCT | 7251 90% | 6442 101% | 6827 95% | 6621 98% | 8726 74% |
Contrast | 875 | 1835 | 1430 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 215.5 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 215.5 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 215.5 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
PCMark for Android | |
Work performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
Honor 20 | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (8941 - 10200, n=7) | |
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | |
Honor 20 | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | |
Google Pixel 3a XL | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (7134 - 8683, n=7) |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (45.8 - 50.6, n=6) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (79.2 - 87.7, n=6) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (40.4 - 44.2, n=6) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (66 - 77, n=6) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (16197 - 17768, n=6) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Sony Xperia 10 Plus (Chrome 73) | |
Google Pixel 3a XL (Chrome 73) | |
Honor 20 (Chrome 75) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G (2770 - 3054, n=6) | |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 (Chrome 78) | |
Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL (Chrome 75) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 | Honor 20 | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL | Google Pixel 3a XL | Sony Xperia 10 Plus | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 34% | 33% | -25% | -43% | 1% | 272% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 480.5 | 829 73% | 831 73% | 315.6 -34% | 280.3 -42% | 530 ? 10% | 1839 ? 283% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 243.6 | 196.4 -19% | 195.6 -20% | 179.1 -26% | 205.2 -16% | 212 ? -13% | 1425 ? 485% |
Random Read 4KB | 106.2 | 156.7 48% | 153.3 44% | 92.1 -13% | 77.7 -27% | 130.6 ? 23% | 277 ? 161% |
Random Write 4KB | 118.9 | 157 32% | 160.2 35% | 87 -27% | 16.77 -86% | 101.2 ? -15% | 309 ? 160% |
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard | 87 ? | 83.9 ? | 68.3 ? | ||||
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard | 62.5 ? | 58.4 ? | 53.2 ? |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.8 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 69.6% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (119.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 96% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor 20 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Av/Standby | 0 / 0.2 Watt |
Låg belastning | 0.7 / 1.8 / 2.2 Watt |
Hög belastning |
5.2 / 7.5 Watt |
Förklaring:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh | Honor 20 3750 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -8% | -14% | 24% | 5% | -1% | -7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.7 | 0.88 -26% | 0.81 -16% | 0.7 -0% | 0.68 3% | 0.84 ? -20% | 0.894 ? -28% |
Idle Average * | 1.8 | 2.27 -26% | 2.35 -31% | 1.63 9% | 2.12 -18% | 1.953 ? -9% | 1.456 ? 19% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.2 | 2.34 -6% | 2.37 -8% | 1.67 24% | 2.17 1% | 2.26 ? -3% | 1.616 ? 27% |
Load Average * | 5.2 | 4.81 7% | 5.33 -3% | 2.64 49% | 3.82 27% | 4.51 ? 13% | 6.45 ? -24% |
Load Maximum * | 7.5 | 6.63 12% | 8.55 -14% | 4.62 38% | 6.44 14% | 6.63 ? 12% | 9.8 ? -31% |
* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 5260 mAh | Honor 20 3750 mAh | Asus ZenFone 6 ZS630KL 5000 mAh | Google Pixel 3a XL 3700 mAh | Sony Xperia 10 Plus 3000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -47% | 7% | -28% | -47% | |
Reader / Idle | 2134 | 1262 -41% | 2114 -1% | 1822 -15% | 1400 -34% |
H.264 | 1423 | 606 -57% | 2138 50% | 960 -33% | 701 -51% |
WiFi v1.3 | 1127 | 654 -42% | 801 -29% | 709 -37% | 635 -44% |
Load | 387 | 208 -46% | 409 6% | 289 -25% | 154 -60% |
För
Emot
Läs den fullständiga versionen av den här recensionen på engelska här.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 imponerar ganska ordentligt på en del områden: För under 5.000 kronor får du en utmärkt och väldigt flexibel smartphonekamera som får poäng för riktigt hög skärpa, utmärkt detaljåtergivning och bra färger. Den ljusstarka AMOLED-skärmen tilltalade oss också, den har en lämplig mängd lagring och har du hörlurar med sladd hemma får du också valuta för pengarna tack vare en 3.5 mm ljudanslutning.
När det kommer till kommunikationsmodulerna börjar man märka att man inte befinner sig i det absoluta toppskiktet: Den maximala LTE-hastigheten är bra, men den är betydligt långsammare än på aktuella toppskiktsenheter. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 håller heller inte jämna steg när det kommer till WiFi och den saknar dessutom en microSD-kortläsare.
Men framför allt är lägre prestanda ett problem för den som vill använda riktigt krävande appar: Mi Note 10 är helt enkelt i en långsammare klass. Varför valde Xiaomi en långsammare SoC när exempelvis Asus ZenFone 6 bevisar att det går att få en Snapdragon 855 för det här priset? Det beror troligen på att 730G passar kamerauppsättningen bättre.
En utmärkt kamera och en riktigt ljusstark AMOLED-skärm till ett lågt pris: Om du klarar dig med en aning lägre prestanda bör Xiaomi Mi Note 10 vara ditt förstahandsval.
Om man tänker på priset finns det knappast några bättre alternativ just nu om du letar efter en av de bästa kamerorna och riktigt lång batteritid.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10
- 09/03/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt